Scholars and practitioners are increasingly attentive to contestation against symbols and institutions underpinning international order(s). Yet International Relations scholarship can benefit from greater understanding of ways in which contestation interacts with salient dimensions of social status in specific international organizations (IOs). Drawing on evidence from the history of the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE), with a focus on democratic governance and human rights, this article analyzes status-related contestation as a significant, yet under-examined type of contestation in multilateral diplomacy. Status-related contestation conveys dissatisfaction about symbols, institutions, and actors which reinforce socially significant divisions that place a state (or group of states) at a social disadvantage in a particular multilateral venue. International organizations provide unique social contexts which affect the content of contestation. Building on scholarship in social psychology, constructivism, and status hierarchies in world politics, the article analyzes the evolution of a dimension (or basis) of social status in the OSCE and illustrates that, beyond domestic and material interests, state representatives communicate social identity-related concerns through language, for example, that expresses discontent with dividing lines, unfairness, or (dis)respect, in attempting to minimize negative social identities in multilateral organizations.
Adler-NissenR (2014) Stigma management in International Relations: Transgressive identities, norms, and order in international society. International Organization68(1): 143–176.
2.
BabayanN (2015) The return of the empire? Russia’s counteraction to transatlantic democracy promotion in its near abroad. Democratization22(3): 438–458.
3.
BakalovaE (2016) Normative revisionism and decoupling: The case of Russia and the international election observation norm. Paper presented at International Studies Association Annual Convention, Atlanta, GA.
4.
BarkerR (2001) Legitimating Identities: The Self-Presentations of Rulers and Subjects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5.
Bially MatternJZarakolA (2016) Hierarchies in world politics. International Organization70(3): 623–654.
6.
BjolaCKornprobstM (2011) Introduction: The argumentative deontology of global governance. In: BjolaCKornprobstM (eds) Arguing Global Governance: Agency, Lifeworld, and Shared Reasoning. London: Routledge, 1–15.
7.
BowerA (2015) Arguing with law: Strategic legal argumentation, US Diplomacy, and debates over the International Criminal Court. Review of International Studies41(2): 337–360.
8.
BrazysSDukalskisA (2017) Canary in the coal mine? China, the UNGA, and the changing world order. Review of International Studies43(4): 742–764.
9.
ClarkI (2005) Legitimacy in International Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10.
ClunanAL (2009) The Social Construction of Russia’s Resurgence: Aspirations, Identity, and Security Interests. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
11.
ClunanAL (2014) Why status matters in world politics. In: PaulTVLarsonDWWohlforthWC (eds) Status in World Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press, 273–296.
12.
DeitelhoffNZimmermannL (2020) Things we lost in the fire: How different types of contestation affect the robustness of international norms. International Studies Review22: 51–76.
13.
DembinskiMSpangerHJ (2017) “Plural peace” - principles of a new Russia policy. Peace Research Institute Frankfurt. Report no. 145.
14.
DengY (2008) China’s Struggle for Status: The Realignment of International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15.
DonnellyJ (2012) The differentiation of international societies: An approach to structural international theory. European Journal of International Relations18(1): 151–176.
16.
Eagleton-PierceM (2013) Symbolic Power in the World Trade Organization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17.
EllemersNJettenJ (2013) The many ways to be marginal in a group. Personality and Social Psychology Review17(1): 3–21.
18.
EllemersNSpearsRDoosjeB (2002) Self and social identity. Annual Review of Psychology53: 161–186.
19.
EpsteinC (2012) Stop telling us how to behave: Socialization or infantilization?International Studies Perspectives13(2): 135–145.
20.
EversFKahlMZellnerW (2005) The Culture of Dialogue: The OSCE Acquis 30 Years after Helsinki. Hamburg: Centre for OSCE Research, University of Hamburg.
21.
FawnR (2013) International Organizations and Internal Conditionality: Making Norms Matter. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
22.
FehlCFreisteinK (2015) Inequalities and global institutional order: The case for a new research agenda. Paper presented at Peace Research Institute Frankfurt, Frankfurt, 23 January.
23.
FlockhartT (ed.) (2005) Socializing Democratic Norms: The Role of International Organizations for the Construction of Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
24.
ForsbergTHellerRWolfR (2014) Introduction: Russia and the quest for status. Communist and Post-Communist Studies47(3–4): 261–268.
25.
GalbreathDJ (2007) The Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe. London: Routledge.
26.
GhebaliVY (2004) OSCE regional policy in Central Asia: Rationale and limits. In: SabahiFWarnerD (eds) The OSCE and the Multiple Challenges of Transition: The Caucasus and Central Asia. Burlington, VT: Ashgate, pp. 3–12.
27.
GhebaliVY (2005) Debating election and election monitoring standards at the OSCE: Between technical needs and politicization. In: OSCE Yearbook. Centre for OSCE Research (CORE), Institute for Peace Research and Security Policy, University of Hamburg, pp. 215–229.
28.
GheciuA (2008) Securing Civilization? The EU, NATO and the OSCE in the Post-9/11 World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29.
HechtC (2012) Inclusiveness and status in international organizations: Cases of democratic norm development and policy implementation in the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe and the United Nations. PhD Dissertation, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
30.
HechtC (2016a) The shifting salience of democratic governance: Evidence from the United Nations General Assembly General Debates. Review of International Studies42(5): 915–938.
31.
HechtC (2016b) Success after stalemate? Persistence, reiteration, and windows of opportunity in multilateral negotiations. Journal of International Organizations Studies7(2): 23–38.
32.
HillWH (2012) Russia, the Near Abroad, and the West: Lessons from the Moldova-Transdniestria Conflict. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
33.
HopkinsNReicherS (2011) Identity, culture and contestation: Social identity as cross-cultural theory. Psychological Studies56(1): 36–43.
34.
HurdI (2011) Law and the practice of diplomacy. International Journal66(3): 581–596.
35.
HurrellA (2007) On Global Order: Power, Values, and the Constitution of International Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
36.
IserM (2015) Recognition between states? Moving beyond identity politics. In: DaaseCFehlCGeisA, et al. (eds) Recognition in International Relations: Rethinking a Political Concept in a Global Context. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 27–45.
37.
JohnstonAI (2008) Social States: China in International Institutions, 1980–2000. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
38.
LaffeyMWeldesJ (1997) Beyond belief: Ideas and symbolic technologies in the study of international relations. European Journal of International Relations3(2): 193–237.
39.
LarsonDWShevchenkoA (2010) Status seekers: Chinese and Russian responses to U.S. primacy. International Security34(4): 63–95.
40.
LarsonDWShevchenkoA (2014) Russia says no: Power, status and emotions in foreign policy. Communist and Post-Communist Studies47(3–4): 269–279.
41.
LarsonDWPaulTVWohlforthWC (2014) Status and world order. In: PaulTVLarsonDWWohlforthWC (eds) Status in World Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press, 3–29.
42.
LindEATylerTR (1988) The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice. New York: Plenum Press.
43.
MarkeyD (1999) Prestige and the origins of war: Returning to realism’s roots. Security Studies8(4): 126–172.
44.
MercerJ (1995) Anarchy and identity. International Organization49(2): 229–252.
45.
MillerJLCramerJVolgyTJ, et al. (2015) Norms, behavioral compliance and status attribution in international politics. International Interactions41(5): 779–804.
46.
MorozovV (2013) Introduction: Locating international democracy. In: MorozovV (ed.) Decentering the West: The Idea of Democracy and the Struggle for Hegemony. Farnham: Ashgate, 1–21.
NeumannIB (2008) Russia as a great power, 1815–2007. Journal of International Relations and Development11: 128–151.
49.
NewmanERichR (eds) (2004) The UN Role in Promoting Democracy: Between Ideals and Reality. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.
50.
PankeDPetersohnU (2012) Why international norms disappear sometimes. European Journal of International Relations18(4): 719–742.
51.
ParsonsT (1940) An analytical approach to the theory of social stratification. American Journal of Sociology45(6): 841–862.
52.
PaulTVShankarM (2014) Status accommodation through institutional means: India’s rise and the global order. In: PaulTVLarsonDWWohlforthWC (eds) Status in World Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press, 165–191.
53.
PoppeAEWolffJ (2013) The normative challenge of interaction: Justice conflicts in democracy promotion. Global Constitutionalism2(3): 373–406.
54.
PouliotV (2010) International Security in Practice: The Politics of NATO–Russia Diplomacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
55.
PouliotV (2014) Setting status in stone: The negotiation of international institutional privileges. In: PaulTVLarsonDWWohlforthWC (eds) Status in World Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press, 192–216.
56.
PouliotV (2016) International Pecking Orders: The Politics and Practice of Multilateral Diplomacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
57.
RosertESchirmbeckS (2007) Zur Erosion internationaler Normen. Folterverbot und nukleares Tabu in der Diskussion [On the erosion of international norms. Ban on torture and nuclear taboo in discussion]. Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen14(2): 253–287. [In German.]
58.
RumeliliB (2013) Modelling democracy: Western hegemony, Turkey, and the Middle East. In: MorozovV (ed.) Decentering the West: The Idea of Democracy and the Struggle for Hegemony. Farnham: Ashgate, 65–83.
59.
SarotteME (2010) Perpetuating U.S. preeminence: The 1990 deals to ‘bribe the Soviets out’ and move NATO in. International Security35(1): 110–137.
60.
SchulzCA (2017) Accidental activists: Latin American status-seeking at the Hague. International Studies Quarterly61: 612–622.
61.
SindicDReicherSD (2009) ‘Our way of life is worth defending’: Testing a model of attitudes towards superordinate group membership through a study of Scots’ attitudes towards Britain. European Journal of Social Psychology39(1): 114–129.
62.
SteffekJ (2003) The legitimation of international governance: A discourse approach. European Journal of International Relations9(2): 249–275.
63.
TajfelHTurnerJC (1986) The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In: WorchelSAustinW (eds) Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall Publishers, 7–24.
64.
ThomasD (2001) The Helsinki Effect: International Norms, Human Rights and the Demise of Communism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
65.
TownsAE (2010) Women and States: Norms and Hierarchies in International Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
66.
TownsAERumeliliB (2017) Taking the pressure: Unpacking the relation between norms, social hierarchies, and social pressures on states. European Journal of International Relations23(4): 756–779.
67.
TsygankovAP (2012) Russia and the West from Alexander to Putin: Honor in International Relations. New York: Cambridge University Press.
68.
TurnerJC (1987) A self-categorization theory. In: TurnerJC (ed.) Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 42–67.
69.
ViolaLA (2013) Stratificatory differentiation as a constitutive principle of the international system. In: AlbertMBuzanBZürnM (eds) Bringing Sociology to International Relations: World Politics as Differentiation Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 112–131.
70.
ViolaLASnidalDZürnM (2015) Sovereign (in)equality in the evolution of the international system. In: LeibfriedSHuberELangeM, et al (eds) Oxford Handbook of Transformations of the State. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 222–236.
71.
WallaceMD (1973) War and Rank among Nations. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath and Company.
72.
WienerA (2014) A Theory of Contestation. Heidelberg: Springer.
73.
WienerA (2018) Contestation and Constitution of Norms in Global International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
74.
WilliamsMC (2007) Culture and Security: Symbolic Power and the Politics of International Security. London: Routledge.
75.
WohlforthWC (2009) Unipolarity, status competition, and great power war. World Politics61(1): 28–57.
76.
WohlforthWCde CarvalhoBLeiraH, et al. (2017) Moral authority and status in International Relations: Good states and the social dimension of status seeking. Review of International Studies44(3): 526–546.
77.
WolfR (2011) Respect and disrespect in international politics: The significance of status recognition. International Theory3(1): 105–142.
78.
WolffJZimmermannL (2016) Between banyans and battle scenes: Liberal norms, contestation, and the limits of critique. Review of International Studies42(3): 513–534.
79.
ZellnerWwith BailesAGhebaliVY, et al. (2005) Managing change in Europe, evaluating the OSCE and its future role: Competencies, capabilities, and missions. CORE Working Paper 13, Hamburg: Centre for OSCE Research.
80.
ZürnM (2018) A Theory of Global Governance: Authority, Legitimacy, and Contestation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
