The objective of the current study was to examine the impact of a multiple conviction criminal record with varying crime types on hiring outcomes. An experimental correspondence audit was used to achieve this objective. The results showed that those with multiple conviction records and varying crime types received significantly fewer callbacks for interviews than those with no record. While the callback point estimates for those with this type of criminal history were not as low as expected, their statistically significant differences from those with no record were consistent with the bulk of previous research. The results also indicated the continued presence of racial discrimination in hiring practices as equally qualified African American applicants received significantly fewer callbacks than White applicants.
AdlerP. A. (1992). The “post” phase of deviant careers: Reintegrating drug traffickers. Deviant Behavior, 13(2), 103–126.
2.
AganA.StarrS. (2017). The Effect of Criminal Records on Access to Employment. American Economic Review, 107(5), 560–564.
3.
AganA.StarrS. (2018). Ban the box, criminal records, and racial discrimination: A field experiment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 133(1), 191–235.
4.
AhmedA. M.LångE. (2017). The employability of ex-offenders: a field experiment in the Swedish labor market. IZA Journal of Labor Policy, 6(1), 6.
5.
AignerD. J.CainG. G. (1977). Statistical theories of discrimination in labor markets. Ilr Review, 30(2), 175–187.
AliA. A.LyonsB. J.RyanA. M. (2017). Managing a perilous stigma: Ex-offenders’ use of reparative impression management tactics in hiring contexts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(9), 1271.
8.
BaertS.NorgaJ.ThuyY.Van HeckeM. (2016). Getting grey hairs in the labour market. An alternative experiment on age discrimination. Journal of Economic Psychology, 57, 86–101.
9.
BendickM.JacksonC. W.ReinosoV. A. (1994). Measuring employment discrimination through controlled experiments. The Review of Black Political Economy, 23(1), 25–48.
10.
BennieR. C. (2017). January 2017 census of odrc institutional population, demographic and offense summary. Bureau of Research and Evaluation, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction.
11.
BerkR. A. (2005). Randomized experiments as the bronze standard. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 1(4), 417–433.
12.
BertrandM.MullainathanS. (2004). Are Emily and Brendan more employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A field experiment on labor market discrimination. American Economic Review, 94, 991–1013.
Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2015). Survey of state criminal history information systems, 2014. Bureau of Justice Statistics.
17.
BushwayShawn D.GarySweetenDavid B.. (2006). Size matters: Standard errors in the application of null hypothesis significance testing in criminology and criminal justice. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 2(1), 1–22.
18.
CarlssonM.FumarcoL.RoothD. O. (2014). Does the design of correspondence studies influence the measurement of discrimination?. IZA Journal of Migration, 3(1), 11.
19.
ChampelyS.EkstromC.DalgaardP.GillJ.WeibelzahlS.AnandkumarA.FordC.VolcicR.De RosarioH. & Maintainer Helios De Rosario. (2018). Package ‘pwr’.” R package version, 1-2. Retrieved from https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/pwr/pwr.pdf.
DaviesS.TannerJ. (2003). The long arm of the law: Effects of labeling on employment. Sociological Quarterly, 44(3), 385–404.
25.
DayR. F. (2019). A study of factors influencing hiring decisions in the context of ban the box policies. CUNY Academic Works.
26.
DeckerS. H.OrtizN.SpohnC.HedbergE. (2015). Criminal stigma, race, and ethnicity: The consequences of imprisonment for employment. Journal of Criminal Justice, 43(2), 108–121.
27.
DeLisiM.PiqueroA. R. (2011). New frontiers in criminal careers research, 2000–2011: A state-of-the-art review. Journal of Criminal Justice, 39(4), 289–301.
28.
DenverM.PickettJ. T.BushwayS. D. (2018). Criminal records and employment: A survey of experiences and attitudes in the United States. Justice Quarterly, 35(4), 584–613.
GaddisS. M. (2017). How black are lakisha and jamal? racial perceptions from names used in correspondence audit studies. Sociological Science, 4, 469–489.
35.
GiguereR.DundesL. (2002). Help wanted: A survey of employer concerns about hiring ex-convicts. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 13(4), 396–408.
36.
GraffamJ.ShinkfieldA. J.HardcastleL. (2008). The perceived employability of ex-prisoners and offenders. International journal of offender therapy and comparative criminology, 52(6), 673–685.
Green v. Missouri Pacific Railroad, 549 F.2d 1158 (8th Cir. 1977).
39.
GriffithJ. N.RadeC. B.AnazodoK. S. (2019). Criminal history and employment: an interdisciplinary literature synthesis. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 38, 505–528. https://doi.org/doi/10.1108/EDI-10-2018-0185.
40.
HardingD. J. (2003). Jean Valjean’s dilemma: The management of ex-convict identity in the search for employment. Deviant Behavior, 24(6), 571–595.
41.
HardingD. J.MorenoffJ. D.NguyenA. P.BushwayS. D. (2018). Imprisonment and labor market outcomes: Evidence from a natural experiment. American Journal of Sociology, 124(1), 49–110.
42.
HeckmanJ. J. (1998). Detecting discrimination. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12(2), 101–116.
43.
HepburnP.Kohler-HausmannI.MedinaA. Z. (2019). Cumulative risks of multiple criminal justice outcomes in New York City. Demography, 56(3), 1161–1171.
HaahrM. (2019). RANDOM.ORG: True random number service. Retrieved from https://www.random.org.
46.
HarrisP. M.KellerK. S. (2005). Ex-offenders need not apply: The criminal background check in hiring decisions. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 21(1), 6–30.
KaebleD.GlazeL. (2016). Correctional populations in the United States, 2015. Bureau of Justice Statistics.
49.
KuhnK. M. (2019). Is it disqualifying? Practitioner responses to criminal offenses in hiring decisions. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 38(5), 547–563. https://doi.org/doi/10.1108/EDI-10-2018-0182
50.
LagesonS.UggenC. (2013). How work affects crime—and crime affects work—over the life course. In Handbook of life-course criminology. Springer.
51.
LagesonS. E.VuoloM.UggenC. (2015). Legal ambiguity in managerial assessments of criminal records. Law & Social Inquiry, 40(1), 175–204.
LaheyJ.BeasleyR. (2018). Technical aspects of correspondence studies. In S. M. Gaddis (Ed.), Audit studies: behind the scenes with theory, method, and nuance (pp. 81–101). Springer, Cham.
LeasureP. (2019). Misdemeanor records and employment outcomes: An experimental study. Crime & Delinquency, 65(13), 1850–1872.
56.
LeasureP. (2020a). A concise guide to designing and implementing an experimental correspondence audit that examines the impact of a criminal record on hiring outcomes. Working Paper.
57.
LeasureP. (2020b). A Review of Formal and Informal Collateral Consequence Relief Mechanisms Aimed to Increase Employment Outcomes for Ex-Offenders. Working Paper.
58.
LeasureP.AndersenST. (2017). Recognizing redemption: Old criminal records and employment outcomes. NYU review of law and social change. The Harbinger, 41, 271–286.
59.
LevashinaJ.CampionM. A. (2009). Expected practices in background checking: review of the human resource management literature. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 21(3), 231–249.
60.
MutzD. C.PemantleR.PhamP. (2019). The perils of balance testing in experimental design: Messy analyses of clean data. The American Statistician, 73(1), 32–42.
61.
MyrickA. (2013). Facing your criminal record: Expungement and the collateral problem of wrongfully represented self. Law & Society Review47, 73–104.
62.
NallyJ. M.LockwoodS. R.HoT. (2011). Employment of ex-offenders during the recession. Journal of Correctional Education, 62(2), 117–131.
63.
NallyJ. M.LockwoodS.HoT.KnutsonK. (2014). Indiana industry sectors that hire ex-offenders: Implications to correctional education programs. Journal of Correctional Education, 65(3), 43–65.
OrtizN. (2014). The gendering of criminal stigma: an experiment testing the effects of race/ethnicity and incarceration on women’s entry-level job prospects (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Arizona State University, Phoenix.
66.
PagerD. (2003). The mark of a criminal record. American Journal of Sociology, 108(5), 937–975.
67.
PagerD.KarafinD. (2009). Bayesian bigot? Statistical discrimination, stereotypes, and employer decision making. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 621(1), 70–93.
68.
PagerD.QuillianL. (2005). Walking the talk? What employers say versus what they do. American Sociological Review, 70(3), 355–380. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240507000301.
69.
PagerD.WesternB.SugieN. (2009). Sequencing disadvantage: barriers to employment facing young black and white men with criminal records. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 623(1), 195–213. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716208330793.
70.
PagerD.WesternB. (2012). Identifying discrimination at work: The use of field experiments. Journal of Social Issues, 68(2), 221–237.
71.
PhillipsD. C. (2016). Do comparisons of fictional applicants measure discrimination when search externalities are present? evidence from existing experiments. The Economic Journal, 129(621), 2240–2264. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecoj.12628.
72.
QuillianL.PagerD.HexelO.MidtbøenA. H. (2017). Meta-analysis of field experiments shows no change in racial discrimination in hiring over time. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 114(41), 10870–10875.
73.
RicciardelliR.MooneyT. (2018). The decision to disclose: Employment after prison. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 57(6), 343–366.
74.
RosnerB. (2011). Fundamentals of biostatistics. 7th ed.Brooks/Cole.
75.
RossJ. I.RichardsS. C.NewboldG.JonesR. S.LenzaM.MurphyD. S.HoganR.CurryG. D. (2011). Knocking on the Ivory Tower’s Door: The Experience of Ex-Convicts Applying for Tenure-Track University Positions. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 22(2), 267–285.
76.
Saint-MontU. (2015). Randomization does not help much, comparability does. PloS one, 10(7), e0132102.
77.
SchwartzR. D.SkolnickJ. H. (1962). Two studies of legal stigma. Social Problems, 10(2), 133–142. https://doi.org/10.2307/799046.
78.
ShadishCookT. D.CampbellD. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Wadsworth Cengage learning.
79.
SiegelmanP.HeckmanJ. (1993). The Urban Institute audit studies: Their methods and findings. In MichaelF.StruykR. J. (Eds.), Clear and convincing evidence: Measurement of discrimination in America (pp. 187–258). Urban Institute Press.
80.
SmithA. (2005). Searching for work in the digital era. Pew Research Center.
81.
Society for Human Resource Management. (2012). Background checking: The use of criminal background checks in hiring decisions. Society for Human Resource Management.
82.
StataCorp. 2019. Stata statistical software: Release 16. StataCorp LP.
SugieN. F. (2018). Work as foraging: A smartphone study of job search and employment after prison. American Journal of Sociology, 123(5), 1453–1491.
86.
Texas v. EEOC. (2019). No. 18-10638.
87.
UggenC.VuoloM.LagesonS.RuhlandE.Whitham, H.K. (2014). The edge of stigma: An experimental audit of the effects of low-level criminal records on employment. Criminology, 52(4), 627–654. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12051
88.
UrbaniakG. C.PlousS. (2013). Research randomizer (Version 4.0) [Computer software].
VuoloM.UggenC.LagesonS. (2016). Statistical power in experimental audit studies: Cautions and calculations for matched tests with nominal outcomes. Sociological Methods & Research, 45(2), 260–303.
92.
VuoloM.UggenC.LagesonS. (2018). To match or not to match? Statistical and substantive considerations in audit design and analysis. In S. M. Gaddis (Ed.), Audit studies: behind the scenes with theory, method, and nuance (pp. 119–140). Springer, Cham.
WesternB.BragaA. A.DavisJ.SiroisC. (2015). Stress and hardship after prison. American Journal of Sociology, 120(5), 1512–1547. https://doi.org/10.1086/681301.
95.
WesternB.SiroisC. (2018). Racialized re-entry: Labor market inequality after incarceration. Social Forces, 97(4), 1517–1542. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/soy096
96.
WilliamsR. (2012). Using the margins command to estimate and interpret adjusted predictions and marginal effects. The Stata Journal, 12(2), 308–331.
97.
WinnickT. A.BodkinM. (2008). Anticipated stigma and stigma management among those to be labeled “ex-con”. Deviant Behavior, 29(4), 295–333.
98.
ZschirntE.RuedinD. (2016). Ethnic discrimination in hiring decisions: A meta-analysis of correspondence tests 1990–2015. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 42(7), 1115–1134. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2015.1133279
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
