The current study explores the way guardianship is perceived by offenders and the extent to which it affects the likelihood of disruption in sexual offences against adult females. Specifically, we compare the micro-situational contexts in which sexual offences against adult females are disrupted to those in which these offences are completed. Data on sexual crime events was collected from 138 adult males who were incarcerated for committing a sexual offence against a woman using a self-report questionnaire incorporating a crime-script framework. We found that the presence or availability of a guardian does not guarantee offence disruption. Rather, action taken by the guardian is the critical factor which determines a sexual offender’s decision to cease the offence.
BalembaS.BeauregardE. (2013). Where and when? Examining spatio-temporal aspects of sexual assault events. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 19(2), 171–190.
2.
BalembaS.BeauregardE.MieczkowskiT. (2012). To resist or not to resist? The effect of context and crime characteristics on sex offenders’ reaction to victim resistance. Crime & Delinquency, 58(4), 588–611.
3.
BanyardV. L. (2011). Who will help prevent sexual violence: Creating an ecological model of bystander intervention. Psychology of Violence, 1(3), 216–229.
4.
BanyardV. L.PlanteE. G.MoynihanM. M. (2004). Bystander education: Bringing a broader community perspective to sexual violence prevention. Journal of Community Psychology, 32(1), 61–79.
5.
BanyardV. L.MoynihanM. M.PlanteE. G. (2007). Sexual violence prevention through bystander education: An experimental evaluation. Journal of Community Psychology, 35(4), 463–481.
6.
BartP.O’BrienP. H. (1985). Stopping rape: Successful survival strategies. Pergamon Press.
7.
BeauregardE.LeclercB. (2007). An application of the rational choice approach to the offending process of sex offenders: A closer look at the decision-making. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 19(2), 115–133.
8.
BeauregardE.LeclercB.LussierP. (2012). Decision making in the crime commission process: Comparing rapists, child molesters, and victim-crossover sex offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 39(10), 1275–1295.
9.
ChiuY-N.LeclercB. (2016). An examination of sexual offenses against women by acquaintances: The utility of a script framework for prevention purposes. In LeclercB.SavonaE. (Eds.), Crime Prevention in the 21st Century (pp. 59–76). Springer.
10.
ChiuY-N.LeclercB. (2019). Predictors and contexts of unsolved and solved sexual offenses. Crime & Delinquency, 66(9), 1268–1295.
11.
ClarkeR. V. (1980). Situational crime prevention: Theory and practice. British Journal of Criminology, 20(2), 136–147.
12.
ClarkeR. V. (1997). Situational crime prevention: Successful case studies (2nd ed.). Albany, NY: Harrow and Heston.
13.
ClarkeR. V.EckJ. E. (2003). Become a Problem-solving Crime Analyst: In 55 Small Steps. Jill Dando Institute of Crime Science, UCL.
14.
Clay-WarnerJ. (2002). Avoiding rape: The effects of protective actions and situational factors on rape outcomes. Violence and Victims, 17(6), 691–705.
15.
Clay-WarnerJ. (2003). The context of sexual violence: Situational predictors of self-protective actions. Violence and victims, 18(5), 543–556.
16.
CohenL. E.FelsonM. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44(4), 588–608.
17.
CokerA. L.Cook-CraigP. G.WilliamsC. M.FisherB. S.ClearE. R.GarciaL. S.HeggeL. M. (2011). Evaluation of Green Dot: An active bystander intervention to reduce sexual violence on college campuses. Violence Against Women, 17(6), 777–796.
18.
CokerA. L.FisherB. S.BushH. M.SwanS. C.WilliamsC. M.ClearE. R.DeGueS. (2015). Evaluation of the Green Dot bystander intervention to reduce interpersonal violence among college students across three campuses. Violence Against Women, 21(12), 1507–1527.
19.
CookA.ReynaldD.M. (2016). Guardianship against sexual offences: Exploring the role of gender in intervention. International Criminal Justice Review, 26(2), 98–114.
20.
CookA.ReynaldD. M.LeclercB.WortleyR. (2018). Learning about situational crime prevention from offenders: Using a script framework to compare the commission of completed and disrupted sexual offenses. Criminal Justice Review, 44(4), 431–451.
21.
Deslauriers-VarinN.BeauregardE. (2010). Victims’ routine activities and sex offenders’ target selection scripts: A latent class analysis. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 22(3), 315–342.
22.
EckJ. E. (2003). Police problems: The complexity of problem theory, research and evaluation. In KnutssonJ. (Ed.), Problem-Oriented Policing: From Innovation to Mainstream. Crime Prevention Studies (Vol. 15, pp. 67–102). Criminal Justice Press.
23.
FelsonM. (1995). Those who discourage crime. In EckJ.WeisburdD. (Eds.), Crime and place: Crime prevention studies (pp. 53–66). Criminal Justice Press.
24.
FelsonM. (1998). Crime and everyday life. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25.
FelsonM.CohenL. E. (1980). Human ecology and crime: A routine activity approach. Human Ecology, 8(4), 389–406.
26.
FisherB. S.DaigleL. E.CullenF. T. (2010). Unsafe in the ivory tower: The sexual victimization of college women. Sage Publications.
27.
GueretteR. T.SantanaS. A. (2010). Explaining victim self-protective behavior effects on crime incident outcomes a test of opportunity theory. Crime & Delinquency, 56(2), 198–226.
28.
HartT. C.MietheT. D. (2008). Exploring bystander presence and intervention in nonfatal violent victimization: When does helping really help?Violence and Victims, 23(5), 637–651.
29.
LeclercB.CaleJ. (2015). Weapon use and sexual abuse outcomes: A multivariate and conjunctive analysis of sexual offenses against women. Security Journal, 28(1), 54–70.
30.
LeclercB.SmallboneS.WortleyR. (2015). Prevention nearby: The influence of the presence of a potential guardian on the severity of child sexual abuse. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 27(2), 189–204.
31.
LeclercB.WortleyR.SmallboneS. (2011).Victim resistance in child sexual abuse: A look into the efficacy of self-protection strategies based on the offender’s experience. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26(9), 1868–1883.
32.
LiebstL. S.HeinskouM. B.Ejbye-ErnstP. (2018). On the actual risk of bystander intervention: A statistical study based on naturally occurring violent emergencies. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 55(1), 27–50.
33.
MarchbanksP. A.LuiK. J.MercyJ. A. (1990). Risk of injury from resisting rape. American Journal of Epidemiology, 132(3), 540–549.
34.
McKillopN.BrownS.WortleyR.SmallboneS. (2015). How victim age affects the context and timing of child sexual abuse: Applying the routine activities approach to the first sexual abuse incident. Crime Science, 4(17), 1–10.
35.
MieczkowskiT.BeauregardE. (2010). Lethal outcome in sexual assault events: A conjunctive analysis. Justice Quarterly, 27(3), 332–361.
36.
MietheT. D.HartT. C.RegoecziW. C. (2008). The conjunctive analysis of case configurations: An exploratory method for discrete multivariate analyses of crime data. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 24(2), 227–241.
37.
OzielS.GoodwillA.BeauregardE. (2014). Variability in behavioural consistency across temporal phases in stranger sexual offences. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 30(3), 176–190.
38.
PlantyM. (2002). Third-party involvement in violent crime, 1993–1999. U.S. Department of Justice.
39.
ReynaldD. M. (2009). Guardianship in action: Developing a new tool for measurement. Crime Prevention & Community Safety, 11(1), 1–20.
40.
ReynaldD. M. (2010). Guardians on guardianship: Factors affecting the willingness to supervise, the ability to detect potential offenders, and the willingness to intervene. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 47(3), 358–390.
41.
ReynaldD. M. (2011a). Factors associated with the guardianship of places: Assessing the relative importance of the spatio-physical and sociodemographic contexts in generating opportunities for capable guardianship. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 48(1), 110–142.
42.
ReynaldD. M. (2011b). Guarding against crime: Measuring guardianship within routine activity theory. Ashgate Publishers.
43.
TarkJ.KleckG. (2014). Resisting rape: The effects of victim self-protection on rape completion and injury. Violence Against Women, 20(3), 270–292.
44.
UllmanS. E. (2007). A 10-year update of ‘review and critique of empirical studies of rape avoidance’Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34(3), 411–429.
45.
UllmanS. E.KnightR. A. (1991). A multivariate model for predicting rape and physical injury outcomes during sexual assaults. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59(5), 724.
46.
WoodhamsJ.LabuschagneG. (2012). South African serial rapists: The offenders, their victims, and their offenses. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 24(6), 1–31.
47.
WortleyR. K. (2012). Exploring the person-situation interaction in situational crime prevention. In TilleyN.FarrellG. (Eds.), The reasoning criminologist: Essays in honour of Ronald V. Clarke (pp. 184–193). Routledge.
