South Korea’s competitive educational landscape, often characterized as a coercive culture with strong academic pressure, challenges the idea of self-determination theory (SDT) that coercion diminishes motivation. In the current study, we explored this assumption by analyzing data from 2,590 South Korean adolescents across a 4-year period. Specifically, we utilized data from the first to fourth waves of the Korea Children and Youth Panel Survey 2018, beginning with students in 7th grade. Random intercept cross-lagged panel model (RI-CLPM) analyses indicated that the interaction between coercive parenting and academic vigor differed depending on gender. Furthermore, the results suggest that the application of SDT may not be generalized in Korean culture and may instead be influenced by unique cultural nuances, such as those that were present for the South Korean sample explored in this study. The study also explored potential implications for advocacy, education, and professional practice, and identified directions for future research.
BerryJ. W. (2002). Cross-cultural psychology: Research and applications. Cambridge University Press.
2.
BronsteinP.GinsburgG. S.HerreraI. S. (2005). Parental predictors of motivational orientation in early adolescence: A longitudinal study. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 34(6), 559–575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-005-8946-0
3.
BuglerM.McGeownS. P.St Clair-ThompsonH. (2013). Gender differences in adolescents’ academic motivation and classroom behaviour. Educational Psychology, 35(5), 541–556. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2013.849325
4.
ByounS. B.ShinN. (2021). Maternal overprotection and young children's interactions with peers during play: The mediating roles of social immaturity and withdrawal of children. Korean Journal of Childcare and Education, 17(1), 105–124. https://doi.org/10.14698/jkcce.2021.17.01.105
5.
ByunS.-y.SchoferE.KimK.-k. (2012). Revisiting the role of cultural capital in East Asian educational systems: The case of South Korea. Sociology of Education, 85(3), 219–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038040712447180
6.
ChenF. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(3), 464–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834
7.
CheungG. W.RensvoldR. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem0902_5
8.
ChoiY.KimY. S.KimS. Y.ParkI. J. K. (2013). Is Asian American parenting controlling and harsh? Empirical testing of relationships between Korean American and Western parenting measures. Asian American Journal of Psychology, 4(1), 19–29. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031220
CustersR.AartsH. (2005). Positive affect as implicit motivator: On the nonconscious operation of behavioral goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(2), 129–142. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.2.129
11.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (2008). Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 49(3), 182–185. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012801
12.
DuchesneS.RatelleC. F. (2010). Parental behaviors and adolescents’ achievement goals at the beginning of middle school: Emotional problems as potential mediators. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(2), 497–507. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019320
13.
DuffyR. D.KimH. J.PerezG.PrietoC. G.TorgalC.KennyM. E. (2022). Decent education as a precursor to decent work: An overview and construct conceptualization. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 138(2), 103771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2022.103771
14.
DuncanJ. (1998). The Korean adoption of Neo-Confucianism: The social context. In SloteW. H.De VosG. A. (Eds.), Confucianism and the family: A study of Indo-Tibetan Scholarsticism (pp. 75–90). State University of New York Press.
15.
EaglyA. H.WoodW.DiekmanA. H. (2000). Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: A current appraisal. In EckesT.TrautnerH. M. (Eds.), The developmental social psychology of gender (pp. 123–174). Erlbaum.
16.
GarrisonY. L.KimJ. Y. C.LiuW. M. (2018). A qualitative study of Korean men experiencing stress due to nonprestigious hakbeol. The Counseling Psychologist, 46(6), 786–813. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000018798042
17.
GarrisonY. L.LiuW. M.YeungC. W.ParkS.SahkerE.ConradM. (2017). The meaning of hakbeol within the context of educational meritocracy and prestige among South Korean college students. Journal of Asia Pacific Counseling, 7(2), 105–121. https://doi.org/10.18401/2017.7.2.1
18.
GhoJ. (2004). Adult mother-daughter relationships in Korea: A qualitative study (Doctoral dissertation, Purdue University).
19.
HaM.KimJ. (2012). Development and validation of the Korean Female Gender Role Conflict Scale for Young Adolescent Girls (K-FGRCS-Y). The Korean Journal of Counseling and Psychotherapy, 24(3), 595–620.
20.
HaddockS. A.ZimmermanT. S.MacPheeD. (2000). The power equity guide: Attending to gender in family therapy. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 26(2), 153–170. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2000.tb00286.x
21.
HamakerE. L.KuiperR. M.GrasmanR. P. P. P. (2015). A critique of the cross-lagged panel model. Psychological Methods, 20(1), 102–116. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038889
22.
HuL.-t.BentlerP. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3(4), 424–453. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989x.3.4.424
23.
HuL.-t.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
24.
HuangG. H.GoveM. (2015). Asian parenting styles and academic achievement: Views from Eastern and Western perspectives. Education, 135(3), 389–397. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1095381
25.
HwangK.-K. (1999). Filial piety and loyalty: Two types of social identification in Confucianism. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2(1), 163–183. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-839X.00031
26.
JarvisJ. A.CorbettA. W.ThorpeJ. D.DufurM. J. (2020). Too much of a good thing: Social capital and academic stress in South Korea. Social Sciences, 9(11), 187. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci9110187
27.
JungJ.-H. (2016). The concept of care in curriculum studies: Juxtaposing Currere and Hakbeolism. Routledge.
28.
KimD. I. (2001). Sociology of sex. Moonumsa.
29.
KimJ. H.KimE.HongS. (2006). Effects of self-determination on the academic achievement in Korean middle school students. Korean Journal of Educational Psychology, 20(1), 243–264.
30.
KimJ. Y.KimE. (2021). Effect of positive parenting styles as perceived by middle school students on academic achievement and the mediation effect of self-esteem and academic engagement. Sustainability, 13(23), 13233. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132313233
31.
KimM. S.LeeH. J.HanY. S. (2006). Explorations on the feminism of Korean women on the bases of their social structural variables and its effect on well-being. The Korean Journal of Woman Psychology, 11(1), 83–105. https://doi.org/10.18205/kpa.2008.13.1.001
32.
KimT.LeeE. (2017). Validation of the Korean Version of Parents as Social Context Questionnaire for Adolescents (PSCQ_KA). Korean Journal of Youth Studies, 24(3), 313–333. https://doi.org/10.21509/KJYS.2017.03.24.3.313
33.
KimY.KwakK.LeeS. (2015). Does optimism moderate parental achievement pressure and academic stress in Korean children?Current Psychology, 35(1), 39–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-015-9355-5
34.
KwonS. K.LeeM.ShinD. (2017). Educational assessment in the Republic of Korea: Lights and shadows of high-stake exam-based education system. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 24(1), 60–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594x.2015.1074540
35.
LeeJ.-y.LeeS.-m. (2012). The development and validation of Korean Academic Engagement Inventory (KAEI). The Korean Journal of Educational Methodology Studies, 24(1), 131–147. https://doi.org/10.17927/tkjems.2012.24.1.131
36.
LeeS. J.CuiL. N.ChungI.-J. (2022). The effect of parenting attitudes on adolescents’ academic grades and helplessness through the mediation of grit: Gender difference. Journal of Youth Welfare, 24(1), 117–143. https://doi.org/10.19034/KAYW.2022.24.1.06
37.
LernerR. M.CastellinoD. R.TerryP. A.VillarruelF. A.McKinneyM. H. (1995). Developmental contextual perspective on parenting. In BornsteinM. H. (Ed.), Handbook of parenting, Vol. 2. Biology and ecology of parenting (pp. 285–309). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
38.
LewisA. J.KremerP.DouglasK.ToumborouJ. W.HameedM. A.PattonG. C.WilliamsJ. (2015). Gender differences in adolescent depression: Differential female susceptibility to stressors affecting family functioning. Australian Journal of Psychology, 67(3), 131–139. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajpy.12086
39.
Little, R. J. A. (1988). A test of missing completely at random for multivariate data with missing values. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83(404), 1198–1202. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1988.10478722
McNallyS.EisenbergN.HarrisJ. D. (1991). Consistency and change in maternal child-rearing practices and values: A longitudinal study. Child Development, 62(1), 190–198. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1991.tb01524.x
43.
MeeceJ. L.PainterJ. (2012). Gender, self-regulation, and motivation. In SchunkD. H.ZimmermanB. J. (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learning (pp. 339–367). Routledge.
44.
MulderJ. D.HamakerE. L. (2021). Three extensions of the random intercept cross-lagged panel model. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 28(4), 638–648. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2020.1784738
OuweneelE.SchaufeliW. B.Le BlancP. M. (2013). Believe, and you will achieve: Changes over time in self-efficacy, engagement, and performance. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 5(2), 225–247. https://doi.org/10.1111/aphw.12008
47.
ParkJ.LeeH.KimJ.ZhouA. Q. (2023). Trajectories of learning attitude profiles in korean middle school students: Examining developmental patterns and the influence of parenting. Child & Youth Care Forum. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10566-023-09763-8
48.
ParkY. S.KimU.HanK. H. (2003). How Korean children and adolescents perceive their parents: Indigenous psychological analysis. Korean Journal of Psychological and Social Issues, 9(2), 127–164.
PinquartM. (2015). Associations of parenting styles and dimensions with academic achievement in children and adolescents: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 28(3), 475–493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9338-y
51.
RogersA. A.DeLayD.MartinC. L. (2016). Traditional masculinity during the middle school transition: Associations with depressive symptoms and academic engagement. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 46(4), 709–724. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-016-0545-8
52.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
53.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61(2), 101860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860
54.
Salmela-AroK.UpadyayaK. (2013). School burnout and engagement in the context of demands–resources model. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(1), 137–151. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12018
55.
SatorraA.BentlerP. M. (2010). Ensuring positiveness of the scaled difference chi-square test statistic. Psychometrika, 75(1), 243–248. https://doi.org/10.1007%2Fs11336-009-9135-y
56.
SchaufeliW. B.MartínezI. M.PintoA. M.SalanovaM.BakkerA. B. (2002). Burnout and engagement in university students: A cross-national study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33(5), 464–481. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022102033005003
57.
SchaufeliW. B.SalanovaM.González-romáV.BakkerA. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(1), 71–92. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015630930326
58.
SharpC.WallK. (2018). Personality pathology grows up: Adolescence as a sensitive period. Current Opinion in Psychology, 21(1), 111–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.11.010
59.
SkinnerE.JohnsonS.SnyderT. (2005). Six dimensions of parenting: A motivational model. Parenting: Science and Practice, 5(2), 175–235. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327922par0502_3
60.
SoenensB.VansteenkisteM. (2005). Antecedents and outcomes of self-determination in 3 life domains: The role of parents’ and teachers’ autonomy support. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 34(6), 589–604. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-005-8948-y
61.
SullivanG. M.ArtinoA. R.Jr. (2013). Analyzing and interpreting data from Likert-type scales. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 5(4), 541–542. https://doi.org/10.4300/jgme-5-4-18
62.
WidamanK. F.FerrerE.CongerR. D. (2010). Factorial invariance within longitudinal structural equation models: Measuring the same construct across time. Child Development Perspectives, 4(1), 10–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-8606.2009.00110.x
63.
YeY.WangC.ZhuQ.HeM.HavawalaM.BaiX.WangT. (2021). Parenting and teacher–student relationship as protective factors for Chinese adolescent adjustment during COVID-19. School Psychology Review, 51(2), 187–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/2372966x.2021.1897478
64.
YeoS. K.LeeW. K. (2017). The relationship between adolescents’ academic stress, impulsivity, anxiety, and skin picking behavior. Asian Journal of Psychiatry, 28(2), 111–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajp.2017.03.039
65.
Zimmer-GembeckM. J.CollinsW. A. (2006). Autonomy development during adolescence. In AdamsG. R.BerzonskyM. D. (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of adolescence (pp. 174–204). Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
