The Concordance of Self-Reported and Officially Recorded Criminal Onset: Results From a Sample of Australian Prisoners

Abstract

This study examines the concordance of self-reported and officially recorded criminal onset among a sample of prisoners in Queensland, Australia. Classified into one of four developmental stages, Gwet’s Agreement Coefficient 1 (AC1) is used to examine the concordance of these two popular data sources. Analysis is conducted across seven offense types, and comparisons are made between Indigenous and non-Indigenous offenders. Results indicate moderate agreement between self-reports and official records with greater concordance for violent and serious property offenses. With few exceptions, self-reported onset precedes officially recorded onset, and concordance was greater for Indigenous offenders. These findings have important methodological implications for criminological research, in particular, developmental and life-course theory, which emphasizes the theoretical importance of the timing and sequencing of criminal events.

Keywords

self-report official records onset validity concordance race

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2014). Australian and New Zealand standard offence classification. Canberra: Author.

Berg

M. T.

Slocum

L. A.

Loeber

(2013). Illegal behavior, neighborhood context, and police reporting by victims of violence. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 50, 75-103.

Blumstein

Cohen

Roth

J. A.

Visher

C. A.

(1986). Criminal careers and “career criminals” (Vol. 1). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

Bosick

S. J.

(2009). Operationalizing crime over the life course. Crime & Delinquency, 55, 472-496.

Brame

Fagan

Piquero

A. R.

Schubert

C. A.

Steinberg

(2004). Criminal careers of serious delinquents in two cities. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 2, 256-272.

Cohen

(1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 41, 687-699. doi:10.1177/001316448104100307

Farrington

D. P.

Auty

K. M.

Coid

J. W.

Turner

R. E.

(2013). Self-reported and official offending from age 10 to age 56. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 19, 135-151.

Farrington

D. P.

Jolliffe

Hawkins

J. D.

Catalano

R. F.

Hill

K. G.

Kosterman

(2003). Comparing delinquency careers in court records and self-reports. Criminology, 41, 933-958.

Farrington

D. P.

Loeber

Elliott

D. S.

Hawkins

J. D.

Kandel

D. B.

Klein

M. W.

. . . Tremblay

R. E.

(1990). Advancing knowledge about the onset of delinquency and crime. In Lahey

B. B.

Kazdin

A. E.

(Eds.), Advances in Clinical Child Psychology (pp. 283-342). Boston, MA: Springer US.

10.

Farrington

D. P.

Loeber

Stouthamer-Loeber

Kammen

W. B.

Schmidt

(1996). Self-reported delinquency and a combined delinquency seriousness scale based on boys, mothers, and teachers: Concurrent and predictive validity for African-Americans and Caucasians. Criminology, 34, 493-517.

11.

Feinstein

A. R.

Cicchetti

D. V.

(1990). High agreement but low kappa: I. The problems of two paradoxes. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 43, 543-549.

12.

Gwet

K. L.

(2008). Computing inter-rater reliability and its variance in the presence of high agreement. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 61, 29-48.

13.

Hindelang

M. J.

(1974). The uniform crime reports revisited. Journal of Criminal Justice, 2(1), 1-17.

14.

Hindelang

M. J.

Hirschi

Weis

(1979). Correlates of delinquency: The illusion of discrepancy between self-report and official measures. American Sociological Review, 44, 995-1014.

15.

Johnson

(2004). Key findings from the drug use careers of female offenders study (Trends and Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice No. 289). Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology.

16.

Kazemian

Farrington

D. P.

(2005). Comparing the validity of prospective, retrospective, and official onset for different offending categories. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 21, 127-147.

17.

Kirk

D. S.

(2006). Examining the divergence across self-report and official data sources on inferences about the adolescent life-course of crime. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 22, 107-129. doi:10.1007/s10940-006-9004-0

18.

Krohn

M. D.

Lizotte

A. J.

Phillips

M. D.

Thornberry

T. P.

Bell

K. A.

(2013). Explaining systematic bias in self-reported measures: Factors that affect the under- and over-reporting of self-reported arrests. Justice Quarterly, 30, 501-528.

19.

Lab

S. P.

Allen

R. B.

(1984). Self-report and official measures: A further examination of the validity issue. Journal of Criminal Justice, 12, 445-455.

20.

Landis

J. R.

Koch

G. G.

(1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159-174.

21.

Lauritsen

J. L.

(1998). The age-crime debate: Assessing the limits of longitudinal self-report data. Social Forces, 77, 127-154.

22.

Loeber

Farrington

D. P.

Stouthamer-Loeber

Moffitt

T. E.

Caspi

White

H. R.

. . . & Beyers

J. M.

(2003). The development of male offending. In Taking stock of delinquency (pp. 93-136). New York, NY: Springer US.

23.

Loeber

Farrington

D. P.

Stouthamer-Loeber

White

H. R.

(2008). Violence and serious theft: Development and prediction from childhood to adulthood. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.

24.

Makkai

Payne

J. L.

(2003). Drugs and crime: A study of incarcerated male offenders. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology.

25.

Maxfield

M. G.

Weller

B. L.

Widom

C. S.

(2000). Comparing self-reports and official records of arrest. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 16, 87-110.

26.

McGee

T. R.

Farrington

D. P.

(2010). Are there any true adult-onset offenders? British Journal of Criminology, 50, 530-549.

27.

Moffitt

T. E.

(1993). Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior: a developmental taxonomy. Psychological review, 100, 674-701.

28.

Moffitt

T. E.

Caspi

Silva

P. A.

(2001). Sex differences in antisocial behaviour: Conduct disorder, delinquency, and violence in the Dunedin Longitudinal Study. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

29.

Payne

J. L.

(2014). Criminal and drug use careers: A trajectory-based analysis of the path-dependent and age-graded relationship between drug use and crime (Doctoral thesis). Australian National University, Canberra.

30.

Payne

J. L.

Piquero

A. R.

(2016). The concordance of self-reported and officially recorded lifetime offending histories: Results from a sample of Australian prisoners. Journal of Criminal Justice, 46, 184-195.

31.

Piquero

A. R.

Farrington

Blumstein

(2003). The criminal career paradigm: Background and recent developments (Vol. 30). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

32.

Piquero

A. R.

Hawkins

D. J.

Kazemian

Petechuk

(2013). Study Group on the Transitions Between Juvenile Delinquency and Adult Crime. Bulletin 2: Criminal career patterns. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.

33.

Piquero

A. R.

Schubert

C. A.

Brame

(2014). Comparing official and self-report records of offending across gender and race/ethnicity in a longitudinal study of serious youthful offenders. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 51, 526-556.

34.

Prichard

Payne

J. L.

(2005). Key findings from the drug use careers of juvenile offenders study. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology.

35.

Shankar

Bangdiwala

S. I.

(2014). Observer agreement paradoxes in 2 × 2 tables: Comparison of agreement measures. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 14(1), Article 100.

36.

Sellin

Wolfgang

M. E.

(1964). The measurement of delinquency (p.423). New York: Wiley.

37.

Theobald

Farrington

D. P.

(2014). Onset of offending. In Bruinsma

Weisburd

(Eds.), Encyclopedia of criminology and criminal justice (pp. 3332-3342). New York, NY: Springer.

38.

Thornberry

T. P.

Krohn

M. D.

(2003). Comparison of self-report and official data for measuring crime. In Pepper

J. V.

Petrie

C. V.

(Eds.), Measurement problems in criminal justice research: Workshop summary (pp. 43-94). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

39.

Thornberry

T. P.

Krohn

M. D.

(2005). Applying interactional theory to the explanation of continuity and change in antisocial behavior. In Farrington

D. P.

(Ed.), Advances in Criminological Theory: Vol. 15. Integrated developmental and life-course theories of offending (pp. 183-209). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

40.

Tracy

P. E.

(1987). Race and class differences in official and self-reported delinquency. In Wolfgang

M. E.

Thornberry

T. P.

Figlio

R. M.

(Eds.), From boy to man, from delinquency to crime (pp. 87-121). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

41.

Wongpakaran

Wedding

Gwet

K. L.

(2013). A comparison of Cohen’s Kappa and Gwet’s AC1 when calculating inter-rater reliability coefficients: A study conducted with personality disorder samples. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 13(1), Article 61.