The current study employs a quasi-experimental design to test the efficacy of situational crime prevention (SCP) in understanding risk avoidance behavior in a darknet environment. Specifically, we deployed a web scraper to extract data from a popular darknet market. We then used these data to assess change in vendors and customers’ behavior following the deliverance of a warning message from the market administrator regarding the former market administrator’s intention to scam market participants. In the one-month following the message, vendors posted fewer advertisements and customers spent less and made fewer transactions on the marketplace. These findings expand the scope of SCP and provide evidence for Hutchings and Holt’s notion that darknet markets can be disrupted by means of gossip.
AkerlofG. A. (1978). The market for “lemons”: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. In DiamondP.RothschildM. (Eds.), Uncertainty in Economics (1st ed., pp. 235–251). New York, USA: Academic Press. https://doi.org/hp8b
AldridgeJ.AskewR. (2017). Delivery dilemmas: How drug cryptomarket users identify and seek to reduce their risk of detection by law enforcement. International Journal of Drug Policy, 41, 101–109. https://doi.org/f9x2mw
4.
AtlasR. (1990, October8–12). “Offensible Space”— Law and Order Obstruction through Environmental Design. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society Annual Meeting (Vol. 34, No. 7, pp. 570–574). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/fxztrx
5.
BeckerG. S. (1968). Crime and punishment: An economic approach. In FieldingN. G.ClarkeA.WittR. (Eds.), The economic dimensions of crime (1st ed., pp. 13–68). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/gf8sw5
6.
BergeronA.Décary-HétuD.OuelletM. (2022). Conflict and victimization in online drug markets. Victims & Offenders, 17(3), 350–371. https://doi.org/hp8d
7.
BranwenG. (2013). Darknet market mortality risks. Retrieved August 24, 2020, from https://www.gwern.net/DNM-survival
8.
BurrussG.HowellC. J.BosslerA.HoltT. J. (2019). Self-perceptions of English and Welsh constables and sergeants preparedness for online crime. Policing: An International Journal, 43(1), 105–119. https://doi.org/grs8
9.
CampbellD. T.StanleyJ. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research (1st ed.). Chicago, IL: Rand McNAlly & Company.
10.
ClarkeR. V. (1980). Situational crime prevention: Theory and practice. British Journal of Criminology, 20(2), 136–147. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23636692
11.
ClarkeR. V. G. (1995). Situational crime prevention. Crime and Justice, 19, 91–150. https://doi.org/dfkhw8
12.
CornishD. B.ClarkeR. V. (2003). Opportunities, precipitators and criminal decisions: A reply to Wortley’s critique of situational crime prevention. Crime Prevention Studies, 16, 41–96.
13.
Décary-HétuD.DupontB. (2013). Reputation in a dark network of online criminals. Global Crime, 14(2-3), 175–196. https://doi.org/gprdgv
14.
Décary-HétuD.MorselliC. (2011). Gang Presence in Social Network Sites. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 5(2), 876–890.
15.
Décary-HétuD.Quessy-DoréO. (2017). Are repeat buyers in cryptomarkets loyal customers? Repeat business between dyads of cryptomarket vendors and users. American Behavioral Scientist, 61(11), 1341–1357. https://doi.org/gckwmn
16.
DickinsonT.WrightR. (2015). Gossip, decision-making and deterrence in drug markets. The British Journal of Criminology, 55(6), 1263–1281. https://doi.org/f7zj8q
17.
DuxburyS. W.HaynieD. L. (2018). Building them up, breaking them down: Topology, vendor selection patterns, and a digital drug market’s robustness to disruption. Social Networks, 52(2018), 238–250. https://doi.org/gdj7p8
18.
FranklinJ.PerrigA.PaxsonV.SavageS. (2007, October 31–November 2). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of internet miscreants [Paper Presentation]. In proceedings of the 14th ACM conference on Computer and communications security (pp. 375–388). United States of America. https://doi.org/b6qfmm
19.
HoltT. J.BlevinsK. R.KuhnsJ. B. (2008). Examining the displacement practices of johns with on-line data. Criminal Justice Journal, 36(6), 522–528. https://doi.org/dvrdjv
20.
HovlandC. I.WeissW. (1951). The influence of source credibility on communication effectiveness. Public Opinion Quarterly, 15(4), 635–650. https://doi.org/fs3zww
21.
HowellC. J. (2021). Self-protection in Cyberspace: Assessing the processual relationship between thoughtfully reflective decision making, protection motivation theory, cyber hygiene, and victimization. (Publication No. 28410121) [Doctoral dissertation, University of South Florida –Tampa]. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. https://doi.org/hp8p
22.
HowellC. J.BurrussG. W. (2020). Datasets for analysis of cybercrime. In HoltT. J.BosslerA. M. (Eds.), The palgrave handbook of international cybercrime and cyberdeviance (1st ed., pp. 207–219). London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/hp8q
23.
HowellC. J.BurrussG. W.MaimonD.SahaniS. (2019). Website defacement and routine activities: considering the importance of hackers’ valuations of potential targets. Journal of Crime and Justice, 42(5), 536–550. https://doi.org/grtx
24.
HowellC. J.MaimonD.CochranJ. K.JonesH. M.PowersR. A. (2017). System trespasser behavior after exposure to warning messages at a Chinese computer network: An examination. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 11(1), 63–77. https://doi.org/grwd
25.
HutchingsA.HoltT. J. (2017). The online stolen data market: Disruption and intervention approaches. Global Crime, 18(1), 11–30. https://doi.org/hp8t
26.
JacobsB. A. (1993). Undercover deception clues: A case of restrictive deterrence. Criminology, 31(2), 281–299. https://doi.org/bp4sbr
27.
JacobsB. A.WrightR. (2010). Bounded rationality, retaliation, and the spread of urban violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 25(10), 1739–1766. https://doi.org/cht7rv
28.
JacquesS.ReynaldD. M. (2012). The offenders’ perspective on prevention: Guarding against victimization and law enforcement. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 49(2), 269–294. https://doi.org/dfsxmh
29.
JefferyC. R. (1971). Crime prevention through environmental design (1st ed.). Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE Publications.
30.
JohnsonB. D.NatarajanM. (1995). Strategies to avoid arrest: Crack sellers’ response to intensified policing. American Journal of Police, 14(3/4), 49–69. https://doi.org/bkx7dk
31.
KamphausenG.WerseB. (2019). Digital figurations in the online trade of illicit drugs: A qualitative content analysis of darknet forums. International Journal of Drug Policy, 73, 281–287. https://doi.org/gnmkvj
32.
KimM. S.AhnJ. H. (2007). Management of trust in the e-marketplace: The role of the buyer’s experience in building trust. Journal of Information Technology, 22(2), 119–132. https://doi.org/b243zm
33.
LadegaardI. (2019). Crime displacement in digital drug markets. International Journal of Drug Policy, 63, 113–121. https://doi.org/gnqxdt
34.
MaimonD.HowellC. J.BurrussG. W. (2021). Restrictive deterrence and the scope of hackers’ reoffending: Findings from two randomized field trials. Computers in Human Behavior, 125, 106943. https://doi.org/grvc
35.
MartinJ. (2014). Drugs on the dark net: How cryptomarkets are transforming the global trade in illicit drugs (1st ed.). London, UK: Palgrave Pivot. https://doi.org/hp8v
36.
MoellerK.CopesH.HochstetlerA. (2016). Advancing restrictive deterrence: A qualitative meta-synthesis. Journal of Criminal Justice, 46(2016), 82–93. https://doi.org/f8z24z
37.
MorselliC.Décary-HétuD.Paquet-CloustonM.AldridgeJ. (2017). Conflict management in illicit drug cryptomarkets. International Criminal Justice Review, 27(4), 237–254. https://doi.org/ghf4g5
38.
NewmanO. (1972). Defensible space: Crime Prevention Through Urban Design (1st ed.). New York, NY: Macmillan Publishing.
39.
NurmiJ.KaskelaT.PeräläJ.OksanenA. (2017). Seller’s reputation and capacity on the illicit drug markets: 11-month study on the Finnish version of the Silk Road. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 178(2017), 201–207. https://doi.org/gbxgjr
40.
OuelletM.MaimonD.HowellJ. C.WuY. (2022). The network of online stolen data markets: How vendor flows connect digital marketplaces. The British Journal of Criminology. https://doi.org/hp8w
41.
PerkinsR. C.HowellC. J. (2021). Honeypots for cybercrime research. In LavorgnaA.HoltT. J. (Eds.), Researching Cybercrimes: Methodologies, Ethics, and Critical Apporaches (1st ed., pp. 233–261). London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
ReuterP.CaulkinsJ. P. (2004). Illegal ‘lemons’: Price dispersion in cocaine and heroin markets. Bulletin on Narcotics, 56(1-2), 141–165. https://www.unodc.org/pdf/bulletin/bulletin_2004_01_01_1_Art6.pdf
44.
SutherlandE. H. (1937). The professional thief. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 28(2), 161–163.
45.
Van BuskirkJ.BrunoR.DobbinsT.BreenC.BurnsL.NaickerS.RoxburghA. (2017). The recovery of online drug markets following law enforcement and other disruptions. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 173(2016), 159–162. https://doi.org/f95bch
46.
WeisburdD.WyckoffL. A.ReadyJ.EckJ. E.HinkleJ. C.GajewskiF. (2006). Does crime just move around the corner? A controlled study of spatial displacement and diffusion of crime control benefits. Criminology, 44(3), 549–592. https://doi.org/fvb24c
47.
WelshB. C.FarringtonD. P. (2009). Public area CCTV and crime prevention: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Justice Quarterly, 26(4), 716–745. https://doi.org/fbwhmg
48.
WrightR. T.DeckerS. H. (1996). Burglars on the job: Streetlife and residential break-ins.Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
49.
YipM.WebberC.ShadboltN. (2013). Trust among cybercriminals? Carding forums, uncertainty and implications for policing. Policing and Society, 23(4), 516–539. https://doi.org/gm477c
