Criminological Explanations,Race,and Biological Attributions of Crime as Predictors of Philadelphia Area Residents’ Support for Criminal Justice Policies

Abstract

This study used telephone surveys from 350 randomly sampled Philadelphians to examine whether attributing crime to individual and environmental causes predicted support for punitive and progressive policies, respectively. This study also investigated whether Blacks and Whites differed in their preferred crime responses, and whether race interacted with crime attributions to predict preferred policies. Finally, this study explored whether biological attributions predicted support for policies. Linear regression analyses revealed: (1) individual crime attributions predicted support for punitive response policies; (2) environmental crime attributions predicted support for progressive policies; (3) Blacks more strongly supported progressive policies; (4) race significantly interacted with crime attributions to predict support for progressive policies; and (5) attributing crime to biological causes was unrelated to either policy type.

Keywords

public opinion crime causation race public policy attribution

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alexander

(2012). The new Jim Crow: Mass incarceration in the age of colorblindness. The New Press.

American Civil Liberties Union (2017, November 16). 91 percent of Americans support criminal justice reform, ACLU polling finds. Retrieved April 13, 2020, from https://www.aclu.org/press-releases/91-percent-americans-support-criminal-justice-reform-aclu-polling-finds

Applegate

B. K.

Cullen

F. T.

Turner

M. G.

Sundt

J. L.

(1996). Assessing public support for three-strikes-and-you’re-out laws: Global versus specific attitudes. Crime & Delinquency, 42(4), 517–534.

Applegate

B. K.

Cullen

F. T.

Fisher

B. S.

(2002). Public views toward crime and correctional policies: Is there a gender gap? Journal of Criminal Justice, 30, 89-100.

Armborst

(2017). How fear of crime affects punitive attitudes. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 23, 461–481.

Baker

Cleary

H. M. D.

Pickett

J. T.

Gertz

M. G.

(2016). Crime salience and public willingness to pay for child saving and juvenile punishment. Crime & Delinquency, 62(5), 645–668.

Baker

Metcalfe

C. F.

Berenblum

Aviv

Gertz

(2015). Examining public preferences for the allocation of resources to rehabilitative versus punitive crime policies. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 26(5), 448–462.

Balvig

Gunnlaugsson

Jerre

Tham

Kinnunen

(2015). The public sense of justice in Scandinavia: A study of attitudes toward punishments. European Journal of Criminology, 12(3), 342–361.

Bobo

L. D.

Johnson

(2004). A taste for punishment: Black and white Americans’ views on the death penalty and the war on drugs. Du Bois Review, 1(1), 151–180.

10.

Calaway

W. R.

Callais

Lightner

(2016). Going to prison: The effect of a prison tour on students’ attitudes toward punitiveness. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 27(3), 432–448.

11.

Campbell

Muncer

(1990). Causes of crime: Uncovering a lay model. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17(4), 410-419.

12.

Carll

(2017). Disparate vantage points: Race, gender, county context, and attitudes about harsh punishments in the US. Social Science Research, 64, 137-153.

13.

Carrier

Walby

(2014). Ptolemizing Lombroso: The psuedo-revolution of biosocial criminology. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Criminology, 6(1), 1–45.

14.

Cochran

J. K.

Boots

D. P.

Chamlin

M. B.

(2006). Political identity and support for capital punishment: A test of attribution theory. Journal of Crime and Justice, 29(1), 45–79.

15.

Cochran

J. K.

Boots

D. P.

Heide

K. M.

(2003). Attribution styles and attitudes toward capital punishment for juveniles, the mentally incompetent, and the mentally retarded. Justice Quarterly, 20(1), 65–93.

16.

Cohen

M. A.

Rust

R. T.

Steen

(2006). Prevention, crime control or cash? Public preferences towards criminal justice spending priorities. Justice Quarterly, 23(3), 317–335.

17.

Cook

C. L.

Lane

(2009a). The place of public fear in sentencing and correctional policy. Journal of Criminal Justice, 37(6), 586–595.

18.

Cook

Lane

(2009b). Legislator ideology and corrections and sentencing policy in Florida: A research note. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 20(2), 209–235.

19.

Cooper

J. A.

Walsh

Ellis

(2010). Is criminology moving toward a paradigm shift? Evidence from a survey of the American Society of Criminology. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 21(3), 332–347.

20.

Cullen

F. T.

Clark

G. A.

Cullen

J. B.

Mathers

R. A.

(1985). Attribution, salience, and attitudes towards criminal sanctioning. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 12(3), 305–331.

21.

Cullen

F. T.

Vose

B. A.

Jonson

C. N. L.

Unnever

J. D.

(2007). Public support for early intervention: Is child saving a “habit of the heart”? Victims and Offenders, 2, 109–124.

22.

Falco

D. L.

Turner

N. C.

(2014). Examining causal attributions towards crime on support for offender rehabilitation. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 39, 630–641.

23.

Gabbidon

S. L.

Boisvert

(2012). Public opinion on crime causation: An exploratory study of Philadelphia area residents. Journal of Criminal Justice, 40, 50–59.

24.

Gajos

J. M.

Beaver

K. M.

Gertz

Bratton

(2014). Public opinions of genetic and neuropsychological contributors to criminal involvement. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 25(3), 368–385.

25.

Green

E. G. T.

Staerklé

Sears

D. O.

(2006). Symbolic racism and whites’ attitudes toward punitive and preventive crime policies. Law and Human Behavior, 30(4), 435–454.

26.

Hartig

(2019, May 3). In year of record midterm turnout, women continued to vote at higher rates than men. Pew Research Center. Retrieved April 13, 2020, from https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/05/03/in-year-of-record-midterm-turnout-women-continued-to-vote-at-higher-rates-than-men/

27.

Heider

(1958). The psychology of inferpersonal relations. John Wiley & Sons.

28.

Johnson

(2006). Crime salience, perceived racial bias, and Blacks’ punitive attitudes. Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice, 4(4), 1–18.

29.

Johnson

(2008). Racial prejudice, perceived injustice, and the Black-White gap in punitive attitudes. Journal of Criminal Justice, 36, 198–206.

30.

Jung

M. K.

(2011). State of white supremacy: Racism, governance, and the United States. Stanford University Press.

31.

Maguire

Johnson

(2015). The structure of public opinion on crime policy: Evidence from seven Caribbean nations. Punishment & Society, 17(4), 502–530.

32.

Marquardt

D. W.

(1970). Generalized inverses, ridge regression, biased linear estimation, and nonlinear estimation. Technometrics, 12(3), 591–612.

33.

McGarrell

E. F.

Flanagan

T. J.

(1987). Measuring and explaining legislator crime control ideology. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 24(2), 102-118.

34.

Mears

D. P.

(2001). Getting tough with juvenile offenders: Explaining support for sanctioning youths as adults. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 28(2), 206–226.

35.

Misra

(2019, April 23). Behind the 2018 U.S. midterm election turnout. United States Census Bureau. Retrieved April 13, 2020, from https://www.census.gov/library/stories/2019/04/behind-2018-united-states-midterm-election-turnout.html

36.

Nagin

D. S.

Piquero

A. R.

Scott

E. S.

Steinberg

(2006). Public preferences for rehabilitation versus incarceration of juvenile offenders: Evidence from a contingent valuation survey. Criminology & Public Policy, 5(4), 627–652.

37.

Peffley

Hurwitz

Mondak

(2017). Racial attributions in the justice system and support for punitive crime policies. American Politics Research, 45(6), 1032–1058.

38.

Pickett

J. T.

Baker

(2014). The pragmatic American: Empirical reality or methodological artifact? Criminology, 52(2), 195–222.

39.

Pickett

J. T.

Chiricos

Gertz

(2014). The racial foundations of whites’ support for child saving. Social Science Research, 44, 44–59.

40.

Piquero

A. R.

Cullen

F. T.

Unnever

J. D.

Piquero

N. L.

Gordon

J. A.

(2010). Never too late: Public optimism about juvenile rehabilitation. Punishment & Society, 12(2), 187–207.

41.

Piquero

A. R.

Steinberg

(2010). Public preferences for rehabilitation versus incarceration of juvenile offenders. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38(1), 1–6.

42.

Ramirez

M. D.

(2013). The polls–trends: Americans’ changing views on crime and punishment. Public Opinion Quarterly, 77(4), 1006–1031.

43.

Ramirez

M. D.

(2015). Racial discrimination, fear of crime, and variability in Blacks’ preferences for punitive and preventative anti-crime policies. Political Behavior, 37(2), 419–439.

44.

Roberts

J. V.

(2004). Public opinion and youth justice. Crime and Justice, 31, 495–542.

45.

Ross

Nisbett

(2011). The person and the situation: Perspectives of social psychology (2nd ed.). Pinter & Martin Ltd.

46.

Sims

(2003). The impact of causal attribution on correctional ideology: A national study. Criminal Justice Review, 28(1), 1–25.

47.

Sims

Johnston

(2004). Examining public opinion about crime and justice: A statewide study. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 15(3), 270–293.

48.

Smith

H. P.

(2013). Reinforcing experiential learning in criminology: Definitions, rationales, and missed opportunities concerning prison tours in the United States. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 24(1), 50–67.

49.

Templeton

L. J.

Hartnagel

T. F.

(2012). Causal attributions of crime and the public’s sentencing goals. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 54(1), 45–65.

50.

The Sentencing Project. (2015). Fact sheet: Black disparities in youth incarceration. Retrieved March 30, 2019, from https://www.sentencingproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Black-Disparities-in-Youth-Incarceration.pdf

51.

Toch

Maguire

(2014). Public opinion regarding crime, criminal justice, and related topics: A retrospect. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 51(4), 424–444.

52.

Tyson

(2018, November 8). The 2018 midterm vote: Divisions by race, gender, education. Pew Research Center. Retrieved April 14, 2020, from https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/11/08/the-2018-midterm-vote-divisions-by-race-gender-education/

53.

Unnever

J. D.

Cochran

J. K.

Cullen

F. T.

Applegate

B. K.

(2010). The pragmatic American: Attributions of crime and the hydraulic relation hypothesis. Justice Quarterly, 27(3), 431–457.

54.

Unnever

J. D.

Cullen

F. T.

Jones

J. D.

(2008). Public support for attacking the ‘root causes’ of crime: The impact of egalitarian and racial beliefs. Sociological Focus, 41(1), 1–33.

55.

Unnever

J. D.

Gabbidon

S. L.

(2011). A theory of African American offending: Race, racism, and crime. Routledge.

56.

U.S. Census Bureau. (2008). Population and housing unit estimates datasets. https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.2008.html

57.

Vaughn

M. G.

(2016). Policy implications of biosocial criminology: Toward a renewed commitment to prevention science. Criminology & Public Policy, 15(3), 703–710.

58.

Walsh

Ellis

(2004). Ideology: Criminology’s Achilles’ heel? Quarterly Journal of Ideology, 27(1&2), 1–25.

59.

Wright

J. P.

Boisvert

(2009). What biosocial criminology offers criminology. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36(11), 1228–1240.

60.

Young

R. L.

(1991). Race, conceptions of crime and justice, and support for the death penalty. Social Psychology Quarterly, 54, 67–75.