What impact does the way a civil war is terminated have on the post-conflict democratization process? This study analyses whether certain types of conflict termination are positive for post-conflict levels of democracy. It is argued that negotiated settlements, being at large more cooperative, are more conducive for democratization than truces or military victories. Stabilizing measures rarely leave possibilities for contestation of elites and thus few incentives to open up post-war society. The empirics reveal that negotiated settlements are the best way to end a conflict if democracy is to develop in its aftermath.
AggestamK (1996) Two-track Diplomacy: Negotiations between Israel and the PLO through Open and Secret Channels. Jerusalem: Leonard Davis Institute for International Relations, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
2.
ApterDE (1988) Machiavellis’s question: Thoughts on positive and negative pluralism. In: ShapiroIReheerG (eds) Power, Inequality, and Democratic Politics: Essays in Honour of Robert A. Dahl. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, pp. 203–218.
3.
BohrerREIIHartzellC (2005) After the shooting stops: Civil war settlements and the post-war environment. Paper prepared for presentation at the International Studies Association annual meeting, Honolulu, Hawaii, 1–5 March 2005.
4.
de MesquitaBBruceBDownsGW (2006) Intervention and democracy. International Organisation60(3): 627–649.
5.
CedermanL-EHugSWengerA (2008) Democratisation and war in political science. Democratisation15(3): 509–524.
6.
CoppedgeMAlvarezAMaldonadoC (2008) Two persistent dimensions of democracy: Contestation and inclusiveness. Journal of Politics40(3): 632–647. Data for the article at: http://www.nd.edu/~mcoppedg/crd/datacrd.htm2009-02-13
7.
CoppedgeMReinickeWH (1990) Measuring polyarchy. Studies in Comparative International Development25(1): 51–72.
8.
DahlRA (1971) Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
9.
DonohueWADruckmanD (2009) Message framing surrounding the Oslo I Accords. Journal of Conflict Resolution53(1): 119–145.
10.
DoyleMWSambanisN (2000) International peacebuilding: A theoretical and quantitative analysis. American Political Science Review94(4): 779–801.
EnterlineAJGriegJM (2008) Against all odds? The history of imposed democracy and the future of Iraq and Afghanistan. Foreign Policy Analysis4(4): 321–347.
13.
FearonJD (2003) Ethnic and cultural diversity by country. Journal of Economic Growth8(2): 195–222.
14.
FearonJDLaitinDD (2008) Civil war termination. Paper presented at 2007 Annual Meetings of the American Political Science Association, Chicago: 30 August to 1 September 2007.
15.
FloresTENooruddinI (2009) Democracy under the gun understanding post conflict economic recovery. Journal of Conflict Resolution53(1): 3–29.
16.
FortnaVP (2003) Scraps of paper? Agreements and the durability of peace. International Organisation57(2): 337–372.
17.
FortnaVP (2004a) Does peacekeeping keep peace? International intervention and the duration of peace after civil war. International Studies Quarterly48(2): 269–292.
18.
FortnaVP (2004b) Peace Time: Cease-Fire Agreements and the Durability of Peace. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
19.
FortnaVP (2008) Peacekeeping and democratisation. In: JarstadAKSiskTD (eds) From War to Democracy: Dilemmas of Peacebuilding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 39–79.
20.
GursesMMasonTD (2008) Democracy out of anarchy: The prospects for post-civil-war democracy. Social Science Quarterly89(2): 315–336.
21.
HartzellCABohrerRE (2007) Civil war and democracy. Paper prepared for the International Studies Association annual meeting, Chicago, 28 February to 3 March 2007.
22.
HipplerJ (2008) Democratisation after civil wars – key problems and experiences. Democratisation15(3): 550–569.
23.
HöglundKSöderberg KovacsM (2010) Beyond the absence of war: The diversity of peace in post-settlement societies. Review of International Studies36(2): 367–390.
24.
JarstadAK (2008a) Dilemmas of war-to-democracy transitions: Theories and concepts. In: JarstadAKSiskTD (eds) From War to Democracy: Dilemmas of Peacebuilding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 17–36.
25.
JarstadAK (2008b) Power-sharing: Former enemies in joint government. In: JarstadAKSiskTD (eds) From War to Democracy: Dilemmas of Peacebuilding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 105–133.
26.
JarstadAKNilssonD (2008) From words to deeds: The implementation of power-sharing pacts in peace accords. Conflict Management and Peace Science25(3): 206–223.
27.
JarstadAKSiskTD (eds) (2008a) From War to Democracy: Dilemmas of Peacebuilding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28.
JarstadAKSiskTD (2008b) Introduction. In: JarstadAKSiskTD (eds) From War to Democracy: Dilemmas of Peacebuilding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–13.
29.
JönssonC (2002) Cognitive theory. In: KremenyukVA (ed.) International Negotiations: Analysis, Approaches, Issues. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
30.
JönssonCTallbergJ (1998) Compliance and post-agreement bargaining. European Journal of International Relations4(4): 371–408.
31.
KleinJPGoertzGDiehlPF (2008) The peace scale: Conceptualizing and operationalizing non-rivalry and peace. Conflict Management and Peace Science25(1): 67–80.
32.
KremenyukV (2005) Lessons for practice. In: ZartmanIWKremenyukV (eds) Peace versus Justice: Negotiating Forward- and Backward-looking Outcomes. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 303–313.
33.
KreutzJ (2010) How and when armed conflicts end: Introducing the UCDP conflict termination dataset. Journal of Peace Research47(2): 243–250.
34.
KrouseRW (1982) Polyarchy and participation: The changing democratic theory of Robert Dahl. Polity14(3): 441–463.
35.
LeeDJ (1991) Polyarchy: The Political Theory of Robert A. Dahl. New York: Garland Publishing.
36.
LiljaJ (2011) Ripening within? Strategies used by rebel negotiators to end ethnic war. Negotiation Journal27(3): 311–342.
37.
LinzJJStepanA (1996) Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
38.
LuttwakE (1999) ‘Give war a chance’. Foreign Affairs78(4): 36–44.
39.
MansfieldEDSnyderJ (2002) Democratic transitions, institutional strength, and war. International Organisation56(2): 297–337.
40.
MukherjeeB (2006) Why political power-sharing agreements lead to enduring peaceful resolution in some civil wars, but not others?International Studies Quarterly50(2): 479–504.
41.
NilssonD (2006) In the shadow of settlement: Multiple rebel groups and precarious peace. Diss. Uppsala: Uppsala Universitet.
42.
ParisR (2006) Bringing the Leviathan back. In: Classical versus contemporary studies of the liberal peace. International Studies Review8(3): 425–440.
43.
PickeringJPecenyM (2006) Forging democracy at gunpoint. International Studies Quarterly50(3): 539–560.
44.
PruittDG (2005) Escalation, readiness for negotiation and third-party functions. In: FarureGOZartmanIW (eds) Escalation and Negotiation in International Conflicts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 251–270.
45.
PutnamR (1988) Diplomacy and domestic politics: The logic of two-level games. International Organization42(3): 427–460.
46.
ReillyB (2008) Post-war elections: Uncertain turning points of transition. In: JarstadAKSiskTD (eds) From War to Democracy: Dilemmas of Peacebuilding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 157–181.
47.
SambanisN (2004) What is civil war? Conceptual and empirical complexities of an operational definition. Journal of Conflict Resolution48(6): 814–848.
48.
SaundersHH (2005) Politics Is About Relationships: A Blueprint for the Citizen’s Century. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
49.
Söderberg KovacsM (2008) When rebels change their stripes: Armed insurgents in post-war politics. In: JarstadAKSiskTD (eds) From War to Democracy: Dilemmas of Peacebuilding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 134–156.
50.
StedmanS (1997) Spoiler problems in peace processes. International Security22(2): 5–53.
51.
ToftMD (2003) Peace Through Victory?Paper presented at American Political Science Association, 27–31 August, Philadelphia.
52.
ToftMD (2010a) Securing the Peace: The Durable Settlement of Civil Wars. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
53.
ToftMD (2010b) Ending civil wars: A case for rebel victory. International Security34(4): 7–36.
54.
WallensteenP (2007) Understanding Conflict Resolution: War, Peace and the Global System. London: Sage.
55.
Wanis-St. JohnA (2006) Back-channel negotiation: International bargaining in the shadows. Negotiation Journal22(2): 119–144.
56.
WantchekonL (2004) The paradox of ‘warlord’ democracy: A theoretical investigation. American Political Science Review98(1): 17–33.
57.
WantchekonLNeemanZ (2002) A theory of post-civil war democratisation. Journal of Theoretical Politics14(4): 439–464.
58.
WrightJ (2008) Political competition and democratic stability in new democracies. British Journal of Political Science38(2): 221–245.
59.
ZartmanIW (1989) Prenegotiation: Phases and functions. In: GrossS (ed.) Getting to the Table: The Processes of International Prenegotiation. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 237–253.
60.
ZartmanIWTouvalS (2007) International mediation. In: CrockerCAHampsonFOAallP (eds) Leashing the Dogs of War: Conflict Management in a Divided World. Washington, D.C.: United States Institute of Peace Press, pp. 437–454.
