Grounded in both organizational- and individual-level theories, this study examined the relationship between police field training officers (FTOs) and their trainees’ subsequent allegations of misconduct. Trainees in the sample were each exposed to multiple FTOs, which presented a unique methodological problem. As such, multilevel models that permitted the nesting of individual trainees within multiple higher order groups of FTOs were estimated. Results revealed that approximately one quarter of the variation in trainees’ allegations of postsupervision misconduct was attributed to FTOs, suggesting the apple (trainee) indeed falls close to the tree (FTO). Implications for FTO selection and training are discussed.
AkersR. L. (1985). Deviant behavior: A social learning approach (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
2.
AlpertG. P. (1989). Law enforcement: City of Canton v. Harris and the deliberate indifference standard. Criminal Law Bulletin, 25, 466-472.
3.
AndersonR. C. (1977). The notion of schemata and the educational enterprise: General discussion of the conference. In AndersonR. C.SpiroR. J.MontagueW. E. (Eds.), Schooling and the acquisition of knowledge (pp.415-431). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
4.
BahnC. (1984). Police socialization in the eighties: Strains in the forging of an occupational identity. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 12, 390-394.
5.
BeaverR. W. (2006). Field training issues for administrators. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, 75, 11-24.
6.
BennettR. R. (1984). Becoming blue: A longitudinal study of police recruit occupational socialization. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 12, 47-58.
7.
CalderoM. A.CrankJ. P. (2011). Police ethics: The corruption of noble cause (3rd ed.). Burlington, MA: Anderson.
8.
ChappellA. T. (2007). Community policing: Is field training the missing link?Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 30, 498-517.
9.
ChappellA. T.Lanza-KaduceL. (2010). Police academy socialization: Understanding the lessons learned in a paramilitary–bureaucratic organization. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 39, 187-214.
10.
ChappellA. T.PiqueroA. R. (2004). Applying social learning theory to police misconduct. Deviant Behavior, 25, 89-108.
11.
Commission on Accreditation for Law Enforcement Agencies. (2006). The standards manual of the law enforcement agency accreditation program (5th ed.). Fairfax, VA: Author.
12.
ConnorG. (2000, March). FTO: “Fundamental” training officer. Law & Order, 48, 27-28.
13.
CrankJ.FlahertyD.GiacomazziA. (2007). The noble cause: An empirical assessment. Journal of Criminal Justice, 35, 103-116.
Dallas Police Department. (2008a). Dallas police department field training program manual. Dallas, TX: Dallas Police Department.
16.
Dallas Police Department. (2008b). Dallas police department general order 416.00: Field training. Dallas, TX: Dallas Police Department.
17.
DoernerW. G.PattersonE. B. (1992). The influence of race and gender upon rookie evaluations of their field training officers. American Journal of Police, 11(2), 23-36.
18.
DoernerW. G.SpeirJ. C.WrightB. S. (1989). An analysis of rater–ratee race and sex influences upon field training officer program evaluations. Journal of Criminal Justice, 17, 103-114.
19.
EngelsonW. (1999). The organizational values of law enforcement agencies: The impact of field training officers in the socialization of police recruits to law enforcement organizations. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 14(2), 11-19.
20.
FaganM. M. (1985). How police officers perceive their field training officer. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 13, 138-152.
21.
FieldingN. G. (1988). Competence and culture in the police. Sociology, 22, 45-64.
22.
FordR. E. (2003). Saying one thing, meaning another: The role of parables in police training. Police Quarterly, 6, 84-110.
23.
HaberfeldM. R. (2013). Critical issues in police training (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
24.
HaiderJ. T. (1990). Field training recruits: Developing, improving, and operating a field training program. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.
25.
JohnsonB. D. (2011). Multilevel analysis in the study of crime and justice. In PiqueroA. R.WeisburdD. (Eds.), Handbook of quantitative criminology (pp. 615-648). New York, NY: Springer.
26.
KaminskyG. F. (2002). The field training concept in criminal justice agencies. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
McCampbellM. S. (1987). Field training for police officers: The state of the art. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
29.
MooreS. A.WomackA. M. (1975). San Jose Police Department Field and Evaluation Program: A case study. San Jose, CA: San Jose Police Department.
30.
PittsS.GlensorR. W.PeakK. J. (2007, August). The police training officer (PTO) program: A contemporary approach to post-academy recruit training. The Police Chief, 74(8), 114-121.
31.
President’s Commission on Law Enforcement and Administration of Justice. (1967, February). The challenge of crime in a free society. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/42.pdf
32.
Rabe-HeskethS.SkrondalA. (2008). Multilevel and longitudinal modeling using Stata (3rd ed.). College Station, TX: Stata Press.
33.
SmithD. A. (1984). The organizational context of legal control. Criminology, 22, 19-38.
34.
SunI. Y. (2000). Police field training officers (FTOs): Their attitudes and behaviors (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). State University of New York at Albany.
35.
SunI. Y. (2002). Police officer attitudes toward peers, supervisors, and citizens: A comparison between field training officers and regular officers. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 27, 69-83.
36.
SunI. Y. (2003a). A comparison of police field training officers’ and nontraining officers’ conflict resolution styles: Controlling versus supportive strategies. Police Quarterly, 6, 22-50.
37.
SunI. Y. (2003b). Officer proactivity: A comparison between police field training officers and non-field training officers. Journal of Criminal Justice, 31, 265-277.
38.
UnsingerP. C.MoreH. W. (1990). Criminal justice induction training: The field training concept. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.
Van MaanenJ. (1973). Observations on the making of policeman. Human Organization, 32, 407-418.
41.
Van MaanenJ. (1974). Working the street: A developmental view of police behavior. In JacobH. (Ed.), The potential for reform of criminal justice (pp. 90-92). Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
42.
WarnersR. H. (2010, November). The field training experience: Perspectives of field training officers and trainees. The Police Chief, 76(11), 58-64.
43.
WebbF. (1993). National survey. Field Training Quarterly, 7(1), 16-39.
44.
WilsonJ. Q. (1967). The police and the delinquent in two cities. In WheelerS.HughesH. M. (Eds.), Controlling delinquents (pp. 173-195). New York, NY: John Wiley.
45.
WilsonJ. Q. (1968). Varieties of police behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
