Scholars of international relations have devoted remarkably little attention to the issue of why and when states enter international organizations (IOs). We argue that states have particular reason to enter IOs during the process of democratization. In the midst of a democratic transition, state leaders have difficulty making a credible commitment to sustain reforms, since they can benefit from rolling back liberalization. Gaining membership in an IO can enhance the credibility of leaders' commitments to democratic reforms. However, not all IOs are equally useful in this regard. We distinguish between IOs that cover standards in areas such as human rights and environmental protection, those that regulate economic activity, and those that are forums for addressing broad political problems. We argue that democratizing states have greater reason to join standards-based and economic IOs than political organizations. The results of a set of statistical tests support this argument.
Abbott, Kenneth W., and Duncan Snidal.1998. Why states act through formal international organizations. Journal of Conflict Resolution42 (1): 3-32.
2.
Archer, Clive.1992. International Organizations. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.
3.
Beck, Nathaniel, and Jonathan Katz.1995. What to do (and not to do) with time-series cross-section data. American Political Science Review89 (3): 634-47.
4.
Boniface, Dexter S.2002. Is there a democratic norm in the Americas? An analysis of the Organization of American States. Global Governance8 (3): 365-81.
5.
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, Alastair Smith, Randolph M. Siverson, and James D. Morrow .2003. The logic of political survival . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6.
Burkhart, Ross, and Michael Lewis-Beck .1994. Comparative democracy: The economic development thesis. American Political Science Review88 (4): 903-10.
7.
Burton, Michael, Richard Gunther, and John Higley.1992. Elites and democratic consolidation in Latin America and southern Europe: An overview. In Elites and democratic consolidation in Latin America and southern Europe, ed. John Higley and Richard Gunther, 323-48. New York: Cambridge University Press.
8.
Calvo, Guillermo A.1989. Incredible reforms. In Debt, stabilization, and development: Essays in memory of Carlos Diaz-Alejandro, ed. Guillermo A. Calvo, Ronald Findlay, Pentti Kouri, and Jorge Braga De Macedo, 217-34. London: Basil Blackwell.
9.
Calvo, Guillermo A., and Jeffrey A. Frankel .1991. Credit markets, credibility and economic transformation. Journal of Economic Perspectives5 (4): 139-48.
10.
Dangerfield, Martin.2000. Subregional economic cooperation in central and eastern Europe: The political economy of CEFTA. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
11.
Dimitrova, Antoaneta, and Geoffrey Pridham .2004. International actors and democracy promotion in central and eastern Europe: The integration model and its limits. Democratization11 (5): 91-112.
12.
Dorussen, Han, and Hugh Ward.2008. Intergovernmental organizations and the Kantian peace: A network perspective. Journal of Conflict Resolution52 (2):189-212.
13.
Feld, Werner J., Robert S. Jordan, with Leon Hurwitz.1994. International organizations: A comparative approach. 3rd ed. Westport, CT : Praeger.
14.
Frankel, Jeffrey A.2005. The environment and globalization. In Globalization: What's new, ed. Michael Weinstein , 129-69. New York: Columbia University Press.
15.
Gleditsch, Kristian S.2004. Modified regime type 4 data. http://privatewww.essex.ac.uk/~ks6/polity.htm
16.
Gleditsch, Kristian S., and Michael Ward.1999. Interstate system membership: A revised list of the independent states since 1816. International Interactions25 (4): 393-413.
17.
Gleditsch, Nils Petter, and Bjorn Sverdrup.1995. Democracy and the environment. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Studies Association, Chicago.
18.
Ghosn, Faten, and Glenn Palmer.2003. Codebook for the Militarized Interstate Dispute Data, version 3.0. http://cow2.1a.psu.edu .
19.
Haas, Ernst B.1964. Beyond the nation-state: Functionalism and international organization. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
20.
Hafner-Burton, Emilie M., and Alexander H. Montgomery .2008. Power or plenty: How do international trade institutions affect economic sanctions?Journal of Conflict Resolution52 (2):213-242.
21.
Hellman, Joel.1998. Winners take all: The politics of partial reform in post-communist transitions. World Politics50 (2): 203-34.
22.
Heston, Alan, Robert Summers, and Bettina Aten.2002. Penn World Table Version 6.1. Center for International Comparisons, University of Pennsylvania , Philadelphia.
23.
Huntington, Samuel P.1991. The third wave: Democratization in the late twentieth century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
24.
Ikenberry, G. John.2001. After victory: Institution, strategic restraint, and the rebuilding of order after major wars. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
25.
Jacobson, Harold K., William Reisinger, and Todd Mathers.1986. National entanglements in international governmental organizations. American Political Science Review80 (1): 141-59.
26.
Jaggers, Keith, and Ted Robert Gurr .1995. Tracking democracy's third wave with the Polity III data. Journal of Peace Research32 (4): 469-82.
27.
Kaczurba, Janusz.1997. The impact of CEFTA. In The further development of CEFTA: Institutionalization, deepening, widening? ed. Heinrich Machowski, 11-16. Warsaw, Poland: Friedrich Ebert Foundation.
28.
Keohane, Robert O.1984. After hegemony: Cooperation and discord in the world political economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
29.
Klebes, Heinrich.1999. The quest for democratic security: The role of the Council of Europe and U.S. foreign policy. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace.
30.
Li, Quan, and Rafael Reuveny.2006. Democracy and environmental degradation . International Studies Quarterly50 (4): 935-56.
31.
Mansfield, Edward D.1994. Power, trade, and war. Princeton, NJ : Princeton University Press.
32.
Mansfield, Edward D., and Jon Pevehouse .2006. Democratization and international organizations. International Organization60 (1): 137-67.
33.
Mansfield, Edward D., Helen V. Milner, and B. Peter Rosendorff .2002. Why democracies cooperate more: Electoral control and international trade agreements. International Organization56 (3): 477-513.
34.
Manuel, Paul C.1996. The challenges of democratic consolidation in Portugal . Westport, CT: Praeger.
35.
Martin, Lisa L.1992. Coercive cooperation: Explaining multilateral economic sanctions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
36.
Mearsheimer, John J.1994/95. The false promise of international institutions. International Security19 (3): 5-49.
37.
Midlarsky, Manus.1998. Democracy and the environment: An empirical assessment . Journal of Peace Research35 (3): 341-61.
38.
Moravcsik, Andrew.2000. The origins of human rights regimes: Democratic delegation in postwar Europe. International Organization54 (2): 217-52.
39.
Neumayer, Eric.2002. Do democracies exhibit stronger international environmental commitment? A cross-country analysis. Journal of Peace Research39 (2): 139-64.
40.
O'Donnell, Guillermo, and Philippe C. Schmitter .1986. Transitions from authoritarian rule: Tentative conclusions about uncertain democracies. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
41.
Olson, Mancur.1993. Dictatorship, democracy, and development. American Political Science Review87 (3): 567-76.
42.
Parish, Randall, and Mark Peceny.2002. Kantian liberalism and the collective defense of democracy in Latin America. Journal of Peace Research39 (2): 229-50.
43.
Pevehouse, Jon C.2005. Democracy from above: Regional organizations and democratization . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
44.
Pevehouse, Jon C., Tim Nordstrom, and Kevin Warnke.2004. The Correlates of War 2 international governmental organizations data version 2.0. Conflict Management and Peace Science21 (2): 101-19.
45.
Powell, Charles.1996. International aspects of democratization: The case of Spain. In The international dimensions of democratization, ed. Lawrence Whitehead, 285-314. Oxford , UK: Oxford University Press.
46.
Pridham, Geoffrey.2001. Re-thinking regime change theory and the international dimension of democratisation: Ten years after in east-central Europe. In Prospects for democratic consolidation in east-central Europe, ed. Geoffrey Pridham and Attila Agh, 54-95. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.
47.
Rodrik, Dani.1989a. Credibility of trade reform—A policy maker's guide . World Economy12 (1): 1-16.
Russett, Bruce, and John R. Oneal .2001. Triangulating peace: Democracy, interdependence and international organizations. New York : W.W. Norton.
50.
Russett, Bruce, John R. Oneal, and David R. Davis .1998. The third leg of the Kantian tripod for peace: International organizations and militarized disputes, 1950—85 . International Organization52 (3): 441-67.
51.
Schimmelfennig, Frank.2001. The community trap: Liberal norms, rhetorical action, and the eastern enlargement of the European Union. International Organization55 (1): 47-80.
52.
Shanks, Cheryl, Harold K. Jacobson, and Jeffrey H. Kaplan .1996. Inertia and change in the constellation of international governmental organizations, 1981—1992 . International Organization50 (4): 593-627.
53.
Singer, J. David, and Melvin Small.1994. Correlates of War project: International and civil war data, 1816—1992. ICPSR Study 9905. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research.
54.
Union of International Associations.2001. Yearbook of international organizations. Brussels: Author.
55.
von Stein, Jana. 2008. The international law and politics of climate change: Ratification of the United Nations Framework Convention and the Kyoto Protocol. Journal of Conflict Resolution52 (2):243-268.
56.
Whitehead, Laurence.1989. The consolidation of fragile democracies: A discussion with illustrations. In Democracy in the Americas, ed. Robert Pastor, 79-95. New York: Holmes and Meier.
57.
———. 1993. Requisites for admission. In The challenge of integration: Europe and the Americas, ed. Peter H. Smith, 149-82. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
58.
———. 1996. The international aspects of democratization: Europe and the Americas. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
