Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Research on resistance to the inclusion of civil society in peace mediation focuses on armed parties and elites as sites of resistance. Such focus grounds policies that prescribe various strategies and process designs that mediators could employ. The mediation of the Intergovernmental Authority on Development in South Sudan from 2012 to 2015 featured such strategies and attempts at various formats, including strong leverage from South Sudan’s neighbors and top development partners. However, civil society’s inclusion did not fully materialize, and armed clashes continued. Examining this mediation process, this article examines two structural challenges to civil society inclusion under-examined in mediation research. First, divisions within civil society can perpetuate divisions among warring parties and hinder the expected benefits of civil society inclusion. Second, the norms of consent and protecting lives considered definitional in peace mediation prioritize armed parties over civil society, limiting mediators’ ability to promote the latter’s inclusion and potentially encouraging further violence.

Keywords

civil society conflict international peace mediation norms resistance

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aeby

(2015) Zimbabwe’s Gruelling transition: Interim power-sharing and conflict management in Southern Africa. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Basel, Basel.

Aeby

(2016) Making an impact from the margins? Civil society groups in Zimbabwe’s interim power-sharing process. The Journal of Modern African Studies 54(04): 703–728.

Akol

(2014) Inclusivity: A challenge to the IGAD-Led South Sudanese peace process. Available at: https://www.suddinstitute.org/publications/show/inclusivity-a-challenge-.to-the-igad-led-south-sudanese-peace-process (accessed 12 December 2015).

Arnault

(2014) Legitimacy and peace processes: International norms and local realities. In: Wennmann

Ramsbotham

(eds) Legitimacy and Peace Processes: From Coercion to Consent. London: Conciliation Resources, pp. 21–25.

Barnes

(2002) Owning the Process: Public Participation in Peacemaking. Available at: https://peacemaker.un.org/sites/peacemaker.un.org/files/PublicParticipation_Accord2009.pdf

Bell

(2019) New inclusion project: Building inclusive settlements. In: Carl

(ed.) Navigating Inclusion in Peace Processes. London: Conciliation Resources, pp. 11–17.

Bell

O’Rourke

(2007) The people’s peace? Peace agreements, civil society, and participatory democracy. International Political Science Review 28(3): 293–324.

Belloni

(2001) Civil society and peacebuilding in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Journal of Peace Research 38(2): 163–180.

Bercovitch

(2009) Mediation and conflict resolution. In: Bercovitch

Kremenyuk

Zartman

(eds) The SAGE Handbook of Conflict Resolution. London: SAGE, pp. 340–354.

10.

Blaydes

de Maio

(2010) Spoiling the peace? Peace process exclusivity and political violence in North-Central Africa. Civil Wars 12(1-2): 3–28.

11.

Cantekin

(2016) Ripeness and readiness theories in international conflict resolution. Journal of Mediation & Applied Conflict Analysis 3(2): 414–428.

12.

Castillejo

(2017) Dilemmas and Experiences of International Support for Inclusive Peacebuilding

13.

Cavalcante

(2014) The Influence of the Liberal Peace Framework on the United Nations Approach to Peacebuilding in Guinea-Bissau*. RCCS Annual Review. A Selection from the Portuguese Journal Revista Crítica De Ciências Sociais 6: 564.

14.

Centre for Conflict Resolution (2016) The peacebuilding role of civil society in South Sudan. Available at: https://media.africaportal.org/documents/CCRPB33_peacebuilding_civilsociety_south_sudan_18nov2016.pdf (accessed 12 March 2018).

15.

Cheeseman

(2011) The internal dynamics of power-sharing in Africa. Democratization 18(2): 336–365.

16.

Citizens For Peace and Justice (2014) Statement on the crisis in South Sudan. Available at: http://www.gurtong.net/ECM/Editorial/tabid/124/ctl/ArticleView/mid/519/articleId/14588/categoryId/120/Statement-On-The-Crisis-In-South-Sudan-By-Citizens-For-Peace-And-Justice.aspx (accessed 12 July 2018).

17.

Çuhadar

(2020) Understanding resistance to inclusive peace processes. Available at: https://www.usip.org/publications/2020/03/understanding-resistance-inclusive-peace-processes (accessed 2 February 2021).

18.

de Waal

(2017) Inclusion in peacemaking: From moral claim to political fact. In: Crocker

Aall

(eds) The Fabric of Peace in Africa: Looking beyond the State. Waterloo, ON, Canada: Centre for International Governance Innovation, pp. 165–181.

19.

Danielsson

(2020) Transcending binaries in critical peacebuilding scholarship to address “inclusivity” projects. Third World Quarterly 41(7): 1085–1102.

20.

Donais

McCandless

(2016) International peace building and the emerging inclusivity norm. Third World Quarterly 38: 291–310.

21.

Donais

McCandless

(2017) International peace building and the emerging inclusivity norm. Third World Quarterly 38(2): 291–310.

22.

Edwards

(2012) Introduction: Civil society and the geometry of human relations. In: Edwards

(ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Civil Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 3–14.

23.

Ghais

(2019) Consequences of excluding armed groups from peace negotiations: Chad and the Philippines. International Negotiation 24(1): 61–90.

24.

Greig

(2001) Moments of opportunity: Recognizing conditions of ripeness for international mediation between enduring rivals. Journal of Conflict Resolution 45(6): 691–718.

25.

Hellmüller

(2019a) A global and inclusive agreement? Participation of armed actors in the inter-Congolese dialogue and its impact on local violence. International Negotiation 24(1): 38–60.

26.

Hellmüller

(2019b) Beyond buzzwords: Civil society inclusion in mediation. In: Jeong

H-W

(ed.) Conflict Intervention and Transformation: Theory and Practice. London: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 47–63.

27.

Hellmüller

(2020) Civil society inclusion in peace processes. In: Richmond

Visoka

(eds) The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Peace and Conflict Studies. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 407–419.

28.

Hellmüller

Palmiano-Federer

Pring

(2017) Are Mediators Norm Entrepreneurs? Exploring the Role of Mediators in Norm Diffusion. Bern: Swisspeace.

29.

Hellmüller

Palmiano-Federer

Zeller

(2015) The role of norms in international peace mediation. Available at: http://www.swisspeace.ch/fileadmin/user_upload/Media/Publications/The_Role_of_Norms_in_International_Peace_Mediation.pdf (accessed 27 April 2015).

30.

Hellmüller

Santschi

(eds) (2013) Is Local Beautiful? New York: Springer.

31.

Hemmer

Graham

Garb

, et al. (2006) Putting the “up” in bottom-up peacebuilding: Broadening the concept of peace negotiations. International Negotiation 11(1): 129–162.

32.

Hirblinger

Landau

(2020) Daring to differ? Strategies of inclusion in peacemaking. Security Dialogue 51(4): 305–322.

33.

Intergovernmental Authority on Development (IGAD) (2013) Communiqué of the 23Rd Extraordinary Session of the IGAD Assembly of Heads of State and Government on the Situation in South Sudan. Nairobi, Kenya: State House.

34.

Intergovernmental Authority on Development (IGAD) (2014) Communiqué of the 26Th Extraordinary Session of the IGAD Assembly of Heads of State and Government. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: IGAD.

35.

Intergovernmental Authority on Development (IGAD) (2016) Report of the Special Envoys on the Conclusion of the Igad-led Mediation to Resolve the Conflict in the Republic of South Sudan (2013-2015). Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: IGAD.

36.

International Crisis Group (2015) South Sudan: Keeping the faith with the IGAD peace process. Available at: https://www.crisisgroup.org/africa/horn-africa/south-sudan/south-sudan-keeping-faith-igad-peace-process (accessed 17 April 2017).

37.

Jewett

(2019) Necessary but insufficient: Civil society in international mediation. International Negotiation 24(1): 117–135.

38.

Johnson

(2016) South Sudan: The Untold Story from Independence to Civil War. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.

39.

Jonas

(2000) Of Centaurs and Doves: Guatemala’s Peace Process. London: Routledge.

40.

Keith

(ed.) (1999) The United Nations international covenant on civil and political rights: Does it make a difference in human rights behavior? Journal of peach Research 36: 95–118.

41.

Lanz

(2011) Who gets a seat at the table? A framework for understanding the dynamics of inclusion and exclusion in peace negotiations. International Negotiation 16(2): 275–295.

42.

Lehti

(2019) Towards a locally owned inclusive peace process. In: Lehti

(ed.) The Era of Private Peacemakers: A New Dialogic Approach to Mediation. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 155–163.

43.

Lewis

(2002) Civil society in African contexts: Reflections on the usefulness of a concept. Development and Change 33(4): 569–586.

44.

Lorch

(2017) Analysing civil society in weak states. In: Lorch

(ed.) Civil Society and Mirror Images of Weak States: Bangladesh and the Philippines. London: Palgrave Macmillan Springer Nature, pp. 31–70.

45.

Mac Ginty

(2008) Indigenous peace-making versus the liberal peace. Cooperation and Conflict 43(2): 139–163.

46.

Mac Ginty

(2015) Where is the local? Critical localism and peacebuilding. Third World Quarterly 36(5): 840–856.

47.

Mac Ginty

Richmond

(2013) The local turn in peace building: A critical agenda for peace. Third World Quarterly 34(5): 763–783.

48.

McGarry

O’leary

(2016) Power-sharing executives: Consociational and centripetal formulae and the case of Northern Ireland. Ethnopolitics 15(5): 497–519.

49.

Marchetti

Tocci

(2009) Conflict society: Understanding the role of civil society in conflict. Global Change, Peace & Security 21(2): 201–217.

50.

Masunungure

(2011) Zimbabwe at the Crossroads: Challenges for Civil Society: OSISA Academic Article. Rosebank: Open Society Initiative for Southern Africa.

51.

Nathan

(2017) Marching orders: Exploring the mediation mandate. African Security 10(3-4): 155–175.

52.

Newman

Paris

Richmond

(2009) New Perspectives on Liberal Peacebuilding. Tokyo, Japan: United Nations University.

53.

Nilsson

(2012) Anchoring the peace: Civil society actors in peace accords and durable peace. International Interactions 38(2): 243–266.

54.

Orjuela

(2003) Building peace in Sri Lanka: A role for civil society? Journal of Peace Research 40(2): 195–212.

55.

Orjuela

(2005) Civil Society in Civil War: Peace Work and Identity Politics in Sri Lanka. Göteborg: Göteborg University, Department of Peace and Development Research.

56.

Paffenholz

(2014a) Broadening participation in peace processes: Dilemmas and options for mediators. Available at: https://peacemaker.un.org/sites/peacemaker.un.org/files/HD_BroadeningParticipationPeaceProcesses_2014.pdf (accessed 15 October 2015).

57.

Paffenholz

(2014b) Civil society and peace negotiations: Beyond the inclusion-exclusion dichotomy. Negotiation Journal 30(1): 69–91.

58.

Paffenholz

(2015a) Inclusive politics: Lessons from and for the new deal. Journal of Peacebuilding & Development 10(1): 84–89.

59.

Paffenholz

(2015b) Unpacking the local turn in peacebuilding: A critical assessment towards an agenda for future research. Third World Quarterly 36(5): 857–874.

60.

Paffenholz

Zartman

(2019) Inclusive Peace Negotiations–From a Neglected Topic to New Hype. International Negotiation 24(1): 1–6.

61.

Pring

Palmiano Federer

(2020) The normative agency of regional organizations and non-governmental organizations in international peace mediation. Swiss Political Science Review 26: 364–383.

62.

Richmond

(2012) A Post-Liberal Peace. Oxfordshire: Routledge.

63.

Richmond

(2018) A genealogy of mediation in international relations: From “analogue” to “digital” forms of global justice or managed war? Cooperation and Conflict 53(3): 301–319.

64.

Riehl

(2001) Who Is Ruling in South Sudan? The Role of Ngos in Rebuilding Socio-political Order. Uppsala: Nordiska Afrikainstitutet.

65.

Sriram

Zahar

M-J

(2009) The perils of power-sharing: Africa and beyond. Africa Spectrum 44(3): 11–39.

66.

Stedman

(2008) Contemporary Peace Making: Conflict, Violence, and Peace Processes. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

67.

Stedman

(1997) Spoiler problems in peace processes. International Security 22(2): 5–53.

68.

Toros

(2008) ‘We don’t negotiate with terrorists!’ Legitimacy and complexity in terrorist conflicts. Security Dialogue 39(4): 407–426.

69.

United Nations (2012) United Nations Guidance for Effective Mediation. New York: United Nations.

70.

Vertin

(2018) A Rope from the Sky: The Making and Unmaking of the World’s Newest State. Stroud: Amberley Publishing.

71.

Vogelaar

(2018) Local ownership, inclusivity and civil-military synergy in EU external action: The case of EU support to security sector reforms in Mali. Journal of Regional Security XIII(2): 105–130.

72.

Wallensteen

Svensson

(2014) Talking peace: International mediation in armed conflict. Journal of Peace Research 51(2): 315–327.

73.

Wanis-St John

Kew

(2008) Civil society and peace negotiations: Confronting exclusion. International Negotiation 13(1): 11–36.

74.

World Bank (2006) Civil society and peacebuilding: Potential, limitations and critical factors. Available at: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/7709 (accessed 17 March 2018).

75.

Zahar

M-J

(2010) SRSG mediation in civil wars: Revisiting the “spoiler” debate. Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations 16(2): 265–280.

76.

Zahar

M-J

McCandless

(2020) Sustaining peace one day at a time: Inclusion, transition crises, and the resilience of social contracts. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 14(1): 119–138.

77.

Zartman

(2008) The timing of peace initiatives: Hurting stalemates and ripe moments. In: Darby

Mac Ginty

(eds) Contemporary Peacemaking. New York: Springer, pp. 22–35.

The other side of resistance: Challenges to inclusivity within civil society and the limits of international peace mediation

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References