This study compared NIBRS arrest data in a statewide sample with arrest and summons data on the same cases collected directly from law enforcement agencies (LEAs). NIBRS matched LEA data in 84.1% of cases. However, 5.8% of LEA arrests and 52.9% of LEA summons were false negatives, that is, they were incorrectly represented as not cleared by arrest in NIBRS. False negatives were more likely when more than 1 day elapsed between incident and arrest and when the crimes were sexual assault or intimidation. False negatives were less likely in small LEAs (for summons) Recommendations are presented for improving accuracy.
AddingtonL. A. (2004). The effect of NIBRS reporting on item missing data in murder cases. Homicide Studies, 8(3), 193–213. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088767904265360
2.
AddingtonL. A. (2006). Using National Incident-Based Reporting System murder data to evaluate clearance predictors: A research note. Homicide Studies, 10(2), 140–152. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088767905285439
3.
AddingtonL. A. (2007). Hot vs. Cold cases: Examining time to clearance for homicides using NIBRS data. Justice Research and Policy, 9(2), 87–112. https://doi.org/10.3818/jrp.9.2.2007.87
4.
AddingtonL. A. (2008). Assessing the extent of nonresponse bias on NIBRS estimates of violent crime. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 24(1), 32–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043986207312936
5.
AddingtonL. A. (2009). Studying the crime problem with NIBRS data: Current uses and future trends. In KrohnM. D.LizotteA. J.HallG. P. (Eds.), Handbook on crime and deviance (pp. 23–42). Springer.
6.
AddingtonL. A. (2015). Introduction to special issue on innovative uses of NIBRS crime data to inform policy. Justice Research and Policy, 16(2), 123–128. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525107115623937
7.
AlderdenM.CrossT. P.VlajnicM.SillerL. (2021). Prosecutors’ perspectives on biological evidence and injury evidence in sexual assault cases. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(7-8), 3880–3902. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260518778259
8.
Barnett-RyanC.SwansonG. (2008). The role of state programs in NIBRS data quality. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 24(1), 18–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043986207312590
9.
BaumerT. L.AdamsK. (2006). Controlling a jail population by partially closing the front door: An evaluation of a “summons in lieu of arrest” policy. The Prison Journal, 86(3), 386–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885506291036
10.
BibelD. (2015). Considerations and cautions regarding NIBRS data: A view from the field. Justice Research and Policy, 16(2), 185–194. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525107115623943
ChiltonR.JarvisJ. (1999). Using the National Incident-Based reporting System (NIBRS) to test estimates of arrestee and offender characteristics. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 15(2), 207–224.
ChiltonR.RegoecziW. C. (2007). Impact of employment, family structure and income on NIBRS offense, victim, offender, and arrest rate. Justice Research and Policy, 9(2), 9–29. https://doi.org/10.3818/JRP.9.2.2007.9
Criminal Justice Information Services Division. (2017). National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS). Technical Specification. Version 3.1 CJIS Document Number – UCRRP-DOC-04521-3.1. CJIS, Uniform Crime Reporting Program, Federal Bureau of Investigation. U.S. Department of Justice.
Criminal Justice Information Services Division Uniform Crime Reporting Program. (2020b). 2019.2.1 National Incident-Based Reporting System Technical Specification. U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation Author.
19.
CrossT. P.AlderdenM.WagnerA.SampsonL.PetersB.LounsburyK. (2020). Biological evidence in adult and adolescent sexual assault cases: Timing and relationship to arrest. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 7(8), 1828–1939. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260517704229
20.
CrossT. P.AlderdenM. A.WagnerA.SampsonL.PetersB.SpencerM.LounsburyK. (2014). Forensic evidence and criminal justice outcomes in a statewide sample of sexual assault cases (Final Report. Award number 2011-WG-BX-0005). National Institute of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice. https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/248254.pdf
21.
CrossT. P.AlderdenM. A.WagnerA.SampsonL.PetersB.LounsburyK. (2020). Biological evidence in adult and adolescent sexual assault cases: Timing and relationship to arrest. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 35(7/8), 1828–1939. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260517704229
22.
DurfeeA.FetzerM. D. (2016). Offense type and the arrest decision in cases of intimate partner violence. Crime and Delinquency, 62(7), 954–977. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128714540277
EitleD.StolzenbergL.D’AlessioS. J. (2005). Police organizational factors, the racial composition of the police, and the probability of arrest. Justice Quarterly, 22(1), 30–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/0741882042000333636
25.
Federal Bureau of Investigation. (2021). UCR focuses on NIBRS and other tools to make more relevant data available to users. https://ucr.fbi.gov/nibrs/2019
26.
FegadelA. R.HeideK. M. (2017). Offspring-perpetrated familicide: Examining family homicides involving parents as victims. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 61(1), 6–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X15589091
HansenM.HurwitzW.MadowW. (1993). Sample survey methods and theory. Wiley-Interscience.
29.
HirschelD.BuzawaE.PattavinaA.FaggianiD. (2007). Domestic violence and mandatory arrest laws: To what extent do they influence police arrest decisions?The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 98, 255–298.
30.
HirschelD.FaggianiD. (2012). When an arrest is not an arrest: Exceptionally clearing cases of intimate partner violence. Police Quarterly, 15(4), 358–385. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098611112452152
31.
JarvisJ. P.MancikA.RegoecziW. C. (2017). Police responses to violent crime: Reconsidering the mobilization of law. Criminal Justice Review, 42(1), 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734016816684198
32.
JarvisJ. P.RegoecziW. C. (2009). Homicide clearances: An analysis of arrest versus exceptional outcomes. Homicide Studies, 13(2), 174–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088767909331694
33.
KanyongoG. Y.BrookG. P.Kyei-BlanksonL.GocmenG. (2007). Reliability and statistical power: How measurement fallibility affects power and required sample sizes for several parametric and nonparametric statistics. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 6(1), 81–90. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/dc29/d584eb8cc951eec7e1076c47de57ebfa88fe.pdf
34.
Law Enforcement Support Section. (2013). National incident-based reporting system (NIBRS) user manual version 1.0. Law Enforcement Support Section, Crime Statistics Management Unit, Criminal Justice Information Services Division, Uniform Crime Reporting Program, Federal Bureau of Investigation USDOJ.
35.
LyonsC. J.RobertsA. (2014). The difference hate makes in clearing crime: An event history analysis of incident factors. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 30(3), 268–289. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043986214536663
36.
MaxfieldM. G. (1999). The National Incident-Based Reporting System: Research and policy applications. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 15(2), 119–149.
37.
McCormackP. D.PattavinaA.TracyP. E. (2017). Assessing the coverage and representativeness of the National Incident-Based Reporting System. Crime and Delinquency, 63(4), 493–516. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128717694595
OrfieldL. B. (1958). Warrant of arrest and summons upon complaint in federal criminal procedure. University of Cincinnati Law Review. University of Cincinnati. College of Law, 27(1), 1–60.
40.
PattavinaA.CarkinD. M.TracyP. E. (2017). Assessing the representativeness of NIBRS arrest data. Crime and Delinquency, 63(12), 1626–1652. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128717724298
41.
PoeE.SnyderH. (1995). The reliability of the FBI’s NIBRS data: Five case studies. National Center for Juvenile Justice.
42.
PuzzancheraC.AdamsB. (2007, November). Who’s taking the “five finger discount”? NIBRS analysis of 2004 shoplifting arrestees [Conference session]. Paper presented at the American Society of Criminology Conference, Washington, DC, United States.
43.
RegoecziW. C.JarvisJ.RiedelM. (2008). Clearing murders: Is it about time?Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 45(2), 142–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427807313706
44.
ReynoldsH. T. (1984). Analysis of nominal data (2nd ed.). SAGE.
45.
RobertsA. (2007). Predictors of homicide clearance by arrest: An event history analysis of NIBRS incidents. Homicide Studies, 11(2), 82–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088767907300748
46.
RobertsA. (2008). The influences of incident and contextual characteristics on crime clearance of nonlethal violence: A multilevel event history analysis. Criminal Justice Journal, 36(1), 61–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2007.12.007
47.
RobertsA. (2009). Contributions of the national incident-based reporting system to substantive knowledge in criminology: A review of research. Sociology Compass, 3(3), 433–458. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9020.2009.00209.x
SimonL. M.EllwangerS. J.HaggertyJ. (2010). Reversing the historical tide of iatrogenic harm: A therapeutic jurisprudence analysis of increases in arrests of domestic batterers and rapists. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 33(5–6), 306–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2010.09.003
50.
SnyderH. N. (1999). The overrepresentation of juvenile crime proportions in robbery clearance statistics. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 15(2), 151–161. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1007570604591
StolzenbergL.D’AlessioS. J. (2008). Co-offending and the age-crime curve. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 45(5), 65–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427807309441
53.
ZimringF. E.LaqueurH. (2015). Kids, groups, and crime: In defense of conventional wisdom. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 52(3), 403–413. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427814555770
