Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

A signature feature of the get-tough era in American corrections has been the proliferation of restrictive housing (RH). Although sometimes equated with solitary confinement, this housing encompasses a variety of distinct forms of incarceration. They are unified by an emphasis on restricted movement and privileges—yet vary in their design and uses. Despite that fact, little is known about the prevalence of different forms of housing. To address this research gap, we use a case study of Florida policy and administrative records data to illuminate the variety of RH types and the varying prevalence of each. We then discuss the implications of the findings for the study of RH uses and impacts and for policy.

Keywords

restrictive housing solitary confinement prevalence variation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Arizona Department of Corrections, Rehabilitation & Reentry. (2021). Department orders index. https://corrections.az.gov/reports-documents/adcrr-policies/department-orders-index

Association of State Correctional Administrators and the Arthur Liman Public Interest Program [ASCA-Liman]. (2016). Aiming to reduce time-in-cell: Reports from correctional systems on the numbers of prisoners in restricted housing and on the potential of policy changes to bring about reforms. Yale Law School. https://law.yale.edu/sites/default/files/area/center/liman/document/aimingtoreducetic.pdf

Beck

A. J.

(2015). Use of restrictive housing in U.S. prisons and jails, 2011-12. Bureau of Justice Statistics. https://bjs.ojp.gov/content/pub/pdf/urhuspj1112.pdf

Butler

H. D.

Griffin

O. H.

Johnson

W. W.

(2013). What makes you the “worst of the worst”? An examination of state policies defining supermaximum confinement. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 24(6), 676–694. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403412465715

California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. (2021). Operations manual. https://www.cdcr.ca.gov/regulations/wp-content/uploads/sites/171/2021/05/DOM_2021_ADA.pdf

Carson

A. E.

(2020). Prisoners in 2019. Bureau of Justice Statistics. https://bjs.ojp.gov/content/pub/pdf/p19.pdf

Cochran

J. C.

Toman

E. L.

Mears

D. P.

Bales

W. D.

(2018). Solitary confinement as punishment: Examining in-prison sanctioning disparities. Justice Quarterly, 35(3), 381–411. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2017.1308541

Collins

W. C.

(2004). Supermax prisons and the constitution: Liability concerns in the extended control unit. National Institute of Corrections. https://nicic.gov/supermax-prisons-and-constitution-liability-concerns-extended-control-unit

Correctional Leaders Association and the Arthur Liman Center for Public Interest Law [CLA-Liman]. (2020). Time-in-cell 2019: A snapshot of restrictive housing based on a nationwide survey of U.S. prison systems. Yale Law School. https://law.yale.edu/sites/default/files/area/center/liman/document/time-in-cell_2019.pdf

10.

Digard

Vanko

Sullivan

(2018). Rethinking restrictive housing: Lessons from five U.S. jail and prison systems. Vera Institute. https://www.vera.org/downloads/publications/rethinking-restrictive-housing-report.pdf

11.

Florida Administrative Code, §33-601.306: Disciplinary Team and Hearing Officer. https://www.flrules.org/gateway/RuleNo.asp?title=CLASSIFICATION%20AND%20CENTRAL%20RECORDS&ID=33-601.306

12.

Florida Administrative Code, §33-601.307: Disciplinary Hearings. https://www.flrules.org/gateway/RuleNo.asp?title=CLASSIFICATION%20AND%20CENTRAL%20RECORDS&ID=33-601.307

13.

Florida Administrative Code, §33-601.314: Rules of Prohibited Conduct and Penalties for Infractions. https://www.flrules.org/gateway/RuleNo.asp?title=CLASSIFICATION%20AND%20CENTRAL%20RECORDS&ID=33-601.314

14.

Florida Administrative Code, §33-601.800: Close Management. https://www.flrules.org/gateway/ruleNo.asp?id=33-601.800

15.

Florida Administrative Code, §33-601.820: Maximum Management. https://www.flrules.org/gateway/ruleNo.asp?id=33-601.820

16.

Florida Administrative Code, §33-602.220: Administrative Confinement. https://www.flrules.org/gateway/ruleNo.asp?id=33-602.220

17.

Florida Administrative Code, §33-602.221: Protective Management. https://www.flrules.org/gateway/ruleNo.asp?id=33-602.221

18.

Florida Administrative Code, §33-602.222: Disciplinary Confinement. https://www.flrules.org/gateway/ruleNo.asp?id=33-602.222

19.

Frost

N. A.

Monteiro

C. E.

(2016). Administrative segregation in U.S. prisons. In Garcia

(Ed.), Restrictive housing in the U.S (pp. 1–48). National Institute of Justice.

20.

Garcia

(Ed.). (2016). Restrictive housing in the U.S. National Institute of Justice.

21.

Helmus

L. M.

Johnson

Harris

A. J. R.

(2019). Developing and validating a tool to predict placements in administrative segregation: Predictive accuracy with inmates, including indigenous and female inmates. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 25(4), 284–302. https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000201

22.

Kaeble

(2021). Time served in state prison, 2018. Bureau of Justice Statistics. https://bjs.ojp.gov/content/pub/pdf/tssp18.pdf

23.

Kapoor

Trestman

(2016). Mental health effects of restrictive housing. In Garcia

(Ed.), Restrictive housing in the U.S (pp. 199–232). National Institute of Justice.

24.

King

R. D.

(1999). The rise and rise of supermax: An American solution in search of a problem? Punishment and Society, 1(2), 163–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/14624749922227766

25.

King

R. D.

(2018). A comparison of British and American policies for managing dangerous prisoners. In Wooldredge

Smith

(Eds.), Oxford handbook of prisons and imprisonment (pp. 367–393). Oxford University Press.

26.

Kurki

Morris

(2001). The purposes, practices, and problems of supermax prisons. Crime and Justice, 28, 385–424. https://doi.org/10.1086/652214

27.

Labrecque

R. M.

Campbell

C. M.

LaBranche

K. J.

Reddy

Zavita

K. R.

Morgan

R. D.

(2021). Administrative segregation: A review of state and federal policies. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 32(7), 718–739. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403421998440

28.

Labrecque

R. M.

Mears

D. P.

(2019). Prison system vs. critics’ views on the use of restrictive housing: Objective risk classification or ascriptive assignment? The Prison Journal, 99(2), 194–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885519825492

29.

Labrecque

R. M.

Smith

(2019a). Assessing the impact of time spent in restrictive housing confinement on subsequent measures of institutional adjustment among men in prison. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 46(10), 1445–1455. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854818824371

30.

Labrecque

R. M.

Smith

(2019b). The impact of restrictive housing on inmate behavior: A systematic review of the evidence. In Huebner

B. M.

Frost

N. A.

(Eds.), Handbook on the consequences of sentencing and punishment decisions (pp. 290–310). Routledge.

31.

Lovell

Johnson

L. C.

Cain

K. C.

(2007). Recidivism of supermax prisoners in Washington State. Crime & Delinquency, 53(4), 633–656. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128706296466

32.

Lovell

Tublitz

Reiter

Chesnut

Pifer

(2020). Opening the black box of solitary confinement through researcher-practitioner collaboration: A longitudinal analysis of prisoner and solitary populations in Washington State, 2002–2017. Justice Quarterly, 37(7), 1303–1321. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2020.1853800

33.

Mears

D. P.

(2006). Evaluating the effectiveness of supermax prisons. The Urban Institute. https://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/publication/50846/411326-Evaluating-the-Effectiveness-of-Supermax-Prisons.PDF

34.

Mears

D. P.

(2016). Critical research gaps in understanding the effects of prolonged time in restrictive housing on inmates and the institutional environment. In Garcia

(Ed.), Restrictive housing in the U.S (pp. 233–295). National Institute of Justice.

35.

Mears

D. P.

Bales

W. D.

(2010). Supermax housing: Placement, duration, and time to reentry. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38(4), 545–554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2010.04.025

36.

Mears

D. P.

Brown

J. M.

Cochran

J. C.

Siennick

S. E.

(2021). Extended solitary confinement for managing prison systems: Placement disparities and their implications. Justice Quarterly, 38, 1492–1518. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2021.1944286

37.

Mears

D. P.

Hughes

Pesta

G. B.

Bales

W. D.

Brown

J. M.

Cochran

J. C.

Wooldredge

(2019). The new solitary confinement? A conceptual framework for guiding and assessing research and policy on “restrictive housing.” Criminal Justice and Behavior, 46(10), 1427–1444. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854819852770

38.

Metcalf

Morgan

Oliker-Friedland

Resnik

Spiegel

Tae

Work

Holbrook

(2013). Administrative segregation, degrees of isolation, and incarceration: A national overview of state and federal correctional policies. Yale University.

39.

Morris

Rothman

D. J.

(Eds.). (1995). Oxford history of the prison. Oxford University Press.

40.

Morris

R. G.

(2016). Exploring the effect of exposure to short-term solitary confinement among violent prison inmates. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 32(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-015-9250-0

41.

Naday

Freilich

J. D.

Mellow

(2008). The elusive data on supermax confinement. The Prison Journal, 88(1), 69–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885507310978

42.

National Institute of Corrections. (1997). Supermax housing: A survey of current practice. https://s3.amazonaws.com/static.nicic.gov/Library/013722.pdf

43.

Office of Program Policy Analysis and Government Accountability. (2019). Florida correctional facilities: Report No. 19-08. https://oppaga.fl.gov/Documents/Reports/19-08.pdf

44.

Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections. (2020). Restrictive housing procedures. https://drc.ohio.gov/policies/inmate-management

45.

Pizarro

Stenius

V. M. K.

(2004). Supermax prisons: Their rise, current practices, and effect on inmates. The Prison Journal, 84(2), 248–264. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885504265080

46.

Pratt

(2018). Addicted to incarceration: Corrections policy and the politics of misinformation in the United States (2nd ed.). SAGE.

47.

Richards

S. C.

(Ed.). (2015). The Marion experiment: Long-term solitary confinement and the supermax movement. Southern Illinois University Press.

48.

Riveland

(1999). Supermax prisons: Overview and general considerations. National Institute of Corrections.

49.

Sakoda

R. T.

Simes

J. T.

(2021). Solitary confinement and the U.S. Prison boom. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 32(1), 66–102. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403419895315

50.

Shalev

(2009). Supermax: Controlling risk through solitary confinement. Willan.

51.

Smith

P. S.

(2006). The effects of solitary confinement on prison inmates: A brief history and review of the literature. Crime and Justice, 34(1), 441–528. https://doi.org/10.1086/500626

52.

Tasca

Turanovic

(2018). Examining race and gender disparities in restrictive housing placements. National Institute of Justice. https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/252062.pdf

53.

Toch

(2003). The contemporary relevance of early experiments with supermax reform. The Prison Journal, 83(2), 221–228. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885503083002007

54.

Travis

Western

Redburn

(Eds.). (2014). The growth of incarceration in the United States. The National Academies Press.

55.

U.S. Department of Justice. (2016). Report and recommendations concerning the use of restrictive housing. https://www.justice.gov/archives/dag/file/815551/download

56.

Ward

D. A.

Werlich

T. G.

(2003). Alcatraz and Marion: Evaluating super-maximum custody. Punishment & Society, 5(1), 53–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474503005001295

57.

Wildeman

Andersen

L. H.

(2020). Long-term consequences of being placed in disciplinary segregation. Criminology, 58(3), 423–453. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12241

58.

Zgoba

K. M.

Pizarro

J. M.

Salerno

L. M.

(2020). Assessing the impact of restrictive housing on inmate post-release criminal behavior. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 45, 102–125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-019-09496-2

What Do We Really Know About the Prevalence of Restrictive Housing? Illuminating the “Dark Figure” of the Most Extreme Forms of Incarceration

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References