Adults’ facial characteristics predict whether and how severely they are sentenced in the adult criminal justice system. We investigate whether characteristics of White and Latinx male youths’ faces predict the severity of their processing in the juvenile justice system. Among a sample of first-time offenders, despite no differences in the severity of their offenses, youth who were perceived by naïve observers as more dominant, less trustworthy, less healthy, and having darker skin were more likely to receive harsher sanctions. Thus, extralegal factors like appearance may bias legal decisions that place some youth at increased risk for more restrictive sanctioning. Our findings highlight the need for structured approaches to juvenile processing decisions that take youths’ appearance out of the picture.
BennettM. W.PlautV. C. (2017). Looking criminal and the presumption of dangerousness: Afrocentric facial features, skin tone, and criminal justice. UC Davis Law Review, 51, 745–803.
2.
BernburgJ. G.KrohnM. D. (2003). Labeling, life chances, and adult crime: The direct and indirect effects of official intervention in adolescence on crime in early adulthood. Criminology, 41(4), 1287–1318. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2003.tb01020.x
3.
BerryD. S.McArthurL. Z. (1986). Perceiving character in faces: The impact of age-related craniofacial changes on social perception. Psychological Bulletin, 100(1), 3–18.
4.
BirdsongC.JohnsonI. M.DaquinJ.WilliamsJ. (2018). Skin tone: An examination of trustworthiness and innocence among college students. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 30(2), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511253.2018.1482935
5.
BridgesG.S.SteenS. (1998). Racial disparities in official assessments of juvenile offenders: Attributional stereotypes as a mediating mechanism. American Sociological Review, 63, 554–570. https://doi.org/10.2307/2657267
6.
BurchT. (2015). Skin color and the criminal justice system: Beyond black-white disparities in sentencing. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 12(3), 395–420. https://doi.org/10.1111/jels.12077
7.
CaudillJ. W.MorrisR. G.El SayedS.YunM.DeLisiM. (2013). Pathways through the juvenile justice system: Predictors of formal disposition. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 11(3), 183–195. https://doi.org/0.1177/1541204012472211
8.
CauffmanC.BeardsleeJ.FineA.FrickP.SteinbergL. (in press). Crossroads in juvenile justice: The impact of initial processing decision on youth five years after first arrest. Development & Psychopathology.
9.
CauffmanE.PiqueroA.KimonisE.SteinbergL.ChassinL.FaganJ. (2007). Legal, individual, and contextual predictors of court disposition in a sample of serious adolescent offenders. Law & Human Behavior, 31, 519–535.
10.
DevineP. G.ForscherP. S.AustinA. J.CoxW. T. L. (2012). Long-term reduction in implicit race bias: A prejudice habit-breaking intervention. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(6), 1267–1278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2012.06.003
11.
EaglyA. H.AshmoreR. D.MakhijaniM. G.LongoL. C. (1991). What is beautiful is good, but. . .: A meta-analytic review of research on the physical attractiveness stereotype. Psychological Bulletin, 110(1), 109–128. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.110.1.109
12.
EberhardtJ. L.DaviesP. G.Purdie-VaughnsV. J.JohnsonS. L. (2006). Looking deathworthy: Perceived stereotypicality of Black defendants predicts capital-sentencing outcomes. Psychological Science, 17(5), 383–386. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01716.x
13.
EisenbarthH.AlpersG. W. (2011). Happy mouth and sad eyes: Scanning emotional facial expressions. Emotion, 11(4), 860–865. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022758
14.
EnlowD. H.MoyersR. E. (1982). Handbook of facial growth. Saunders.
15.
ErtE.FleischerA.MagenN. (2016). Trust and reputation in the sharing economy: The role of personal photos in Airbnb. Tourism Management, 55, 62–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2016.01.013
16.
Estrada-ReynoldsV. C.ReynoldsJ. J.McCreaS. M.FrengS. (2017). I don’t like the cut of your jib: Perceived facial masculinity as a cue to criminality. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 24(3), 392–409. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2016.1247639
17.
FeldB. C. (2017). The evolution of the juvenile court: Race, politics, and the criminalizing of juvenile justice. NYU Press.
18.
FineA.DonleyS.CavanaghC.MiltimoreS.SteinbergL.FrickP. J.CauffmanE. (2017). And justice for all: Determinants and effects of probation officers’ processing decisions regarding first-time juvenile offenders. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 23(1), 105–117. https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000113
19.
FloweH. D.HumphriesJ. E. (2011). An examination of criminal face bias in a random sample of police lineups. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25, 265–273. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1673
20.
FunkF.WalkerM.TodorovA. (2017). Modelling perceptions of criminality and remorse from faces using a data-driven computational approach. Cognition and Emotion, 31(7), 1431–1443. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2016.1227305
GheorghiuA. I.CallanM. J.SkylarkW. J. (2019). A thin slice of science communication: Are people’s evaluations of TED talks predicted by superficial impressions of the speakers?Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11, 117–125. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550618810896
23.
GreenwoodP.AbrahamseA.ZimringF. (1984). Factors affecting sentencing severity for young adult offenders. Rand Corporation.
24.
GunaydinG.SelcukE.ZayasV. (2017). Impressions based on a portrait predict, 1-month later, impressions following a live interaction. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(1), 36–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550616662123
25.
HaganJ.SheddC.PayneM. R. (2005). Race, ethnicity, and youth perceptions of criminal injustice. American Sociological Review, 70(3), 381–407. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240507000302
26.
HehmanE.StolierR. M.FreemanJ. B.FlakeJ. K.XieS. Y. (2019). Toward a comprehensive model of face impressions: What we know, what we do not, and paths forward. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 13(2), e12431. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12431
27.
HehmanE.XieS. Y.OfosuE. K.NespoliG. A. (2018, February19). Assessing the point at which averages are stable: A tool illustrated in the context of person perception. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/2n6jq
28.
JaegerB.EvansA. M.StelM.van BeestI. (2019). Explaining the persistent influence of facial cues in social decision-making. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 148, 1008–1021. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000591
29.
JohnsonB. M.CollinsW. A. (1988). Perceived maturity as a function of appearance cues in early adolescence: Ratings by unacquainted adults, parents, and teachers. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 8(4), 357–372. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431688084004
30.
JohnsonB. D.KingR. D. (2017). Facial profiling: Race, physical appearance, and punishment. Criminology, 55(3), 520–547. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12143
31.
JonesB. C.LittleA. C.Penton-VoakI. S.TiddemanB. P.BurtD. M.PerrettD. I. (2001). Facial symmetry and judgments of apparent health: Support for a “good genes” explanation of the attractiveness–symmetry relationship. Evolution and Human Behavior, 22(6), 417–429. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-5138(01)00083-6
32.
KeatingC. F.RandallD. W.KendrickT.GutshallK. A. (2003). Do baby-faced adults receive more help? The (cross-cultural) case of the lost resume. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 27(2), 89–109.
33.
KingR. D.JohnsonB. D. (2016). A punishing look: Skin tone and Afrocentric features in the halls of justice. American Journal of Sociology, 122(1), 90–124. https://doi.org/0002-9602/2016/12201-0003$10.00
34.
KlattT.MaltbyJ.HumphriesJ. E.SmailesH. L.RyderH.PhelpsM.FloweH. D. (2016). Looking bad: Inferring criminality after 100 milliseconds. Applied Psychology in Criminal Justice, 12(2), 114–125.
35.
LangloisJ. H.KalakanisL.RubensteinA. J.LarsonA.HallamM.SmootM. (2000). Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 126(3), 390–423. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.126.3.390
36.
LiQ.HeymanG. D.MeiJ.LeeK. (2019). Judging a book by its cover: Children’s facial trustworthiness as judged by strangers predicts their real-world trustworthiness and peer relationships. Child Development, 90(2), 562–575. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12907
37.
LinC.AdolphsR.AlvarezR. M. (2018). Inferring whether officials are corruptible from looking at their faces. Psychological Science, 29(11), 1807–1823. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797618788882
MonkE. P. (2018). The color of punishment: African Americans, skin tone, and the criminal justice system. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 42, 1593–1612. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2018.1508736
40.
OosterhofN. N.TodorovA. (2008). The functional basis of face evaluation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(32), 11087–11092. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0805664105
41.
PerrettD. I.LeeK. J.Penton-VoakI.RowlandD.YoshikawaS.BurtD. M.HenziS. P.CastlesD. L.AkamatsuS. (1998). Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness. Nature, 394, 884–887. https://doi.org/10.1038/29772
42.
PetersenA. M. (2017). Complicating race: Afrocentric facial feature bias and prison sentencing in Oregon. Race and Justice, 7, 59–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/2153368716663607
43.
PetrosinoA.Turpin-PetrosinoC.GuckenburgS. (2010). Formal system processing of juveniles: Effects on delinquency. The Campbell Collaboration.
RomanJ.ButtsJ. A. (2005). The economics of juvenile jurisdiction. The Urban Institute.
46.
ScottE. S.ReppucciN. D.AntonishakJ.DeGennaroJ. T. (2006). Public attitudes about the culpability and punishment of young offenders. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 24(6), 815–832. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.727
SmailesH. L.HumphriesJ. E.RyderH.KlattT.MaltbyJ.PearmainA. M.FloweH. D. (2018). Age-related differences in spontaneous trait judgments from facial appearance. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 25, 759–768. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2018.1477633
49.
SteffensmeierD.UlmerJ.KramerJ. (1998). The interaction of race, gender, and age in criminal sentencing: The punishment cost of being young, black, and male. Criminology, 36, 763–798. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1998.tb01265.x
50.
SutherlandJ. E.CojocariuA. M.DayD. M.HehmanE. (2020). Youths’ facial appearance distinguishes leaders from followers in group-perpetrated criminal offenses and is associated with sentencing outcomes. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 47(2), 187–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854819889645
51.
SutherlandC. A. M.OldmeadowJ. A.SantosI. M.TowlerJ.BurtM.YoungA. W. (2013). Social inferences from faces: Ambient images generate a three-dimensional model. Cognition, 127(1), 105–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.12.001
ToddA. R.ThiemK. C.NeelR. (2016). Does seeing faces of young black boys facilitate the identification of threatening stimuli?Psychological Science, 27(3), 384–393. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615624492
54.
TodorovA.MandisodzaA. N.GorenA.HallC. C. (2005). Inferences of competence from faces predict election outcomes. Science, 308(5728), 1623–1626.
55.
TodorovA.OlivolaC. Y.DotschR.Mende-SiedleckiP. (2015). Social attributions from faces: Determinants, consequences, accuracy, and functional significance. Annual Review of Psychology, 66, 519–545. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143831
56.
TodorovA.SaidC. P.EngellA. D.OosterhofN. N. (2008). Understanding the evaluation of faces on social dimensions. Trends in Cognitive Science, 12(12), 455–460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2008.10.001
57.
UlmerJ. T.LaskorunskyJ. A. (2016). The role of juvenile adjudications in the disproportional incarceration of African–American and Hispanic defendants. Journal of Crime and Justice, 39(1), 9–27.
58.
ViglioneJ.HannonL.DeFinaR. (2011). The impact of light skin on prison time for black female offenders. The Social Science Journal, 48(1), 250–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2010.08.003
59.
WardC.FloweH.HumphriesJ. (2012). The effects of masculinity and suspect gender on perceptions of guilt. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26(3), 482–488. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2823
60.
WhiteK. M. (2014). The salience of skin tone: Effects on the exercise of police enforcement authority. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 38(6), 993–1010. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2014.952752
61.
WilliamsM. J.George-JonesJ.HeblM. (2019). The face of STEM: Racial phenotypic stereotypicality predicts STEM persistence by—and ability attributions about—students of color. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 116(3), 416–443. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000153
62.
WilsonJ. P.HugenbergK.RuleN. O. (2017). Racial bias in judgments of physical size and formidability: From size to threat. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113(1), 59–80. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000092
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
