The objective of this study was to examine the influence of type of counsel across race on juvenile court outcomes. Using data from a sample of juvenile court referrals from two midwestern juvenile courts, this study examined the interaction of race and type of counsel on disposition outcome. The results indicated that youth without an attorney were the most likely to have the charges dismissed, and this effect was more pronounced for non-White youth. In addition, non-White youth represented by a private attorney were significantly more likely than similar White youth to receive a secure confinement disposition.
Aday, D., Jr. (1986). Court structure, defense attorney use, and juvenile court decisions. Sociological Quarterly, 27, 107-119.
2.
Aiken, L., & West, S. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
3.
Albonetti, C. (1997). Sentencing under the federal sentencing guidelines: Effects of defendant characteristics, guilty pleas and departures on sentence outcomes for drug offenses, 1991-1992. Law and Society Review, 31, 278-322.
4.
Aldrich, J., & Nelson, F. (1984). Linear probability, logit and tobit models. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
5.
Bailey, W. (1981). Preadjudicatory detention in a large metropolitan juvenile court. Law and Human Behavior, 5, 19-43.
6.
Bell, D., Jr., & Lang, K. (1985). The intake dispositions of juvenile offenders. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 22, 309-328.
7.
Bishop, D.,& Frazier, C. (1988). The influence of race in juvenile justice processing. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 25, 242-263.
8.
Bishop, D.,& Frazier, C. (1996). Race effects in juvenile justice decision -making: Findings of a statewide analysis. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 86, 392-414.
9.
Black, D.,& Reiss, A., Jr. (1970). Police control of juveniles. American Sociological Review, 35, 63-77.
10.
Bortner, M., & Reed, W. (1985). The pre-eminence of process: An example of refocused justice research. Social Science Quarterly, 66, 413-425.
11.
Bortner, M., Sunderland, M., & Winn, R. (1985). Race and the impact of juvenile deinstitutionalization. Crime & Delinquency, 31, 35-46.
12.
Burruss, G., & Kempf-Leonard, K. (2002). The questionable advantage of defense counsel in juvenile court. Justice Quarterly, 19, 37-67.
13.
Carrington, P.,& Moyer, S. (1990). The effect of defense counsel and outcome in juvenile court. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 32, 621-637.
14.
Clarke, S., & Koch, G. (1980). Juvenile court: Therapy or crime control, and do lawyers make a difference?Law and Society Review, 14, 263-308.
15.
Cohen, J. (1992). Quantitative methods in psychology. Psychology Bulletin, 112. 155-159.
16.
Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
17.
Cohen, L., & Klugel, J. (1979a). The detention decision: A study of the impact of social characteristics and legal factors in two metropolitan juvenile courts. Social Forces, 58, 146-161.
18.
Cohen, L., & Klugel, J. (1979b). Selecting delinquents for adjudication: An analysis of intake screening decisions in two metropolitan courts. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 16, 143-163.
19.
Conley, D. (1994). Adding color to a Black and White picture: Using qualitative data to explain racial disproportionality in the juvenile justice system. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 31, 135-148.
20.
Dannefer, D.,& Schutt, R. (1982). Race and juvenile justice processing in court and police agencies. American Journal of Sociology, 87, 1113-1132.
21.
DeJong, C., & Jackson, K. (1998). Putting race into context: Race, juvenile justice processing and urbanization. Justice Quarterly, 15, 487-504.
22.
Dootjes, I., Erickson, P.,& Fox, R. (1972). Defense counsel in juvenile court: A variety of roles. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 14, 132-149.
23.
Duffee, D.,& Siegel, L. (1971). The organization man: Legal counsel in the juvenile court. Criminal Law Bulletin, 7, 544-553.
24.
Eisenstein, J.,& Jacob. H. (1977). Felony justice: An organizational analysis of criminal courts. Boston: Little, Brown.
25.
Erickson, P. (1975). Legalistic and traditional role expectations for defense counsel in juvenile court. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 17, 78-93.
26.
Fagan, J., Slaughter, E.,& Hartstone, E. (1987). Blind justice? The impact of race on the juvenile justice process. Crime & Delinquency, 33, 224-258.
27.
Feld, B. (1988). In re Gault: A cross-state comparison of the right to counsel in juvenile court. Crime & Delinquency, 34, 393-424.
28.
Feld, B. (1991). Justice by geography: Urban, suburban and rural variations in juvenile justice administration. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 82, 156-210.
29.
Feld, B. (1993a). Criminalizing the American juvenile court. In M. Tonry (Ed.) Crime and justice: A review of research(pp. 197-280). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
30.
Feld, B. (1993b). Justice for children: The right to counsel and the juvenile courts. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
31.
Feld, B. (1999). Afunny thing happened on theway to the centenary. Punishment and Society, 1, 187-214.
32.
Ferster, E., & Courtless, T. (1972). Pre-dispositional data, role of counsel, and decisions in a juvenile court. Law and Society Review, 7, 195-222.
33.
Ferster, E., Courtless, T.,& Snethen, E. (1971). The juvenile justice system: In search of the role of counsel. Fordham Law Review, 39, 375-412.
34.
Frazier, C.,& Bishop, D. (1985). The pretrial detention of juveniles and its impact on case dispositions. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 76, 1132-1152.
35.
Frazier, C., & Bishop, D. (1995). Reflections on race effects in juvenile justice. In K. Kempf-Leonard, C. Pope, & W. Feyerherm (Eds.), Minorities in juvenile justice(pp. 16-46). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
36.
Frazier, C., Bishop, D., & Henretta, J. C. (1992). The social context of race differentials in juvenile justice dispositions. Sociological Quarterly, 33, 447-458.
37.
Frazier, C., & Cochran, J. (1987). Detention of juveniles: Its effect on subsequent juvenile court processing decisions. Youth & Society, 17, 286-305.
38.
Hawkins, D. (1987). Beyond anomalies: Rethinking the conflict perspective on race and criminal punishment. Social Forces, 65, 719-745.
39.
Hawkins, D.,& Jones, H. (1989). Black adolescents and the criminal justice system. In R. Jones (Ed.), Black adolescents(pp. 403-425). Berkeley, CA: Lobbard Henry.
40.
Henretta, J., Frazier, C., & Bishop, D. (1986). The effect of prior case outcomes on juvenile justice decision-making. Social Forces, 65, 554-562.
41.
In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1 (1967).
42.
Johnson, J.,& Secret, P. (1990). Race and juvenile court decision making revisited. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 4, 159-187.
43.
Kempf-Leonard, K., & Sontheimer, L. (1995). The role of race in juvenile justice processing in Pennsylvania. In K. Kempf Leonard, C. Pope,& W. Feyerherm, (Eds.), Minorities in juvenile justice(pp. 98-127). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
44.
Langley, M. (1972). The juvenile court: The making of a delinquent. Law and Society Review, 7, 273-298.
45.
Lefstein, N., Stapleton, V., & Teitelbaum, L. (1969). In search of juvenile justice: Gault and its implementation. Law and Society Review, 3, 491-563.
46.
Leiber, M. (1994). A comparison of juvenile court outcomes for Native Americans, African Americans, and Whites. Justice Quarterly, 11, 257-278.
47.
Liao, T. (1994). Interpreting probability models: Logit, probit, and other generalized linear models. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
48.
Long, J. (1997). Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
49.
Marshall, I., & Thomas, C. (1983). Discretionary decision-making and the juvenile court. Juvenile and Family Court Journal, 34, 47-59.
50.
Mather, L. (1974). The outsider in the courtroom: An alternative role for the defense. In H. Jacob (Ed.), The potential for reform of criminal justice(pp. 263-290). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
51.
McCarthy, B.,& Smith, B. (1986). The conceptualization of discrimination in the juvenile justice process: The impact of administrative factors and screening decisions on juvenile court dispositions. Criminology, 24, 41-64.
52.
McCord, J., Spatz-Widom, C., & Crowell, C. (2002). Juvenile crime, juvenile justice. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
53.
McGarrell, E. (1993). Trends in racial disproportionality in juvenile court processing: 1985-1989. Crime & Delinquency, 39, 29-48.
54.
Melton, G. (1989). Taking Gault seriously: Toward a new juvenile court. Nebraska Law Review, 68, 146-181.
Myers, S., Jr. (1985). Statistical tests of discrimination in punishment. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 1, 191-218.
57.
Neigher, A. (1967). The Gault decision: Due process and the juvenile courts. Federal Probation, 31, 8-18.
58.
Nesburg, A. (1971). Juvenile due process in the lower courts. Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology, and Police Science, 62, 335-349.
59.
Neubauer, D. (1974). Criminal justice in middle America. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
60.
Paternoster, R., Brame, R., Mazerolle, P., & Piquero, A. (1998). Using the correct statistical test for the equality of regression coefficients. Criminology, 36, 859-866.
61.
Piliavin, I.,& Briar, S. (1964). Police encounters with juveniles. American Sociological Review, 51, 91-119.
62.
Platt, A. (1969). The child savers. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
63.
Poole, E., & Regoli, R. (1980). An analysis of juvenile court dispositions. Juvenile and Family Court Journal, 31, 23-32.
64.
Pope, C., & Feyerherm, W. (1990). Minority status and juvenile justice processing: An assessment of the research literature (parts I and II). Criminal Justice Abstracts, (June and September), 527-542.
65.
Reasons, C. (1970). Gault: Procedural change and substantive effect. Crime & Delinquency, 16, 163-171.
66.
Schlossman, S. (1977). Love and the American delinquent: The theory and practice of “ progressive” juvenile justice, 1825-1920. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
67.
Scott, E., & Grisso, T. (1998). The evolution of adolescence: A developmental perspective on juvenile justice reform. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 88, 137-193.
68.
Stapleton, V., & Teitelbaum, L. (1972). In defense of youth: A study of the role of counsel in American juvenile courts. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
69.
Thomas, C.,& Sieverdes, C. (1975). Juvenile court intake: Ananalysis of discretionary decisionmaking. Criminology12, 413-432.
70.
Thornberry, T. (1973). Race, socioeconomic status and sentencing in the juvenile justice system. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 64, 90-98.
71.
Thornberry, T.,& Christensen, R. (1984). Juvenile justice decision-making as a longitudinal process. Social Forces, 63, 433-444.
72.
U. S. Bureau of the Census. (1990). Census of Population and Housing. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
73.
U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs. (1999). Juvenile offenders and victims: 1999 national report. Pittsburgh, PA: National Center for Juvenile Justice.
74.
Winslade, W. (1974). The juvenile court: From idealism to hypocrisy. Social Theory and Practice, 3, 181-199.
75.
Wordes, M., & Bynum, T. (1995). Policing juveniles: Is there bias against youths of color? In K. Kempf-Leonard, C. Pope, & W. Feyerherm (Eds.), Minorities in juvenile justice(pp. 47-65). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
76.
Wordes, M., Bynum, T.,& Corley, C. (1994). Locking up youth: The impact of race on detention decisions. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 31, 149-165.
77.
Zatz, M. (1987). The changing forms of racial/ethnic bias in sentencing. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 24, 69-92.
