Using a representative household survey data, we examine the generality of self-control, the predictive strengths of sanction threats, and the interaction between criminal propensity and sanction threats in explaining criminal probability. Although the data confirm the generality of self-control predictions of deviant/criminal behavior in the Turkish cultural context, the effects appear quite modest and contingent on fear of informal sanctions and temptation. Consistent with the findings of recent studies, a small interaction between self-control and sanction threats suggests that deterrence is greatest among individuals with weak self-control. However, there is no interaction between sanction threats and temptation, suggesting that sanction fear is equally likely among individuals regardless of their level of temptation.
AikenL. S.WestS. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
2.
AntonaccioO.BotchkovarE. V.TittleC. R. (2011). Attracted to crime: Exploration of criminal motivation among respondents in three European cities. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38, 1200-1221.
3.
AntonaccioO.TittleC. R. (2008). Morality, self-control, and crime. Criminology, 46, 479-510.
4.
BaierC. J.WrightB. R. E. (2001). “If you love me, keep my commandments”: A meta-analysis of the effect of religion on crime. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 38, 3-21.
5.
BendaB. B. (2002). Religion and violent offenders in boot camp: A structural equation model. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 39, 91-121.
6.
BotchkovarE. V.TittleC. R. (2005). Crime, shame and reintegration in Russia. Theoretical Criminology, 9, 401-442.
7.
BrauerJ. R.TittleC. R.AntonaccioO.IslamM. Z. (2012). Childhood experiences and self-control. Deviant Behavior, 33, 375-392.
8.
CohnE. G.FarringtonD. P. (2012). Scholarly influence in criminology and criminal justice journals in 1990–2005. Criminal Justice Review, 37, 360-383.
9.
CretacciM. A.RiveraC. J.DingF. (2009). Self-control and Chinese deviance: Behind the bamboo curtain. International Journal of Criminal Justice Sciences, 4, 131-143.
10.
GottfredsonM. R. (2009). The empirical status of control theory. In CullenF. T.WrightJ. P.BlevinsK. R. (Eds.), Taking stock: The status of criminological theory (pp. 77-100). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
11.
GottfredsonM. R.HirschiT. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
12.
GrasmickH. G.BursikR. J. (1990). Conscience, significant others, and rational choice: Extending the deterrence model. Law & Society Review, 24, 837-861.
13.
GrasmickH. G.TittleC. R.BursikR. J.ArneklevB. J. (1993). Testing the core empirical implications of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 30, 5-29.
14.
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
15.
HirschiT.GottfredsonM. (1983). Age and the explanation of crime. The American Journal of Sociology, 89, 552-584.
16.
HirschiT.GottfredsonM. (1993). Commentary: Testing the general theory of crime. The Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 30, 47-54.
17.
HirtenlehnerH.PauwelsL. J. R.MeskoG. (2014). Is the effect of perceived deterrence on juvenile offending contingent on the level of self-control? Results from three countries. British Journal of Criminology, 54, 128-150.
18.
LatimoreT. L.TittleC. R.GrasmickH. G. (2006). Childrearing, self-control, and crime: Additional evidence. Sociological Inquiry, 76, 343-371.
19.
MarcusB.SchulerH.QuellP.HümpfnerG. (2002). Measuring counterproductivity: Development and initial validation of a German self-report questionnaire. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 10, 18-35.
20.
NaginD. S.PaternosterR. (1993). Enduring individual differences and rational choice theories of crime. Law & Society Review, 27, 467-496.
21.
NaginD. S.PaternosterR. (1994). Personal capital and social control: The deterrence implications of a theory of individual differences in criminal offending. Criminology, 32, 581-606.
22.
NaginD. S.PogarskyG. (2001). Integrating celerity, impulsivity, and extra-legal sanction threats into a model of general deterrence: Theory and evidence. Criminology, 39, 865-892.
23.
ÖzbayÖ.KöksoyO. (2009). Is low self-control associated with violence among youths in Turkey?International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 53, 145-167.
24.
ÖzdemirY.VazsonyiA. T.CokF. (2013). Parenting process and aggression: The role of self-control among Turkish adolescents. Journal of Adolescence, 36, 65-77.
25.
PauwelsL.WeermanF.BruinsmaG.BernascoW. (2011). Perceived sanction risk, individual propensity and adolescent offending: Assessing key findings from the deterrence literature in a Dutch sample. European Journal of Criminology, 8, 386-400.
26.
PiqueroA. R.PaternosterR.PogarskyG.LoughranT. (2011). Elaborating the individual difference component in deterrence theory. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 7, 335-360.
27.
PiqueroA. R.TibbettsS. (1996). Specifying the direct and indirect effects of low self-control and situational factors in offenders’ decision making: Toward a more complete model of rational offending. Justice Quarterly, 13, 481-510.
28.
PogarskyG. (2007). Deterrence and individual differences among convicted offenders. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 23, 59-74.
29.
RebellonC. J.StrausM. A.MedeirosR. (2008). Self-control in global perspective: An empirical assessment of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory within and across 32 national settings. European Journal of Criminology, 5, 331-361.
30.
RibeaudD.EisnerM. (2006). The “drug–crime link” from a self-control perspective: An empirical test in a Swiss youth sample. European Journal of Criminology, 3, 33-67.
31.
RomeroE.Gómez-FraguelaA.LuengoA.SobralJ. (2003). The self-control construct in the general theory of crime: An investigation in terms of personality psychology. Psychology, Crime & Law, 9, 61-86.
32.
SeipelC.EiflerS. (2010). Opportunities, rational choice, and self-control: On the interaction of person and situation in a general theory of crime. Crime & Delinquency, 56, 167-197.
33.
StaffordM.WarrM. (1993). A reconceptualization of general and specific deterrence. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 30, 123-135.
34.
SvenssonR.PauwelsL.WeermanF. M. (2010). Does the effect of self-control on adolescent offending vary by level of morality? A test in three countries. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37, 732-743.
35.
TittleC. R.AntonaccioO.BotchkovarE. (2012). Social learning, reinforcement and crime: Evidence from three European cities. Social Forces, 90, 863-890.
36.
TittleC. R.AntonaccioO.BotchkovarE.KranidiotiM. (2010). Expected utility, self-control, morality, and criminal probability. Social Science Research, 39, 1029-1046.
37.
TittleC. R.BotchkovarE. V. (2005a). The generality and hegemony of self-control theory: A comparison of Russian and US adults. Social Science Research, 34, 703-731.
38.
TittleC. R.BotchkovarE. V. (2005b). Self-control, criminal motivation and deterrence: An investigation using Russian respondents. Criminology, 43, 307-354.
39.
TittleC. R.PaternosterR. (2000). Social deviance and crime: An organizational and theoretical approach. Los Angeles, CA: Roxbury Publishing.
VazsonyiA. T.MikuškaJ.KelleyE. L. (2017). It’s time: A meta-analysis on the self-control-deviance link. Journal of Criminal Justice, 48, 48-63.
42.
WangG. T.QiaoH.HongS.ZhangJ. (2002). Adolescent social bond, self-control, and deviant behavior in China. International Journal of Contemporary Sociology, 39, 52-68.
43.
WardJ. T.GibsonC. L.BomanJ.LeiteW. L. (2010). Assessing the validity of the retrospective behavioral self-control scale: Is the general theory of crime stronger than the evidence suggests?Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37, 336-357.
44.
WikströmP.-O. H. (2006). Linking individual, setting, and acts of crime: Situational mechanisms and the explanation of crime. In WikströmP.-O. H.SampsonR. J. (Eds.), The explanation of crime: Contexts, mechanisms, and development (pp. 61-107). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
45.
WikströmP.-O. H.TseloniA.KarlisD. (2011). Do people comply with the law because they fear getting caught?European Journal of Criminology, 8, 401-420.
46.
WrightB. R. E.CaspiA.MoffittT. E.PaternosterR. (2004). Does the perceived risk of punishment deter criminally prone individuals? Rational choice, self-control, and crime. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 41, 180-213.
