Scholars who study criminal and delinquent behavior rely on the self-report method for measuring crime and delinquency. Gang researchers also rely on the self-report method for determining gang involvement and measuring criminal and delinquent behavior of gang members. This study examines disclosure rates of recent drug use by gang members in comparison with their urinalysis outcomes. A substantial body of research indicates that members of the criminally involved population, at least those who get arrested, are less than accurate when reporting recent drug use; however, it does not appear that gang members are different in their reporting than members of the group as a whole. Disclosure rates of gang members did not differ significantly from those of non-gang members. This adds to the cumulative body of evidence that although not perfect, self-reports of illegal behavior are a valid measurement technique in gang research.
Ball, R. A., & Curry, G. D. (1995). The logic of definition in criminology: Purposes and methods for defining ‘gangs’. Criminology, 33, 225-245.
2.
Battin, S. R., Hill, K. G., Abbott, R. D., Catalano, R. F., & Hawkins, J. D. (1998). The contribution of gang membership to delinquency beyond delinquent friends. Criminology, 36, 93-115.
3.
Bjerregaard, B., & Smith, C. (1993). Gender differences in gang participation, delinquency, and substance use. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 4, 329-355.
4.
Curry, G. D. (2000). Self-reported gang involvement and officially recorded delinquency. Criminology, 38, 1253-1274.
5.
Curry, G. D., Decker, S. H., & Egley, A., Jr. (2002). Gang involvement and delinquency in a middle school population. Justice Quarterly19, 275-292.
6.
Curry, G. D., & Spergel, I. A. (1992). Gang involvement and delinquency among Hispanic and African American adolescent males. Journal of Research on Crime and Delinquency, 29, 273-291.
7.
Decker, S. H., & Curry, G. D. (2000). Addressing key features of gang membership: Measuring the involvement of young members. Journal of Criminal Justice, 28, 473-482.
8.
Decker, S. H., Pennell, S., & Caldwell, A. (1996). Arrestees and guns: Monitoring their illegal firearms market. Final Report submitted to the National Institute of Justice. Washington, DC.
9.
Decker, S. H., & Weerman, F. (2005). European gangs and troublesome street groups: Findings from the Eurogang Research Program. Walnut Creek, CA: Alta Mira.
10.
Del Boca, F., & Noll, J. E. (2000). Truth or consequences: The validity of self-report data in health services research on addictions. Addiction, 95, 347-360.
11.
Egley, H. A. (2003). The national youth gang survey. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
12.
Esbensen, F., & Huizinga, D. (1993). Gangs, drugs, and delinquency in a survey of urban youth. Criminology, 31, 565-590.
13.
Esbensen, F., Huizinga, D., & Weiher, A. W. (1993). Gang and non-gang youth differences in explanatory factors. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 9, 94-116.
14.
Esbensen, F., Winfree, T., He, N., & Taylor, T. (2001). Youth gangs and definitional issues: When is a gang a gang, and why does it matter. Crime & Delinquency, 47, 105-130.
15.
Farrington, D. P., Loeber, R., Stouthamer-Loeber, M., Van Kammen, W. B., & Schmidt, L. (1996). Self-reported delinquency and a combined delinquency scale based on boys, mothers, and teachers: Concurrent and predictive validity for African Americans and Caucasians. Criminology, 34, 493-517.
16.
Fendrich, M., & Xu, Y. (1994). The validity of drug use reports from juvenile arrestees. International Journal of the Addictions, 29, 971-985.
17.
Gibbons, D. C. (1979). The criminological enterprise: Theories and perspectives. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
18.
Golub, A., Johnson, B., Taylor, A., & Liberty, H. J. (2002). The validity of arrestees’ self-reports: Variations across questions and persons. Justice Quarterly, 19, 477-502.
19.
Gordon, R. A., Lahey, B., Kawai, E., Loeber, R., Stouthamer-Loeber, M., & Farrington, D. (2004, February). Antisocial behavior and youth gang membership: Selection and socialization. Criminology, 42, 55-89.
20.
Gray, T. A., & Wish, E. D. (1999). Correlates of underreporting recent drug use by female arrestees. Journal of Drug Issues, 29, 91-106.
21.
Harrison, L. (1997). The validity of self-reported drug use in survey research: An overview and critique of research methods. In L. Harrison & A. Hughes (Ed.), The validity of self-reported drug use: Improving the accuracy of survey estimates (pp.17-36). Washington, DC: National Institute on Drug Abuse.
22.
Hindelang, M. J., Hirschi, T., & Weis, J. G. (1981). Measuring delinquency. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
23.
Huizinga, D., & Elliott, D. (1986). Reassessing the reliability and validity of self-report delinquent measures. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 2, 293-327.
24.
Junger-Tas, J., & Marshall, I. H. (1999). The self-report methodology in crime research. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice: A review of research (Vol. 25, pp. 291-367). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
25.
Katz, C. M. (2003a). Issues in the production and dissemination of gang statistics. Crime and Delinquency, 49, 485-516.
26.
Katz, C. M. (2003b). Youth gangs in Arizona. Prepared for the Arizona Criminal Justice Commission. Phoenix: Arizona State University West.
27.
Katz, C. M., & Webb, V. (2004). Police response to gangs: A multi-site study. Phoenix: Arizona State University West.
28.
Katz, C. M., Webb, V., & Armstrong, T. (2003). Fear of gangs: A test of alternative theoretical models. Justice Quarterly, 20, 95-130.
29.
Katz, C. M., Webb, V., Gartin, P., & Marshall, C. (1997). The validity of self-reported marijuana and cocaine use. Journal of Criminal Justice, 25, 31-41.
30.
Katz, C. M., Webb, V., & Schaefer, D. (2000). The validity of police gang intelligence lists: Examining differences in delinquency between documented gang members and non-documented delinquent youth. Police Quarterly, 3, 413-437.
31.
Kim, J. Y. S., Fendrich, M., & Wislar, J. S. (2000). The validity of juvenile arrestees’ drug use reporting: A gender comparison. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 37, 419-432.
32.
Klein, M. W. (1985). The American Street Gang. New York: Oxford University Press.
33.
Klein, M. W. (1989). Cross-national research in self-reported crime and delinquency. Boston: Kluwer Academic.
34.
Liao, T. L. (1994). Interpreting probability models: Logit, probit, and other generalized linear models. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
35.
Magura, S., & Kang, S. Y. (1996). Validity of self-reported drug use in high risk populations: A meta-analytical review. Substance Abuse and Misuse, 31, 1131-1153.
36.
McElrath, K., Dunham, R., & Cromwell, P. (1995). Validity of self-reported cocaine and opiate use among arrestees in five cities. Journal of Criminal Justice, 23, 531-540.
37.
Mieczkowski, T. (1990). The accuracy of self-reported drug use: An evaluation and analysis of new data. In R. Weisheit, (Ed.), Drugs, crime, and the criminal justice system (pp. 22-37). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
38.
Miller, J., & Brunson, R. K. (2000). Gender dynamics in youth gangs: A comparison of males’ and females’ accounts. Justice Quarterly, 17, 419-448.
39.
National Institute of Justice. (1999). Drug use forecasting annual report, 1998. Washington, DC: Author.
40.
Porterfield, A. L. (1946). Youth in trouble. Fort Worth, TX: Leo Potishman.
41.
Rosenfeld, R., & Decker, S. H. (1993). Discrepant value, correlated measures: Cross-city and longitudinal comparisons of self-reports and urine tests of cocaine use among arrestees. Journal of Criminal Justice, 21, 223-230.
42.
Sheley, J. F., & Wright, J. D. (1995). In the line of fire: Youth, guns and violence in urban America. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
43.
Short, J. F., Jr. (1957). Reported behavior as a criterion of deviant behavior. Social Problems, 5, 207-213.
44.
Short, J. F., Jr. (1985). The level of explanation problem. In R. Meier (Ed.), Theoretical methods in criminology (pp. 51-72). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
45.
Short, J. F., Jr., & Nye, F. I. (1958). Extent of unrecorded juvenile delinquency: Tentative conclusions. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 49, 296-302.
46.
Sutherland, E. H. (1949). White-collar crime. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
47.
Thornberry, T., & Krohn, M. D. (2000). The self-report method for measuring delinquency and crime. In D. Duffee (Ed.), Criminal justice 2000 (pp. 33-84). Washington, DC: The National Institute of Justice.
48.
Thornberry, T., Krohn, M. D., Lizotte, A., & Chard-Wierschem, D. (1993). The role of juvenile gangs in facilitating delinquent behavior. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 30, 55-87.
49.
Visher, C. (1991). A comparison of urinalysis technologies for drug testing in criminal justice. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
50.
Wallerstein, J. S., & Wylie, C. J. (1947). Our law-abiding law-breakers. Probation, 25, 107-112.
51.
Winfree, L. T., Jr., Fuller, K., Vigil, T., & Mays, G. L. (1992). The definition and measurement of “gang status”: Policy implications for juvenile justice. Juvenile and Family Court Journal, 43, 29-37.
52.
Wish, E., Toborg, M., & Bellassai, J. (1988). Identifying drug users and monitoring them during conditional release. National Institute of Justice: Issues and Practices. Washington, DC: Department of Justice.
53.
Zatz, M. S. (1987). Chicano youth gangs and crime: The creation of a moral panic. Contemporary Crises, 11, 129-158.
54.
Zatz, M. S., & Portillos, E. (2000). Voices from the barrio. Criminology, 38, 369-402.
