This article proposes a firm-based theory to explain the rise of anti-system politics, emphasizing the influence of firms on political attitudes. It argues that economic factors like globalization and technological change are insufficient explanations without considering firm strategies as meso-level mediators of structural changes. Low-road employers, who offer low-quality jobs, create a mismatch between workers’ economic experiences and expectations, fostering feelings of unfairness and political dissatisfaction. Using a differences-in-differences design based on changes in Italian retail regulation, the study finds that the entry of large, low-road retailers boosts support for a radical right party, Lega Nord. A conjoint experiment surveying Italian private sector employees (n = 1340) links low-road employment, within-firm inequality, and out-group employment opportunities to perceptions of unfairness and anti-system political attitudes. These results highlight the importance of firm-level dynamics in political analysis.
AbadieA.AtheyS.ImbensG.JeffreyW. (2017). When hould you adjust standard errors for clustering?arXiv: 1710.02926 [econ, math, stat]. https://arxiv.org/abs/1710.02926 (October 24, 2017. Accessed September 10, 2021).
2.
AhlquistJ. S.ClaytonA. B.LeviM. (2014). Provoking preferences: Unionization, trade policy, and the ILWU puzzle. International Organization, 68(1), 33–75. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0020818313000374
3.
AkkermanA.MuddeC.ZasloveA. (2014). How populist are the people? Measuring populist attitudes in voters. Comparative Political Studies, 47(9), 1324–1353. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414013512600 (Accessed January 14, 2022).
AnsellB.McNamaraK. R. (2018). Housing, place, and populism, 44.
7.
ArndtC.RennwaldL. (2017). Workplace characteristics and working class vote for the old and new right. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 55(1), 137–164. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjir.12143 (Accessed August 11, 2025).
8.
AutorD.DornD.HansonG.MajlesiK. (2016). Importing political polarization? The electoral consequences of rising trade exposure. Working Paper, Work- ing Paper Series 22637. National Bureau of Economic Research, September. Accessed May 30, 2020.https://doi.org/10.3386/w22637. https://www.nber.org/papers/w22637
BarthE.BrysonA.DavisJ. C.FreemanR. (2016). It’s where you work: Increases in the dispersion of earnings across establishments and individuals in the United States. Journal of Labor Economics, 34(S2), S67–S97. https://doi.org/10.1086/684045 (Accessed February 22, 2020).
BecherM.StegmuellerD. (2025). Global competition, local unions, and political representation: Disentangling mechanisms. American Journal of Political Science, 1 (15), ajps.12979. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12979(Accessed August 11, 2025).
13.
BernardA. B.MoxnesA.SaitoY. U. (2019). Production networks, geography, and firm performance. Journal of Political Economy, 127(2), 639–688. https://doi.org/10.1086/700764 (Accessed February 22, 2020).
14.
BerriochoaK. M.BusemeyerM. R. (2025). Keeping up with the joneses? Perceptions of mobility and opportunity within local knowledge economies across Germany. Acta Politica. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41269-024-00382-2 (January 15, 2025, Accessed July 25, 2025).
15.
BertrandM.KramarzF. (2002). Does entry regulation hinder job creation? Evidence from the French retail industry. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(4), 1369–1413. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355302320935052 (Accessed November 8, 2021).
16.
BloomN.SadunR.Van ReenenJ. (2017). Management as a technology?81.
17.
BoletD. (2021). Drinking alone: Local socio-cultural degradation and radical right support—the case of British pub closures. Comparative Political Studies, 54(9), 1653–1692. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414021997158 (Accessed May 28, 2022).
18.
BurgoonB.van NoortS.RooduijnM.GeoffreyUnderhillR. D. (2018). Radical right populism and the role of positional deprivation and inequality. Working Paper 733. LIS Working Paper Series. https://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/203019 (Accessed April 9, 2020).
19.
CallawayB.Goodman-BaconA.PedroSant’AnnaH. C. (2021). Difference-in-Differences with a continuous treatment. arXiv: 2107.02637 [econ]. https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.02637 (July 9, 2021. Accessed September 8, 2021).
CardosoA. R. (1997). Workers or employers: Who is shaping wage inequality?Oxford Bulletin of Economics & Statistics, 59(4), 523–547. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0084.00081 (Accessed April 29, 2020).
23.
CardosoA. R. (1999). Firms’ wage policies and the rise in labor market inequality: The case of Portugal. ILR Review, 53(1), 87–102. https://doi.org/10.1177/001979399905300105 (Accessed April 29, 2020).
24.
Cento BullA.GilbertM. (2001). The Lega Nord and the northern question in Italian politics. Palgrave. (Accessed April 6, 2021).
25.
ChoiJ.KuziemkoI.WashingtonE. L.WrightG. (2021). Local Eco-nomic and political effects of trade deals: Evidence from NAFTA. Working Paper, Working Paper Series 29525. National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w29525. https://www.nber.org/papers/w29525 (November. Accessed May 25, 2022).
26.
ColantoneI.StanigP. (2018). The trade origins of economic nationalism: Import competition and voting behavior in Western Europe. American Journal of Political Science, 62(4), 936–953. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12358
27.
DavisS. J.HaltiwangerJ.HandleyK.JarminR.LernerJ.MirandaJ. (2014). Private equity, jobs, and productivity. The American Economic Review, 104(12), 3956–3990. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.104.12.3956 (Accessed May 18, 2020).
28.
Del GattoM.HassanF.GianmarcoI.OttavianoP.SchivardiF. (2019). Company profits in Italy. 093. European Commission Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2765/63729 (Accessed August 26, 2021).
29.
DetteH.SchumannM. (2024). Testing for equivalence of pre-trends in difference-in-differences estimation. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 42(4), 1289–1301. https://doi.org/10.1080/07350015.2024.2308121 (Accessed August 4, 2025).
30.
DubeA.NaiduS.ReichA. D. (2022). Power and dignity in the low-wage labor market: Theory and evidence from Wal-Mart workers. Pre-published, September. Working Paper. National Bureau of Economic Research. p. 30441. https://doi.org/10.3386/w30441. https://www.nber.org/papers/w30441 (Accessed September 13, 2022).
GestJ. (2015). Pro- and anti-system behavior: A complementary approach to voice and silence in studies of political behavior. Citizenship Studies, 19(5), 535–552. https://doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2015.1074345 (Accessed March 23, 2020).
33.
GestJ.TylerR.MayerJ. (2018). Roots of the radical right: Nostalgic deprivation in the United States and Britain. Comparative Political Studies, 51(13), 1694–1719. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414017720705 (Accessed May 28, 2022).
GuisoL.PistaferriL.SchivardiF. (2005). Insurance within the firm. Journal of Political Economy, 113(5), 1054–1087. https://doi.org/10.1086/432136 (accessed April 29, 2020).
36.
HåkansonC.LindqvistE.VlachosJ. (2015). Firms and skills: The evolution of worker sorting. Working Paper 2015:9. Working Paper. https://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/129384 (Accessed May 6, 2020).
37.
HauffS.KirchnerS. (2014). Cross-National Differences and Trends in Job Quality. 13. Unternehmensführung am Fachbereich BWL der Universität Hamburg, January.
38.
HäusermannS.KurerT.ZollingerD. (n.d.). Aspiration versus apprehension: Economic opportunities and electoral preferences, 54.
KitscheltH.RehmP. (2014). Occupations as a site of political preference formation. Comparative Political Studies, 47(12), 1670–1706. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414013516066 (Accessed May 28, 2022).
45.
KristalT.CohenY.NavotE. (2020). Workplace compensation practices and the rise in benefit inequality. American Sociological Review, 85(2), 271–297. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122420912505 (Accessed April 28, 2020).
46.
KurerT. (2020). The declining middle: Occupational change, social status, and the populist right. Comparative Political Studies, 53(10–11), 0010414020912283. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414020912283 (Accessed April 14, 2020).
OstermanP. (2018). In search of the high road: Meaning and evidence. ILR Review, 71(1), 3–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/0019793917738757 (Accessed September 8, 2021).
51.
PattersonP. H. (2018). The supermarket as a global historical development: Structures, capital and values. In The routledge companion to the history of retailing. Routledge.
52.
PioreM.SabelC. (1984). The second industrial divide: Prospects for prosperity. Basic Books.
53.
RahmanK. S.ThelenK. (2018). Broken contract: The rise of the networked firm and the transformation of twenty-first century capitalism. Unpublished manuscript, MIT.
54.
RodrikD. (2017). Populism and the economics of globalization. National Bureau of Economic Research.
SebastianD.MehdiR.AnkeeW. (2018). Credit-supply shocks and firm productivity in Italy - ScienceDirect. Journal of International Money and Finance, 872018 (October ), 155–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2018.06.004(Accessed April 20, 2020).
ThelenK. (2025). Attention, shoppers!: American retail capitalism and the origins of the amazon economy. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691266558 (February 18, 2025, accessed August 4, 2025).
60.
TillyC. (1999). Durable inequality. University of California Press. Google Books: SRcjUymz5cMC.
61.
TintelnotF.Ken KikkawaA.MogstadM.DhyneE. (2018). Trade and domestic production networks. Working Paper, Working Paper Series 25120. National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w25120. https://www.nber.org/papers/w25120 (October. Accessed April 29, 2020).
62.
Tomaskovic-DeveyD.Avent-HoltD. R. (2019). Relational inequalities: An organizational approach. Oxford University Press.
WeilD. (2014). The fissured workplace: Why work became so bad for so many and what can be done to improve it. Harvard University Press. Google Books: k4_zAgAAQBAJ.
65.
WilmersN. (2018). Wage stagnation and buyer power: How buyer supplier relations affect U.S. workers’ wages, 1978 to 2014. American Sociological Review, 83(2), 213–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122418762441 (accessed October 27, 2019).
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
