Within the large body of literature on racial/ethnic disparities in criminal sentencing, some research has demonstrated that these relationships are conditional upon various legally relevant case characteristics, including the type of offense for which the defendants are sentenced. To date, however, few studies have explored the potential moderating effects of different violent crimes. Using data from Florida (N = 186,885), the findings from these analyses indicate that Black–White sentencing disparities are particularly pronounced for manslaughter, robbery/carjacking, arson, and resisting arrest with violence. While Hispanic ethnicity exerts limited effects on sentencing outcomes generally, Hispanics are particularly disadvantaged in manslaughter cases. Relative to minority defendants, White offenders receive harsher sentences for sexual battery, other sex offenses, and abuse of children.
AlbonettiC. A. (1991). An integration of theories to explain judicial discretion. Social Problems, 38, 247–266.
2.
AlbonettiC. A. (1997). Sentencing under the federal sentencing guidelines: Effects of defendant characteristics, guilty pleas, and departures on sentence outcomes for drug offenses, 1991-1992. Law & Society Review, 31, 789–822.
3.
AuerhahnK. (2007). Just another crime? Examining disparity in homicide sentencing. The Sociological Quarterly, 48, 277–313.
4.
BachmanR. (1994). Violence against women: A national crime victimization survey report. Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department of Justice.
5.
BaldusD. C.WoodworthG.PulaskiC. A.Jr. (1985). Monitoring and evaluating contemporary death sentencing systems: Lessons from Georgia. University of California-Davis Law Review, 18, 1375–1407.
6.
BarnettA. (1985). Some distribution patterns for the Georgia death sentence. University of California-Davis Law Review, 18, 1327–1374.
7.
BaumerE. P. (2013). Reassessing and redirecting research on race and sentencing. Justice Quarterly, 30, 231–261.
8.
BontragerS.BalesW.ChiricosT. (2005). Race, ethnicity, threat and the labeling of convicted felons. Criminology, 43, 589–622.
9.
BridgesG. S.CrutchfieldR. D. (1988). Law, social standing and racial disparities in imprisonment. Social Forces, 66, 699–724.
10.
BridgesG. S.SteenS. (1998). Racial disparities in official assessments of juvenile offenders: Attributional stereotypes as mediating mechanisms. American Sociological Review, 63, 554–570.
11.
CaravelisC.ChiricosT.BalesW. (2011). Static and dynamic indicators of minority threat in sentencing outcomes: A multi-level analysis. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 27, 405–425.
12.
CaravelisC.ChiricosT.BalesW. (2013). Race, ethnicity, threat, and the designation of career offenders. Justice Quarterly, 30, 869–894.
13.
CrawfordC.ChiricosT.KleckG. (1998). Race, racial threat, and sentencing of habitual offenders. Criminology, 36, 481–512.
14.
CrowM. S.JohnsonK. A. (2008). Race, ethnicity, and habitual-offender sentencing: A multilevel analysis of individual and contextual threat. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 19, 63–83.
15.
CurryT. R. (2010). The conditional effects of victim and offender ethnicity and victim gender on sentences for non-capital cases. Punishment & Society, 12, 438–462.
16.
DemuthS.SteffensmeierD. (2004). Ethnicity effects on sentence outcomes in large urban courts: Comparisons among White, Black, and Hispanic defendants. Social Science Quarterly, 85, 994–1011.
17.
EngenR. L.GaineyR. R. (2000). Modeling the effects of legally relevant and extralegal factors under sentencing guidelines: The rules have changed. Criminology, 38, 1207–1230.
18.
EngenR. L.GaineyR. R.CrutchfieldR. D.WeisJ. G. (2003). Discretion and disparity under sentencing guidelines: The role of departures and structured sentencing alternatives. Criminology, 41, 99–130.
19.
FarrellR. A.HolmesM. D. (1991). The social and cognitive structure of legal decision-making. The Sociological Quarterly, 32, 529–542.
20.
FranklinT. W. (2018). The state of race and punishment in America: Is justice really blind?Journal of Criminal Justice, 59, 18–28.
21.
FreiburgerT. L.HilinskiC. M. (2013). An examination of the interactions of race and gender on sentencing decisions using a trichotomous dependent variable. Crime & Delinquency, 59, 59–86.
22.
FreiburgerT. L.JordanK. L.Hilinski-RosickC. M. (2019). A multivariate analysis of incarceration and sentence length decisions for older defendants. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 30, 1064–1085.
23.
GriffinT.WooldredgeJ. (2006). Sex-based disparities in felony dispositions before versus after sentencing reform in Ohio. Criminology, 44, 893–923.
24.
HarringtonM. P.SpohnC. (2007). Defining sentence type: Further evidence against use of the total incarceration variable. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 44, 36–63.
25.
HauserW.PeckJ. H. (2017). The intersection of crime seriousness, discretion, and race: A test of the liberation hypothesis. Justice Quarterly, 34, 166–192.
26.
HawkinsD. F. (1987). Beyond anomalies: Rethinking the conflict perspective on race and criminal punishment. Social Forces, 65, 719–745.
27.
HesterR.HartmanT. K. (2017). Conditional race disparities in criminal sentencing: A test of the liberation hypothesis from a non-guidelines state. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 33, 77–100.
28.
HolleranD.SpohnC. (2004). On the use of the total incarceration variable in sentencing research. Criminology, 42, 211–240.
29.
JacksonH. F.GlassC.HopeS. (1987). A functional analysis of recidivistic arson. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 26, 175–185.
30.
JohnsonB. D. (2003). Racial and ethnic disparities in sentencing departures across modes of conviction. Criminology, 41, 449–490.
31.
JohnsonB. D. (2006). The multilevel context of criminal sentencing: Integrating judge- and county-level influences. Criminology, 44, 259–298.
32.
JohnsonB. D.BetsingerS. (2009). Punishing the “model minority”: Asian-American criminal sentencing outcomes in federal district courts. Criminology, 47, 1045–1090.
33.
JordanK. L.FreiburgerT. L. (2015). The effect of race/ethnicity on sentencing: Examining sentence type, jail length, and prison length. Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice, 13, 179–196.
34.
KalvenH.ZeiselH. (1966). The American jury. Little, Brown.
35.
KauttP.SpohnC. (2002). Crack-ing down on Black drug offenders? Testing for interactions among offenders’ race, drug type, and sentencing strategy in federal drug sentences. Justice Quarterly, 19, 1-35.
36.
KimB.SpohnC.HedbergE. C. (2015). Federal sentencing as a complex collaborative process: Judges, prosecutors, judge-prosecutor dyads, and disparity in sentencing. Criminology, 53, 597–623.
37.
KingsnorthR. F.MacIntoshR. C.WentworthJ. (1999). Sexual assault: The role of prior relationship and victim characteristics in case processing. Justice Quarterly, 16, 275–302.
38.
KurlychekM. C.JohnsonB. D. (2010). Juvenility and punishment: Sentencing juveniles in adult criminal court. Criminology, 48, 725–758.
39.
KutateladzeB. L.AndiloroN. R.JohnsonB. D.SpohnC. C. (2014). Cumulative disadvantage: Examining racial and ethnic disparity in prosecution and sentencing. Criminology, 52, 514–551.
40.
LehmannP. S. (2018). Sentencing other people’s children: The intersection of race, gender, and juvenility in the adult criminal court. Journal of Crime and Justice, 41, 553–572.
41.
LongJ. S.FreeseJ. (2006). Regression models for categorical dependent variables using Stata (2nd ed.). Stata Press.
42.
MaxwellC. D.RobinsonA. L.PostL. A. (2003). The impact of race on the adjudication of sexual assault and other violent crimes. Journal of Criminal Justice, 31, 523–538.
43.
MietheT. D. (1987). Stereotypical conceptions and criminal processing: The case of the victim-offender relationship. Justice Quarterly, 4, 571–593.
44.
MietheT. D.MooreC. A. (1986). Racial differences in criminal processing: The consequences of model selection on conclusions about differential treatment. The Sociological Quarterly, 27, 217–237.
45.
MitchellO. (2005). A meta-analysis of race and sentencing research: Explaining the inconsistencies. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 21, 439–466.
46.
MorganR. E. (2017). Race and Hispanic origin of victims and offenders, 2012-15. Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department of Justice.
47.
MustardD. B. (2001). Racial, ethnic, and gender disparities in sentencing: Evidence from the U.S. federal courts. The Journal of Law & Economics, 44, 285–314.
48.
MyersM. A. (1989). Symbolic policy and the sentencing of drug offenders. Law & Society Review, 23, 295–315.
49.
NardulliP. F.EisensteinJ.FlemmingR. B. (1988). The tenor of justice: Criminal courts and the guilty plea process. University of Illinois Press.
50.
O’BrienR. M. (1987). The interracial nature of violent crimes: A reexamination. American Journal of Sociology, 92, 817–835.
51.
SampsonR. J. (1984). Group size, heterogeneity, and intergroup conflict: A test of Blau’s inequality and heterogeneity. Social Forces, 62, 618–639.
52.
SampsonR. J.LauritsenJ. L. (1997). Racial and ethnic disparities in crime and criminal justice in the United States. Crime and Justice, 21, 311–374.
53.
SimonL. M. (1996). Legal treatment of the victim-offender relationship in crimes of violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 11, 94–106.
54.
SmithB. L.DamphousseK. R. (1998). Terrorism, politics, and punishment: A test of structural-contextual theory and the “liberation hypothesis.”Criminology, 36, 67–92.
55.
SorensenJ. R.WallaceD. H. (1995). Capital punishment in Missouri: Examining the issue of racial disparity. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 13, 61–80.
56.
SpohnC. (2000). Thirty years of sentencing reform: The quest for a racially neutral sentencing process. Criminal Justice, 3, 427–501.
57.
SpohnC. (2015). Evolution of sentencing research. Criminology & Public Policy, 14, 225–232.
58.
SpohnC.CederblomJ. (1991). Race and disparities in sentencing: A test of the liberation hypothesis. Justice Quarterly, 8, 305–327.
59.
SpohnC.DeLoneM. (2000). When does race matter? An analysis of the conditions under which race affects sentence severity. Sociology of Crime, Law and Deviance, 2, 3–37.
60.
SpohnC.SpearsJ. (1996). The effect of offender and victim characteristics on sexual assault case processing decisions. Justice Quarterly, 13, 649–679.
61.
SteenS.EngenR. L.GaineyR. R. (2005). Images of danger and culpability: Racial stereotyping, case processing, and criminal sentencing. Criminology, 43, 435–468.
62.
SteffensmeierD.DemuthS. (2000). Ethnicity and sentencing outcomes in U.S. federal courts: Who is punished more harshly?American Sociological Review, 65, 705–729.
SteffensmeierD.Painter-DavisN.UlmerJ. (2017). Intersectionality of race, ethnicity, gender, and age on criminal punishment. Sociological Perspectives, 60, 810–833.
65.
SteffensmeierD.UlmerJ.KramerJ. (1998). The interaction of race, gender, and age in criminal sentencing: The punishment cost of being young, Black, and male. Criminology, 36, 763–798.
66.
SudnowD. (1965). Normal crimes: Sociological features of the penal code in a public defender office. Social Problems, 12, 255–276.
67.
SwigertV. L.FarrellR. A. (1977). Normal homicides and the law. American Sociological Review, 42, 16–32.
68.
UlmerJ. T. (2012). Recent developments and new directions in sentencing research. Justice Quarterly, 29, 1–40.
69.
UlmerJ. T.KramerJ. H. (1996). Court communities under sentencing guidelines: Dilemmas of formal rationality and sentencing disparity. Criminology, 34, 383–408.
70.
UlmerJ. T.LaskorunskyJ. A. (2016). The role of juvenile adjudications in the disproportional incarceration of African-American and Hispanic defendants. Journal of Crime and Justice, 39, 9–27.
71.
UnneverJ. D.HembroffL. A. (1988). The prediction of racial/ethnic sentencing disparities: An expectation states approach. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 25, 53–82.
72.
WangX.MearsD. P.SpohnC.DarioL. (2013). Assessing the differential effects of race and ethnicity on sentence outcomes under different sentencing systems. Crime & Delinquency, 59, 87–114.
73.
WarrenP.ChiricosT.BalesW. (2012). The imprisonment penalty for young Black and Hispanic males: A crime-specific analysis. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 49, 56–80.
74.
WilliamsM. R.DemuthS.HolcombJ. E. (2007). Understanding the influence of victim gender in death penalty cases: The importance of victim race, sex-related victimization, and jury decision making. Criminology, 45, 865–891.
75.
WilliamsR. (2012). Using the margins command to estimate and interpret adjusted predictions and marginal effects. The Stata Journal, 12, 308–331.
76.
WooldredgeJ.FrankJ.GouletteN.TravisL.III. (2015). Is the impact of cumulative disadvantage on sentencing greater for Black defendants?Criminology & Public Policy, 14, 187–223.
77.
WordD. L.PerkinsR. C. (1996). Building a Spanish surname list for the 1990’s—A new approach to an old problem. Population Division, U.S. Census Bureau.
78.
ZatzM. S. (1987). The changing forms of racial/ethnic biases in sentencing. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 24, 69–92.
79.
ZatzM. S. (2000). The convergence of race, ethnicity, gender, and class on court decision making: Looking toward the 21st century. Criminal Justice, 3, 503–552.
