Beginning in November 2012, New Haven, Connecticut, served as the pilot site for Project Longevity, a statewide focused deterrence gun violence reduction strategy. The intervention brings law enforcement, social services, and community members together to meet with members of violent street groups at program call-ins. Using autoregressive integrated moving average models and controlling for the possibility of a non-New Haven–specific decline in gun violence, a decrease in group offending patterns, and the limitations of police-defined group member involved (GMI) categorization of shootings and homicides, the results of our analysis show that Longevity is associated with a reduction of almost five GMI incidents per month. These findings bolster research confirming the efficacy of focused deterrence approaches to reducing gun violence.
AkersR. L. (1999). Criminological theories: Introduction and evaluation (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: Fitzroy Dearborn.
2.
BlumsteinA.RosenfeldR. (1998). Explaining recent trends in U.S. homicide rates. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 88, 1175-1216.
3.
BragaA. A.ApelR.WelshB. C. (2013). The spillover effects of focused deterrence on gang violence. Evaluation Review, 37, 314-342.
4.
BragaA. A.HureauD. M.PapachristosA. V. (2014). Deterring gang-involved gun violence: Measuring the impact of Boston’s operation ceasefire on street gang behavior. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 30, 113-139.
5.
BragaA. A.HureauD.WinshipC. (2008). Losing faith? Police, Black churches, and the resurgence of youth violence in Boston. Cambridge, MA: Rappaport Institute for Greater Boston, Harvard Kennedy School.
6.
BragaA. A.KennedyD. M.PiehlA. M.WaringE. J. (2001). Reducing gun violence: The Boston gun project’s operation ceasefire. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
7.
BragaA. A.KennedyD. M.WaringE. J.PiehlA. M. (2001). Problem-oriented policing, deterrence, and youth violence: An evaluation of Boston’s operation ceasefire. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 38, 195-225.
8.
BragaA. A.McDevittJ.PierceG. L. (2006). Understanding and preventing gang violence: Problem analysis and response development in Lowell, Massachusetts. Police Quarterly, 9, 20-46.
9.
BragaA. A.PapachristosA. V.HureauD. (2009). The concentration and stability of gun violence at micro places in Boston, 1980-2008. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 26, 33-53.
10.
BragaA. A.WeisburdD. L. (2012). The effects of focused deterrence strategies on crime: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the empirical evidence. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 49, 323-358.
11.
BragaA. A.WeisburdD. L. (2015). Focused deterrence and the prevention of violent gun injuries: Practice, theoretical principles, and scientific evidence. Annual Review of Public Health, 36, 55-68.
12.
CookP. J.LaubJ. H. (1998). The unprecedented crime epidemic in youth violence. Crime & Justice, 24, 27-64.
13.
CorsaroN.BrunsonR. K.McGarrellE. F. (2013). Problem-oriented policing and open-air drug markets examining the Rockford pulling levers deterrence strategy. Crime & Delinquency, 59, 1085-1107.
14.
CorsaroN.EngelR. S. (2015). Most challenging of contexts: Assessing the impact of focused deterrence on serious violence in New Orleans. Criminology & Public Policy, 14, 471-505.
15.
CrandallV.WongS.-L. (2012). Practice brief: Call-in preparation and execution. New York, NY: National Network for Safe Communities, Center for Crime Prevention and Control, John Jay College of Criminal Justice.
16.
DeckerS. H. (1996). Collective and normative features of gang violence. Justice Quarterly, 13, 243-264.
17.
EngelR. S.CorsaroN.TillyerM. S. (2010). Evaluation of the Cincinnati Initiative to Reduce Violence (CIRV). Cincinnati, OH: University of Cincinnati Policing Institute.
18.
EngelR. S.TillyerM. S.CorsaroN. (2013). Reducing gang violence using focused deterrence: Evaluating the Cincinnati Initiative to Reduce Violence (CIRV). Justice Quarterly, 30, 403-439.
19.
GibbsJ. P. (1975). Crime, punishment, and deterrence. New York, NY: Elsevier.
KellingG. L.MooreM. H. (1988). The evolving strategy of policing (No. 4). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice.
22.
KennedyD. M. (1997). Pulling levers: Chronic offenders, high-crime settings, and a theory of prevention. Valparaiso University Law Review, 31, 449-484.
23.
KennedyD. M.BragaA. A.PiehlA. M. (1997). The (un)known universe: Mapping gangs and gang violence in Boston. In WeisburdD. L.McEwenJ. T. (Eds.), Crime mapping and crime prevention (pp. 219-262). New York, NY: Criminal Justice Press.
24.
KennedyD. M.PiehlA. M.BragaA. A. (1996). Youth violence in Boston: Gun markets, serious youth offenders, and a use-reduction strategy. Law and Contemporary Problems, 59, 147-196.
25.
KleinM. W.CrawfordL. Y. (1967). Groups, gangs, and cohesiveness. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 4, 63-75.
26.
McGarrellE. F.ChermakS.WilsonJ. M.CorsaroN. (2006). Reducing homicide through a “lever-pulling” strategy. Justice Quarterly, 23, 214-231.
27.
McGloinJ. M. (2005). Policy and intervention considerations of a network analysis of street gangs. Criminology & Public Policy, 4, 607-635.
28.
National Network for Safe Communities. (2013). Group violence intervention: An implementation guide. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Community Oriented Policing Services.
29.
PapachristosA. V. (2009). Murder by structure: Dominance relations and the social structure of gang homicide. American Journal of Sociology, 115, 74-128.
30.
PapachristosA. V.HureauD. M.BragaA. A. (2013). The corner and the crew: The influence of geography and social networks on gang violence. American Sociological Review, 78, 417-447.
31.
PapachristosA. V.KirkD. S. (2015). Changing the street dynamic: Evaluating Chicago’s group violence reduction strategy. Criminology & Public Policy, 14, 525-558.
32.
PapachristosA. V.MearesT. L.FaganJ. (2007). Attention felons: Evaluating project safe neighborhoods in Chicago. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 4, 223-272.
RosenbaumD. P. (1988). Community crime prevention: A review and synthesis of the literature. Justice Quarterly, 5, 323-395.
35.
Sierra-ArevaloM.PapachristosA. V. (2015a). Applying group audits to problem-oriented policing. In BichlerG.MalmA. (Eds.), Preventing crime with social network analysis (pp. 27-46). Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
36.
Sierra-ArevaloM.PapachristosA. V. (2015b). Social network analysis and gangs. In PyroozD. C.DeckerS. H. (Eds.), Handbook of gangs (pp. 157-177). New York, NY: Wiley.
37.
SkoganW. G. (1990). Disorder and decline: Crime and the spiral of decay in American neighborhoods. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
38.
StaffordM. C.WarrM. (1993). A reconceptualization of general and specific deterrence. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 30, 123-135.
39.
TitaG. E.RadilS. M. (2011). Spatializing the social networks of gangs to explore patterns of violence. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 27, 521-545.
40.
TitaG. E.RileyK. J.RidgewayG.GrammichC. A.AbrahamseA. (2010). Reducing gun violence: Results from an intervention in East Los Angeles. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
41.
TonryM.MooreM. H. (1998). Youth violence in America. In TonryM.MooreM. H. (Eds.), Crime and justice (Vol. 24, pp. 1-26). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
42.
WeisburdD.TelepC. W.HinkleJ. C.EckJ. E. (2010). Is problem-oriented policing effective in reducing crime and disorder?Criminology & Public Policy, 9, 139-172.
43.
ZimringF. E. (2007). The great American crime decline. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
44.
ZimringF. E.HawkinsG. J. (1973). Deterrence: The legal threat in crime control. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
