The 2016 EU Global Strategy and the 2015 European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP) review have made stabilisation of the ENP area one of their main priorities. Our argument here, however, is that the Global Strategy and the ENP review not only seek to mitigate the numerous crises currently affecting the neighbourhood; they also aim to address a set of intra-EU vulnerabilities linked to events in the ENP area that are threatening the EU’s own ontological security. We employ narrative analysis to explore how insecurity in the EU and in the ENP area is affecting the EU’s relation to the neighbourhood-other and its understanding of the EU-self. Our main findings point to the Global Strategy and the ENP review providing ample measures to stabilise the neighbourhood. However, whether they have provided a sufficiently compelling narrative to enable the emergence of new emotional structures for the EU and its member states to make sense of themselves and their relation to the neighbourhood-other remains an open question.
AggestamL (2004) A European foreign policy? Role conceptions and the politics of identity in Britain, France and Germany. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, Department of Political Science, Stockholm University, Stockholm.
2.
BerenskoetterF (2014) Parameters of a national biography. European Journal of International Relations20(1): 262–288.
3.
BrowningCSJoenniemiP (2017) Ontological security, self-articulation and the securitization of identity. Cooperation and Conflict52(1): 31–47.
4.
CampbellD (1998) Writing Security: United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
5.
ChernobrovD (2016) Ontological security and public (mis)recognition of international crises: Uncertainty, political imagining, and the self. Political Psychology37: 581–596.
6.
Council of Ministers (2015) Council conclusions on the Review of the European Neighbourhood Policy. Press release 926/15, 14December. Brussels: Council of the European Union.
EC/EEAS (2015a) Review of the European Neighbourhood Policy. JOIN(2015)50 final, 18November. Brussels: European Commission.
10.
EC/EEAS (2015b) Towards a new European Neighbourhood Policy. Joint Consultation Paper, JOIN(2015)6 final, 4March. Brussels: European Commission.
11.
EC/EEAS (2017a) A strategic approach to resilience in the EU’s external action. JOIN(2017) 21 final, 7June. Brussels: European Commission.
12.
EC/EEAS (2017b) Report on the implementation of the European Neighbourhood Policy Review. Joint report, JOIN(2017)18 final, 18May. Brussels: European Commission.
13.
European Commission (2004) European Neighbourhood Policy. Strategy paper, COM(2004)373 final, 12May. Brussels: European Commission.
14.
European Commission (2014) Neighbourhood at the crossroads – Taking stock of a year of challenges. JOIN(2014)12 final, 27March. Brussels: European Commission.
15.
European Commission (2015) The European agenda on security. COM(2015)185 final, 28April. Brussels: European Commission.
16.
European Commission (2016) State of play of implementation of the priority actions under the European agenda on migration. COM(2016)85 final, 10February. Brussels: European Commission.
17.
European Council (2014) Special meeting of the European Council. EUCO 163/14, 30August. Brussels: European Council.
18.
European Council (2015) Informal Meeting of the Heads of State or Government: Statement by the Members of the European Council. Brussels: European Council.
19.
European Council (2016) Remarks by President Donald Tusk after the signature of the EU-NATO declaration. Press release 420/16, 8July. Brussels: European Council.
20.
European Parliament (2015) Review of the European Neighbourhood Policy. P8_TA-PROV(2015)0272, 9July. Brussels: European Parliament.
21.
European Security Strategy (ESS) (2003) A Secure Europe in A Better World. Brussels: European Union.
HuysmansJ (1998) Security! What do you mean? From concept to thick signifier. European Journal of International Relations4(2): 226–255.
28.
KinnvallC (2004) Globalization and religious nationalism: Self, identity, and the search for ontological security. Political Psychology25(4): 741–767.
29.
KinnvallC (2017) Feeling ontologically (in)secure: States, traumas and the governing of gendered space. Cooperation and Conflict52: 90–108.
30.
LaingRD (1990 [1960]) The Divided Self. London: Penguin Books.
31.
Lyons-PadillaSGelfandMJMirahmadiHet al. (2015) Belonging nowhere: Marginalization and radicalization risk among Muslim immigrants. Behavioral Science & Policy1(2): 1–12.
32.
MälksooM (2015) ‘Memory must be defended’: Beyond the politics of mnemonical security. Security Dialogue46(3): 221–237.
33.
MitzenJ (2006a) Anchoring Europe’s civilizing identity: Habits, capabilities and ontological security. Journal of European Public Policy13(2): 270–285.
34.
MitzenJ (2006b) Ontological security in world politics: State identity and the security dilemma. European Journal of International Relations12(3): 341–370.
35.
MogheriniF (2015) Speech of the HR/VP Mogherini: The EU Internal-External Security Nexus: Terrorism as an example of the necessary link between different dimensions of action. In: Barcelona EU global strategy conference, Barcelona, 26 November.
SchimmelfennigF (2001) Liberal identity and post-nationalist inclusions: The eastern enlargement of the European Union. In: CedermanL-E (ed.) Constructing Europe’s Identity: The External Dimension. London: Lynne Rienner, pp. 165–186.
42.
SimpsonJA (2007) Psychological foundations of trust. Current Directions in Psychological Science16(5): 264–268.
43.
SomersMR (1994) The narrative constitution of identity: A relational and network approach. Theory and Society23(5): 605–649.
44.
SteeleBJ (2008) Ontological Security in International Relations: Self-Identity and the IR State. Abingdon: Routledge.
ZaiottiR (2007) Of friends and fences: Europe’s Neighbourhood Policy and the ‘gated community syndrome’. Journal of European Integration29(2): 143–162.
