While social disorganization theory suggests the importance of change, most prior research examining macro-level criminological associations uses cross-sectional data. The current study examines the multilevel relationship between changes in disadvantage and changes in crime over time using four data sources: the National Neighborhood Crime Study, the 2000 U.S. Census, crime-incidents occurring between 2005 and 2009, and the 2005–2009 American Community Survey. Analyzing 6,068 census tracts within 53 large U.S. cities using multilevel models with time nested within tracts nested within cities, I parse out the contribution of changes in tract-level disadvantage from city-level disadvantage to changes in robbery and burglary rates. Results indicate the importance of both static and dynamic associations between disadvantage and crime, at both the neighborhood and city level.
AllenJ.CancinoJ. M. (2012). Social disorganization, Latinos and juvenile crime in the Texas borderlands. Criminal Justice Journal, 40(2), 152–163.
2.
BaumerE. P.WolffK. T.ArnioA. N.ChiapputoJ. K. (2014). Assessing the link between foreclosure and crime rates: A multi-level analysis of neighborhoods across large US Cities (No. 2009-IJ-CX–0020). National Institute of Justice.
3.
BeckerJ. H. (2016). The dynamics of neighborhood structural conditions: The effects of concentrated disadvantage on homicide over time and space. City and Community, 15(1), 64–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/cico.12152
4.
BeckerJ. H. (2020). Social organization and homicide rates in Chicago neighborhoods: The role of structural stability and change. Journal of Crime and Justice, 43(4), 518–534. https://doi.org/10.1080/0735648x.2020.1717584
5.
BerryB. J. L.KasardaJ. D. (1977). Contemporary urban ecology. Macmillan Publishing Company.
6.
BlauJ. R.BlauP. M. (1982). The cost of inequality: Metropolitan structure and violent crime. American Sociological Review, 47(1), 114–129.
BursikR. J. (2000). The systemic theory of neighborhood crime rates. In SimpsonS. S. (Ed.), Of crime & criminality: The use of theory in everyday life (pp. 87–108). Pine Forge Press.
9.
BursikR. J.WebbJ. (1982). Community change and patterns of delinquency. American Journal of Sociology, 88(1), 24–42. https://doi.org/10.1086/227632
10.
ChamberlainA. W.HippJ. R. (2015). It’s all relative: Concentrated disadvantage within and across neighborhoods and communities, and the consequences for neighborhood crime. Criminal Justice Journal, 43(6), 431–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2015.08.004
11.
GardnerW.MulveyE. P.ShawE. C. (1995). Regression analyses of counts and rates: Poisson, overdispersed poisson, and negative binomial models. Psychological Bulletin, 118(3), 392–404. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.118.3.392
12.
HippJ. R.WickesR. (2017). Violence in urban neighborhoods: A longitudinal study of collective efficacy and violent crime. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 33(4), 783–808. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-016-9311-z
13.
KikuchiG.DesmondS. A. (2010). A longitudinal analysis of neighborhood crime rates using latent growth curve modeling. Sociological Perspectives, 53(1), 127–149. https://doi.org/10.1525/sop.2010.53.1.127
14.
KrivoL. J.PetersonR. D. (1996). Extremely disadvantaged neighborhoods and urban crime. Social Forces, 75(2), 619–648. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/75.2.619
15.
KubrinC. E.HertingJ. R. (2003). Neighborhood correlates of homicide trends: An analysis using growth-curve modeling. Sociological Quarterly, 44(3), 329–350. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.2003.tb00536.x
16.
KubrinC. E.WeitzerR. (2003). New directions in social disorganization theory. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 40(4), 374–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427803256238
17.
MartinezR.StowellJ. I.LeeM. T. (2010). Immigration and crime in an era of transformation: A longitudinal analysis of homicides in San Diego neighborhoods, 1980–2000. Criminology, 48(3), 797–829. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2010.00202.x
18.
MorenoffJ. D.SampsonR. J.RaudenbushS. W. (2001). Neighborhood inequality, collective efficacy, and the spatial dynamics of urban violence. Criminology, 39(3), 517–558. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2001.tb00932.x
19.
OsgoodD. W. (2000). Poisson-based regression analysis of aggregate crime rates. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 16(1), 21–43. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007521427059
20.
ParkR. E.BurgessE. W. (1925). The city: Suggestions for the investigations of human behavior in the urban environment. University of Chicago Press.
21.
PetersonR. D.KrivoL. J. (2005). Macrostructural analyses of race, ethnicity, and violent crime: Recent lessons and new directions for research. Annual Review of Sociology, 31(1), 331–356. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.31.041304.122308
22.
PetersonR. D.KrivoL. J. (2010a). Divergent social worlds: Neighborhood crime and the racial-spatial divide. Russell SAGE Foundation.
23.
PetersonR. D.KrivoL. J. (2010b). National neighborhood crime study (NNCS), 2000. ICPSR27501-v1. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor].
24.
PrattT. C.CullenF. T. (2005). Assessing macro-level predictors and theories of crime: A meta-analysis. Crime and Justice, 32, 373–450. https://doi.org/10.1086/655357
25.
RamosJ.WengerM. (2018). Effects in disguise: The importance of controlling for constructs at multiple levels in macro-level immigration and crime research. City and Community, 17(4), 1100–1118. https://doi.org/10.1111/cico.12343
26.
SampsonR. J. (1988). Local friendship ties and community attachment in mass society: A multilevel systemic model. American Sociological Review, 53(5), 766–779. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095822
27.
SampsonR. J.GrovesW. B. (1989). Community structure and crime: Testing social-disorganization theory. American Journal of Sociology, 94(4), 774–802. https://doi.org/10.1086/229068
ShawC.McKayH. (1942). Juvenile delinquency and urban areas (vol. Xxxii). University of Chicago Press.
30.
SteenbeekW.HippJ. R. (2011). A longitudinal test of social disorganization theory: Feedback effects among cohesion, social control, and disorder. Criminology, 49(3), 833–871.
31.
TaylorR. B. (1997). Social order and disorder of street blocks and neighborhoods: Ecology, microecology, and the systemic model of social disorganization. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 34(1), 113–155. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427897034001006
32.
WengerM. R. (2019a). Separating the influence of inequality on burglary and robbery by level of analysis: A multilevel approach. Social Science Research, 81, 42–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2019.03.007
33.
WengerM. R. (2019b). Clarifying the relationship between racial diversity and crime: Neighborhoods versus cities. Crime and Delinquency, 65(11), 1513–1536. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128718768726
34.
WengerM. R. (2021). Omitted Level Bias in Multilevel Research: An Empirical Test Distinguishing Block-Group, Tract, and City Effects of Disadvantage on Crime. Justice Quarterly, 38(5), 792–826. https://doi:10.1080/07418825.2019.1649449
