Predictors of Physical and Dating Violence in Middle and High School Students in the United States

Abstract

Dating violence is a growing and prominent problem for today’s middle and high school students. Intimate partner violence, which can include physical, sexual, emotional, and psychological aggression, affects millions of individuals worldwide. This specific study will examine one age group affected by this rampant phenomenon: adolescents under the age of 18. The purpose of this study is to continue the examination of correlates of dating violence, specifically physical and sexual, through the analysis of data from the 2015 Youth Risk Behavior Survey and application of Routine Activities Theory. Results support hypotheses that the components of Routine Activities Theory are moderate to strong predictors of physical and sexual dating violence in adolescents.

Keywords

domestic violence quantitative theory

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alleyne

Coleman-Cowger

Crown

Gibbons

Vines

(2011). The effects of dating violence, substance use and risky sexual behavior among a diverse sample of Illinois youth. Journal of Adolescence, 34, 11-18.

Almeida

Johnson

Corliss

Molnar

Azrael

(2009). Emotional distress among LGBT youth: The influence of perceived discrimination based on sexual orientation. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 38(7), 1001-1014.

Bennet

Guran

Ramos

Margolin

(2011). College students’ electronic victimization in friendships and dating relationships: Anticipated distress and associations with risky behaviors. Violence and Victims, 4, 410-429.

Black

Basile

Breiding

Smith

Walters

Merrick

. . . Stevens

(2011). The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey: 2010 Summary report. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Borrajo

Gamez-Guadix

Prereda

Calvete

(2015). The development and validation of the cyber dating abuse questionnaire among young couples. Computers in Human Behavior, 48, 358-365. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.063

Bossler

A. M.

Holt

T. J.

(2009). Online activities, guardianship, and malware infection: An examination of routine activities theory. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 3, 400-420.

Burke

Wallen

Vail-Smith

Knox

(2011). Using technology to control intimate partners: An exploratory study of college undergraduates. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 1162-1167.

Capaldi

Langhinrichsen-Rohling

(2012). Informing intimate partner violence prevention efforts: Dyadic, developmental, and contextual considerations. Prevention Science, 13, 323-328.

Cass

A. I.

(2007). Routine activities and sexual assault: An analysis of individual- and school-level factors. Violence and Victims, 22, 350-366.

10.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2016). Dating matters: Strategies to promote health teen relationships. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/DatingMatters/

11.

Chaveepojnkamjorn

Pichainarong

(2011). Current drinking and health-risk behaviors among male high school students in central Thailand. BMC Public Health, 14, Article 233.

12.

Child Trends. (2015). Dating. Retrieved from http://www.childtrends.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/73_Dating1.pdf

13.

Cohen

L. E.

Felson

(1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44, 588-608.

14.

Collins

Welsh

Furman

(2009). Adolescent romantic relationships. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 631-652.

15.

Cook

Williams

Guerra

Kim

Sadek

(2010). Predictors of bullying and victimization in childhood and adolescence: A meta-analytic investigation. School Psychology Quarterly, 25(2), 65-83.

16.

Foshee

McNaughton Reyes

H. L.

Ennett

S. T.

Suchindran

Mathias

J. P.

Karriker-Jaffe

K. J.

. . . Benefield

T. S.

(2011). Risk and protective factors distinguishing profiles of adolescent peer and dating violence perpetration. Journal of Adolescent Health, 48, 344-350.

17.

Goodenow

Szalacha

Robin

Westheimer

(2008). Dimensions of sexual orientation and HIV-related risk among adolescent females: Evidence from a statewide survey. American Journal of Public Health, 98, 1051-1058.

18.

Hinduja

Ingram

J. R.

(2008). Self-control and ethical beliefs on the social learning of intellectual property theft. Western Criminology Review, 9, 52–72.

19.

Hinduja

Patchin

J. W.

(2009). Bullying beyond the schoolyard: Preventing and responding to cyberbullying. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

20.

Hinduja

Patchin

J. W.

(2011). Electronic dating violence: A brief for educators and parents. Cyberbullying Research Center. Available from http://www.cyberbullying.us

21.

Hollis

Felson

Welsh

(2013). The capable guardian in Routine Activities Theory: A theoretical and conceptual reappraisal. Crime Prevention & Community Safety, 15, 65-79.

22.

Howard

Wang

Yan

(2007). Psychosocial factors associated with reports of physical dating violence among U.S. adolescent females. Adolescence, 42, 311-324.

23.

Igartua

Thombs

Burgos

Montoro

(2009). Concordance and discrepancy in sexual identity, attraction, and behavior among adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health, 45, 602-608.

24.

Jones

Raghavan

(2012). Sexual orientation, social support networks, and dating violence in an ethnically diverse group of college students. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Social Services, 24, 1-22.

25.

Juvonen

Graham

Schuster

(2003). Bullying among young adolescents: The strong, the weak, and the troubled. Pediatrics, 112, 1231-1237.

26.

Katz-Wise

Hyde

(2012). Victimization experiences of lesbian, gay, and bisexual individuals: A meta-analysis. Journal of Sex Research, 49, 142-167.

27.

Kellerman

Margolin

Borofsky

Baucom

Iturralde

(2013). Electronic aggression among emerging adults: Motivations and contextual factors. Emerging Adulthood, 14, 293-304.

28.

Koo

D. J.

Chitwood

D. D.

Sanchez

(2008). Violent victimization and the routine activities/lifestyle of active drug users. Journal of Drug Issues, 38, 1105-1138.

29.

Korchmaros

Ybarra

Langhinrichsen-Rohling

Boyd

Lenhart

(2013). Perpetration of teen dating violence in a networked society. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16, 1-7.

30.

Kowalski

R. M.

Limber

S. P.

Agatston

P. W.

(2008). Cyberbullying: Bullying in the digital age. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

31.

Lormand

Markham

Peskin

Byrd

Addy

Baumler

Tortolero

(2013). Dating violence among urban, minority, middle school youth and associated sexual risk behaviors and substance use. Journal of School Health, 83(6), 415-421.

32.

Loveisrespect. (2017). Let’s talk about respect + sex! Available from http://www.loveisrespect.org

33.

Lyndon

Bonds-Raacke

Cratty

(2011). College students’ Facebook stalking of ex-partners. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 13, 263-268.

34.

Marcum

C. D.

(2010). Assessing sex experiences of online victimization: An examination of adolescent online behaviors using Routine Activity Theory. Criminal Justice Review, 35, 412-437.

35.

Marcum

C. D.

Higgins

G. E.

Nicholson

(2017). I’m watching you: Cyberstalking behaviors of university students in romantic relationships. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 42, 373-388.

36.

Marcum

C. D.

Higgins

G. E.

Ricketts

M. L.

(2014). Sexting behaviors among adolescents in rural North Carolina: A theoretical examination of low self-control and deviant peer association. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 82(2), 68-78.

37.

Marcum

C. D.

Higgins

G. E.

Wolfe

Ricketts

(2014). Becoming someone new: Identity theft behaviors by high school students. Journal of Financial Crime, 22, 318-328.

38.

Martin-Storey

Crosnoe

(2012). Sexual minority status, peer harassment, and adolescent depression. Journal of Adolescence, 35(4), 1001-1011.

39.

McCarthy

Casey

(2008). Love, sex, and crime: Adolescent romantic relationships and offending. American Sociological Review, 73, 944-969.

40.

McDonnell

Ott

Mitchell

(2010). Predicting dating violence victimization and perpetration among middle and high school students in a rural southern community. Children and Youth Services Review, 32, 1458-1463.

41.

Meier

R. F.

Miethe

T. D.

(1993). Understanding theories of criminal victimization. Crime and justice, 459-499.

42.

Menard

(2010). Logistic regression: From introductory to advanced concepts and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

43.

Messinger

(2011). Invisible victims: Same-sex IPV in the national violence against women survey. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26, 2228-2243.

44.

Nabors

E. L.

(2010). Drug use and intimate partner violence among college students: An in-depth exploration. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 25, 1043-1063.

45.

Navarro

Jasinski

(2013). Why girls? Using routine activities theory to predict cyberbullying experiences between girls and boys. Women & Criminal Justice, 23, 286-303.

46.

Office of National Drug Control Policy. (2007). Teens, drugs & violence: A special report. Retrieved from https://www.hsdl.org/?view&did=477440

47.

O’Keefe

(1997). Predictors of dating violence among high school students. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 12, 546-568.

48.

Orpinas

Hseih

Song

Holland

Nahapetyan

(2013). Trajectories of physical dating violence from middle to high school: Association with relationship quality and acceptability of aggression. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42, 551-565.

49.

Pabian

Vandebosch

(2016). An investigation of short-term longitudinal associations between social anxiety and victimization and perpetration of traditional bullying and cyberbullying. Journal of Youth Adolescence, 45, 328-339. doi:10.1007/s10964-015-0259-3

50.

Pampel

F. C.

(2000). Logistic regression: A primer. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

51.

Pepler

Craig

Connolly

Yulie

McMaster

Jiang

(2006). A developmental perspective on bullying. Aggressive Behavior, 32, 376-384.

52.

Porter

Williams

(2011). Intimate violence among underrepresented groups on a college campus. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26, 3210-3224.

53.

Quatman

Sampson

Robinson

Watson

(2001). Academic, motivational, and emotional correlates of adolescent dating. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 127, 211-234.

54.

Ramrakha

Bell

Paul

Dickson

Moffitt

Caspi

(2007). Childhood behavior problem linked to sexual risk taking in young adulthood: A birth cohort study. Journal of the American Academyc of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 46, 1272-1279.

55.

Reekman

Cannard

(2009). Cyberbullying: A TAFE perspective. Youth Studies Australia, 28, 41-49.

56.

Reid

Peterson

Hughey

Garcia-Reid

(2006). School climate and adolescent drug use: Mediating effects of violence victimization in the urban high school context. Journal of Primary Prevention, 27, 281-292.

57.

Reyes

Foshee

Bauer

Ennett

(2011). The role of heavy alcohol use in the developmental process of desistance in dating aggression during adolescence. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 39, 239-250.

58.

Reyes

Foshee

Bauer

Ennett

(2012). Heavy alcohol use and dating violence perpetration during adolescence: Family, peer and neighborhood violence as moderators. Prevention Science, 13, 340-349.

59.

Reyns

B. W.

Henson

Fisher

B. S.

(2011). Being pursued online: Applying cyberlifestyle–routine activities theory to cyberstalking victimization. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38, 1149-1169. doi:10.1177/0093854811421448

60.

Rivera-Rivera

Allen-Leigh

Rodriguez-Ortega

Chavez-Ayala

Lazcano-Ponce

(2007). Prevalence and correlates of adolescent dating violence: Baseline study of a cohort of 7960 male and female Mexican public school students. Preventive Medicine, 44, 477-484.

61.

Rosario

Schrimshaw

Hunter

Braun

(2006). Sexual identity development among lesbian, gay, and bisexual youths: Consistency and change over time. Journal of Sex Research, 43, 46-58.

62.

Rothman

Johnson

Azreal

Hall

Weinberg

(2010). Perpetration of physical assault against dating partners, peers, and siblings among a locally representative sample of high school students in Boston, Massachusetts. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 164, 1118-1124.

63.

Rothman

Reyes

Johnson

LaValley

(2012). Does the alcohol make them do it? Dating violence perpetration and drinking among youth. Epidemiologic Reviews, 34, 103-119.

64.

Ryan

Huebner

Diaz

Sanchez

(2009). Family rejection as a predictor of negative health outcomes in white and Latino lesbian, gay, and bisexual young adults. Pediatrics, 123, 346-352.

65.

Schreck

C. J.

Fisher

B. S.

(2004). Specifying the influence of family and peers on violent victimization: Extending routine activities and lifestyles theories. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19, 1021-1041.

66.

Schwartz

M. D.

Pitts

V. L.

(1995). Exploring a feminist routine activities approach to explaining sexual assault. Justice Quarterly, 12, 9-31.

67.

Shorey

Stuart

Cornelius

(2011). Dating violence and substance use in college students: A review of the literature. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 16, 541-550.

68.

Spano

Freilich

J. D.

(2009). An assessment of the empirical validity and conceptualization of individual level multivariate studies of lifestyle/routine activities theory published from 1995 to 2005. Journal of Criminal Justice, 37, 305-314.

69.

Spano

Freilich

J. D.

Bolland

(2008). Gang membership, gun carrying, and employment: Applying routine activities theory to explain violent victimization among inner city, minority youth living in extreme poverty. Justice Quarterly, 25, 381-410.

70.

Spano

Nagy

(2005). Social guardianship and social isolation: An application and extension of lifestyle/routine activities theory to rural adolescents. Rural Sociology, 70, 414-437.

71.

Swahn

Simon

Arias

Bossarte

(2008). Measuring sex differences in violence victimization and perpetration within date and same-sex peer relationships. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 23, 1120-1138.

72.

Taylor

T. J.

Peterson

Esbensen

F. A.

Freng

(2007). Gang membership as a risk factor for adolescent violent victimization. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 44, 351–380.

73.

Temple

Freeman

(2011). Dating violence and substance use among ethnically diverse adolescents. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 23, 1120-1138.

74.

Tseloni

Wittebrood

Farrell

Pease

(2004). Burglary victimization in England and Wales, the United States and the Netherlands: A cross-national comparative test of routine activities and lifestyle theories. British Journal of Criminology, 44, 66-91.

75.

Vagi

O’Malley

Basile

Vivolo-Kantor

(2015). Teen dating violence (physical and sexual) among US High School Students: Findings from the 2013: National Youth Risk Behavior Survey. JAMA Pediatrics, 169(5), 474-482.

76.

Vagi

Rothman

Latzman

Teten Tharp

Hall

Breiding

(2013). Beyond correlates: A review of risk and protective factors for adolescent dating violence perpetration. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42, 633-649.

77.

Wolfe

Marcum

C. D.

Higgins

G. E.

Ricketts

M. L.

(2014). Routine cell phone activity and sex victimization: Extending the generality of Routine Activity Theory and exploring the etiology of risky teenage behavior. Crime & Delinquency, 46, 5-34.

78.

Zweig

Dank

Yahner

Lachman

(2013). The rate of cyber dating abuse among teens and how it relates to other forms of teen dating violence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42, 1063-1077.