Do Principal Preparation Programs Influence Student Achievement Through the Building of Teacher-Team Qualifications by the Principal? An Exploratory Analysis
Restricted accessOtherFirst published online February, 2011
Do Principal Preparation Programs Influence Student Achievement Through the Building of Teacher-Team Qualifications by the Principal? An Exploratory Analysis
Purpose: The primary purpose of this study is to explore how the characteristics of the principal preparation programs of newly hired elementary school principals might influence school achievement through the development of well-qualified teams of teachers by the school. Of primary interest is whether elementary school principals from preparation programs with certain types of characteristics are more or less likely to build teams of well-qualified teachers who, in turn, positively affect overall student achievement. A secondary purpose is to establish a relationship between the overall school-level qualifications of teams of teachers and school-level student achievement on the Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills (TAKS) to underscore the importance of the first relationship. Research Design: This quantitative study utilizes ordinary least squares regression to analyze seven extracts of data from the Texas Education Agency, merged together to create a data set that matched teachers, principals, school characteristics, and student achievement to individual schools. First, the authors establish the relationship between school-level teacher-team quality and school-level student outcomes on the TAKS. Second, they examine the relationship between principal preparation program characteristics and the measures of teacher-team quality after controlling for principal characteristics, school characteristics, and student achievement. Furthermore, because the authors hypothesize that principals cannot quickly alter the quality of teams of teachers in schools, they examine school achievement and teacher-team quality over four years.
Alexander, C.A., & Fuller, E.J. ( 2004). The relationship between middle school mathematics certification and student achievement in Texas. Austin, TX: State Board for Educator Certification.
2.
Angelle, P.S. ( 2006). Instructional leadership and monitoring: Increasing teacher intent to stay through socialization. NASSP Bulletin, 90, 318-334.
3.
Angrist, J., & Guryan, J. ( 2003). Does teacher testing raise teacher quality? Evidence from state certification requirements (Working Paper 9545). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research .
4.
Baker, B., & Cooper, B.S. ( 2005). Do principals with stronger academic backgrounds hire better teachers? Policy implications for improving high-poverty schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 41, 449-479.
5.
Baker, B.D., Orr, M.T., & Young, M.D. ( 2007). Academic drift, institutional production and professional distribution of graduate degrees in educational administration. Educational Administration Quarterly, 43, 279-318.
6.
Baker, E.L., Barton, P.E., Darling-Hammond, L., Haertel, E.Ladd, H.Linn, R., Ravitch, D., Rothstein, R.Shavelson, R.J. & Shepard, l. ( 2010). Problems with the use of test scores to evaluate teachers . Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.
7.
Berry, B., & Fuller, E.J. ( 2007a). Final report on the 2007 Clark County School District Teaching and Learning Conditions Survey. Hillsborough, NC: Center for Teaching Quality.
8.
Berry, B., & Fuller, E.J. ( 2007b). Stemming the tide of teacher attrition: Teacher working conditions in Arizona. Hillsborough, NC: Center for Teaching Quality.
9.
Berry, B., & Fuller, E.J. ( 2007c). Teaching and learning conditions in Ohio: Implications for supply and demand. Hillsborough, NC: Center for Teaching Quality.
10.
Berry, B., & Fuller, E.J. ( 2008). Cultivate learning environments to accelerate recruitment and retention: A report on Mississippi teacher working conditions. Hillsborough, NC: Center for Teaching Quality.
11.
Boyd, D., Goldhaber, D., Lankford, H., & Wyckoff, J. ( 2007). The effect of certification and preparation on teacher quality. Future of Children, 17(1): 45-68.
12.
Boyd, D., Grossman, P., Lankford, H., Loeb, S., & Wyckoff, J. ( 2007). Who leaves?Teacher attrition and student achievement. Retrieved from http://www.teacherpolicyresearch.org/portals/1/pdfs/Do%20Effective%20Teachers%20Leave.pdf
13.
Braun, D., Gable, R., & Kite, S. ( 2008, October). The relationship among leadership preparation practices and leader, school, and student outcomes in K-8 schools. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Northeastern Educational Research Association, Rocky Hill, CT.
14.
Brewer, D.J. ( 1993). Principals and student outcomes: Evidence from U.S. high schools. Economics of Education Review, 12, 281-292.
15.
Brewer, D., & Goldhaber, D. ( 1996). Educational achievement and teacher qualifications: New evidence from microlevel data. In B. S. Cooper & S. T. Speakman (Eds.), Advances in educational productivity volume 6: Optimizing education resources (pp. 243-264). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
16.
Coleman, J. ( 1966). Equality of educational opportunity. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Office of Education, National Center for Education Statistics .
17.
Darling-Hammond, L., Berry, B., & Thoreson, A. ( 2001). Does teacher certification matter? Evaluating the evidence . Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23(1), 57-78.
18.
Darling-Hammond, L., Holtzman, D.J., Gatlin, S.J., & Heilig, J.V. ( 2005). Does teacher preparation matter? Evidence about teacher certification, Teach for America, and teacher effectiveness. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 13(42). Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v13n42/
19.
Darling-Hammond, L., LaPointe, M., Meyerson, D., Orr, M.T., & Cohen, C. ( 2007). Preparing school leaders for a changing world: Lessons from exemplary leadership development programs. Stanford, CA: Stanford University, Stanford Educational Leadership Institute.
20.
Ehrenberg, R.G., & Brewer, D.J. ( 1994). Do school and teacher characteristics matter? Evidence from High School and Beyond. Economics of Education Review , 13, 1-17.
21.
Ehrenberg, R.G., & Brewer, D.J. ( 1995). Did teachers’ verbal ability and race matter in the 1960’s? Coleman revisited. Economics of Education Review, 14, 1-21.
22.
Fabiano, L. ( 1999). Measuring teacher qualifications (NCES-WP-1999-04). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics .
23.
Ferguson, R.F. ( 1991). Paying for public education: New evidence on how and why money matters. Harvard Journal of Legislation, 28, 465-498.
24.
Figlio, D.N. ( 2002). Can public schools buy better-qualified teachers? Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 55, 686-699.
25.
Fuller, E.J. ( 2008). Secondary mathematics and science teachers in Texas: Supply, demand, and quality. Austin: Texas Business and Education Coalition.
26.
Fuller, E.J., & Orr, M.T. ( 2006, November). Principal production, employment, and retention by type of preparation program. Presented at the annual meeting of the University Council for Educational Administration, San Antonio, TX.
27.
Goldhaber, D., & Brewer, D.J. ( 2000). Does teacher certification matter? High school teacher certification status and student achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 22, 129-145.
28.
Goldring, E., & Greenfield, W. (2002). Understanding the evolving concept of leadership in education: Roles, expectations, and dilemmas. In J. Murphy (Ed.), Educational leadership challenge: Redefining leadership for the 21st century. One hundred-first yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part I (pp. 1-19). Chicago, IL: National Society for the Study of Education.
29.
Guarino, C.M., Santibañez, L., & Daley, G.A. ( 2006). Teacher recruitment and retention: A review of the recent empirical literature. Review of Educational Research, 76, 173-208.
30.
Hallinger, P., & Heck, R.H. ( 1998). Exploring the principal’s contribution to school effectiveness: 1980-1995. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 9, 157-191.
31.
Hanushek, E.A., Kain, J.F., & Rivken, S.G. ( 1998). Teachers, schools and academic achievement (Working Paper 6691). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
32.
Hanushek, E.A., Kain, J.F., & Rivken, S.G. ( 2004). Why public schools lose teachers. Journal of Human Resources, 39, 326-354.
Hanushek, E.A., Rivken, S.G., & Taylor, L.L. ( 1996). Aggregation and the estimated effects of school resources . Review of Economics and Statistics, 78, 611-627.
35.
Heck, R.H., & Hallinger, P. ( 1999). The study of educational leadership and management. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 33, 229-244.
36.
Ingersoll, R. ( 1999). The problem of underqualified teachers in American secondary schools. Educational Researcher, 28, 26-37.
37.
Jackson, C.K., & Bruegmann, E. ( 2009). Teaching students and teaching each other: The importance of peer learning for teachers (Working Paper 15202). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
38.
Kersting, N. ( 2008). Using video clips of mathematics classroom instruction as item prompts to measure teachers’ knowledge of teaching mathematics . Educational and Psychological Measurement, 68, 845-861.
39.
Laczko-Kerr, I., & Berliner, D.C. (2002). The effectiveness of "Teach for America" and other under-certified teachers on student academic achievement: A case of harmful public policy. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 10(37). Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v10n37/
40.
Ladd, H.F., Clotfelter, C.T., & Vigdor, J.L. ( 2007). How and why do teacher credentials matter for student achievement? NBER Working Paper # 142786. Cambridge, MA.National Bureau of Economic Research.
41.
Ladd, H.F., Clotfelter, C.T., & Vigdor, J.L. ( 2010). Teacher credentials and student achievement in high school: A cross subject analysis with fixed effects. Journal of Human Resources, 45(3): 655-681.
42.
Lankford, H., Loeb, S., & Wyckoff, J. ( 2002). Teacher sorting and the plight of urban schools. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24, 37-62.
43.
Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. ( 2000). Principal and teacher leader effects: A replication. School Leadership and Management, 20, 415-434.
44.
Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. ( 2005, April). A review of transformational school leadership research. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.
45.
Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. ( 2008). Linking leadership to student learning: The contributions of leader efficacy. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44, 496-528.
46.
Leithwood, K., Jantzi, D., Coffin, G., & Wilson, P. ( 1996). Preparing school leaders: What works? Journal of School Leadership, 6, 316-342.
47.
Leithwood, K., Louis, K.S., Anderson, S., & Wahlstrom, K. ( 2004). How leadership influences student learning. Toronto, Canada: Center for Applied Research and Educational Improvement and Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.
48.
Leithwood, K.A., & Montgomery, D.J. (1984, April). Patterns of growth in principal effectiveness. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
49.
McCaffrey, D.F., Sass, T.R., Lockwood, J.R. & Mihaly, K. ( 2009). The intertemporal variability of teacher effect estimates . Education Finance and Policy, 4(4): 572-606.
50.
Murnane, R.J., & Phillips, B.R. (1981). Learning by doing, vintage, and selection: Three pieces of the puzzle relating teaching experience and teaching performance. Economics of Education Review, 1, 453-465.
51.
Orr, M.T. ( 2011). Pipeline to preparation to advancement: Graduates’ experiences in, through, and beyond leadership preparation. Educational Administration Quarterly, 47(1), 114-172.
52.
Papa, F., Lankford, H., & Wyckoff, J. ( 2002). The attributes and career paths of principals: Implications for improving policy. Albany, NY: University at Albany.
53.
Prestine, N.A., & Nelson, B.S. ( 2005). How can educational leaders support and promote teaching and learning? New conceptions of learning and leading in schools. In W. A. Firestone & C. Riehl (Eds.), A new agenda for research in educational leaderships (pp. 46-60). New York, NY: Teacher’s College Press.
54.
Printy, S.M. ( 2008). Leadership for teacher learning: A community of practice perspective. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44, 187-226.
55.
Reback, R. ( 2004). The impact of college course offerings on the supply of academically talented public school teachers. Journal of Econometrics, 121, 377-404.
56.
Riehl, C. ( 2000). The principal’s role in creating inclusive schools for diverse students: A review of normative, empirical, and critical literature on the practice of educational Administration. Review of Educational Research, 70, 55-81.
57.
Robinson, V.M.J., Lloyd, C.A., & Rowe, K.J. ( 2008). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership types. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44, 635-674.
58.
Rosenblum, S., Louis, K.S., & Rossmiller, R. (1994). School leadership and teacher quality of work life in restructuring schools. In J. Murphy & K. S. Louis (Eds.), Reshaping the principalship: Insights from transformational reform efforts (pp. 99-122). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
59.
Rothstein, J. ( 2010). Teacher quality in educational production: Tracking, decay, and student achievement. Quarterly Journal of Economics , 125(1): 175-214.
60.
Rowan, B., Chiang, F., & Miller, R.J. ( 1997). Using research on employees’ performance to study the effects of teachers on student achievement. Sociology of Education, 70, 256-284.
61.
Rowan, B., Correnti, R., & Miller, R.J. ( 2002). What large-scale, survey research tells us about teacher effects on student achievement: Insights from the Prospects study of elementary schools. Teachers College Record, 104(8): 1525-1567.
62.
Sanders, W.L., & Rivers, J.C. ( 1996). Research project report: Cumulative and residual effects of teachers on future student academic achievement. Knoxville : University of Tennessee, Value-Added Research and Assessment Center.
63.
Sass, T. ( 2008, November). The stability of value-added measures of teacher quality and implications for teacher compensation policy. Washington, DC: National Center for Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Education Research.
64.
Smylie, M.A., & Bennett, A. (with Konkol, P., & Fendt, C.R.). (2005). What do we know about developing school leaders? A look at existing research and next steps for new study. In W. A. Firestone & C. Reihl (Eds.), A new agenda: Directions for research on educational leadership (pp. 138-155). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
65.
Smylie, M., & Hart, A. ( 1999). School leadership for teacher learning and change: A human and social capital development perspective. In J. Murphy & K. S. Louis (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational administration. A project of the American Educational Research Association (2nd ed., pp. 421-441). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
66.
Strauss, R.P. ( 2003, April). The preparation and selection of public school administrators in Pennsylvania: Supply and demand and the effects on student achievement. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Education Finance Association, Orlando, FL.
67.
Toutkoushian, R., & Smart, J.C. ( 2001). Do institutional characteristics affect student gains from college? Review of Higher Education, 25(1), 39-61.
68.
Waters, J.T., Marzano, R.J., & McNulty, R.A. ( 2003). Balanced leadership: What 30 years of research tells us about the effect of leadership on student achievement. Aurora, CO: Mid-continent Research for Education and Learning.
69.
Wayne, A. & Youngs, P. ( 2003). Teacher characteristics and student achievement gains: A review. Review of Educational Research, 73(1): 89-122.
70.
Wenglinsky, H. ( 2002). How schools matter: The link between teacher classroom practices and student academic performance. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 10(12). Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v10n12/
71.
Wilson, S. ( 2008, March). Comments on recommended reporting practices in teacher education research. Comments made at the meeting of theAmerican Educational Research Association, New York, NY.
72.
Wilson, S., Floden, R., & Ferrini-Mundy, J. (2001). Teacher preparation research: Current knowledge, gaps, and recommendations. Washington, DC: Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy.
73.
Young, M.D. ( 2008). Programs are making important progress in providing research-based preparation that supports student learning. UCEA Review, 50(2), 9-10.
Young, M.D., & Grogan, M. ( 2008). Leadership preparation and development in North America . In J. Lumby, G. Crow, & P. Pashiardis (Eds.), The international handbook of leadership development (pp. 303-324). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
76.
Youngs, P. ( 2007). How elementary principals’ beliefs and actions influence new teachers’ experiences. Educational Administration Quarterly, 43, 101-137.
