Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This article examines the North Atlantic Treaty Organization’s (NATO) efforts to restore its ontological security under a weakening global nuclear regime. Combining insights from critical regime theory and the Lacanian ontological security perspective, the article conceptualizes nuclear regime as a symbolic order that NATO relies on to mask its structural “lack” stemming from its contradictory commitment to both deterrence and disarmament. Through a structural narrative analysis of the Alliance’s official texts from 1949 to 2025, the article reveals three narrative emplotments (romance, tragedy, and comedy) that NATO has invoked to reaffirm and stabilize its elusive nuclear identity. By acting as stabilizing “fantasies,” these narrative emplotments have helped NATO justify its self-image as a moral and responsible nuclear alliance. By showing how collective actors retain identity through symbolic discursive performance by activating and deactivating a series of plots, this article has contributed to both ontological security and critical regime perspectives.

Keywords

critical regime theory global nuclear regime Lacan NATO ontological security structural narrative analysis

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

ABM (1972) ABM Treaty. Available at: https://media.nti.org/documents/abm_treaty.pdf (accessed 22 February 2024).

Biswas

(2014) Nuclear Desire: Power and the Postcolonial Nuclear Order. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

Brassett

Browning

(2024) Russian warship, go fuck yourself”: Humour and the (geo)political limits of vicarious war. Cooperation and Conflict 59(3): 311–336.

Brassett

Browning

O’Dwyer

(2021) EU’ve got to be kidding: Anxiety, humour and ontological Security. Global Society 35(1): 8–26.

Browning

Joenniemi

(2013) From fratricide to security community: Retheorising difference in the constitution of Nordic Peace. Journal of International Relations and Development 16: 483–513.

Browning

Joenniemi

(2017) Ontological security, self-articulation and the securitization of identity. Cooperation and Conflict 52(1): 31–47.

Cash

(2020) Psychoanalysis, cultures of anarchy, and ontological insecurity. International Theory 12(2): 306–321.

Eberle

(2019) Narrative, desire, ontological security, transgression: Fantasy as a factor in international politics. Journal of International Relations and Development 22(1): 243–268.

Eberle

Daniel

(2019) “Putin, You Suck”: Affective sticking points in the Czech narrative on “Russian Hybrid Warfare”. Political Psychology 40(6): 1267–1281.

10.

Egeland

(2020a) Who stole disarmament? History and nostalgia in Nuclear abolition discourse. International Affairs 96(5): 1387–1403.

11.

Egeland

(2020b) Spreading the burden: How NATO became a ‘Nuclear’ alliance. Diplomacy and Statecraft 31(1): 143–167.

12.

Ejdus

(2017) ‘Not a heap of stones’: Material environments and ontological security in international relations. Cambridge Review of International Affairs 30(1): 23–43.

13.

Ellsberg

(2017) The Doomsday Machine: Confessions of a Nuclear War Planner. London: Bloomsbury.

14.

Epstein

(2011) Who Speaks? Discourse, the Subject and the Study of Identity in International Politics. European Journal of International Relations 17(2): 327–350.

15.

Epstein

(2018) The productive force of the negative and the desire for recognition: lessons from Hegel and Lacan. Review of International Studies 44(5): 805–828.

16.

Flockhart

(2020) Is this the End? Resilience, ontological security, and the crisis of the liberal international order. Contemporary Security Policy 41(2): 215–240.

17.

Floyd

(2025) Ontological vs. societal security: Same difference or distinct concepts? International Politics 62: 795–813.

18.

Frye

(1957) Anatomy of Criticism: Four Essays. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

19.

Giddens

(1991) Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.

20.

Hagström

(2021) Great power Narcissism and ontological (in) security: The narrative mediation of greatness and weakness in international politics. International Studies Quarterly 65(2): 331–342.

21.

Hill

(2021) NATO and the treaty on the prohibition of nuclear weapons. Available at: https://www.chathamhouse.org/sites/default/files/2021-01/2021-01-29-nato-tpnw-hill.pdf (accessed 10 January 2025).

22.

ICAN (2013) Unspeakable Suffering: The Humanitarian Impact of Nuclear Weapons. Geneva: ICAN.

23.

ICAN (2018) ICAN briefing: These 35 states are sabotaging the NPT 5 nuclear states and 30 enablers. Available at: https://www.icanw.org/new_research_35_states_are_sabotaging_the_npt (accessed 15 February 2025).

24.

ICAN (2024) Commentary: Nuclear-armed states try to deflect the blame for their new nuclear arms race. Available at: https://www.icanw.org/commentary_nuclear_armed_states_try_to_deflect_the_blame_for_their_new_nuclear_arms_race (accessed 15 February 2025).

25.

INF (1987) Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty. Available at: https://armscontrolcenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/INF-Treaty.pdf (accessed 21 November 2024).

26.

Johansson-Nogués

(2018) The EU’s ontological (in) security: Stabilising the ENP area and the EU self. Cooperation and Conflict 53(4): 528–544.

27.

Keohane

(1984) After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

28.

Khoury

(2016) Narrative, power, and legitimacy in international politics. European Journal of International Relations 22(3): 1–24.

29.

Kinnvall

(2004) Globalization and religious nationalism: Self, identity, and the search for ontological security. Political Psychology 25(5): 741–767.

30.

Kinnvall

Mitzen

(2018) Ontological security and conflict: The dynamics of crisis and the constitution of community. Journal of International Relations and Development 21(4): 825–835.

31.

Kinnvall

Mitzen

(2020) Anxiety, fear, and ontological security in world politics: Thinking with and beyond Giddens. International Theory 12(2): 240–256.

32.

Koivula

Ossa

(2022) NATO’s Burden-Sharing Disputes: Past, Present and Future Prospects. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.

33.

Krasner

(1982) Structural causes and regime consequences: Regimes as intervening variables. International Organization 36(2): 185–205.

34.

Kratochwil

Ruggie

(1986) International organization: A state of the art on an art of the state. International Organization 40(4): 753–775.

35.

Krickel-Choi

(2022) The concept of anxiety in ontological security studies. International Studies Review 24(3): 1–21.

36.

Kristensen

Korda

Johns

, et al. (2024a) Chinese nuclear weapons, 2024. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 80(1): 49–72.

37.

Kristensen

Korda

Johns

, et al. (2024b) Russian nuclear weapons, 2024. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 80(2): 118–145.

38.

Kristensen

Korda

Johns

, et al. (2024c) United States nuclear weapons, 2024. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 80(3): 182–208.

39.

Kristensen

Korda

Johns

, et al. (2024d) United Kingdom nuclear weapons, 2024. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 80(6): 394–407.

40.

Kristensen

Korda

Johns

, et al. (2025) French nuclear weapons, 2025. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 81(4): 313–326.

41.

Kuusisto

(2009) Comic plots as conflict resolution strategy. European Journal of International Relations 15(4): 601–626.

42.

Kuusisto

(2018) Comparing IR plots: Dismal tragedies, exuberant romances, hopeful comedies and cynical satire. International Politics 55160–55176.

43.

McDonough

(2003) The 2002 Nuclear posture review: The ‘New Triad’, counterproliferation, and U.S. Grand strategy Working Article No. 38. Available at: https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/46523/WP38.pdf (accessed 10 December 2024).

44.

Mitzen

(2006a) Ontological security in world politics: State identity and the security dilemma. European Journal of International Relations 12(3): 341–370.

45.

Mitzen

(2006b) Anchoring Europe’s civilizing identity: Habits, capabilities and ontological security. Journal of European Public Policy 13(2): 270–285.

46.

NAC (North Atlantic Council) (2020) North Atlantic council statement as the treaty on the prohibition of nuclear weapons enters into force. Available at: https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/news_180087.htm (accessed 15 November 2024).

47.

NATO (1949) The strategic concept for the defense of the North Atlantic Area (DC 6/1). Available at: https://www.nato.int/docu/stratdoc/eng/a491201a.pdf (accessed 6 November 2024).

48.

NATO (1952) The strategic concept for the defense of the North Atlantic Area (MC 3/5). Available at: https://www.nato.int/docu/stratdoc/eng/a521203a.pdf (accessed 6 November 2024).

49.

NATO (1957a) Final Communiqué. Available at: https://www.nato.int/en/about-us/official-texts-and-resources/official-texts/1957/05/02/final-communique (accessed 24 January 2026).

50.

NATO (1957b) Final Communiqué. Available at: https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/official_texts_17551.htm?selectedLocale=en (accessed 26 October 2025).

51.

NATO (1957c) Overall strategic concept for the defense of the North Atlantic Area (MC 14/2). Available at: https://www.nato.int/docu/stratdoc/eng/a570523a.pdf (accessed 8 November 2024).

52.

NATO (1962) Final Communiqué. Available at: https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/official_texts_26579.htm?selectedLocale=en (accessed 28 October 2025).

53.

NATO (1967a) Final Communiqué. Available at: https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/official_texts_26706.htm?selectedLocale=en (accessed 26 October 2025).

54.

NATO (1967b) The future tasks of the alliance report of the council ‘The Harmel Report’. Available at: https://www.nato.int/en/about-us/official-texts-and-resources/official-texts/1967/12/13/the-future-tasks-of-the-alliance (accessed 28 January 2026).

55.

NATO (1968) Overall strategic concept for the defense of the North Atlantic treaty organization area (MC 14/3). Available at: https://www.nato.int/content/dam/nato/webready/documents/Archives/stratdoc/eng/a680116a.pdf (accessed 24 January 2026).

56.

NATO (1971) Final Communiqué. Available at: https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/official_texts_26812.htm?selectedLocale=en (accessed 26 October 2025).

57.

NATO (1975) Ministerial Guidance 1975. Available at: https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/official_texts_26924.htm?selectedLocale=en (accessed 30 October 2025).

58.

NATO (1978a) Final Communiqué. Available at: https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/official_texts_27007.htm?selectedLocale=en (accessed 28 October 2025).

59.

NATO (1978b) Washington Summit Final Communiqué. Available at: https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/official_texts_27013.htm?selectedLocale=en (accessed 30 October 2025).

60.

NATO (1979a) Final Communiqué. Available at: https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/official_texts_27036.htm?selectedLocale=en (accessed 28 October 2025).

61.

NATO (1979b) Final Communiqué. Available at: https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/official_texts_27045.htm?selectedLocale=en (accessed 28 October 2025).

62.

NATO (1979c) Final Communiqué. Available at: https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/official_texts_27042.htm?selectedLocale=en (accessed 28 October 2025).

63.

NATO (1979d) Final Communiqué. Available at: https://www.nato.int/en/about-us/official-texts-and-resources/official-texts/1979/12/13/final-communique (accessed 29 January 2026).

64.

NATO (1979e) Special meeting. Available at: https://www.nato.int/en/about-us/official-texts-and-resources/official-texts/1979/12/12/special-meeting (accessed 29 January 2026).

65.

NATO (1986) Final Communiqué. Available at: https://www.nato.int/en/about-us/official-texts-and-resources/official-texts/1986/05/22/final-communique (accessed 25 January 2026).

66.

NATO (1987) Final Communiqué. Available at: https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/official_texts_23395.htm?selectedLocale=en (accessed 28 October 2025).

67.

NATO (1988) Conventional Arms control: The way ahead. Available at: https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/official_texts_23458.htm?selectedLocale=en (accessed 31 October 2025).

68.

NATO (1989) The Alliance’s comprehensive concept of arms control and disarmament. Available at: https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/official_texts_23553.htm?selectedLocale=en (accessed 30 October 2025).

69.

NATO (1990) Declaration on a transformed North Atlantic alliance. Available at: https://www.nato.int/en/about-us/official-texts-and-resources/official-texts/1990/07/05/declaration-on-a-transformed-north-atlantic-alliance (accessed 1 February 2026).

70.

NATO (1991) The alliance’s new strategic concept. Available at: https://www.nato.int/cps/em/natohq/official_texts_23847.htm (accessed 16 December 2024).

71.

NATO (1997a) Founding Act. Available at: https://www.nato.int/en/about-us/official-texts-and-resources/official-texts/1997/05/27/founding-act (accessed 12 January 2025).

72.

NATO (1997b) Madrid declaration. Available at: https://www.nato.int/docu/comm/1997/970708/home.htm (accessed 18 December 2024).

73.

NATO (1999) The alliance’s strategic concept. Available at: https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/official_texts_27433.htm (accessed 16 December 2024).

74.

NATO (2006) Riga summit declaration. Available at: https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/official_texts_37920.htm (accessed 18 December 2024).

75.

NATO (2008) Bucharest summit declaration. Available at: https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/official_texts_8443.htm (accessed 20 December 2024).

76.

NATO (2010) Strategic concept. Available at: https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_82705.htm (accessed 17 December 2024).

77.

NATO (2012) Chicago summit declaration. Available at: https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/official_texts_87593.htm (accessed 8 December 2024).

78.

NATO (2014) Wales summit declaration. Available at: https://www.nato.int/cps/cn/natohq/official_texts_112964.htm (accessed 20 December 2024).

79.

NATO (2016) Warsaw summit Communiqué. Available at: https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/official_texts_133169.htm (accessed 27 December 2024).

80.

NATO (2018) Brussels summit declaration. Available at: https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/official_texts_156624.htm (accessed 18 January 2025).

81.

NATO (2021) Brussels summit Communiqué. Available at: https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/news_185000.htm (accessed 18 January 2025).

82.

NATO (2022a) Statement by NATO heads of state and government. Available at: https://www.nato.int/cps/cn/natohq/official_texts_193719.htm (accessed 12 January 2025).

83.

NATO (2022b) NATO 2022 strategic concept. Available at: https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/official_texts_196951.htm (accessed 14 January 2025).

84.

NATO (2023) Vilnius summit Communiqué. Available at: https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/official_texts_217320.htm?selectedLocale=en (accessed 12 January 2025).

85.

NATO (2024a) Washington summit declaration. Available at: https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/official_texts_227678.htm (accessed 15 February 2025).

86.

NATO (2024b) Speech by NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte at the Concert Noble, Brussels. Available at: https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/opinions_231348.htm (accessed 18 January 2025).

87.

Noda

(2022) A wolf in sheep’s clothing? The NPT and symbolic proliferation. Contemporary Security Policy 43(1): 134–160.

88.

NPT (1970) Treaty on the non-proliferation of nuclear weapons. Available at: https://www.iaea.org/sites/default/files/publications/documents/infcircs/1970/infcirc140.pdf (accessed 15 November 2024).

89.

Nuclear Posture Review (2010) Available at: https://courses.physics.illinois.edu/phys280/sp2014/archive/2010%20Nuclear%20Posture%20Review%20Executive%20Summary.pdf (accessed 10 December 2024).

90.

Nuclear Posture Review (2018) Available at: https://media.defense.gov/2018/feb/02/2001872877/-1/-1/1/executive-summary.pdf (accessed 10 December 2024).

91.

Panico

(2022) Making nuclear possession possible: The NPT disarmament principle and the production of less violent and more responsible nuclear states. Contemporary Security Policy 43(4): 651–680.

92.

Panke

Petersohn

(2016) Norm challenges and norm death: The inexplicable? Cooperation and Conflict 5(1): 3–19.

93.

Paterson

(2024) Business as usual like never before! Continuity, rupture, and anxiety management in the 2014 Scottish independence referendum campaign. Cooperation and Conflict 59(4): 510–529.

94.

Payne

(2013) Reading the global war on terror as comedy. In: Paper presented at the ISSS/ISAC annual conference, Washington, DC, 4–6 August.

95.

Pelopidas

(2017) The unbearable lightness of luck: Three sources of overconfidence in the manageability of nuclear crisis. European Journal of International Security 2(2): 240–262.

96.

Plokhy

(2021) Nuclear Folly: A History of the Cuban Missile Crisis. New York: Norton.

97.

Ringmar

(2006) Inter-textual relations: The quarrel over the Iraq war as a conflict between narrative types. Cooperation and Conflict 41(4): 403–421.

98.

Rumelili

(2015) Identity and desecuritisation: The pitfalls of conflating ontological and physical security. Journal of. International Relations and Development 18(1): 52–74.

99.

SALT I (1972) Interim agreement between the United States of America and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics on certain measures with respect to the limitation of strategic offensive Arms. Available at: https://media.nti.org/documents/salt_1.pdf (accessed 21 December 2024).

100.

SALT II (1979) Treaty between the United States of America and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics on the limitation of strategic offensive Arms, together with agreed statements and common understandings regarding the Treaty. Available at: https://media.nti.org/documents/salt_2.pdf (accessed 24 December 2024).

101.

Sayler

(2024) Defense Primer: Hypersonic Boost-Glide Weapons. Congressional research service. Available at: https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/IF/IF11459/8 (accessed 10 February 2025).

102.

Schimmelfennig

(2016) NATO and institutional theories of international relations. In: Webber

Hyde-Price

(eds) Theorising NATO: New Perspectives on the Atlantic Alliance. London: Routledge, pp. 93–115.

103.

Schlosser

(2013) Command and Control: Nuclear Weapons, the Damascus Accident, and the Illusion of Safety. New York: Penguin Press.

104.

Sharani

Çelik

(2024) Seeking ontological security through thick narratives: Syrian Civil War, ontological insecurity, and narratives. Cooperation and Conflict 60(2): 342–368.

105.

Sherwin

(2020) Gambling with Armageddon: Nuclear Roulette from Hiroshima to the Cuban Missile Crisis, 1945-1962. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

106.

START I (1991) Treaty between the United States of America and the Union of Socialist Soviet Republics on further reduction and limitation of strategic offensive Arms. Available at: https://media.nti.org/documents/start_1_treaty.pdf (accessed 23 December 2024).

107.

START II (1993) Treaty between the United States of America and the Russian Federation on further reduction and limitation of strategic offensive Arms. Available at: https://www.nti.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/start_2_treaty.pdf (accessed 23 December 2024).

108.

Steele

(2008) Ontological Security in International Relations: Self-Identity and the IR State. New York: Routledge.

109.

Steele

(2024) Order and justice in ontological security studies. Cooperation and Conflict 60(2): 213–236.

110.

Subotić

(2016) Narrative, ontological security, and foreign policy change. Foreign Policy Analysis 12(4): 610–627.

111.

TPNW (Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons) (2017) Available at: https://docs.un.org/en/A/CONF.229/2017/8 (accessed 15 January 2025).

112.

Vieira

(2018) (Re-)imagining the ‘Self’ of ontological security: The case of Brazil’s ambivalent postcolonial subjectivity. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 46(2): 142–164.

113.

Vulović

Ejdus

(2024) Object-cause of desire and ontological security: Evidence from Serbia’s opposition to Kosovo’s membership in UNESCO. International Theory 16(1): 122–151.

114.

Vuorelma

(2025) An existential threat in the North: Ontological insecurity and the Nordic path to NATO. Cooperation and Conflict. 60(4): 727–751.

115.

White

(1973) Metahistory: The Historical Imagination in Nineteenth-Century Europe. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

116.

Woolf

(2021) U.S. Strategic Nuclear Forces: Background, Developments, and Issues. Congressional Research Service. Available at: https://sgp.fas.org/crs/nuke/RL33640.pdf (accessed 28 December 2024).

117.

Young

(2002) The Institutional Dimensions of Environmental Change: Fit, Interplay, and Scale. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

118.

Zarakol

(2017) States and ontological security: A historical rethinking. Cooperation and Conflict 52(1): 48–68.

Between deterrence and disarmament: NATO’s struggle for ontological security amid disruptions in the global nuclear regime

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References