Gender and Criminal Justice Responses to Terrorism in the United States

Abstract

Generally, women receive more lenient treatment by the criminal justice system compared to men. Prior research on how gender shaped prosecutorial decision-making and sentencing outcomes has focused on conventional forms of crime, while less is known about how it operates in terrorism-related cases. This is a critical gap in a growing body of research on justice disparities given that women continue to make up a significant portion of terrorism defendants in the U.S. Utilizing data from the American Terrorism Study, we seek to answer how legal and extralegal case attributes of federal terrorism cases vary across gender, how gender shapes federal terrorism case outcomes, and how combinations of relevant case attributes uniquely impact court outcomes for males and females.

Keywords

female terrorism criminal justice responses

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ahola

A. S.

Christianson

S. Å.

Hellström

Å.

(2009). Justice needs a blindfold: Effects of gender and attractiveness on prison sentences and attributions of personal characteristics in a judicial process. Psychiatry Psychology and Law, 16(supp1), S90–S100. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218710802242011

Albonetti

C. A.

(1987). Prosecutorial discretion: The effects of uncertainty. Law & Society Review, 21(2), 291–318.

Albonetti

C. A.

(1991). An integration of theories to explain judicial discretion. Social Problems, 38(2), 247–266. https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.1991.38.2.03a00090

Albonetti

C. A.

(1997). Sentencing under the federal sentencing guidelines: Effects of defendant characteristics, guilty pleas, and departures on sentence outcomes for drug offenses, 1991-1992. Law & Society Review, 31(4), 789–822.

Albonetti

C. A.

(1998). Direct and indirect effects of case complexity, guilty pleas, and offender characteristics on sentencing for offenders convicted of white-collar offense prior to sentencing guidelines. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 14, 353–378. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023077704546

Alexander

Turkington

(2018). Treatment of terrorists: How does gender affect justice? CTC Sentinel, 11(8), 24–29.

Auerhahn

Henderson

J. S.

McConnell

P. R.

Lockwood

(2017). Are you judged by the residence you keep? Homicide sentencing, attribution, and neighborhood context. Criminology, Criminal Justice, Law & Society, 18(1), 28–51.

Baker

Gau

J. M.

(2018). Female offenders’ perceptions of police procedural justice and their obligation to obey the law. Crime and Delinquency, 64(6), 758–781. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128717719418

Banks

(2019). Introduction: Women, gender, and terrorism: Gendering terrorism. Women & Criminal Justice, 29(4-5), 181–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/08974454.2019.1633612

10.

Bickle

G. S.

Peterson

R. D.

(1991). The impact of gender-based family roles on criminal sentencing. Social Problems, 38(3), 372–394.

11.

Bishop

D. M.

Frazier

C. E.

(1992). Gender bias in juvenile justice processing: Implications of the JJDP act. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 82(4), 1162–1186.

12.

Blee

K. M.

(1996). Becoming a racist: Women in contemporary Ku Klux Klan and Neo-Nazi groups. Gender & Society, 10(6), 680–702.

13.

Bloom

(2011). Bombshell: Women and terrorism. University of Pennsylvania Press.

14.

Boritch

(1992). Gender and criminal court outcomes: An historical analysis. Criminology, 30(3), 293–326. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1992.tb01106.x

15.

Campion

(2020). Women in the extreme and radical right: Forms of participation and their implications. Social Science, 9(9), 149. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci9090149

16.

Caplan

J. M.

Kennedy

L. W.

Barnum

J. D.

Piza

E. L.

(2017). Crime in context: Utilizing risk terrain modeling and conjunctive analysis of case configurations to explore the dynamics of criminogenic behavior settings. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 33(2), 133–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043986216688814

17.

Cassidy

Rydberg

(2018). Analyzing variation in prior record penalties across conviction offenses. Crime and Delinquency, 64(7), 831–855. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128717693215

18.

Chase

(2008). The chivalry hypothesis & filicide: Are there categorical differences between mothers and fathers who kill their children? Undergraduate Review, 4(1), 41–50.

19.

Chesney-Lind

(1996). Media misogyny: Demonizing “violent” girls and women. In Ferrell

Websdale

(Eds.), Making trouble: Cultural constructions of crime, deviance and control (1st ed., pp. 115–140). Routledge.

20.

Corley

Smith

B. L.

Damphousse

K. R.

(2005). The changing face of American terrorism. In Snowden

Whitsel

(Eds.), Terrorism: Research, readings, and realities (1st ed.). Prentice Hall.

21.

Cramer

E. P.

(1999). Variables that predict verdicts in domestic violence cases. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 14(11), 1137–1150. https://doi.org/10.1177/088626099014011002

22.

Crawford

Bradley

M. S.

(2016). Parent gender and child removal in physical abuse and neglect cases. Children and Youth Services Review, 65, 224–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2016.04.013

23.

Curran

D. A.

(1983). Judicial discretion and defendant’s sex. Criminology, 21(1), 41–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1983.tb00250.x

24.

D’Alessio

S. J.

Stolzenberg

(1993). Socioeconomic status and the sentencing of the traditional offender. Criminal Justice Journal, 21(1), 61–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2352(93)90006-9

25.

Daly

(1987). Discrimination in the criminal courts: Family, gender, and the problem of equal treatment. Social Forces, 66(1), 152–175.

26.

Daly

(1989). Rethinking judicial paternalism: Gender, work-family relations, and sentencing. Gender & Society, 3(1), 9–36.

27.

Daly

Bordt

R. L.

(1995). Sex effects and sentencing: An analysis of the statistical literature. Justice Quarterly, 12(1), 141–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418829500092601

28.

Daly

Tonry

(1997). Gender, race, and sentencing. Crime and Justice, 22, 201–252. https://doi.org/10.1086/449263

29.

Demuth

(2002). The effects of citizenship status on sentencing outcomes in drug cases. Federal Sentencing Reporter, 14(5), 271-275. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/fsr.2002.14.5.2271

30.

Demuth

Steffensmeier

(2004). The impact of gender and race-ethnicity in the pretrial release process. Social Problems, 51(2), 222–242. https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2004.51.2.222

31.

Doerner

J. K.

(2012). Gender disparities in sentencing departures: An examination of U.S. Federal courts. Women & Criminal Justice, 22(3), 176–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/08974454.2012.687953

32.

Doerner

J. K.

Demuth

(2014). Gender and sentencing in the federal courts: Are women treated more leniently? Criminal Justice Policy Review, 25(2), 242–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403412466877

33.

Embry

Lyons

P. M.

(2012). Sex-based sentencing: Sentencing discrepancies between male and female sex offenders. Feminist Criminology, 7(2), 146–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/1557085111430214

34.

Farnworth

Teske

R. H. C.

Jr (1995). Gender differences in felony court processing. Women & Criminal Justice, 6(2), 23–44. https://doi.org/10.1300/j012v06n02_02

35.

Farnworth

Teske

R. H. C. Thurman

Jr. (1991). Ethnic, racial and minority disparity in felony court processing. In Lynch

M. J.

Patterson

E. B.

(Eds.), Race and criminal justice (pp. 123–134). Harrow and Heston.

36.

Felson

R. B.

Ackerman

(2001). Arrest for domestic and other assaults. Criminology, 39(3), 655–676. https://doi.org/epdf/10.111/j.1745-9125.2001.tb00936.x

37.

Freiburger

T. L.

Burke

A. S.

(2011). Status Offenders in the Juvenile Court: The Effects of Gender, Race, and Ethnicity on the Adjudication Decision. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 9(4), 352–365. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541204011399933.

38.

Freiburger

T. L.

Hilinski

C. M.

(2010). The impact of race, gender and age on the pretrial decision. Criminal Justice Review, 35(3), 318–334. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734016809360332

39.

González

A. L.

Freilich

J. D.

Chermak

S. M.

(2014). How women engage homegrown terrorism. Feminist Criminology, 9(4), 344–366. https://doi.org/10.1177/1557085114529809

40.

Gonzalez-Perez

(2008). Women and terrorism: Female activity in domestic and international terror groups. Routledge.

41.

Grabe

M. E.

Trager

K. D.

Lear

Rauch

(2006). Gender in crime news: A case study test of the chivalry hypothesis. Mass Communication & Society, 9(2), 137–163. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327825mcs0902_2

42.

Gurian

E. A.

(2011). Media portrayals of female murder offenders. Prison Service Journal, 194, 14–20.

43.

Hart

T. C.

(2014). Conjunctive analysis of case configurations. JDiBrief Series. UCL Jill Dando Institute of Security and Crime Science.

44.

Hart

T. C.

Rennison

C. M.

Miethe

T. D.

(2017). Identifying patterns of situational clustering and contextual variability in criminological data: An overview of conjunctive analysis of case configurations. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 33(2), 112–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043986216689746

45.

Holtfreter

(2013). Gender and “other people’s money”: An analysis of white-collar offender sentencing. Women & Criminal Justice, 23(4), 326–344.

46.

Horowitz

Pottieger

A. E.

(1991). Gender bias in juvenile justice handling of seriously crime-involved youths. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 28, 75–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427891028001005

47.

Kautt

Spohn

(2002). Cracking down on Black drug offenders? Testing for interactions among offenders’ race, drug type, and sentencing strategy in federal drug sentences. Justice Quarterly, 19(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418820200095151

48.

Kramer

Steffensmeir

(1993). Race and imprisonment decisions. Sociological Quarterly, 34(2), 357–376.

49.

Lightowlers

(2019). Drunk and doubly deviant? The role of gender and intoxication in sentencing assault offences. The British Journal of Criminology, 59(3), 693–717. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azy041

50.

Lofstrom

Raphael

(2016). Crime, the criminal justice system, and socioeconomic inequality. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 30(2), 103–126. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.30.2.103

51.

Makin

D. A.

Hoard

(2014). Understanding the gender gap in domestic terrorism through criminal participation. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 25(5), 531–552. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403413478016

52.

Meaux

L. T.

Cox

Kopkin

M. R.

(2018). Saving damsels, sentencing deviants and selective chivalry decisions: Juror decision-making in an ambiguous assault case. Psychiatry, Psychology & Law, 25(5), 724–736. https://doiorg.proxylib.csueastbay.edu/10.1080/13218719.2018.1474817

53.

Miethe

T. D.

Hart

T. C.

Regoeczi

W. C.

(2008). The conjunctive analysis of case configurations: An exploratory method for discrete multivariate analyses of crime data. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 24(2), 227–241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-008-9044-8

54.

Motivans

(2019, January). Federal justice statistics, 2015-2016. U.S. Department of Justice Bulletin.

55.

Moulds

E. F.

(1978). Chivalry and paternalism: Disparities of treatment in the criminal justice system. The Western Political Quarterly, 31(3), 416–430. https://doi.org/10.2307/447741

56.

Nagel

Weitzman

(1971). Women as litigants. The Hastings Law Journal, 23(1), 171–198.

57.

Palmer

(2010). The glass ceiling for female terrorists: Can women lead an Islamist terror group? Slate Magazine. https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2010/03/is-there-a-glass-ceiling-in-islamist-terrorist-organizations.html

58.

Pinchevsky

G. M.

Steiner

(2016). Sex-based disparities in pretrial release decisions and outcomes. Crime and Delinquency, 62(3), 308–340. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128713482415

59.

Piquero

N. L.

Davis

J. L.

(2004). Extralegal factors and the sentencing of organizational defendants: An examination of the federal sentencing guidelines. Criminal Justice Journal, 32(6), 643–654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2004.08.001

60.

Raghavan

S. V.

Balasubramaniyan

(2014). Evolving role of women in terror groups: Progression or regression? Journal of International Women’s Studies, 15(2), 197–211. http://vc.bridgew.edu/jiws/vol15/iss2/13

61.

Ragin

(1987). The comparative method: Moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies. The University of California Press.

62.

Rennison

C. M.

DeKeseredy

W. S.

(2017). Situational contexts of rural violence: A comparison of male and female perpetration. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 33(2), 189–206. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043986216688813

63.

Rodriguez

Curry

T. R.

Lee

(2006). Gender differences in criminal sentencing: Do effects vary across violent, property, and drug offenses? Social Science Quarterly, 87(2), 318–339. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2006.00383.x

64.

Rosenau

(2020). The dark history of America’s first female terrorist group. Politico Magazine, Politico.com/news/magazine/2020/05/03/us-history-first-women-terrorist-group-191037

65.

Rosich

K. J.

(2007). Race, ethnicity, and the criminal justice system. American Sociological Association.

66.

Shermer

L. O.

Johnson

B. D.

(2010). Criminal prosecutions: Examining prosecutorial discretion and charge reductions in U.S. Federal district courts. Justice Quarterly, 27(3), 394–430. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418820902856972

67.

Shields

Smith

Damphousse

(2006). Their day in court: Assessing guilty plea rates among terrorists. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 22(3), 261–276. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043986206292370

68.

Siegel

L. J.

Bartollas

(2011). Corrections today. Wadsworth Cengage Learning.

69.

Sjoberg

Gentry

C. E.

(2008). Reduced to bad sex: Narratives of violent women from the Bible to the war on terror. International Relations, 22, 5–23.

70.

Skolnick

J. H.

(1966). Justice without trial: Law enforcement in democratic society. John Wiley and Sons.

71.

Smith

(1994). Terrorism in America: Pipe bombs and pipe dreams. SUNY Press.

72.

Smith

Damphousse

(1996). Punishing political offenders: The effect of political motive on federal sentencing decisions. Criminology, 34(3). 289–321. https://doi.org10.1111/j.1745-9125.1996.tb01209.x

73.

Spohn

(1990). The sentencing decisions of Black and White judges: Expected and unexpected similarities. Law & Society Review, 24(5), 1197–1216. https://doi.org/10.2307/3053666

74.

Spohn

Beichner

(2000). Is preferential treatment of female offenders a thing of the past? A multisite study of gender, race, and imprisonment. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 11(2), 149–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403400011002004

75.

Spohn

C. C.

Spears

J. W.

(1997). Gender and case processing decisions: A comparison of case outcomes for male and female defendants charged with violent felonies. Women & Criminal Justice, 8(3), 29–59. https://doi.org/10.1300/j012v08n03_02

76.

Steffensmeier

Demuth

. (2000). Ethnicity and sentencing outcomes in U.S. Federal Courts: Who is punished more harshly? American Sociological Review, 65(5), 705–729. https://doi.org/10.2307/2657543.

77.

Steffensmeier

Demuth

(2006). Does gender modify the effects of race - ethnicity on criminal sanctioning? Sentences for male and female White, Black, and Hispanic defendants. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 22, 241–261. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10940-006-9010-2.pdf

78.

Steffensmeier

D. J.

(1980). Assessing the impact of the women’s movement on sex-based differences in the handling of adult criminal defendants. Crime and Delinquency, 26(3), 344–357. https://doi.org/10.1177/001112878002600305

79.

Steffensmeier

Kramer

Streifel

(1993). Gender and imprisonment decisions. Criminology, 31, 411–446. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1993.tb01136.x

80.

Steffensmeier

Kramer

Ulmer

(1995). Age differences in sentencing. Justice Quarterly, 12(3), 583–602. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418829500096151

81.

Steffensmeier

Painter-Davis

Ulmer

(2017). Intersectionality of race, ethnicity, gender, and age on criminal punishment. Sociological Perspectives, 60(4), 810–833. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731121416679371

82.

Steffensmeier

Ulmer

Kramer

(1998). The interaction of race, gender, and age in criminal sentencing: The punishment cost of being young, Black, and male. Criminology, 36(4), 763–798. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1998.tb01265.x

83.

Sternadori

(2007). Sexy, tough or inept? Depictions of women terrorists in the news. Media Report to Women, 35, 14–22.

84.

Ulmer

J. T.

Kramer

J. H.

(1996). Court communities under sentencing guidelines: Dilemmas of formal rationality and sentencing disparity. Criminology, 34(3), 383–408.

85.

Warren

Chiricos

Bales

(2012). The imprisonment penalty for young black and hispanic males: A crime-specific analysis. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 49(1), 56–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427810397945

86.

Yon

Milton

(2019). Simply small men? Examining differences between females and males radicalized in the United States. Women & Criminal Justice, 29(4–5), 188–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/08974454.2018.1543067