Prejudice and discrimination against sexual and gender minorities contribute to mental health challenges. Intergroup dialogue (IGD) is a validated intervention for mitigating the conflicts. This 7-week IGD program aimed to diminish sociocultural prejudice against LGBTQ+ individuals and assess its effectiveness. Findings revealed improved cultural empathy and critical consciousness in both LGBTQ+ and non-LGBTQ+ groups. Non-LGBTQ+ participants exhibited increased comfort and empathy towards LGBTQ+ individuals and recognition of LGBTQ+ rights. LGBTQ+ participants reported a heightened awareness of minority issues and a greater motivation to challenge societal injustices. Session depth followed an inverted U-shape, while smoothness exhibited a U-shaped pattern, reflecting the four stages of IGD. Depth correlated positively with the working alliance, while smoothness was linked to both positive and negative emotions. This pioneering study highlights the potential of IGD in reducing prejudice and improving attitudes toward LGBTQ+ individuals, especially in less LGBTQ+-friendly contexts like South Korea, providing insights for future research.
AldanaA.RowleyS. J.CheckowayB.Richards-SchusterK. (2012). Raising ethnic-racial consciousness: The relationship between intergroup dialogues and adolescents’ ethnic-racial identity and racism awareness. Equity & Excellence in Education, 45(1), 120–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2012.641863
2.
AlldredgeC. T.BurlingameG. M.YangC.RosendahlJ. (2021). Alliance in group therapy: A meta-analysis. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 25(1), 13–28. https://doi.org/10.1037/gdn0000135
3.
AllportG. W. (1954). The Nature of Prejudice. Addison-Wesley.
4.
CadenasG. A.LynnN.LiK. M.LiuL.CantúE. A.RuthA.CarrollS.KulpS.SpenceT. (2020). Racial/ethnic minority community college students’ critical consciousness and social cognitive career outcomes. The Career Development Quarterly, 68(4), 302–317. https://doi.org/10.1002/cdq.12238
ChuY. S.KimK. T.KimB. M. (2019). Public attitudes towards social minorities: The case of South Korea. Institute for Health and Social Affairs. https://doi.org/10.978.896827/6163
7.
CraigM. A.RichesonJ. A. (2012). Coalition or derogation? How perceived discrimination influences intraminority intergroup relations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(4), 759–777. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026481
8.
CroucherS. M.BrunoA.McGrathP.AdamsC.McGahanC.SuitsA.HuckinsA. (2012). Conflict Styles and High–Low Context Cultures: A Cross-Cultural Extension. Communication Research Reports, 29(1), 64–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2011.640093
9.
DeRubeisR. J.BrotmanM. A.GibbonsC. J. (2005). A conceptual and methodological analysis of the nonspecifics argument. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 12(2), 174–183. https://doi.org/10.1093/clipsy.bpi022
10.
DesselA. B. (2010). Effects of intergroup dialogue: Public school teachers and sexual orientation prejudice. Small Group Research, 41(5), 556–592. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496410369560
11.
DesselA. B.AliN. (2012). Arab/Jewish intergroup dialogue courses: Building communication skills, relationships, and social justice. Small Group Research, 43(5), 559–586. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496412453773
12.
DesselA. B.WoodfordM. R.RoutenbergR.BreijakD. P. (2013). Heterosexual students' experiences in sexual orientation intergroup dialogue courses. Journal of Homosexuality, 60(7), 1054–1080. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2013.776413
13.
DesselA. B.WoodfordM. R.WarrenN. (2011). Intergroup dialogue courses on sexual orientation: lesbian, gay and bisexual student experiences and outcomes. Journal of Homosexuality, 58(8), 1132–1150. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2011.598420
14.
DiemerM. A.FrisbyM. B.PinedoA.BardelliE.ElliotE.HarrisE.McAlisterS.VoightA. M. (2022). Development of the short critical consciousness scale (ShoCCS). Applied Developmental Science, 26(3), 409–425. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2020.1834394
15.
FrantellK. A. (2016). Positive and negative emotion, group climate, and ethnocultural empathy in intergroup dialogue [Master’sthesis, University of Tennessee, Knoxville]. TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/3770/
16.
FrantellK. A.MilesJ. R.RuweA. M. (2019). Intergroup dialogue: A review of recent empirical research and its implications for research and practice. Small Group Research, 50(5), 654–695. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496419835923
17.
FreireP. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Herder and Herder.
18.
GriffinS. R.BrownM.WarrenN. M. (2012). Critical education in high schools: The promise and challenges of intergroup dialogue. Equity & Excellence in Education, 45(1), 159–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2012.641868
19.
GurinP.NagdaB. A.ZùñigaX. (2013). Dialogue across difference: Practice, theory, and research on intergroup dialogue. Russell Sage Foundation.
20.
James-GallawayC. D. (2023). “They were mostly sitting back and staying quiet”: A critical race discourse analysis of racial voyeurism in cross-racial intergroup dialogues. Whiteness and Education, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/23793406.2023.2217184
21.
JangA. K.JeongJ. S.KimJ. S.ShinY. J. (2022). Consensual qualitative study on participation positive experience of intergroup dialogue program: Focusing on factors related to program effect. Multicultural Education Studies, 15(2), 83–113. https://doi.org/10.14328/MES.2022.6.30.83
22.
JangJ. Y.AhnH. N. (2018). Validation of the Korean Version of the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual Positive Identity Measure. Korean Journal of Counseling And Psychotherapy, 30(2), 273–295. https://doi.org/10.20406/KJCS.2022.5.28.2.133
23.
JoslinJ. Y.DesselA. B.WoodfordM. R. (2016). Social work students’ experiences in a Christianity and sexual minority intergroup dialogue. Social Work Education, 35(5), 547–559. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2016.1178716
24.
KanamoriY.Cornelius-WhiteJ. H.PegorsT. K.DanielT.HulgusJ. (2017). Development and validation of the transgender attitudes and beliefs scale. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46(5), 1503–1515. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-016-0840-1
25.
KimS. Y.EomJ. S.RoE, Y.YouS. E. (2013). Development and Validation of Discrete Emotions Scale (DES). Korean Journal of Psychology: General, 32(1), 63–89.
26.
KivlighanD. M.Jr. (2011). Individual and group perceptions of therapeutic factors and session evaluation: An actor–partner interdependence analysis. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 15(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022397
27.
KlopfD. W. (2001). Intercultural encounters: The fundamentals of intercultural communication, Morton Publishing Company.
28.
LeeH. J.KimG. R.KwonY. R.ShinY. J. (2021). Validation of the Korean Version of the Transgender Attitudes and Beliefs Scale (K-TABS). The Korean Journal of Counseling and Psychotherapy, 33(3), 1077–1108. https://doi.org/10.23844/kjcp.2021.08.33.3.1077
29.
LeeS. H.KimK. H. (1993). A Validation study of the Korean Version of Session Evaluation Questionnaire. The Korean Journal of Counseling and Psychotherapy, 5(1), 30–47.
30.
LeeS. M. (2011). The effect of intergroup contact through Internet on the reduction of racial prejudice against South-East Asian migrants in Korea. [Master’s thesis, Ajou University].
31.
Lopez-HumphreysM.DawsonB. A. (2014). From education to action: The immediate and long-term results of intergroup dialogue on BSW students’ social justice activity. The Journal of Baccalaureate Social Work, 19(1), 31–43. https://doi.org/10.18084/basw.19.1.5g7l07512351xm50
McIntoshP. (2007). White privilege: Unpacking the invisible knapsack. In AndersonM. L.CollinsP. H. (Eds.), Race, class, and gender: An anthology (pp. 98–102). Thomson Wadsworth.
34.
McWhirterE. H.McWhirterB. T. (2016). Critical consciousness and vocational development among Latina/o high school youth: Initial development and testing of a measure. Journal of Career Assessment, 24(3), 543–558. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072715599535
35.
MeyerI. H. (2003). Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: Conceptual issues and research evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 129(5), 674–697. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.5.674
36.
MilesJ. R.KivlighanD. M.Jr. (2012). Perceptions of group climate by social identity group in intergroup dialogue. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 16(3), 189–205. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028634
37.
MilesJ. R.MullerJ. T.ArnettJ. E.IIIBournJ. R.JohnsonM. C.RecabarrenD. (2015). Group member affect and session evaluations in intergroup dialogue. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 19(4), 225–242. https://doi.org/10.1037/gdn0000032
38.
MullerJ. T.MilesJ. R. (2017). Intergroup dialogue in undergraduate multicultural psychology education: Group climate development and outcomes. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 10(1), 52–71. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0040042
39.
NagdaB. A.GurinP. (2013). The practice of intergroup dialogue. In GurinP.NagdaB. A.ZùñigaX. E. (Eds.), Dialogue across difference: Practice, theory, and research on intergroup dialogue (pp. 32–73). Russell Sage Foundation.
40.
NagdaB. A.KimC. W.TrueloveY. (2004). Learning about difference, learning with others, learning to transgress. Journal of Social Issues, 60(1), 195–214. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-4537.2004.00106.x
41.
National Human Rights Commission of Korea. (2017). Factual Survey on Hate Speech and Regulatory Measures. National Human Rights Commission of Korea.
42.
ParkJ.HanG. (2018). Collectivism and the development of indigenous psychology in South Korea. In LiW. W.HodgettsD.FooK. H. (Eds.), Asia-Pacific perspectives on intercultural psychology (pp. 53–74). Routledge.
43.
PettigrewT. F.TroppL. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(5), 751–783. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751
RiggleE. D.MohrJ. J.RostoskyS. S.FingerhutA. W.BalsamK. F. (2014). A multifactor lesbian, gay, and bisexual positive identity measure (LGB-PIM). Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity, 1(4), 398–411. https://doi.org/10.1037/sgd0000057
46.
RinneT.SteelG. D.FairweatherJ. (2013). The role of Hofstede's individualism in national-level creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 25(1), 129–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2013.752293
47.
RobakR. W.KangosK. A.ChiffrillerS. H.GriffinP. W. (2013). The working alliance in group counseling: An exploratory study. Psychological Reports, 113(2), 591–604. https://doi.org/10.2466/21.02.PR0.113x19z7
48.
StephanW.StephanC. W. (2001). Improving Intergroup Relations. Sage.
49.
StilesW. B. (1980). Measurement of the impact of psychotherapy sessions. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychotherapy, 48(2), 176–185. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.48.2.176
50.
StilesW. B.ReynoldsS.HardyG. E.ReesA.BarkhamM.ShapiroD. A. (1994). Evaluation and description of psychotherapy sessions by clients using the session evaluation questionnaire and the session impacts scale. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 41(2), 175–185. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.41.2.175
51.
StilesW. B.SnowJ. S. (1984). Dimensions of psychotherapy session impact across sessions and across clients. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 23(1), 59–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8260.1984.tb00627.x
52.
Ting-ToomeyS. (1982). Toward a theory of conflict and culture. ERIC Clearinghouse.
53.
WangY. W.DavidsonM. M.YakushkoO. F.SavoyH. B.TanJ. A.BleierJ. K. (2003). The scale of ethnocultural empathy: Development, validation, and reliability. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 50(2), 221–234. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.50.2.221
54.
WorthingtonR. L.DillonF. R.Becker-SchutteA. M. (2005). Development, Reliability, and Validity of the Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Knowledge and Attitudes Scale for Heterosexuals (LGB-KASH). Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(1), 104–118. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.52.1.104
55.
YangJ. Y.KwonK. I. (2020). The Development and Validation of Working Alliance Scale for group counseling. The Korean Journal of Counseling and Psychotherapy, 32(3), 1263–1296. https://doi.org/10.23844/kjcp.2020.08.32.3.1263
56.
ZúñigaX.NagdaB. A.CheslerM. E.Cytron-WalkerA. E. (2007). Intergroup dialogue in higher education: meaningful learning about social justice. ASHE Higher Education Report, 32(4), 1–128. https://doi.org/10.1002/aehe.3204
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
