Is a Risky Lifestyle Always “Risky”? The Interaction Between Individual Propensity and Lifestyle Risk in Adolescent Offending: A Test in Two Urban Samples
Restricted accessOtherFirst published online October, 2010
Is a Risky Lifestyle Always “Risky”? The Interaction Between Individual Propensity and Lifestyle Risk in Adolescent Offending: A Test in Two Urban Samples
This study examines the effects on adolescent offending of lifestyle risk and the individual propensity to offend. It is assumed that lifestyle risk will have a more important effect on offending for those individuals with high levels of individual propensity, whereas for individuals with low levels of individual propensity it is assumed that a risky lifestyle will not, or will only marginally, influence their involvement in offending. The data are drawn from two different samples of young adolescents in Antwerp, Belgium (N = 2,486), and Halmstad, Sweden (N = 1,003). The data provide strong support for the hypothesis that the effect of lifestyle risk is dependent on the strength or weakness of individual propensity, indicating that lifestyle risk has a stronger effect on delinquency for individuals with a high propensity to offend. The similarity of the results across two independent samples suggests the findings are stable.
Agnew, R. ( 2003). The interactive effects of social control variables on delinquency. In C. L. Britt & M. R. Gottfredson (Eds.), Control theories of crime and delinquency. Advances in criminological theory (Vol. 12, pp. 53-76). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishing.
2.
Agnew, R., & Peterson, D.M. (1989). Leisure and delinquency . Social Problems, 36, 332-350.
3.
Aiken, L.S., & West, S.G. ( 1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions . Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
4.
Bernburg, J.G., & Thorlindsson, T. (2001). Routine activities in social context: A closer look at the role of opportunity in deviant behavior . Justice Quarterly, 18, 543-567.
5.
Birkbeck, C., & LaFree, G. (1993). The situational analysis of crime and deviance. Annual Review of Sociology, 19, 113-137.
6.
Bjarnason, T. ( 1995). Administration mode bias in a school survey on alcohol, tobacco and illicit drug use. Addiction, 90, 555-559.
7.
Blalock, H.M., Jr. ( 1965). Theory building and the statistical concept of interaction . American Sociological Review, 30, 374-380.
8.
Boxford, S. ( 2006). Schools and the problem of crime. Cullompton, UK: Willan Publishing.
9.
Bronfenbrenner, U. ( 1979). The ecology of human development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10.
Brownfield, D., & Sorensen, A.M. (1993). Self-control and juvenile delinquency: Theoretical issues and an empirical assessment of selected elements of a general theory of crime. Deviant Behavior, 4, 243-264.
11.
Chapple, C.L., McQuillan, J.A., & Berdahl, T.A. ( 2005). Gender, social bonds, and delinquency: A comparison of boys’ and girls’ models. Social Science Research , 34, 357-383.
12.
Cohen, A.K., & Short, J.F., Jr. (1961). Juvenile delinquency. In R. K. Merton & R. A. Nisbet (Eds.), Contemporary social problems (pp. 77-127). New York: Harcourt Brace & World.
13.
Cohen, L.E., & Felson, M. ( 1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44, 588-608.
14.
Costello, B.J., & Vowell, P.R. ( 1999). Testing control theory and differential association: A reanalysis of the Richmond youth project data. Criminology , 37, 815-842.
15.
Farrington, D.P. ( 1996). The explanation and prevention of youthful offending . In J. D. Hawkins (Ed.), Delinquency and crime: Current theories (pp. 68-148). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
16.
Farrington, D. P., Sampson, R. J., & Wikström, P-O. H. (Eds.). (1993). Integrating individual and ecological aspects of crime. Stockholm: Allmänna Förlaget.
17.
Felson, M. ( 1994). Crime and everyday life. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
18.
Gottfredson, M.R., & Hirschi, T. ( 1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
19.
Grasmick, H.G., Tittle, C.R., Bursik, R.J., Jr., & Arneklev, B.J. (1993). Testing the core empirical implications of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 30, 5-29.
20.
Hindelang, M.J., Gottfredson, M.R., & Garofalo, J. ( 1978). Victims of personal crime: An empirical foundation for a theory of personal victimization. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
21.
Hirschi, T. ( 1969). Causes of delinquency. Berkeley: University of California Press.
22.
Jaccard, J., Turrisi, R., & Wan, C.K. ( 1990). Interaction effects in multiple regression. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
23.
Jan Stams, G., Brugman, D., Dekovi’c, M., van Rosmalen, L., van der Laan, P., & Gibbs, J.C. ( 2006). The moral judgment of juvenile delinquents: A meta-analysis . Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 34, 697-713.
24.
Magnusson, D. ( 1988). Individual development from an interactional perspective . Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum .
25.
Mahoney, J.L., & Stattin, H. ( 2000). Leisure time activities and adolescent antisocial behavior: The role of structure and social context. Journal of Adolescence , 23, 113-127.
26.
McClendon, M.J. ( 1994). Multiple regression and causal analysis. Itasca, IL: F. E. Peacock.
27.
Nofziger, S., & Kurtz, D. ( 2005). Violent lives: A lifestyle model linking exposure to violence to juvenile violent offending. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 42, 3-26.
28.
Norton, E.C., Wang, H., & Chunrong, A. ( 2004). Computing interaction effects and standard errors in logit and probit models. The Stata Journal, 4, 103-116.
29.
Osgood, D.W., & Anderson, A.L. (2004). Unstructured socializing and rates of delinquency. Criminology, 42, 519-549.
30.
Osgood, D.W., Finken, L.L., & McMorris, B.J. (2002). Analyzing multiple-item measures of crime and deviance II: Tobit regression analysis of transformed scores. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 18, 319-347.
Pauwels, L., & Svensson, R. ( 2008). How serious is the problem of item nonresponse in delinquency scales and aetiological variables? A cross-national inquiry into two classroom PAPI self-report studies in Antwerp and Halmstad. European Journal of Criminology, 5, 289-308.
33.
Pratt, T.C., & Cullen, F.T. ( 2000). The empirical status of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime: A meta-analysis. Criminology, 38, 931-964.
34.
Sampson, R.J., & Bartusch, D.J. (1998). Legal cynicism and (subcultural?) tolerance of deviance: The neighborhood context of racial differences. Law and Society Review, 32, 777-804.
35.
Svensson, R. ( 2004). Shame as a consequence of the parent-child relationship: A study of gender differences in juvenile delinquency. European Journal of Criminology, 4, 477-504.
36.
Turner, M.G., & Piquero, A.R. ( 2002). The stability of self-control. Journal of Criminal Justice, 30, 457-471.
37.
Vazsonyi, A.T., Pickering, L.E., Belliston, L.M., Hessing, D., & Junger, M. ( 2002). Routine activities and deviant behaviors: American, Dutch, Hungarian, and Swiss youth. Journal of Quantitative Criminology , 18, 397-422.
38.
Vazsonyi, A.T., Pickering, L.E., Junger, M., & Hessing, D. ( 2001). An empirical test of a general theory of crime: A four nation comparative study of self-control and prediction of deviance. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 38, 91-131.
39.
Wikström, P-O. H. ( 2004). Crime as alternative. Towards a cross-level situational action theory of crime causation. In J. McCord (Ed.), Beyond empiricism: Institutions and intentions in the study of crime. Advances in criminological theory (Vol. 13, pp. 1-37). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishing.
40.
Wikström, P-O. H. ( 2005). The social origins of pathways in crime: Towards a developmental ecological action theory of crime involvement and its changes. In D. P. Farrington (Ed.), Integrated developmental and life course theories of offending. Advances in criminological theory (Vol. 14, pp. 211-245). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishing.
41.
Wikström, P-O. H. ( 2006). Individuals, settings and acts of crime. Situational mechanisms and the explanation of crime. In P-O. H. Wikström & R. J. Sampson (Eds.), The explanation of crime: Contexts, mechanisms and development (pp. 61-107). Cambridge , UK: Cambridge University Press.
Wikström, P-O. H., & Loeber, R. ( 2000). Do disadvantaged neighborhoods cause well-adjusted children to become adolescent delinquents? A study of male juvenile serious offending, individual risk and protective factors, and neighborhood context. Criminology, 38, 1109-1142.
44.
Wikström, P-O. H., & Sampson, R.J. ( 2003). Social mechanisms of community influences on crime and pathways in criminality. In B. B. Lahey , T. E. Moffitt, & A. Caspi (Eds.), Causes of conduct disorder and juvenile delinquency (pp. 118-148). New York: Guilford.
45.
Wikström, P-O. H., & Sampson, R. J. (Eds.). (2006). The explanation of crime: Context, mechanisms, and development. Cambridge , UK: Cambridge University Press.
46.
Wikström, P-O H., & Svensson, R. ( 2008). Why are English youth more violent than Swedish youth? A comparative study of the role of crime propensity, lifestyles and their interactions. European Journal of Criminology, 5, 309-330.
