This study aims to explore joint trajectories of parental supervision and cyberbullying for boys and girls, respectively. Drawing on a longitudinal sample of South Korean youth, we employ a latent group-based trajectory modeling approach to examine overlapping patterns of parental supervision and cyberbullying trajectories, and gender differences in the bivariate overlap. We found that boys with higher levels of parental supervision were more likely to be in the Noninvolved cyberbullying group, whereas girls with the highest level of parental supervision tended to engage in cyberbullying at an early age but soon desisted from it after the initial involvement. Results suggest that effects of parental supervision on cyberbullying may vary across gender.
AtikG.GüneriO. Y. (2013). Bullying and victimization: Predictive role of individual, parental, and academic factors. School Psychology International, 34(6), 658–673. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034313479699
2.
BeckmanL.HagquistC.HellströmL. (2013). Discrepant gender patterns for cyberbullying and traditional bullying—An analysis of Swedish adolescent data. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(5), 1896–1903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.03.010
3.
BjörkqvistK. (1994). Sex differences in physical, verbal, and indirect aggression: A review of recent research. Sex Roles, 30(3–4), 177–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01420988
4.
BonannoR. A.HymelS. (2013). Cyber bullying and internalizing difficulties: Above and beyond the impact of traditional forms of bullying. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42(5), 685–697. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-013-9937-1
5.
BumpusM. F.CrouterA. C.McHaleS. M. (2001). Parental autonomy granting during adolescence: Exploring gender differences in context. Developmental Psychology, 37(2), 163–173. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.37.2.163
6.
BurkeP. J. (1989). Gender identity, sex, and school performance. Social Psychology Quarterly, 52(2), 159–169.
7.
CassidyW.FaucherC.JacksonM. (2013). Cyberbullying among youth: A comprehensive review of current international research and its implications and application to policy and practice. School Psychology International, 34(6), 575–612. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034313479697
8.
CernkovichS. A.GiordanoP. C. (1987). Family relationships and delinquency. Criminology, 25(2), 295–321.
9.
ChangF.-C.ChiuC.-H.MiaoN.-F.ChenP.-H.LeeC.-M.ChiangJ.-T.PanY.-C. (2015). The relationship between parental mediation and internet addiction among adolescents, and the association with cyberbullying and depression. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 57, 21–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2014.11.013
10.
CraigW.Harel-FischY.Fogel-GrinvaldH.DostalerS.HetlandJ.Simons-MortonB.. . . PickettW. (2009). A cross-national profile of bullying and victimization among adolescents in 40 countries. International Journal of Public Health, 54(Suppl. 2), 216–224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-009-5413-9
11.
CrickN. R.CasasJ. F.NelsonD. A. (2002). Toward a more comprehensive understanding of peer maltreatment: Studies of relational victimization. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11(3), 98–101.
12.
CrosnoeR.EricksonK. G.DornbuschS. M. (2002). Protective functions of family relationships and school factors on the deviant behavior of adolescent boys and girls. Youth & Society, 33(4), 515–544. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X02033004002
13.
CrouterA. C.HeadM. R. (2002). Parental monitoring and knowledge of children. In BornsteinM. H. (Ed.), Handbook of parenting (pp. 461–483). Lawrence Erlbaum.
DilmaçB. (2009). Psychological needs as a predictor of cyber bullying: A preliminary report on college students. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 9(3), 1307–1325.
17.
DingQ.LiD.ZhouY.DongH.LuoJ. (2017). Perceived parental monitoring and adolescent internet addiction: A moderated mediation model. Addictive Behaviors, 74, 48–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.05.033
18.
DishionT. J.McMahonR. J. (1998). Parental monitoring and the prevention of child and adolescent problem behavior: A conceptual and empirical formulation. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 1(1), 61–75.
19.
ElsaesserC.RussellB.OhannessianC. M.PattonD. (2017). Parenting in a digital age: A review of parents’ role in preventing adolescent cyberbullying. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 35, 62–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2017.06.004
20.
GottfredsonM.HirschiT. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford University Press.
21.
GradingerP.StrohmeierD.SpielC. (2012). Motives for bullying others in cyberspace: A study on bullies and bully-victims in Austria. In LiQ.CrossD.SmithP. K. (Eds.), Cyberbullying in the global playground: Research from international perspectives (pp. 263–284). Wiley-Blackwell.
22.
HaganL. K.KuebliJ. (2007). Mothers’ and fathers’ socialization of preschoolers’ physical risk taking. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 28(1), 2–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2006.10.007
23.
HayC.MeldrumR.MannK. (2010). Traditional bullying, cyber bullying, and deviance: A general strain theory approach. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 26, 130–147. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043986209359557
24.
HeimerK. (1996). Gender, interaction, and delinquency: Testing a theory of differential social control. Social Psychology Quarterly, 59(1), 39–61. https://doi.org/10.2307/2787118
25.
HindujaS.PatchinJ. W. (2007). Offline consequences of online victimization: School violence and delinquency. Journal of School Violence, 6(3), 89–112. https://doi.org/10.1300/J202v06n03
HirschiT. (1969). Causes of delinquency. University of California Press.
28.
HuangD. Y. C.MurphyD. A.HserY.-I. (2011). Parental monitoring during early adolescence deters adolescent sexual initiation: Discrete-time survival mixture analysis. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 20(4), 511–520. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-010-9418-z
29.
JackmanM. R. (1994). The velvet glove: Paternalism and conflict in gender, class, and race relations. University of California Press.
30.
JangH.SongJ.KimR. (2014). Does the offline bully-victimization influence cyberbullying behavior among youths? Application of General Strain Theory. Computers in Human Behavior, 31(1), 85–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.007
31.
KimJ.SongH.JenningsW. G. (2017). A distinct form of deviance or a variation of bullying? Examining the developmental pathways and motives of cyberbullying compared with traditional bullying in South Korea. Crime & Delinquency, 63(12), 1600–1625. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128716675358
32.
KowalskiR. M.GiumettiG. W.SchroederA. N.LattannerM. R. (2014). Bullying in the digital age: A critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth. Psychological Bulletin, 140(4), 1073–1137. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035618
KowalskiR. M.LimberS. P.AgatstonP. W. (2012). Cyberbullying: Bullying in the digital age (2nd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.
35.
KuhnE. S.LairdR. D. (2011). Individual differences in early adolescents’ beliefs in the legitimacy of parental authority. Developmental Psychology, 47(5), 1353–1365. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024050
36.
LairdR. D.CrissM. M.PettitG. S.DodgeK. A.BatesJ. E. (2008). Parents’ monitoring knowledge attenuates the link between antisocial friends and adolescent delinquent behavior. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 36(3), 299–310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-007-9178-4
37.
LeeY.KimJ. (2017). An examination of victimization trajectories among a sample of South Korean adolescents: Risk and protective factors. Crime & Delinquency, 63(11), 1434–1457. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128716634103
38.
LiQ. (2006). Cyberbullying in schools: A research of gender differences. School Psychology International, 27(2), 157–170. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034306064547
39.
LowS.EspelageD. (2013). Differentiating cyber bullying perpetration from non-physical bullying: Commonalities across race, individual, and family predictors. Psychology of Violence, 3(1), 39–52. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030308
40.
MoffittT. E. (1993). Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior: A developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review, 100, 674–701. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.100.4.674
41.
MoffittT. E.CaspiA.RutterM.SilvaP. A. (2001). Sex differences in antisocial behaviour: Conduct disorder, delinquency, and violence in the Dunedin Longitudinal Study. Cambridge University Press.
42.
NaginD. S. (2005). Group-based modeling of development. Harvard University Press.
43.
NelsonS. E.Van RyzinM. J.DishionT. J. (2015). Alcohol, marijuana, and tobacco use trajectories from age 12 to 24 years: Demographic correlates and young adult substance use problems. Development and Psychopathology, 27, 253–277. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579414000650
44.
OlweusD. (1994). Bullying at school: Basic facts and effects of a school based intervention program. The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 35(7), 1171–1190. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1994.tb01229.x
45.
PeplerD. J.JiangD.CraigW. M.ConnollyJ. (2008). Developmental trajectories of bullying and associated factors. Child Development, 79(2), 325–338. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01128.x
46.
PeplerD. J.JiangD.CraigW. M.ConnollyJ. (2010). Developmental trajectories of girls’ and boys’ delinquency and associated problems. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 38(7), 1033–1044. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-010-9389-y
PiqueroA. R.MonahanK. C.GlasheenC.SchubertC. A.MulveyE. P. (2013). Does time matter? Comparing trajectory concordance and covariate association using time-based and age-based assessments. Crime & Delinquency, 59(5), 738–763.
49.
SampsonR. J.LaubJ. H. (2003). Life-course desisters? Trajectories of crime among delinquent boys followed to age 70. Criminology, 41(3), 555–592.
50.
ShapkaJ. D.LawD. M. (2013). Does one size fit all? Ethnic differences in parenting behaviors and motivations for adolescent engagement in cyberbullying. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42(5), 723–738. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-013-9928-2
51.
SmithD. A.PaternosterR. (1987). The gender gap in theories of deviance: Issues and evidence. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 24, 140–172.
52.
SmokowskiP. R.EvansC. B. R.CotterK. L. (2014). The differential impacts of episodic, chronic, and cumulative physical bullying and cyberbullying: The effects of victimization on the school experiences, social support, and mental health of rural adolescents. Violence and Victims, 29(6), 1029–1046. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.VV-D-13-00076
TokunagaR. S. (2010). Following you home from school: A critical review and synthesis of research on cyberbullying victimization. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(3), 277–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2009.11.014
55.
WangJ.IannottiR. J.NanselT. R. (2009). School bullying among adolescents in the United States: Physical, verbal, relational, and cyber. Journal of Adolescent Health, 45(4), 368–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2009.03.021
56.
WangJ.NanselT. R.IannottiR. J. (2011). Cyber and traditional bullying: Differential association with depression. Journal of Adolescent Health, 48(4), 415–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.07.012
57.
WebbJ. A.BrayJ. H.GetzJ. G.AdamsG. (2002). Gender, perceived parental monitoring, and behavioral adjustment: Influences on adolescent alcohol use. The American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 72(3), 392–400. https://doi.org/10.1037/0002-9432.72.3.392
XieH.DrabickD. A. G.ChenD. (2011). Developmental trajectories of aggression from late childhood through adolescence: Similarities and differences across gender. Aggressive Behavior, 37(5), 387–404. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20404
62.
YbarraM. L.MitchellK. J. (2004). Online aggressor/targets, aggressors, and targets: A comparison of associated youth characteristics. The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45(7), 1308–1316. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.00328.x
