This article examines the coverage of the National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS) arrest data as of 2016. We use NIBRS and Uniform Crime Report (UCR), Summary Reporting System on persons arrested. We examine the correspondence of arrests measures between the UCR and NIBRS for overall arrests, and arrests by sex, race, and age. We found that NIBRS arrest data are a close match to UCR data overall and the differences across demographic measures are very slight.
AddingtonL.A. (2007). Hot v. cold cases: Examining time to clearance for homicides using NIBRS data. Justice Research and Policy, 9,87-112.
2.
BierieD. M.DetarP. J.CraunS. W. (2016). Firearm violence directed at police. Crime & Delinquency, 62, 501-524.
3.
ChiltonR.JarvisJ. (1999a). Using the National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS) to test estimates of arrestee and offender characteristics. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 15, 207-224.
4.
ChiltonR.JarvisJ. (1999b). Victims and offenders in two crime statistics programs: A comparison of the National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS) and the National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS). Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 15, 193-205.
5.
ChiltonR.RegoecziW. C. (2007). Impact of employment, family structure, and income on NIBRS offense, victim, offender, and arrest rates. Justice Research and Policy, 9(2), 9-29.
6.
D’AlessioS. J.StolzenbergL. (2003). Race and the probability of arrest. Social Forces, 81, 1381-1397.
7.
DichterM. E.MarcusS. C.MorabitoM. S.RhodesK. V. (2011). Explaining the IPV arrest decision: Incident, agency, and community factors. Criminal Justice Review, 36, 22-39.
8.
DrawveG.ThomasS. A.WalkerJ. T. (2014). The likelihood of arrest: A routine activity theory approach. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 39, 450-470.
9.
DurfeeA. (2012). Situational ambiguity and gendered patterns of arrest for intimate partner violence. Violence Against Women, 18, 64-84.
10.
DurfeeA.FetzerM. D. (2016). Offense type and the arrest decision in cases of intimate partner violence. Crime & Delinquency, 62, 954-977.
11.
EitleD.StolzenbergL.D’AlessioS. J. (2005). Police organizational factors, the racial composition of the police, and the probability of arrest. Justice Quarterly, 22, 30-57.
FegadelA. R.HeideK. M. (2017). Offspring-perpetrated familicide: Examining family homicides involving parents as victims. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 61, 6-24.
17.
HirschelD.BuzawaE.PattavinaA.FaggianiD. (2007). Domestic violence and mandatory arrest laws: To what extent do they influence police arrest decisions?The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 98, 255-298.
18.
HirschelD.BuzawaE. S. (2013). The impact of offenders leaving the scene on the police decision to arrest in cases of intimate partner violence. Violence Against Women, 19, 1079-1103.
19.
HirschelD.FaggianiD. (2012). When an arrest is not an arrest: Exceptionally clearing cases of intimate partner violence. Police Quarterly, 15, 358-385.
20.
HirschelD.HutchisonI. (2011). Unraveling the relative contributions of his, her, and their drinking to the likelihood of arrest in intimate partner violence cases. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26, 3050-3079.
21.
HirschelD.HutchisonI. W.ShawM. (2010). The interrelationship between substance abuse and the likelihood of arrest, conviction, and re-offending in cases of intimate partner violence. Journal of Family Violence, 25, 81-90.
22.
JarvisJ. P.MancikA.RegoecziW. C. (2017). Police responses to violent crime: Reconsidering the mobilization of law. Criminal Justice Review, 42, 5-25.
23.
LyonsC. J.RobertsA. (2014). The difference “hate” makes in clearing crime: An event history analysis of incident factors. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 30, 268-289.
24.
McCormackP. D.PattavinaA.TracyP. E. (2017). Assessing the coverage and representativeness of the National Incident-Based Reporting System. Crime & Delinquency, 63, 493-516.
25.
PattavinaA.BuzawaE.HirschelD.FaggianiD. (2007). Policy, place, and perpetrators: Using NIBRS to explain arrest practices in intimate partner violence. Justice Research and Policy, 9(2), 31-51.
26.
PoggioE. C.KennedyS. D.ChaikenJ. M.CarlsonK. E. (1985). Blueprint for the Future of the Uniform Crime Reporting Program. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
27.
RobertsA. (2007). Predictors of homicide clearance by arrest an event history analysis of NIBRS incidents. Homicide Studies, 11, 82-93.
28.
RobertsA.LyonsC. J. (2011). Hispanic victims and homicide clearance by arrest. Homicide Studies, 15, 48-73.
29.
RobertsD. J. (1997.). Implementing the National Incident-Based Reporting System: A project status report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
30.
SnyderH. N. (1999). The over-representation of juvenile crime proportions in robbery clearance statistics. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 15, 151-161.
31.
SteffensmeierD.HarrisC. T.Painter-DavisN. (2015). Gender and arrests for larceny, fraud, forgery, and embezzlement: Conventional or occupational property crime offenders?Journal of Criminal Justice, 43, 205-217.
32.
StolzenbergL.D’AlessioS. J. (2004). Sex differences in the likelihood of arrest. Journal of Criminal Justice, 32, 443-454.
33.
StromK. J.WarnerT. D.TichavskyL.ZahnM. A. (2014). Policing juveniles: Domestic violence arrest policies, gender, and police response to child–parent violence. Crime & Delinquency, 60, 427-450.
WalfieldS. M. (2016). When a cleared rape is not cleared: A multilevel study of arrest and exceptional clearance. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 31, 1767-1792.
