In The Culture of Control: Crime and Social Order in Contemporary Society, David Garland linked contemporary crime control policies and welfare reforms to a cultural formation that he termed the “crime complex of late modernity.” According to Garland, once established, the crime complex exerts a contemporaneous effect on public views about both criminal justice and the welfare state, increasing popular support for security measures as well as more restrictive public assistance policies. Although Garland’s thesis has featured prominently in scholarship on crime and punishment, few empirical studies have tested the specific predictions that underlie his arguments. To address this research gap, this study uses public opinion data to assess the extent to which key dimensions of the crime complex are associated with public views about criminal justice policies and welfare reforms that emphasize security and control. The results support several of the theoretical underpinnings of Garland’s thesis. The authors discuss the implications of the findings for theory, research, and policy.
American Association for Public Opinion Research. (2008). Standard definitions: Final dispositions of case codes and outcome rates for surveys. Ann Arbor, MI: Author.
2.
BarkerV. (2007). The politics of pain: A political institutionalist analysis of crime victims’ moral protests. Law & Society Review, 41, 619-664.
3.
BarkerV. (2009). The politics of imprisonment: How the democratic process shapes the way America punishes offenders. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
4.
BaumerE. P.MessnerS. F.RosenfeldR. (2003). Explaining spatial variation in support for capital punishment: A multilevel analyses. American Journal of Sociology, 108, 844-875.
5.
BeckettK. (1997). Making crime pay: Law and order in contemporary American politics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
6.
BeckettK.WesternB. (2001). Governing social marginality: Welfare, incarceration, and the transformation of state policy. Punishment & Society, 3, 43-59.
7.
BlombergT. (1987). Criminal justice reform and social control: Are we becoming a minimum security society? In LowmanJ.MenziesR.PalysT. S. (Eds.), Transcarceration: Essays in the sociology of social control (pp. 218-226). London, England: Gower.
8.
BlumsteinA.BeckA. J. (1999). Population growth in U.S. prisons, 1980-1996. Crime and Justice, 26, 17-61.
9.
BlumsteinA.WallmanJ. (2006). The recent risk and fall of American violence. In BlumsteinA.WallmanJ. (Eds.), The crime drop in America (pp. 1-14). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
10.
BraithwaiteJ. (2003). What’s wrong with the sociology of punishment?Theoretical Criminology, 7, 5-28.
11.
BrownE. K. (2006). The dog that did not bark: Punitive social views and the “professional middle classes.”Punishment & Society, 8, 287-312.
12.
BuddJ. C. (2010). Pledge your body for you bread: Welfare, drug testing, and the inferior Fourth Amendment. William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal, 19, 751-804.
13.
Bureau of Justice Statistics. (1997). Criminal victimization in the United States, 1994. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
14.
CarminesE. G.ZellerR. A. (1979). Reliability and validity assessment. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
15.
CavenderG. (2004). Media and crime policy: A reconsideration of David Garland’s The Culture of Control. Punishment & Society, 6, 335-348.
16.
CesaroniC.DoobA. N. (2003). The decline in support for penal welfarism: Evidence of support among the elite for punitive segregation. British Journal of Criminology, 43, 434-441.
17.
ChiricosT.PadgettK.GertzM. (2000). Fear, TV news, and the reality of crime. Criminology, 38, 755-786.
18.
ChiricosT.PadgettK.BrattonJ.PickettJ. T.GertzM. (2012). Racial threat and opposition to the re-enfranchisement of ex-felons. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 1, 13-28.
19.
ChiricosT.WelchK.GertzM. (2004). Racial typification of crime and support for punitive measures. Criminology, 42, 358-390.
20.
CostelloeM. T.ChiricosT.GertzM. (2009). Punitive attitudes toward criminals: Exploring the relevance of crime salience and economic insecurity. Punishment & Society, 11, 25-49.
21.
DubberM. D. (2002). Victims in the war on crime: The use and abuse of victim’s rights. New York: New York University Press.
22.
EliasR. (1990). The politics of victimization: Victims, victimology, and human rights. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
23.
EliasR. (1993). Victims still: The political manipulation of crime victims. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
24.
EschholzS.ChiricosT.GertzM. (2003). Television and fear of crime: Program types, audience traits, and the mediating effect of perceived neighborhood racial composition. Social Problems, 50, 395-415.
25.
FattahE. A. (1986). Prologue: On some visible and hidden dangers of victim movements. In FattahE. A. (Ed.), From crime policy to victim policy: Reorienting the justice system (pp. 1-16). London, England: Macmillan.
26.
FergusonK. M.MindelC. H. (2007). Modeling fear of crime in Dallas neighborhoods: A test of social capital theory. Crime & Delinquency, 53, 322-349.
27.
GansH. J. (1995). The war against the poor: The underclass and anti-poverty policy. New York, NY: Basic Books.
28.
GarlandD. (1985). Punishment and welfare: A history of penal strategies. Aldershot, UK: Gower.
29.
GarlandD. (2001). The culture of control: Crime and social order in contemporary society. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
30.
GelmanA. (2007). Struggles with survey weighting and regression modeling. Statistical Science, 22, 153-164.
31.
GilensM. (1996). Race coding and white opposition to welfare. American Political Science Review, 90, 593-604.
32.
GottschalkM. (2006). The prison and the gallows: The politics of mass incarceration in America. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
33.
GraberD. A. (1980). Crime news and the public. New York, NY: Praeger.
GuerinoP.HarrisonP. M.SabolW. J. (2011). Prisoners in 2010. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics Bulletin.
36.
HerzogS. (2008). An attitudinal explanation of biases in the criminal justice system: An empirical testing of defensive attribution theory. Crime & Delinquency, 54, 457-481.
37.
HirschfieldP. J.PiqueroA. R. (2010). Normalization and legitimation: Modeling stigmatizing attitudes toward ex-offenders. Criminology, 48, 27-56.
LavrakasP. (1993). Telephone survey methods: Sampling, selection, and supervision. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
45.
LiskaA. E.SanchiricoA.ReedM. D. (1988). Fear of crime and constrained behavior: Specifying and estimating a reciprocal effects model. Social Forces, 63, 827-837.
46.
LuckenK.BalesW. (2008). Florida’s sexually violent predator program: An examination of risk and civil commitment eligibility. Crime & Delinquency, 54, 95-127.
47.
MarxG. T. (1988). Undercover: Police surveillance in America. Berkeley: University of California Press.
48.
MearsD. P. (2010). American criminal justice policy: An evaluation approach to increasing accountability and effectiveness. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
49.
MearsD. P.ManciniC.GertzM.BrattonJ. (2008). Sex crime, children, and pornography. Crime & Delinquency, 54, 532-559.
50.
MelossiD.PavariniM. (1981). The prison and the factory: Origins of the penitentiary system. London, England: Macmillan.
51.
NietoM.Johnston-DoddsK.SimmonsC. W. (2002). Public and private applications of video surveillance and biometric technologies. Sacramento: Californian Research Bureau, California State Library.
52.
PickettJ. T.ChiricosT. (2012). Controlling other people’s children: Racialized views of delinquency and whites’ punitive attitudes toward juvenile offenders. Criminology, 50, 673-710.
53.
PickettJ. T.ChiricosT.GoldenK. M.GertzM. (2012). Reconsidering the relationship between perceived neighborhood racial composition and whites’ perceptions of victimization risk: Do Racial stereotypes matter?Criminology, 50, 145-186.
54.
RaderN. E. (2004). The threat of victimization: A theoretical reconceptualization of fear of crime. Sociological Spectrum, 24, 689-704.
55.
RaderN. E.MayD. C.GoodrumS. (2007). An empirical assessment of the “threat of victimization:” Considering fear of crime, perceived risk, avoidance, and defensive behaviors. Sociological Spectrum, 27, 475-505.
56.
RandM. R. (2008). Criminal victimization, 2007. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics Bulletin.
57.
ReimanJ.LeightonP. (2010). The rich get richer and the poor get prison: Ideology, class, and criminal justice (9th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
58.
RobertsJ. V.HoughM. (2005). Understanding public attitudes to criminal justice. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
59.
RosenfeldR. (2002). Crime decline in context. Contexts, 1, 25-34.
60.
RountreeP. W. (1998). A reexamination of the crime-fear linkage. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 35, 341-372.
61.
RountreeP. W.LandK. C. (1996a). Burglary victimization, perceptions of crime risk, and routine activities: A multilevel analysis across Seattle neighborhoods and census tracts. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 33, 147-180.
62.
RountreeP. W.LandK. C. (1996b). Perceived risk versus fear of crime: Empirical evidence of conceptually distinct reactions in survey data. Social Forces, 74, 1353-1376.
63.
RubinA. T. (2011). Punitive penal preferences and support for welfare: Applying the “governance of social marginality” thesis to the individual level. Punishment & Society, 13, 198-229.
64.
RudolphT. J.EvansJ. (2005). Political trust, ideology, and public support for government spending. American Journal of Political Science, 49, 660-671.
65.
SabolW. J.WestH. C.CooperM. (2009). Prisoners in 2008. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics Bulletin.
66.
SavelsbergJ. J. (2002). Cultures of control in contemporary societies. Law & Social Inquiry, 27, 685-710.
67.
SheldenR. G. (2004). The imprisonment crisis in America. Review of Policy Research, 21, 5-12.
68.
SimonJ. (1993). Poor discipline: Parole and the social control of the underclass 1890-1990. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
69.
SimonJ. (2007). Governing through crime: How the war on crime transformed American democracy and created a culture of fear. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
70.
SmithB. L.SloanJ. J.WardR. M. (1990). Public support for the Victims’ Rights Movement: Results of a statewide survey. Crime & Delinquency, 36, 488-502.
71.
UnneverJ. D.CochranJ. K.CullenF. T.ApplegateB. K. (2010). The pragmatic American: Attributions of crime and the hydraulic relation hypothesis. Justice Quarterly, 27, 431-457.
72.
UnneverJ. D.CullenF. T. (2009). Empathetic identification and punitiveness: A middle-range theory of individual differences. Theoretical Criminology, 13, 283-312.
73.
UnneverJ. D.CullenF. T. (2010). The social sources of Americans’ punitiveness: A test of three competing models. Criminology, 48, 99-130.
74.
UnneverJ. D.CullenF. T.FisherB. S. (2007). A liberal is someone who has not been mugged: Criminal victimization and political beliefs. Justice Quarterly, 24, 309-334.
75.
U.S. Department of Justice. (2011). Crime in the United States, 2010. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
76.
WacquantL. (2009). Punishing the poor: The neoliberal government of social insecurity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
77.
WardG.KupchikA. (2010). What drives juvenile probation officers? Relating organizational contexts, status characteristics, and personal convictions to treatment and punishment orientations. Crime & Delinquency, 56, 35-69.
78.
WarrM. (1980). The accuracy of public beliefs about crime. Social Forces, 59, 456-470.
79.
WarrM. (2000). Fear of crime in the United States: Avenues for research and policy. In DuffeeD. (Ed.), Criminal justice 2000: Volume 4, Measurement and analysis of crime and justice (pp. 451-489). Bethesda, MD: National Institute of Justice.
80.
WelshD. C.FarringtonD. P. (2009). Making public places safe: Surveillance and crime prevention. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
81.
WesternB. (2004). Politics and social structure in The Culture of Control. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 7, 33-41.
82.
WilcoxP.QuisenberryN.JonesS. (2003). The built environment and community crime risk interpretation. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 40, 322-334.
