In recent decades, long-term solitary confinement has become a mainstay of prison systems. Critiques and research of this confinement typically have focused on its potential harms. Few studies have examined the range of harms to those placed in it; fewer still have examined solitary confinement’s potential benefits or sought insight from those who work with them. Guided by Sykes’ deprivation theory, we draw on focus groups and interviews with 144 correctional personnel to examine their perceptions of incarcerated individuals’ experiences with, and responses to, deprivations of solitary confinement. We show that staff view the pains of imprisonment as potentially increasing or decreasing in solitary confinement and that they view incarcerated persons as adapting to such confinement in different ways.
AhaltC.HaneyC.RiosS.FoxM. P.FarabeeD.WilliamsB. (2017). Reducing the use and impacts of solitary confinement in corrections. International Journal of Prisoner Health, 13(1), 41–48.
2.
ArrigoB.A.BullockJ. L. (2008). The psychological effects of solitary confinement on prisoners in supermax units. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 52(6), 622–640.
3.
BottomsA. E. (1999). Interpersonal violence and social order in prisons. Crime and Justice, 26, 205–282.
4.
BriggsC. S.SundtJ. L.CastellanoT. C. (2003). The effect of supermaximum security prisons on aggregate levels of institutional violence. Criminology, 41(4), 1341–1376.
ButlerH. D.SteinerB.MakariosM. D.TravisL. FIII. (2017). Assessing the effects of exposure to supermax confinement on offender postrelease behaviors. The Prison Journal, 97(3), 275–295.
7.
CallahanL. (2004). Correctional officer attitudes toward inmates with mental disorder. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 3(1), 37–54.
8.
CampS. D.GaesG. G.Klein-SaffranJ.DaggettD. M.SaylorW. G. (2002). Using inmate survey data in assessing prison performance a case study comparing private and public prisons. Criminal Justice Review, 27(1), 26–51.
9.
Chesney-LindM.MauerM. (Eds.). (2003). Invisible punishment: The collateral consequences of mass imprisonment. The New Press.
10.
CheesemanK. A.KimB.LambertE. G.HoganN. L. (2011). Correctional officer perceptions of inmates and overall job satisfaction. Journal of Crime and Justice, 34(2), 81–102.
11.
ClarkK. (2018). The effect of mental illness on segregation following institutional misconduct. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 45(9), 1363–1382.
12.
CloyesK.LovellD.AllenD. G.RhodesL. A. (2006). Assessment of psychological impairment in a supermaximum security unit sample. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 33(6), 760–781.
13.
CreweB. (2011). Depth, weight, tightness: Revisiting the pains of imprisonment. Punishment and Society, 13(5), 509–529.
14.
CreweB.LawsB. (2018). Subcultural adaptations to incarceration. In WooldredgeJ.SmithP. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of prisons and imprisonment (pp. 125–142). Oxford University Press.
15.
CreweB.LevinsA. (2029). The prison as a reinventive institution. Theoretical Criminology, 24(4), 568–589.
16.
CreweB.LieblingA.HulleyS. (2011). Staff culture, use of authority, and prisoner quality of life in public and private sector prisons. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 44(1), 94–115.
17.
CochranJ. C.TomanE. L.MearsD. P.BalesW. D. (2018). Solitary confinement as punishment: Examining in-prison sanctioning disparities. Justice Quarterly, 35(3), 381–411.
18.
CoxA. (2011). Doing the programme or doing me? The pains of youth imprisonment. Punishment and Society, 13(5), 592–610.
19.
DhamiM. K.AytonP.LoewnsteinG. (2007). Adaptation to imprisonment: Indigenous or imported?Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34(8), 1085–1100.
20.
DiPietroS. M. (2018). Roads diverged: An examination of violent and nonviolent pathways in the aftermath of the Bosnia War. Criminology, 57(1), 74–104.
21.
DurnescuI. (2011). Pains of probation: Effective practice and human rights. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 55(4), 530–545.
22.
DvoskinJ. A.SpiersE. M. (2004). On the role of correctional officers in prison mental health. Psychiatric Quarterly, 75(1), 41–59.
23.
FarkasM. A. (1999). Correctional officer attitudes toward inmates and working with inmates in a “get tough” era. Journal of Criminal Justice, 27, 495–506.
24.
FeeleyM. M.SimonJ. (1992). The new penology: Notes on the emerging strategy of corrections and its implication. Criminology, 30(4), 449–474.
25.
FlickU. (2004). Triangulation in qualitative research. In FlickU.von KardoffE.SteinkeI. (Eds.), A companion to qualitative research (pp. 178–183). Sage.
26.
FosterH. (2016). The conditions of confinement in restrictive housing. In GarciaM. (Ed.), Restrictive housing in the U.S. (pp. 85–116). National Institute of Justice.
27.
FoucaultM. (1979). Discipline and punishment. Vintage.
28.
FrostN. A.MonteiroC. E. (2016). Administrative segregation in U.S. prisons. In GarciaM. (Ed.), Restrictive housing in the U.S. (pp. 1–43). National Institute of Justice.
29.
GalanekJ. D. (2015). Correctional officers and the incarcerated mentally ill: Responses to psychiatric illness in prison. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 29(1), 116–136.
30.
GarciaM. (Ed.). (2016). Restrictive housing in the U.S. National Institute of Justice.
31.
GarlandD. (2013). The 2012 Sutherland Address: Penality and the penal state. Criminology, 51(3), 475–517.
32.
GendreauP.LabrecqueR. M. (2018). The effects of administrative segregation. In WooldredgeJ.SmithP. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of prisons and imprisonment (pp. 340–366). Oxford University Press.
33.
GiallombardoR. (1966). Society of women: A study of a women’s prison. Wiley.
34.
GrassianS. (1983). Psychopathological effects of solitary confinement. American Journal of Psychiatry, 140(11), 1450–1454.
35.
GottschalkM. (2009). The long reach of the carceral state: The politics of crime, mass imprisonment, and penal reform in the United States and abroad. Law and Society, 34(2), 439–472.
36.
HaganB. O.WangE. A.AminawungJ. A.Albizu-GarciaC. E.ZallerN.NyamuS.ShavitS.DelucaJ.FoxA. D. (2017). History of solitary confinement is associated with post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms among individuals recently released from prison. Journal of Urban Health, 95(2), 141–148.
37.
HaneyC. (2003). Mental health issues in long-term solitary and supermax confinement. Crime and Delinquency, 49(1), 124–156.
38.
HaneyC. (2018). Restricting the use of solitary confinement. Annual Review of Criminology, 1, 285–310.
39.
HuebnerB. M.FrostN. A. (Eds.). (2019). Handbook on the consequences of sentencing and punishment decisions. Routledge.
40.
JennessVSextonL.SumnerJ. (2019). Sexual victimization against transgender women in prison: Consent and coercion in context. Criminology, 57(4), 603–631.
41.
KaebleD.CowhigM. (2018). Correctional populations in the United States, 2016. Bureau of Justice Statistics.
42.
KingR. D. (1999). The rise and rise of supermax: An American solution in search of a problem?Punishment and Society, 1(2), 163–186.
43.
KingR, D. (2005). Effects of supermax custody. In LieblingA.MarunaS. (Eds.), The effects of imprisonment (pp. 118–145). Willan.
44.
KitzingerJ. (1994). The methodology of focus groups: The importance of interaction between research participants. Sociology of Health and Illness, 16(1), 103–121.
45.
KruegerR. A.CaseyM. A. (2014). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. Sage.
46.
KreagerD. A.KruttschnittC. (2018). Inmate society in the era of mass incarceration. Annual Review of Criminology, 1, 261–283.
47.
KupersT. A. (2017). Solitary: The inside story of supermax isolation and how we can abolish it. University of California Press.
48.
KurkiL.MorrisN. (2001). Supermax prisons. Crime and Justice, 28, 385–424.
49.
LabrecqueR. M. (2019). Assessing the impact of time spent in restrictive housing confinement on subsequent measures of institutional adjustment among men in prison. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 46(10), 1445–1455.
50.
LabrecqueR. M.SmithP. (2019). The impact of restrictive housing on inmate behavior: A systematic review of the evidence. In HuebnerB. M.FrostN. A. (Eds.). Handbook on the consequences of sentencing and punishment decisions (pp. 290–310). Routledge.
51.
LavoieJ. A.ConnollyD. A.RoeschR. (2006). Correctional officers’ perceptions of inmates with mental illness: The role of training and burnout syndrome. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 5(2), 151–166.
52.
LeigeyM. E.RyderM. A. (2015). The pains of permanent imprisonment: Examining perceptions of confinement among older life without parole inmates. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 59(7), 726–742.
53.
ListwanS. J.SullivanC. J.AgnewR.CullenF. T.ColvinM. (2013). The pains of imprisonment revisited: The impact of strain on inmate recidivism. Justice Quarterly, 30(1), 144–168.
54.
LoflandJ.LoflandL. H. (2006). Developing analysis. In LoflandJ.SnowD.AndersonL.LoflandL. H. (Eds.), Analyzing social settings: A guide to qualitative observation and analysis (pp. 183–203). Wadsworth Thomson.
55.
LovellD.CloyesK.AllenD.RhodesL. (2000). Who lives in supermaximum custody?Federal Probation, 64, 33–38.
56.
MarcumC. D.Hilinski-RosickC. M.FreiburgerT. L. (2014). Examining the correlates of male and female inmate misconduct. Security Journal, 27(3), 284–303.
57.
MartelJ. (2001). Telling the story: A study in the segregation of women prisoners. Social Justice, 28(1), 196–215.
58.
MearsD. P. (2008). An assessment of supermax prisons using an evaluation research framework. The Prison Journal, 88(1), 43–68.
59.
MearsD. P. (2016). Critical research gaps in understanding the effects of prolonged time in restrictive housing on inmates and the institutional environment. In GarciaM. (Ed.), Restrictive housing in the U.S. (pp. 234–295). National Institute of Justice.
60.
MearsD. P.BalesW. D. (2009). Supermax incarceration and recidivism. Criminology, 47(4), 801–836.
61.
MearsD. P.HughesV.PestaG. P.BalesW. D.BrownJ. M.CochranJ. C.WooldredgeJ. (2019). The new solitary confinement? A conceptual framework for guiding and assessing research and policy on “restrictive housing.”Criminal Justice and Behavior, 46(10), 1427–1444.
62.
MearsD. P.WatsonJ. (2006). Towards a fair and balanced assessment of supermax prisons. Justice Quarterly, 23(2), 232–270.
63.
MisisM.KimB.CheesemanK.HoganN. L.LambertE. (2013). The impact of correctional officer perceptions of inmates on job stress. Sage Open, 3(2), 1–13.
64.
MollemanT.LeeuwF. L. (2012). The influence of prison staff on inmate conditions: A multilevel approach to staff and inmate surveys. European Journal of Crime Policy Research, 18(2), 217–233.
65.
MorganD. L. (1996). Focus groups. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 129–152.
66.
MorganR. D.GendreauP.SmithP.GrayA. L.LabrecqueR. M.MacLeanN.Van HornS. A.BolanosA. D.BatastiniA. B.MillsJ. F. (2016). Quantitative syntheses of the effects of administrative segregation on inmates’ well-being. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 22(4), 439–461.
67.
MorrisR. G. (2016). Exploring the effect of exposure to short-term solitary confinement among violent prison inmates. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 32(1), 1–22.
68.
O’KeefeM. L.KlebeK. J.MetznerJ.DvoskinJ.FellnerJ.StuckerA. (2013). A longitudinal study of administrative segregation. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 41(1), 49–60.
69.
PizarroJSteniusV. K. M. (2004). Supermax prisons: Their rise, current practices, and effect on inmates. The Prison Journal, 84(2), 248–264.
70.
PizarroJ.ZgobaK. M.HaugebrookS. (2014). Supermax and recidivism: An examination of the covariates among a sample of supermax ex-inmates. The Prison Journal, 94(2), 180–197.
71.
PrattT. (2018). Addicted to incarceration: Corrections policy and the politics of misinformation in the United States (2nd ed.). Sage.
72.
ReiterK. A. (2012). The most restrictive alternative: A litigation history of solitary confinement in U.S. prisons, 1960–2006. Studies in Law, Politics and Society, 57, 71–124.
73.
RhodesL. A. (2004). Total confinement: Madness and reason in the maximum-security prison. University of California Press.
74.
RichardsS. C. (Ed.). (2015). The Marion experiment: Long-term solitary confinement and the supermax movement. Southern Illinois University Press.
75.
RivelandC. (1999). Supermax prisons: Overview and general considerations. National Institute of Corrections.
76.
RocheleauA. M. (2013). An empirical exploration of the “pains of imprisonment” and the level of prison misconduct and violence. Criminal Justice Review, 38(3), 354–374.
77.
RossiP. H.LipseyM. W.FreemanH. E. (2004). Evaluation: A systematic approach (7th ed.). Sage.
78.
SchlesingerS. (1986). State and Federal prisoners, 1925–85. Bureau of Justice Statistics.
79.
SeversonR. E. (2019). Gender differences in mental health, institutional misconduct, and disciplinary segregation. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 46(12), 1719–1737.
80.
ShalevS. (2009). Supermax: Controlling risk through solitary confinement. Willan.
81.
SimonJ. (2000). The “society of captives” in the era of hyper-incarceration. Theoretical Criminology, 4(3), 285–308.
82.
SmithP. S. (2006). The effects of solitary confinement on prison inmates: A brief history and review of the literature. Crime and Justice, 24(1), 441–528.
83.
SteinerB.CainC. M. (2016). The relationship between inmate misconduct, institutional violence, and administrative segregation. In GarciaM. (Ed.), Restrictive housing in the U.S. (pp. 165–197). National Institute of Justice.
84.
SuedfeldP.RamirezC.DeatonJ.Baker-BrownG. (1982). Reactions and attributes of prisoners in solitary confinement. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 9(3), 303–340.
85.
SundtJ. (2016). The effect of administrative segregation on prison order and organizational culture. In GarciaM. (Ed.), Restrictive housing in the U.S. (pp. 297–330). National Institute of Justice.
86.
SundtJ.CastellanoT. C.BriggsC. (2008). The sociopolitical context of prison violence and its control: A case study of supermax and its effect in Illinois. The Prison Journal, 88(1), 94–122.
87.
SykesG. M. (1958). The society of captives: A study of maximum security prison. Princeton University Press.
88.
TochH. (1992). Living in prison: The ecology of survival. Free Press.
89.
TuranovicJ. J.RodriguezN.PrattT. C. (2012). The collateral consequences of incarceration revisited: A qualitative analysis of the effects on caregivers of children of incarcerated parents. Criminology, 50(4), 913–959.
90.
UgelvikT. (2014). Paternal pains of imprisonment: Incarcerated fathers, ethnic minority masculinity and resistance narratives. Punishment and Society, 16(2), 152–168.
91.
VaughnM. S. (1993). Listening to the experts: A national study of correctional administrators’ responses to prison overcrowding. Criminal Justice Review, 18(1), 12–25.
92.
WaltersG. D. (2018). Checking the math: Do restrictive housing and mental health need add up to psychological deterioration?Criminal Justice and Behavior, 45(9), 1347–1362.
93.
WardD. A.WerlichT. G. (2003). Alcatraz and Marion: Evaluating super-maximum custody. Punishment and Society, 5(1), 53–75.
94.
WooldredgeJ. D.SmithP. (Eds.). (2018). The Oxford handbook on prisons and imprisonment. Oxford University Press.
