Post-Release Source of Income and Convictions of Formerly Incarcerated Adults

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between post-release source of income and convictions for different types of crime. Longitudinal data from a sample of formerly incarcerated adults (n = 10,879) released from Dutch prisons were used. Fixed effects models show that, compared with receiving social benefits, post-release employment is associated with a lower probability of convictions for crime in general, and for property crime. Persons who are not employed and do not receive benefits have a higher likelihood of conviction for any crime, property crime, and violent crime compared with those receiving social benefits. The magnitude of this positive relationship is stronger for those living alone, for women, and for persons older than 25. Results have implications for crime control policies.

Keywords

formerly incarcerated adults employment social benefits no income convictions

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aaltonen

MacDonald

J. M.

Martikainen

Kivivuori

(2013). Examining the generality of the employment-crime relationship. Criminology, 51(3),561–594.

Agnew

(1992). Foundation for a general strain theory of crime and delinquency. Criminology, 30(1), 47–87.

Allison

P. D.

(2009). Fixed effects regression models. Sage.

Andersen

S. N.

Skardhamar

(2017). Pick a number: Mapping recidivism measures and their consequences. Crime & Delinquency, 63(5), 613–635.

Anxo

Mencarini

Pailhé

Solaz

Tanturri

M. L.

Flood

(2011). Gender differences in time use over the life course in France, Italy, Sweden, and the US. Feminist Economics, 17(3), 159–195.

Apel

(2009). Employment and crime. In Miller

J. M.

(Ed.), 21st century criminology: A reference handbook. Sage Publications.

Arnett

J. J.

(2015). Emerging adulthood: The winding road from the late teens through the twenties (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.

Bakker

B. F.

(2012). Estimating the validity of administrative variables. Statistica Neerlandica, 66(1), 8–17.

Bakker

B. F.

Van Rooijen

Van Toor

(2014). The system of social statistical datasets of Statistics Netherlands: An integral approach to the production of register-based social statistics. Statistical Journal of the IAOS, 30(4), 411–424.

10.

Baldry

McDonnell

Maplestone

Peeters

(2003). Formerly incarcerated adults and accommodation: What bearing do different forms of housing have on social reintegration. Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute.

11.

Becker

G. S.

(1968). Crime and punishment: An economic approach. Journal of Political Economy, 76(2), 48.

12.

Beerthuizen

M. G. C. J.

Beijersbergen

K. A.

Noordhuizen

Weijters

(2015). Fourth edition of the aftercare monitor for former prisoners. WODC.

13.

Berg

M. T.

Huebner

B. M.

(2011). Reentry and the ties that bind: An examination of social ties, employment, and recidivism. Justice Quarterly, 28(2), 382-410.

14.

Bloom

(2006). Employment-focused programs for formerly incarcerated adults: What have we learned, what are we learning, and where should we go from here? http://www.mdrc.org/publications/435/full.pdf

15.

Bushway

Reuter

(2002). Labor markets and crime risk factors. In Sherman

L. W.

Farrington

D. P.

Welsh

B. C.

MacKenzie

D. L.

(Eds.), Evidence-based crime prevention. Routledge.

16.

Cohen

L. E.

Felson

(1979). Social-change and crime rate trends: Routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44(4), 588–608.

17.

Cook

P. J.

Kang

Braga

A. A.

Ludwig

O’Brien

M. E.

(2015). An experimental evaluation of a comprehensive employment-oriented prisoner re-entry program. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 31(3), 355–382.

18.

De Mooij

R. A

. (2006). Reinventing the Welfare State. CPB.

19.

Durose

M. R.

Cooper

A. D.

Snyder

H. N.

(2014). Recidivism of prisoners released in 30 states in 2005: Patterns from 2005 to 2010. Bureau of Justice Statistics of the U.S. Department of Justice.

20.

Ehrlich

(1973). Participation in Illegitimate Activities – Theoretical and Empirical Investigation. Journal of Political Economy, 81(3), 521–565.

21.

Eurostat. (2017). Social protection statistics – Social benefits. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Social_protection_statistics_-_social_benefits#Expenditure_on_social_protection_benefits_by_function

22.

Farrington

D. P.

Auty

K. M.

Coid

J. W.

Turner

R. E.

(2013). Self-reported and official offending from age 10 to age 56. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 19(2), 135–151.

23.

Farrington

D. P.

Gallagher

Morley

St. Ledger

R. J.

West

D. J.

(1986). Unemployment, school leaving, and crime. The British Journal of Criminology, 26(4), 335–356.

24.

Hacker

J. S.

(2002). The divided welfare state: The battle over public and private social benefits in the United States. Cambridge University Press.

25.

Hausman

(1978). Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica, 46, 1251–1271.

26.

Hirschi

(1969). Causes of delinquency. University of California Press.

27.

Horney

Osgood

D. W.

Marshall

I. H.

(1995). Criminal careers in the short-term: Intra-individual variability in crime and its relation to local life circumstances. American Sociological Review, 60, 655–673.

28.

Houbiers

(2004). Towards a social statistical database and unified estimates at Statistics Netherlands. Journal of Official Statistics, 20(1), 55–75.

29.

Huebner

B. M.

Berg

M. T.

(2011). Examining the sources of variation in risk for recidivism. Justice Quarterly, 28(1), 146–173.

30.

Huebner

B. M.

DeJong

Cobbina

(2010). Women coming home: Long-term patterns of recidivism. Justice Quarterly, 27(2), 225–254.

31.

Jaynes

C. M.

(2020). The relationship between job quality and crime: Examining heterogeneity in treatment and treatment effect. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 57(6), 693–740.

32.

La Vigne

N. G.

Visher

C. A.

Castro

. (2004). Chicago prisoners’ experiences returning home. Urban Institute.

33.

Makarios

Steiner

Travis

L. F.

(2010). Examining the predictors of recidivism among men and women released from prison in Ohio. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37(12), 1377–1391.

34.

Martinez

D. J.

Christian

(2009). The familial relationships of former prisoners: Examining the link between residence and informal support mechanisms. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 38(2), 201–224.

35.

Matsaganis

Ozdemir

Ward

(2014). The coverage rate of social benefits. Publications Office of the European Union. http://ec.europa.eu/social/BlobServlet?docId

36.

McFadyen

R. G.

(1995). Coping with threatened identities: Unemployed people’s self-categorizations. Current Psychology, 14(3), 233–256.

37.

Messina

Burdon

Hagopian

Prendergast

(2006). Predictors of prison-based treatment outcomes: A comparison of men and women participants. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 32(1), 7–28.

38.

Mesters

van der Geest

Bijleveld

(2016). Crime, employment and social welfare: an individual-level study on disadvantaged males. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 32(2), 159–190.

39.

Mulhausen

D. B.

(2015). Studies cast doubt on effectiveness of prisoner reentry programs. Heritage Foundation.

40.

Nguyen

Kamada

Ramakers

(2020). On the margins: Considering the relationship between informal work and reoffending. Justice Quarterly. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2020.1778059

41.

OECD. (2020). Gender wage gap. https://data.oecd.org/earnwage/gender-wage-gap.htm

42.

Osgood

D. W.

Wilson

J. K.

OMalley

P. M.

Bachman

J. G.

Johnston

L. D.

(1996). Routine activities and individual deviant behavior. American Sociological Review, 61(4), 635–655.

43.

Peters

R. H.

Strozier

A. L.

Murrin

M. R.

Kearns

W. D.

(1997). Treatment of substance-abusing jail inmates: Examination of gender differences. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 14(4), 339–349.

44.

Phelps

E. S.

(1994). Low-wage employment subsidies versus the welfare-state. American Economic Review, 84(2), 54–58.

45.

Ramakers

Nieuwbeerta

Van Wilsem

Dirkzwager

(2017a). Not just any job will do: A study on employment characteristics and recidivism risks after release. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 61(16), 1795–1818.

46.

Ramakers

Nobbe

Nieuwbeerta

Dirkzwager

(2017b). Zwart werk na vrijlating [Off-the-books employment following release from prison]. Mens en Maatschappij, 92(1), 7–33.

47.

Ramakers

Van Wilsem

Nieuwbeerta

Dirkzwager

(2016). Returning to a former employer: A potentially successful pathway to ex-prisoner re-employment. British Journal of Criminology, 56(4), 668–688.

48.

Rodermond

(2018). Out of prison, out of crime? Women on the road to desistance. Vrije Universiteit.

49.

Sampson

R. J.

Laub

J. H.

(1993). Crime in the making: Pathways and turning points through life. Harvard University Press.

50.

Skardhamar

Telle

(2012). Post-release employment and recidivism in Norway. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 28(4), 629–649.

51.

Slocum

L. A.

Simpson

S. S.

Smith

D. S.

(2005). Strained lives and crime: Examining intra-individual in strain and offending in a sample of incarcerated women. Criminology, 43(4), 1067–1110.

52.

Snel

De Boom

Engbergsen

(2008). The silent transformation of the Dutch welfare state and the rise of in-work poverty. In Andreb

H. J.

Lohmann

(Eds.), The working poor in Europe employment, poverty and globalization. Edward Elgar Publishing.

53.

Statistics Netherlands. (2020). Statistics Netherlands’ database. https://opendata.cbs.nl/#/CBS/nl/

54.

Thompson

Uggen

(2012). Dealers, thieves, and the common determinants of drug and non-drug illegal earnings. Criminology, 50(4), 1057–1087.

55.

Tripodi

S. J.

Kim

J. S.

Bender

(2010). Is employment associated with reduced recidivism? The complex relationship between employment and crime. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 54(5), 706–720.

56.

Uggen

(2000). Work as a turning point in the life course of criminals: A duration model of age, employment, and recidivism. American Sociological Review, 65(4), 529–546.

57.

Uggen

Thompson

(2003). The socioeconomic determinants of ill-gotten gains: Within-person changes in drug use and illegal earnings. American Journal of Sociology, 109(1), 146–185.

58.

Uggen

Wakefield

(2008). What have we learned from longitudinal studies of work and crime? In The long view of crime: A synthesis of longitudinal research (pp. 191–219). Springer.

59.

Valentine

E. J.

Redcross

(2015). Transitional jobs after release from prison: Effects on employment and recidivism. IZA Journal of Labor Policy, 4(1), 16.

60.

Van Oorschot

. (1991). Non-take-up of social security benefits in Europe. Journal of European Social Policy, 1(1), 15–30.

61.

Verbruggen

Apel

Van der Geest

V. R.

Blokland

A. A. J.

(2015). Work, income support, and crime in the Dutch welfare state: A longitudinal study following vulnerable youth into adulthood. Criminology, 53(4), 545–570.

62.

Visher

C. A.

Courtney

S. M. E

. (2006). Cleveland prisoners’ experiences returning home. Urban Institute.

63.

Visher

C. A.

Debus-Sherrill

S. A.

Yahner

(2011). Employment after prison: A longitudinal study of former prisoners. Justice Quarterly, 28(5), 698–718.

64.

Visher

C. A.

Debus

Yahner

(2008). Employment after prison: A longitudinal study of releasees in three states. Urban Institute.

65.

Visher

C. A.

Travis

(2003). Transitions from prison to community: Understanding individual pathways. Annual Review of Sociology, 29, 89–113.

66.

Wartna

B. S. J.

Blom

Tollenaar

(2011). The Dutch Recidivism Monitor. WODC.

67.

Weijters

(2015). Comparing income and housing of former prisoners after imprisonment with their situation before imprisonment. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 21(1), 35–48.

68.

Weijters

Rokven

Verweij

(2018). Fifth edition of the aftercare monitor for former prisoners. WODC.

69.

Wensveen

Palmen

Blokland

A. A. J.

Meeus

(2017). Examining the work–crime association in emerging adulthood: A longitudinal analysis based on a Dutch population sample. European Journal of Criminology, 14(4), 467–484.

70.

Wensveen

Palmen

Ramakers

Dirkzwager

Nieuwbeerta

(2016). Terug naar huis? Veranderingen in woonsituaties tijdens detentie en na vrijlating [Back to home? Changes in housing situation during detention and following release]. Tijdschrift voor Criminologie, 58(1), 28–55.

71.

Western

Braga

A. A.

Davis

Sirois

(2014). Stress and hardship after prison. American Journal of Sociology, 120(5), 1512–1547.

72.

Willott

Griffin

(1999). Building your own lifeboat: Working-class male offenders talk about economic crime. British Journal of Social Psychology, 38(4), 445–460.

73.

Zellner

(1962). An efficient method of estimating seemingly unrelated regressions and tests for aggregation bias. Journal of the American statistical Association, 57(298), 348–368.

74.

Zhang

J. S.

(1997). The effect of welfare programs on criminal behavior: A theoretical and empirical analysis. Economic Inquiry, 35(1), 120–137.