Abstract
The article focuses on game-theoretic explanations of some special features of East- West trade. In particular, the fact that there is a rather low level of economic cooperation between the parties, even though a higher level would undoubtedly benefit both, is discussed in the light of the Edgeworth Box and elementary games. The games utilized in the explanation and analysis are 2 x 2 games of non-zero-sum variety. Moreover, we discuss the role of threats and 'envy' as determinants of the outcomes. We argue that the rather simple apparatus we use goes a long way towards explaining why there is some cooperation between East and West and, on the other hand, why its level is low.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
