A number of parolees are returning to the community with programming needs that may not have been addressed during their incarceration; these unmet needs may subsequently affect their successful reintegration into the community. Although there is an increasing female parole population, there has been a paucity of research concerning female parolees. The current study examines the types of needs identified at intake from a sample of 546 female parolees. The results revealed the following. First, if a parolee was employed, had stable living arrangements, and was assessed as needing and receiving some type of drug and/or alcohol program intervention, she was less likely to fail on parole. Second, many of these women were underassessed for having needs for drug and alcohol treatment as well as employment, housing, and other assistance. This underassessment may be because of an increasing emphasis on parole supervision (i.e., custody) rather than treatment in parole agencies.
Acoca, L. (1998). Defusing the time bomb: Understanding and meeting the growing health care needs of incarcerated women in America. Crime & Delinquency44, 49-69.
2.
Beck, A. J., & Shipley, B. E. (1997). Recidivism of prisoners released in 1983. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
3.
Brewster, D. R., & Sharp, S. F. (2002). Educational programs and recidivism in Oklahoma: Another look. The Prison Journal82, 314-334.
4.
Bush-Baskette, S. (2000). The war on drugs and the incarceration of mothers.Journal of Drug Issues, 30, 919-928.
5.
California Department of Corrections. (n.d.). Central California Women's Facility. Retrieved May 24, 2005, from http://www.corr.ca.gov/InstitutionsDiv/INSTDIV/facilities/fac_prison_CCWF.asp
6.
Chaterjee, S., & Price, B. (1991). Regression diagnostics. New York: John Wiley.
7.
Chesney-Lind, M. (2000). Women and the criminal justice system: Gender matters. In Topics in community corrections: Responding to women offenders in the community (pp. 7-10). Washington, DC: National Institute of Corrections.
8.
Ditton, P. (1999). Mental health and treatment of inmates and probationers. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
9.
Dodge, M., & Pogrebin, M. R. (2001). Collateral costs of imprisonment for women: Complications of reintegration. The Prison Journal81, 42-54.
10.
Eaton, M. (1993). Women after prison. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
11.
Famega, C. N. (2003). Discretion or direction? An analysis of patrol officer downtime. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Cincinnati, OH.
12.
Flavin, J. (2004). Employment counseling, housing assistance... and Aunt Yolanda?: How strengtheningfamilies' social capital can reduce recidivism. Criminology & Public Policy3, 209-216.
13.
Glaze, L. E. (2003). Probation and parole in the United States, 2002. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
14.
Glaze, L. E., & Palla, S. (2004). Probation and parole in the United States, 2003. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
15.
Greenfeld, L. A., & Snell, T. L. (1999). Women offenders. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
16.
Harm, N. J., & Phillips, S. D. (2001). You can't go home again: Women and criminal recidivism. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation32(3), 3-21.
17.
Holtfreter, K., Reisig, M. D., & Morash, M. (2004). Poverty, state capital, and recidivism among women offenders. Criminology & Public Policy3, 185-208.
18.
Inciardi, J. A., Lockwood, D., & Pottieger, A. E. (1993). Women and crack-cocaine. New York: Macmillan.
19.
Kruttschnitt, C., & Gartner, R. (2003). Women's imprisonment. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice: A review of research (Vol. 30, pp. 1-81). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
20.
Langan, P. A., & Levin, D. J. (2002). Recidivism of prisoners released in 1994. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
21.
Lynch, M. (1998). Waste managers?: The new penology, crime fighting, and parole agent identity. Law & Society Review32, 839-870.
22.
Mahan, S. (1996). Crack cocaine, crime, and women. Drugs, health, and social policy series (Vol. 4). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23.
Maher, L., & Curtis, R. (1995). In search of the female urban “gangsta”: Change, culture, and crack cocaine. In B. R. Price & N. J. Sokoloff (Eds.), The criminal justice system and women(pp. 147-166). New York: McGraw-Hill.
24.
McShane, M., & Williams, F. P., III. (1998). Predicting parole success. Sacramento: California Department of Corrections, Parole and Community Services Division.
25.
Menard, S. (1995). Applied logistic regression analysis. Quantitative applications in the social sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26.
Morash, M., & Schram, P. J. (2002). The prison experience: Special issues of women in prison. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
27.
Mumola, C. J. (2000). Incarcerated parents and their children. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
28.
O'Brien, P. (2001a). “Just like baking a cake”: Women describe the necessary ingredients for successful reentry after incarceration. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Human Services82, 287-295.
29.
O'Brien, P. (2001b). Makingit in the“free world.”Albany: State University of New York Press.
30.
Pearl, N. (1998). Use of community-based social services to reduce recidivism in female parolees. Women and Criminal Justice10(1), 27-52.
31.
Petersilia, J. (2001). Prisoner reentry: Public safety and reintegration challenges.The Prison Journal, 81, 360-375.
32.
Petersilia, J. (2003). When prisoners come home: Parole and prisoner reentry. New York: Oxford University Press.
33.
Pettiway, L. E. (1997). Workin'it. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
34.
Richie, B. (1996). Compelled to crime: The gender entrapment of battered Black women.New York: Routledge.
35.
Richie, B. (2001). Challenges incarcerated women face as they return to their communities: Findings from life history interviews. Crime & Delinquency47, 368-389.
36.
Sterk, C. E. (1999). Fast lives: Women who use crack cocaine. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
37.
Stine, R. A. (1995). Graphical interpretation of variance inflation factors. The American Statistician49, 53-56.
38.
Vito, G. F., & Tewksbury, R. (2000). Gender comparisons in drug testing probationers and parolees. Corrections Compendium25(9), 1-5, 27-27.
