The current study uses finite mixture models (FMMs) to examine whether competing theories—social learning and social control—are differentially applicable to individuals. Posterior probabilities reveal that 85% of individuals are most consistent with social learning theory (“learners”), whereas 15% are most consistent with social bonding theory (“bonders”). Relative to bonders, learners have significantly lower alcohol consumption and alcohol use risk—as denoted by learning and bonding variables. Results reveal generally stronger variable effects in the FMM as compared with the full-sample ordinary-least-squares (OLS) regression, particularly for differential association and belief. OLS regressions among classified subsamples resulted in substantial gains in explained variance among learners but no improvements among bonders. Implications of differential applicability of theories for assessments of theoretical validity and policy development are discussed.
AchenC. H. (2005). Let’s put garbage-can regressions and garbage-can probits where they belong. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 22, 327-339.
2.
AgnewR. (1992). Foundation for a general strain theory of crime and delinquency. Criminology, 30(1), 47-88.
3.
AgnewR. (2001). Building on the foundation of general strain theory: Specifying the types of strain most likely to lead to crime and delinquency. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 38, 319-361.
4.
AgnewR. (2011). Toward a unified criminology: Integrating assumptions about crime, people and society. New York: New York University Press.
5.
AgnewR. (2012). Toward a unified criminology: Integrating assumptions about crime, people and society. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Criminology, 4, 1-9.
6.
AkersR. L. (1973). Deviant behavior: A social learning approach. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
7.
AkersR. L. (1989). A social behaviorist’s perspective on integration of theories of crime and deviance. In MessnerS. F.KrohnM. D.LiskaA. E. (Eds.), Theoretical integration in the study of deviance and crime: Problems and prospects (pp. 23-36). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
8.
AkersR. L. (2011). Social learning and social structure: A general theory of crime and deviance. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
9.
AkersR. L.Cochran (1985). Adolescent marijuana use: A test of three theories of deviant behavior. Deviant Behavior, 6, 323-346.
10.
AkersR. L.KrohnM. D.Lanza-KaduceL.RadosevichM. (1979). Social learning and deviant behavior: A specific test of a general theory. American Sociological Review, 44, 636-655.
11.
AkersR. L.LeeG. (1999). Age, social learning, and social bonding in adolescent substance use. Deviant Behavior, 20(1), 1-25.
12.
AkersR. L.SellersC. S. (2013). Criminological theories: Introduction, evaluation, and application (6th ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
13.
BakerJ. O. (2010). The expression of low self-control as problematic drinking in adolescents: An integrated control perspective. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38, 237-244.
14.
BanduraA.RossD.RossS. (1961). Transmission of aggression through imitation of aggressive models. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 63, 575-582.
15.
BeccariaC. (1986). On crimes and punishments (1st ed.). Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Pub. Co.
16.
BurgessR. L.AkersR. L. (1966). A differential association-reinforcement theory of criminal behavior. Social Problems, 14, 128-147.
17.
CatalanoR. F.HawkinsJ. D. (1996). The social development model: A theory of antisocial behavior. In HawkinsJ. D. (Ed.), Delinquency and crime: Current theories (pp. 149-197). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
18.
CaudyM.TangL.AinsworthS. A.LerchJ.TaxmanF. S. (2013). Reducing recidivism through correctional programming: Using meta-analyses to inform the RNR Simulation Tool. In TaxmanF. S.PattavinaA. (Eds.), Simulation strategies to reduce recidivism: Risk Need Responsivity (RNR) Modeling in the criminal justice system (pp. 167-193). New York, NY: Springer.
19.
CernkovichS. A.GiordanoP. C. (1992). School bonding, race, and delinquency. Criminology, 30, 261-291.
20.
ClarkeK. A. (2001). Testing nonnested models of international relations: Reevaluating realism. American Journal of Political Science, 45, 724-744.
21.
ClarkeK. A. (2007). The necessity of being comparative: Theory confirmation in quantitative political science. Comparative Political Studies, 40, 886-908.
22.
CooperK.MayD.SoderstromI.JarjouraG. R. (2009). Examining theoretical predictors of substance use among a sample of incarcerated youth. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 48, 669-695.
23.
ElliottD. S.AgetonS. S.CanterR. J. (1979). An integrated theoretical perspective on delinquent behavior. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 16, 3-27.
24.
ElliottD. S.HuizingaD.AgetonS. S. (1985). Explaining delinquency and drug use. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
25.
GottfredsonM.HirschiT. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
26.
HansenM. A. (2011). Those irrational vote wasters! Testing competing theories for liberal democratic voting in the 2010 British general election. Unpublished manuscript. Milwaukee, WI: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.
27.
HawkinsJ. D.WeisJ. G. (1985). The social development model: An integrated approach to delinquency prevention. The Journal of Primary Prevention, 6, 73-97.
28.
HayC.ForrestW. (2008). Self-control theory and the concept of opportunity: The case for a more systematic union. Criminology, 46, 1039-1072.
29.
HirschiT. (1969). Causes of delinquency. Berkeley: University of California Press.
30.
HirschiT. (1989). Exploring alternatives to integrated theory. In MessnerS. F.KrohnM. D.LiskaA. E. (Eds.), Theoretical integration in the study of deviance and crime: Problems and prospects (pp. 37-49). Albany: SUNY Press.
31.
HoebenE. M.MeldrumR. C.WalkerD.YoungJ. T. N. (2016). The role of peer delinquency and unstructured socializing in explaining delinquency and substance use: A state-of-the-art review. Journal of Criminal Justice, 47, 108-122.
32.
HoeveM.StamsG. J. J. M.van der PutC. E.DubasJ. S.van der LaanP. H.GerrisJ. R. M. (2012). A meta-analysis of attachment to parents and delinquency. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 40, 771-785.
33.
ImaiK.TingleyD. (2012). A statistical method for empirical testing of competing theories. American Journal of Political Science, 56, 218-236.
34.
JenkinsP. H. (1997). School delinquency and the school social bond. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 34, 337-367.
35.
JenningsW. G.ReingleJ. M. (2012). On the number and shape of developmental/life-course violence, aggression, and delinquency trajectories: A state-of-the-art review. Journal of Criminal Justice, 40, 472-489.
36.
JohnsonR. E.MarcosA. C.BahrS. J. (1987). The role of peers in the complex etiology of adolescent drug use. Criminology, 25, 323-340.
37.
JonsonC. L.McArthurR.CullenF. T.WilcoxP. (2012). Unravelling the sources of adolescent substance use: A test of rival theories. International Journal on School Disaffection, 9(2), 53-90.
38.
KempfK. L. (1993). The empirical status of Hirschi’s control theory. New Directions in Criminological Theory: Advances in Criminological Theory, 4, 143-185.
39.
KrohnM. D.EasseyJ. M. (2014). Integrated theories of crime. In MillerJ. M. (Ed.), The encyclopedia of theoretical criminology (pp. 1-6). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
40.
KrohnM. D.Lanza-KaduceL.AkersR. L. (1984). Community context and theories of deviant behavior: An examination of social learning and social bonding theories. The Sociological Quarterly, 25, 353-372.
41.
KrohnM. D.MasseyJ. L. (1980). Social control and delinquent behavior: An examination of the elements of the social bond. The Sociological Quarterly, 21, 529-544.
42.
KrohnM. D.MasseyJ. L.SkinnerW. F.LauerR. M. (1983). Social bonding theory and adolescent cigarette smoking: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 24, 337-349.
43.
KrohnM. D.WardJ. T. (2015). Integrating criminological theories. In PiqueroA. R. (Ed.), The handbook of criminological theory (pp. 318-335). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
44.
KubrinC. E.StuckyT. D.KrohnM. D. (2009). Researching theories of crime and deviance. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
45.
MarcosA. C.BahrS. J.JohnsonR. E. (1986). Test of a bonding/association theory of adolescent drug use. Social Forces, 65(1), 135.
46.
MessnerS. F.KrohnM. D.LiskaA. E. (1989). Theoretical integration in the study of deviance and crime: Problems and prospects. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
47.
MoffittT. E. (1993). Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior: A developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review, 100, 674-701.
48.
NaginD. (2005). Group-based modeling of development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
49.
NaginD.S. (2016). Group-based trajectory modeling and criminal career research. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 53, 356-371.
50.
PayneA. A.SalottiS. (2007). A comparative analysis of social learning and social control theories in the prediction of college crime. Deviant Behavior, 28, 553-573.
51.
PegueroA. A.PoppA. M.LatimoreT. L.ShekarkharZ.KooD. J. (2011). Social control theory and school misbehavior: Examining the role of race and ethnicity. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 9, 259-275.
52.
PrattT. C.CullenF. T.SellersC. S.Thomas WinfreeL.MadensenT. D.DaigleL. E.. . . GauJ. M. (2010). The empirical status of social learning theory: A meta-analysis. Justice Quarterly, 27, 765-802.
53.
ReineckeJ.SeddigD. (2011). Growth mixture models in longitudinal research. Advances in Statistical Analysis, 95, 415-434.
54.
SampsonR. J.LaubJ. H. (1993). Crime in the making: Pathways and turning points through life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
55.
SkardhamarT. (2010). Distinguishing facts and artifacts in group-based modeling. Criminology, 48, 295-320.
56.
SutherlandE. H. (1947). Principles of criminology (4th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott.
57.
ThornberryT. P. (1987). Toward an interactional theory of delinquency. Criminology, 25, 863-892.
58.
ThornberryT. P.KrohnM. D. (2005). Applying interactional theory to the explanation of continuity and change in antisocial behavior. In FarringtonD. P. (Ed.), Integrated developmental and life-course theories of offending: Advances in criminological theory (Vol. 14, pp. 183-209). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
59.
VaughnM. G.DeLisiM.BeaverK. M.HowardM. O. (2009). Multiple murder and criminal careers: A latent class analysis of multiple homicide offenders. Forensic Science International, 183(1-3), 67-73.
60.
WeisburdD.PiqueroA. (2008). How well do criminologists explain crime? statistical modeling in published studies. Crime and Justice, 37(1), 453-502.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
