Interviews with 27 girls and the professionals who worked with them yielded retrospective accounts of court interventions into families. Contradicting prior criticisms, for the setting and sample, girls were not confined to control sexual activity or as punishment for crimes committed after they ran from abusive families. Intervention problems included holding girls responsible for fighting with physically abusive caretakers, and electronically forced presence in homes with destructive caretakers. Family counseling benefitted girls with troubled families. Independent living benefited those with intractably destructive families. The research generated contemporary local information about broad criticisms leveled against juvenile courts’ responses to girls.
AcocaL. (1999). Investing in girls: A 21st century strategy. Juvenile Justice, 6(1), 3-13.
2.
AcocaL.DedelK. (1998). No place to hide: Understanding and meeting the needs of girls in the California juvenile justice system. Oakland, CA: National Council on Crime and Delinquency.
3.
ArnoldR. A. (1990). Women of color: Processes of victimization and criminalization of Black women. Social Justice, 17, 153-166.
4.
BainesM.AlderC. (1996). Are girls more difficult to work with? Youth workers’ perceptions in juvenile justice and related areas. Crime and Delinquency, 42, 467-485.
5.
BaumrindD. (1966). Effects of authoritative parental control on child behavior. Child Development, 37, 887-907.
6.
BaumrindD. (1996). The discipline controversy revisited. Family Relations, 4, 405-414.
7.
BelknapJ. (2007). The invisible woman: Gender, crime, and justice (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.
8.
BelknapJ.HolsingerK. (2006). The gendered nature of risk factors for delinquency. Feminist Criminology, 1, 48-71.
9.
BelknapJ.HolsingerK.DunnM. (1997). Understanding incarcerated girls: The results of a focus group study. The Prison Journal, 77, 381-404.
10.
BernburgJ. G.KrohnM. D. (2003). Labeling, life chances, and adult crime: The direct and indirect effects of official intervention in adolescence on crime in early adulthood. Criminology, 41, 1287-1318.
11.
BlechmanE. A.VryanK. D. (2000). Prosocial family therapy: A manualized preventive intervention for juvenile offenders. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 5, 343-378.
12.
Bond-MaupinL.MaupinJ.LeisenringA. (2002). Girls’ delinquency and the justice implications of intake workers’ perspectives. Women & Criminal Justice, 13, 51-77.
13.
BottcherJ. (1995). Gender as social control: A qualitative study of incarcerated youths and their siblings in Greater Sacramento. Justice Quarterly, 12, 33-57.
14.
BroidyL. M. (1995). Direct supervision and delinquency: Assessing the adequacy of structural proxies. Journal of Criminal Justice, 23, 541-554.
15.
BrowneK. D.HamiltonE. C. (1998). Physical violence between young adults and their parents: Associations with a history of child maltreatment. Journal of Family Violence, 13, 59-79.
16.
Buck-WillisonJ.MearsD. P.ShollenbergerT.OwensC.ButtsJ. A. (2009). Past, present, and future of juvenile justice: Assessing the policy options (APO). Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
17.
BuzawaE.HotalingG. (2006). The impact of relationship status, gender, and minor status in the police response to domestic assaults. Victims & Offenders, 1, 323-360.
CernkovichS. A.GiordanoP. C. (1987). Family relationships and delinquency. Criminology, 25, 295-321.
20.
Chesney-LindM. (1973). Judicial enforcement of the female sex role: The family court and the female delinquent. Issues in Criminology, 8(2), 51-69.
21.
Chesney-LindM. (1989). Girls’ crime and woman’s place: Toward a feminist model of female delinquency. Crime & Delinquency, 35, 5-29.
22.
Chesney-LindM. (1997). The female offender: Girls, women, and crime. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23.
Chesney-LindM. (2010). Jailing “bad” girls. In Chesney-LindM.JonesN. (Eds.), Fighting for girls: Critical perspectives on gender and violence (pp. 57-79). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
24.
Chesney-LindM.MorashM. (2011). Introduction. In Chesney-LindM.MorashM. (Eds.), Feminist theories of crime (pp. xi-xxx). Williston, Vermont: Ashgate.
25.
Chesney-LindM.MorashM.AndersenT. (2008). Girls’ troubles, girls’ delinquency, and gender responsive programming: A review. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 41, 162-189.
26.
Chesney-LindM.PaskoL. J. (2004). The female offender: Girls, women, and crime. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
27.
Chesney-LindM.RodriguezN. (1983). Women under lock and key. The Prison Journal, 63, 47-65.
28.
Chesney-LindM.SheldenR. G. (1997). Girls, delinquency, and juvenile justice (2nd ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
29.
CostelloJ. C.WorthingtonN. L. (1981). Incarcerating status offenders: Attempts to circumvent the juvenile justice and delinquency prevention act. Harvard Civil Rights–Civil Liberties Law Review, 16, 41-81.
30.
CovingtonS. (1998). The relational theory of women’s psychological development: Implications for the criminal justice system. In ZaplinR. T. (Ed.), Female offenders: Critical perspectives and effective interventions (pp. 113-128). Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen.
31.
CreswellJ. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
32.
DalyK. (1992). Women’s pathway to felony court: Feminist theories of law breaking and problems of representation. Review of Law and Women’s Studies, 2, 11-52.
33.
DatesmanS.ScarpittiF. (1977). Unequal protection for males and females in the juvenile court. In FerdinandT. N. (Ed.), Juvenile delinquency: Little brother grows up (pp. 45-62). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
34.
DavisC. P. (2007). At-risk girls and delinquency: Career pathways. Crime & Delinquency, 53, 408-435.
35.
DuroseM. R.HarlowC. W.LanganP. A.MotivansM.RantalaR. R.SmithE. L. (2005). Family violence statistics: Including statistics on strangers and acquaintances (NCJ 207846). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
36.
FederleK. H.Chesney-LindM. (1992). Special issues in juvenile justice: Gender, race, and ethnicity. In SchwartzI. M. (Ed.), Juvenile justice and public policy: Toward a national agenda (pp. 165-195). New York, NY: Macmillan.
37.
FeldB. (1999). Race and the transformation of the juvenile court. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
38.
FettermanD. M. (1998). Ethnography: Step by step. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
39.
FinkelhorD. (1994). Current information on the scope and nature of child sexual abuse. The Future of Children, 4(2), 31-53.
40.
FreedmanD.ThorntonA.CamburnD.AlwinD.Young-DeMarcoL. (1988). The life history calendar: A technique for collecting retrospective data. Sociological Methodology, 18, 37-68.
41.
GaarderE.BelknapJ. (2004). Little women. Women & Criminal Justice, 15, 51-80.
42.
GavazziS. M.YarcheckC. M.Chesney LindM. (2006). Global risk indicators and the role of gender in a juvenile detention sample. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 3, 597-612.
43.
GellesR. J. (1996). The book of David: How preserving families can cost children’s lives. New York, NY: Basic Books.
44.
GreenwoodP. W. (2004). Cost-effective violence prevention through targeted family interventions. Annals of the New York Academy of Science, 1036, 201-214.
45.
HabermasT.BluckS. (2000). Getting a life: The emergence of the life story in adolescence. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 748-769.
46.
HanksR. S.CarrN. T. (2008). Lifelines of women in jail as self-constructed visual probes for life history research. Marriage & Family Review, 42, 105-116.
47.
JohnsonM. P.FerraroK. J. (2000). Research on domestic violence in the 1990s: Making distinctions. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62, 948-963.
48.
Kempf-LeonardK.SampleL. L. (2000). Disparity based on sex: Is gender specific treatment warranted?Justice Quarterly, 17, 89-138.
49.
KrienertJ. L. (2003). Masculinity and crime: A quantitative exploration of Messerschmidt’s hypothesis. The Electronic Journal of Sociology, 7(2), 1-30.
50.
LanctotN.CernkovichS. A.GiordanoP. C. (2007). Delinquent behavior, official delinquency, and gender: Consequences for adulthood functioning and well-being. Criminology, 45, 131-157.
51.
LatimerJ. (2001). A meta-analytic examination of youth delinquency, family treatment, and recidivism. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 43, 237-253.
52.
LeveL. D.ChamberlainP.ReidJ. B. (2005). Intervention outcomes for girls referred from juvenile justice: Effects on delinquency. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 1181-1185.
53.
LevesqueR. J. R.TomkinsA. J. (1995). Revisioning juvenile justice: Implications of the new child protection movement. Journal of Urban and Contemporary Law, 48, 87-116.
54.
MacDonaldJ. M.Chesney-LindM. (2001). Gender bias and juvenile justice revisited: A multiyear analysis. Crime & Delinquency, 47, 173-195.
55.
MihalicS.IrwinK.ElliottD.FaganA.HansenD. (2001). Blueprints for violence prevention. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
56.
OdemM. E. (1995). Delinquent daughters: Protecting and policing adolescent female sexuality in the United States, 1885-1920. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.
57.
OwenB. (1998). In the mix: Struggle and survival in a woman’s prison. Albany: State University of New York Press.
58.
PaganiL.TremblayR.NaginD.ZoccolilloM.VitaroF.McDuffP. (2004). Risk factor models for adolescent verbal and physical aggression toward mothers. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 28, 528-537.
59.
PaskoL. (2002). Naked power: Stripping as a confidence game. Sexualities, 5, 49-66.
60.
PattonM. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
RobertsJ.HorneyJ. (2010). The life event calendar method in criminological research. In PiqueroA. R.WeisburdD. (Eds.), Handbook of Quantitative Criminology (pp. 289-312). New York, NY: Springer.
65.
RodriguezN.SmithH.ZatzM. S. (2009). “Youth is enmeshed in a highly dysfunctional family system”: Exploring the relationship among dysfunctional families, parental incarceration, and juvenile court decision making. Criminology, 47, 177-208.
66.
RuspiniE. (2002). Introduction to longitudinal research. London, England: Routledge.
67.
SanerH.EllicksonP. (1996). Concurrent risk factors for adolescent violence. Journal of Adolescent Health, 19, 94-103.
68.
SchaefferC. M.BorduinC. M. (2005). Long-term follow-up to a randomized clinical trial of multisystemic therapy with serious and violent juvenile offenders. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 445-453.
69.
SchaffnerL. (2006). Girls in trouble with the law. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
70.
SchlossmanS.CairnsR. B. (1994). Problem girls: Observations on past and present. In ModellJ.ParkeR. D.ElderJ. (Eds.), Children in time and place: Intersecting historical and developmental insights (pp. 110-130). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
71.
SchmidtF.HogeR. D.GomesL. (2005). Reliability and validity analysis of the youth level of service/case management inventory. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 32, 329-344.
72.
SedlakA.BroadhurstD. (1996). Executive summary of the third national incidence study of child abuse and neglect. Washington, DC: National Center on Child Abuse and Neglect, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
73.
SedlakA. J.MettenburgJ.BasenaM.PettaI.McPhersonK.GreeneA. (2010). Fourth national incidence study of child abuse and neglect (NIS–4): Report to congress. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families.
74.
SpragueJ. (2005). Feminist methodologies for critical researchers: Bridging differences. New York, NY: Altamira Press.
75.
SteinbergL.MountsN.LambornS.DornbuschS. (1991). Authoritative parenting and adolescent adjustment across various ecological niches. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 1, 19-36.
76.
AndersenT.MorashM.Chesney-LindM. (2011). Are girls getting tougher, or are we tougher on girls? Probability of arrest and juvenile court oversight in 1980 and 2000. Justice Quarterly, 28, 719-744.
77.
Strandberg-LarsenK.NielsenN.GronbaekM.AndersenP.OlsenJ.AndersenA. (2008). Binge drinking in pregnancy and risk of fetal death. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 111, 602-609.
78.
StrausM. A.GellesR. J. (1990). How violent are American families? Estimates from the national family violence resurvey and other studies. In StrausM. A.GellesR. J. (Eds.), Physical violence in American families: Risk factors and adaptations to violence in 8145 families (pp. 95-112). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
79.
SuttonJ. E. (2010). A review of the life-events calendar method for criminological research. Journal of Criminal Justice, 5, 1038-1044.
80.
WelchC. L.Roberts-LewisA. c.ParkerS. (2009). Incorporating gender specific approaches for incarcerated female adolescents: Multilevel risk model for practice. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 48, 67-83.
