In this article, the authors used a statewide survey to investigate the extent to which beliefs regarding the age at which youth reach maturity, the role of peer influences, and other factors, such as abuse during childhood, are associated with measures of how harshly juveniles should be treated by the justice system. The results of this study provide strong support for the hypothesis that assessments of adolescent development are important predictors of attitudes about how juveniles should be treated in the justice system. In all cases, variables measuring attitudes surrounding adolescent development explained substantially more of the variance in attitudes toward punishment than did demographic and socioeconomic variables.
CarlsmithK. M.DarleyJ. M.RobinsonP. H. (2002). Why do we punish? Deterrence and just deserts as motives for punishment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 284-299.
2.
CauffmanE.SteinbergL. (2000). (Im)maturity of judgment in adolescence: Why adolescents may be less culpable than adults. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 18, 741-760.
3.
ChoudhuryS.BlakemoreS.CharmanT. (2006). Social cognitive development during adolescence. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 1, 165-174.
4.
Coalition for Juvenile Justice. (2007). Adolescent brain development and juvenile justice fact sheet. Washington, DC: Author.
5.
CullenF.FisherB.ApplegateB. (2000). Public opinion about punishment and corrections. In TonryM. (Ed.), Crime and justice: A review of research (Vol. 27, pp. 1-79). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
6.
EricksonM.JensenG. (1977). Delinquency is still a group behavior: Toward revitalizing the group premise of the sociology of deviance. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 68, 262-273.
7.
FeldB. (1999). The honest politician’s guide to juvenile justice in the twenty-first century. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 564, 10-27.
8.
FeldB. (2004). Competence, culpability, and punishment: Implications of Atkins for executing and sentencing adolescents. Hofstra Law Review, 32, 463-552.
9.
GarciaJ. (2007). Letter to Committee on Education and Labor. Phoenix: State of Arizona, Governor’s Office for Children, Youth and Families.
10.
GardnerM.SteinbergL. (2005). Peer influence on risk taking, risk preference, and risky decision making in adolescence and adulthood: An experimental study. Developmental Psychology, 41, 625-635.
11.
GriffinP. (2003). Trying and sentencing juveniles as adults: An analysis of state transfer and blended sentencing laws. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Delinquency and Prevention, National Center for Juvenile Justice.
12.
GriffinP.TorbetP.SzymanskiL. (1998). Trying juveniles as adults in criminal court: An analysis of state transfer provisions. Washington, DC: U.S. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
13.
GrovesR. (2006). Nonresponse rates and nonresponse bias in household surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 70, 646-675.
14.
HayesL. (2004). Juvenile suicide in confinement: A national survey. Alexandria, VA: National Center on Institutions and Alternatives.
15.
HewittJ.RegoliR.KierkusC. (2006). Adolescent risk-taking as a justification for paternalistic legal policy. Justice Policy Journal, 3, 1-31.
16.
Human Rights Watch. (2005). The rest of their lives: Life without parole for child offenders in the United States. Washington, DC: Author.
17.
Human Rights Watch. (2008). The rest of their lives: Life without parole for child offenders in the United States in 2008. 2008 update. Washington, DC: Author.
18.
JessorR.JessorS. L. (1977). Problem behavior and psychosocial development: A longitudinal study of youth. New York, NY: Academic Press.
19.
KeeterS.KennedyC.DimockM.BestJ.CraighillP. (2006).Gauging the impact of growing nonresponse items and estimates from a national RDD survey. Public Opinion Quarterly, 70, 759-799.
20.
KrisbergK.AustinJ. (1993). Reinventing juvenile justice. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
21.
KubiakS. P.AllenT. (2008). Public opinion regarding juvenile life without parole in consecutive statewide surveys. Crime & Delinquency, 57, 495-515.
22.
LoganW. (1998). Proportionality and punishment: Imposing life without parole on juveniles. Wake Forest Law Review, 33, 681-725.
23.
McGowanA.HahnR.LiebermanA.CrosbyA.FulliloveM.JohnsonR.. . . StoneG. (2007). Effects on violence of laws and policies facilitating the transfer of juveniles from the juvenile justice system to the adult justice system: A systematic review. American Journal of Preventative Medicine, 32, S7-S28.
24.
MoonM.SundtJ.CullenF.WrightJ. (2000). Is child saving dead? Public support for juvenile rehabilitation. Crime & Delinquency, 46, 38-60.
25.
MooreD. (1994). Majority advocate death penalty for teenage killers. Gallup Poll Monthly, September, 2-3.
26.
NaginD.PiqueroA. R.ScottE.SteinbergL. (2006). Public’s preference for rehabilitation versus incarceration of juvenile offenders: Evidence from a contingent valuation survey. Criminology & Public Policy, 5, 627-652.
27.
NelsonE.LeibenluftE.McClureE.PineD. S. (2005). The social re-orientation of adolescence: A neuroscience perspective on the process and its relation to psychopathology. Psychological Medicine, 35, 163-174.
28.
Office of Statistics and Programming. (2007). United States suicide injury deaths per 100,000, all races, both sexes, age 14-17. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
29.
PausT.ZijdenbosA.WorsleyK.CollinsD. L.BlumenthalJ.GieddJ. N.. . . EvansA. C. (1999). Structural maturation of neural pathways in children and adolescents in vivo study. Science, 283, 1908-1911.
30.
RobertsJ. (2004). Public opinion and youth violence. In TonryM.DoobA. N. (Eds.), Crime and justice: A review of research, youth crime and youth justice, comparative and cross national perspectives (Vol. 31, p. 495). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago press.
31.
RobertsJ.StalansL. (1997). Public opinion: Crime and criminal justice. Boulder, CO: Westview.
32.
RobertsJ.StalansL. J.IndermaurS.HoughM. (2003). Penal populism and public opinion: Lessons from five counties. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
33.
SchiraldiV.SolerM. (1998). The will of the people? The public’s opinion of the Violent and Repeat Juvenile Offender Act of 1997. Crime & Delinquency, 44, 590-601.
34.
ScottE.GrissoT. (1997). The evolution of adolescence: A developmental perspective on juvenile justice reform. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 88, 137-189.
35.
SolerM. (2001). Public opinion on youth crime and race: A guide for advocates. Washington, DC: Building Blocks for Youth.
36.
SowellE. R.ThompsonP. M.HolmesC. J.JerniganT. L.TogoA. W. (1999). In vivo evidence for post-adolescence brain maturation in frontal and striatal regions. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 859-861.
37.
StalansL.HenryG. (1994). Societal views of justice for adolescents accused of murder. Law and Human Behavior, 18, 675-696.
38.
SteinbergL.CauffmanE. (1996). Maturity of judgment in adolescence: Psychosocial factors in adolescent decision-making. Law and Behavior, 20, 249-272.
39.
SteinbergL.ScottE. (2003). Less guilty by reason of adolescence: Developmental immaturity, diminished responsibility, and the juvenile death penalty. American Psychologist, 58, 1009-1018.
40.
ThompsonP. (2004). Time-lapse imaging tracks brain maturation from ages 5-20. Los Angeles: National Institute of Mental Health and the University of California at Los Angeles.
41.
U.S. Supreme Court. (2010). Graham v. Florida, argued November 9, 2009. decided May, 17, 2010.201.
42.
ZimringF. (1998). American youth violence. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
