This study investigated what helped and what hindered in cross-cultural supervision. The participants were 25 visible minority graduate students and early counseling professionals. They were individually interviewed according to an expanded version of Flanagan’s critical incident technique. The most frequently cited positive themes were subsumed in five key areas: (a) personal attributes of the supervisor, (b) supervision competencies, (c) mentoring, (d) relationship, and (e) multicultural supervision competencies. The most frequently reported negative themes were grouped into five areas: (a) personal difficulties as a visible minority, (b) negative personal attributes of the supervisor, (c) lack of a safe and trusting relationship, (d) lack of multicultural supervision competencies, and (e) lack of supervision competencies. The results support a person-centered mentoring model of effective supervision.
AanstoosC. M. (1983). The think aloud method in descriptive research. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 14, 243–266.
2.
AllenT. D.PoteetM. L. (2011). Enhancing our knowledge of mentoring with a person-centric approach. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 4(1), 126–130.
3.
AncisJ. R.LadanyN. (2001). A multicultural framework for counseling supervision. In Counselor supervision: Principles, process, and practice (pp. 63–90). Philadelphia, PA: Brunner-Routledge.
4.
ArthurN.CollinsS. (2009). Culture-infused counselling supervision. In PellingN.BarlettaJ.ArmstrongP. (Eds.), The practice of clinical supervision (pp. 267–295). Bowen Hills, QLD: Australian Academic Press.
BlackL. L.SuarezE. C.MedinaS. (2004). Helping students help themselves: Strategies for successful mentoring relationships. Counselor Education & Supervision, 44, 44–55.
7.
ButterfieldL. D.BorgenW. A.AmundsonN. E.MaglioA. T. (2005). Fifty years of the critical incident technique: 1954–2004 and beyond. Qualitative Research, 5, 475. doi:10.1177/1468794105056924
8.
CarminC. N. (1988). Issues in research on mentoring: Definitional and methodological. International Journal on Mentoring, 2, 9–13.
9.
CastoC.CaldwellC.SalazarC. F. (2005). Creating mentoring relationships between female faculty and students in counselor education for potential mentees and mentors. Journal of Counseling and Development, 83, 331–336.
10.
ClarkR. A.HardenS. L.JohnsonW. B. (2000). Mentor relationships in clinical psychology doctoral training: Results of a national survey. Teaching of Psychology, 27, 262–268.
11.
CoreyG.HaynesR.MoultonP.MuratoriM. (2010). Clinical supervision in the helping professions. Alexandria, VA: American Counseling Association.
12.
DanielsJ. D.D’AndreaM.KimB. S. (1999). Assessing the barriers and changes of cross-cultural supervision: A case study. Counselor Education and Supervision, 38, 191–204.
13.
DicksonG. L.Argus-CalvoB.TafoyaN. G. (2010). Multicultural counselor training experiences: Training effects and perceptions of training among a sample of predominately Hispanic students. Counselor Education & Supervision, 49, 247–265.
14.
EllisM. V.BergerL. R.RingE. R.HanusA.SwordsB. A.SiemborM.. . . MacuraJ. (2010). Construct validity: Harmful and inadequate clinical supervision. Poster presented at the American Psychological Association convention, San Diego, CA.
15.
FalenderC. A.ShafranskeE. P. (2007). Competence in competency-based supervision practice: Construct and application. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 38(3), 232–240. doi:10.1037/0735-7028.38.3.232
16.
FlanaganJ. C. (1954). The critical incident technique. Psychological Bulletin, 51, 327–258.
17.
FouadN. A.GrusC. L.HatcherR. L.KaslowN. J.HutchingsP. S.MadsonM. B.. . .CrossmanR. E. (2009). Competency benchmarks: A model for understanding and measuring competence in professional psychology across training levels. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 3(4 Suppl.), S5–S26. doi:10.1037/a0015832
18.
GiorgiA. (1975). An application of phenomenological method in psychology. In GiorgiA.FischerC. F.MurrayE. L. (Eds.), Duquesne studies in phenomenological psychology (pp. 82–103). Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.
19.
GongR.ChenS.-Y.LeeS.-L. (2011). Does mentoring work? The mediating effect of mentoring in China. Social Behavior and Personality, 39(6), 807–824.
20.
GoodyearR. K.AbadieP. D.EfrosF. (1984). Supervisory theory into practice: Differential perception of supervision by Ekstein, Ellis, Polster, and Rogers. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 31(2), 228–237.
21.
GoodyearR. K.BunchK.ClaibornC. D. (2005). Current supervision scholarship in psychology: A five-year review. The Clinical Supervisor, 24, 137–147.
22.
GreenS. G.BauerT. N. (1995). Supervisory mentoring by advisors: Relationshups with doctoral students’ potential productivity, and commitment. Personnel Psychology, 48, 537–561.
23.
GuestC.DooleyK. S. (1999). Supervisor malpractice: Liability to the supervisee in clinical supervision. Counselor Education and Supervision, 38, 269–279.
24.
HaberR. (1996). Dimensions of psychotherapy supervision: Maps and means. In JonesJ. W., Quality supervision: What it is and how to do it, presented at CAPS West Conference, June 1998.
25.
HansmanC. C. (2001). Who plans? Who participates? Critically examining mentoring programs. In SmithR. O.DirkxJ. M.EddyP. L.FarrellP. L.PolzinM. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 42nd annual Adult Education Research Conference. East Lansing: Michigan State University.
26.
HendersonC. E.CawyerC. S.WatkinsC. E. (1997, August). A comparison of student and supervisor perceptions of effective practicum supervision. Poster presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Chicago, IL.
27.
HeppnerP. P.RoehlkeH. J. (1984). Differences among supervisees at different levels of training: Implications for a developmental model of supervision. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 31, 76–90.
28.
HernándezP.TaylorB. A.McDowellT. (2009). Listening to ethnic minority AAMFT approved supervisors: Reflections on their experiences as supervisees. Journal of Systemic Therapies, 28(1), 88–100.
29.
HerzbergF.MausnerB.SnydermanB. B. (1959). The motivation to work (2nd ed.). New York, NY: John Wiley.
30.
HollowayE. (1995). Clinical supervision: A systems approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31.
HuntP. (1986, spring). Supervision. Marriage Guidance, pp. 15–22.
32.
HuttC. H.ScottJ.KingM. (1983). A phenomenological study of supervisees’ positive and negative experiences in supervision. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, and Practice, 20, 118–123.
33.
InmanA. G. (2006). Supervisor multicultural competence and its relation to supervisory process and outcome. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 32, 73–85.
34.
JacobiM. (1991). Mentoring and undergraduate academic success: A literature review. Review of Educational Research, 61, 505–532.
35.
JerniganM. M.GreenC. E.HelmsJ. E.Perez-GualdronL.HenzeK. (2010). An examination of people of color supervision dyads: Racial identity matters as much as race. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 4(1), 62–73.
36.
JohnsonW. B. (2002). The intentional mentor: Strategies and guidelines for the practice of mentoring. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 33(1), 88–96.
37.
JohnsonW. B. (2007). On being a mentor: A guide for higher education faculty. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
38.
Johnson-BaileyJ.CerveroR. M. (2002). Cross-cultural mentoring as a context for learning. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 96, 15–26.
39.
JonesJ. W. (1998, June). Quality supervision: What it is and how to do it. Paper presented at CAPS West Conference, San Diego, CA.
40.
KaduvettoorA.O’ShaughnessyT.MoriY.BeverlyC.IIIWeatherfordR. D.LadanyN. (2009). Helpful and hindering multicultural events in group supervision: Climate and multicultural competence. The Counseling Psychologist, 37(6), 786–820.
41.
LadanyN.FriedlanderM. L.NelsonM. L. (2005). Critical events in psychotherapy supervision: An interpersonal approach. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
42.
LambersE. (2007). A person-centred perspective on supervision. In CooperM.O’HaraM.SchmidP. F.WyattG. (Eds.), The handbook of person-centred psychotherapy and counselling (pp. 366–378). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
43.
LeeJ.C.-K.FengS. (2007). Mentoring support and the professional development of beginning teachers: A Chinese perspective. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 15(3), 243–262.
44.
LeongS. (2010). Mentoring and research supervision in music education: Perspectives of Chinese postgraduate students. International Journal of Music Education, 28(2), 145–158.
45.
McLeodA. L. (2009). A phenomenological investigation of supervisors’ and supervisees’ experiences with attention to cultural issues in multicultural supervision. Doctoral dissertation, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA.
46.
McNeillB. W.HomK. L.PerezJ. A. (1995). The training and supervisory needs of racial and ethnic minority students. Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development, 23, 246–258.
47.
Muse-BurkeJ. L.LadanyN.DeckM. D. (2001). The supervisory relationship. In BradleyL. J.LadanyN. (Eds.), Counselor supervision: Principles, process, and practice (3rd ed., pp. 28–62). Philadelphia, PA: Brunner-Routledge.
48.
PanW.SunL.-Y.ChowI.H.S. (2011). The impact of supervisory mentoring on personal learning and career outcomes: The dual moderating effect of self-efficacy. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 78(2), 264–273.
49.
PattersonC. H. (1983). Supervision in counseling: II. Contemporary models of supervision: A client-centered approach to supervision. The Counseling Psychologist, 11(1), 21–25.
50.
PaulB. D.CroteauJ. M. (2000, August). Biased and exemplary practices of White supervisors in multicultural supervision: A qualitative study. Poster session presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.
51.
Pope-DavisD. B.ToporekR. L.Ortega-VillalobosL. (2003). Assessing supervisors’ and supervisees’ perceptions of multicultural competence in supervision using the Multicultural Supervision Inventory. In Pope-DavisD. B.ColemanH. L.LiuW. M.ToporekR. L. (Eds.), Handbook of multicultural competencies in counseling and psychology (pp. 211–224). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
52.
RakinE. A. (1991). Mentor, mentee, mentoring: Building career development relationships. Nursing Connections, 4, 49–57.
53.
RonnestadM.SkovholtT. (1993). Supervision of beginning and advanced graduate students of counseling and psychotherapy. Journal of Counseling and Development, 71, 396–405.
54.
SueD. W.SueD. (1990). Counseling the culturally different: Theory & practice (3rd ed.). New York, NY: John Wiley.
55.
SwerdlikM. E.BardonJ. L. (1988). A survey of mentoring experiences in school psychology. Journal of School Psychology, 26, 213–224.
56.
TannenbaumR.BermanM. (1990). Ethical and legal issues in psychotherapy supervision. Psychotherapy in Private Practice, 8, 65–77.
57.
TentoniS. C. (1995). The mentoring of counseling students: A concept in search of a paradigm. Counselor Education and Supervision, 35, 32–42.
58.
ThomasG. C. (2010). Child welfare supervision: A practical guide for supervisors, managers, and administrators. Child & Family Social Work, 15, 261–262.
59.
VasquezM. J. (1992). Psychologist as clinical supervisor: Promoting ethical practice. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 23, 196–202.
60.
Villas-Boas BowenM. C. (1986). Personality differences and person-centered supervision. Person-Centered Review, 1(3), 291–309.
61.
WongL.C.J.WongP.T.P.IshiyamaF. I. (in press). The expanded critical incident technique. International Journal of Existential Psychology and Psychotherapy.
62.
WongP.T.P. (2010). Meaning therapy: An integrative and positive existential psychotherapy. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 40, 85–94.
63.
WorthenV. E.McNeillB. W. (1996). A phenomenological investigation of “good” supervision events. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 43, 25–34.
