This study conducts a meta-analysis of the impact of collective victimhood beliefs on conflict-related attitudes. Examining 745 estimates from 103 articles, we assess the relationship between collective victimhood beliefs and hawkishness, reconciliation, out-group exclusion, and in-group attachment. While we find an aggregate positive association between collective victimhood beliefs and conflict-enhancing attitudes, there is an important distinction between non-inclusive and inclusive forms of collective victimhood: non-inclusive collective victimhood beliefs are associated with greater conflict-enhancing attitudes, whereas inclusive collective victimhood beliefs generally have opposing effects. These results are consistent across a wide range of geographic contexts, types of conflict experiences, and identities. They also extend to the association between collective victimhood beliefs and the emotions and cognitive perspectives that are often identified as mediators. Methodologically, observational and experimental studies reach similar conclusions about the direction of collective victimhood beliefs' impact, but experimental studies find consistently smaller effect sizes.
AdelmanL.LeidnerB.ÜnalH.NahhasE.ShnabelN. (2016). A whole other story: Inclusive victimhood narratives reduce competitive victimhood and intergroup hostility. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42(10), 1416–1430. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167216662868
3.
AlexanderJ. C. (2013). Trauma: A social theory. John Wiley & Sons.
4.
Al-GhazziO. (2021). We will be great again: Historical victimhood in populist discourse. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 24(1), 45–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549420985851
5.
Alrababa’hA.WilliamsonS.DillonA.HainmuellerJ.HangartnerD.HotardM.LaitinD. D.LawrenceD.WeinsteinJ. (2023). Learning from null effects: A bottom-up approach. Political Analysis, 31(3), 448–456. https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2021.51
6.
ArielyG. (2019). National days, national identity, and collective memory: Exploring the impact of holocaust day in israel. Political Psychology, 40(6), 1391–1406. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12595
7.
BarnhartJ. (2020). The consequences of humiliation: Anger and status in world politics. Cornell University Press.
8.
BarrettL. F. (2006). Valence is a basic building block of emotional life. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(1), 35–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2005.08.006
9.
Bar-TalD.Chernyak-HaiL.SchoriN.GundarA. (2009a). A sense of self-perceived collective victimhood in intractable conflicts. International Review of the Red Cross, 91(874), 229–258. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1816383109990221
10.
Bar-TalD.RavivA.RavivA.Dgani-HirshA. (2009b). The influence of the ethos of conflict on Israeli jews’ interpretation of Jewish—Palestinian encounters. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 53(1), 94–118. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002708325942
11.
BauerM.BlattmanC.ChytilováJ.HenrichJ.MiguelE.MittsT. (2016). Can war foster cooperation?The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 30(3), 249–274. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.30.3.249
12.
BilewiczM.LiuJ. (2020). Collective victimhood as a form of adaptation. In VollhardtJ. R. (Ed.), The social psychology of collective victimhood (pp. 120–140). Oxford University Press.
13.
BilewiczM.WiniewskiM.KoftaM.WójcikA. (2013). Harmful ideas: The structure and consequences of anti-semitic beliefs in poland. Political Psychology, 34(6), 821–839. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12024
14.
BorensteinaM.HedgesL. V.HigginsJ. P.RothsteinH. R. (2010). A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis. Research Synthesis Methods, 1(2), 97–111. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.12
15.
BouchatP.LicataL.RosouxV.AlleschC.AmmererH.BovinaI.BruckmüllerS.CabecinhasR.ChryssochoouX.CohrsJ. C.CsertőI.DelouvéeS.DuranteF.Ernst-VintilaA.FlassbeckC.HiltonD.KestelootC.KisliogluR.KrennA.KleinO. (2017). A century of victimhood: Antecedents and current impacts of perceived suffering in World War I across Europe. European Journal of Social Psychology, 47(2), 195–208. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2232
16.
CairnsE.MallettJ.LewisC.WilsonR. (2003). Who are the victims? Self-assessed victimhood and the Northern Irish conflict. Statistics and Research Branch of the Northern Ireland Office. Belfast, UK. (tech. rep. Northern Ireland Office Research & Statistical Series: Report No. 7).
17.
CanettiD.HirschbergerG.RapaportC.Elad-StrengerJ.Ein-DorT.RosenzveigS.PyszczynskiT.HobfollS. E. (2018). Collective trauma from the lab to the real world: The effects of the Holocaust on contemporary Israeli political cognitions. Political Psychology, 39(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12384
18.
ChayinskaM.KendeA.WohlM. J. (2022). National identity and beliefs about historical linguicide are associated with support for exclusive language policies among the Ukrainian linguistic majority. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 25(4), 924–940. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430220985911
19.
CheungM. W. (2014). Modeling dependent effect sizes with three-level meta-analyses: A structural equation modeling approach. Psychological Methods, 19(2), 211–229. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032968
20.
CheungM. W. (2015a). Meta-analysis: A structural equation modeling approach. Wiley.
21.
CheungM. W. (2015b). Metasem: An r package for meta-analysis using structural equation modeling. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(51521), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01521
22.
CohrsJ. C.McNeillA.VollhardtJ. R. (2015). The two-sided role of inclusive victimhood for intergroup reconciliation: Evidence from northern Ireland. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 21(4), 634–647. https://doi.org/10.1037/pac0000141
23.
CollierD.MahoneyJ. E. (1993). Conceptual “stretching”’ revisited: Adapting categories in comparative analysis. American Political Science Review, 87(4), 845–855. https://doi.org/10.2307/2938818
24.
DinasE.FoukaV.SchläpferA. (2021). Family history and attitudes toward out-groups: Evidence from the european refugee crisis. The Journal of Politics, 83(2), 647–661. https://doi.org/10.1086/710016
25.
DruliolleV.BrettR. (2018). The politics of victimhood in post-conflict societies: Comparative and analytical perspectives. Palgrave Macmillan.
26.
FeinsteinY.BonikowskiB. (2021). Nationalist narratives and anti-immigrant attitudes: Exceptionalism and collective victimhood in contemporary Israel. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 47(3), 741–761. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2019.1620596
27.
FrancoA.MalhotraN.SimonovitsG. (2014). Publication bias in the social sciences: Unlocking the file drawer. Science, 345(6203), 1502–1505. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1255484
GerberA.MalhotraN. (2008). Do statistical reporting standards affect what is published? Publication bias in two leading political science journals. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 3(3), 313–326. https://doi.org/10.1561/100.00008024
30.
GodefroidtA. (2023). How terrorism does (and does not) affect citizens’ political attitudes: A meta-analysis. American Journal of Political Science, 67(1), 22–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12692
31.
GreenE. G.VisintinE. P.HristovaA.BozhanovaA.PereiraA.StaerkléC. (2017). Collective victimhood and acknowledgement of outgroup suffering across history: Majority and minority perspectives. European Journal of Social Psychology, 47(2), 228–240. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2237
32.
HirschbergerG.Ein-DorT. (2020). A temporal account of collective victimization as existential threat: Reconsidering adaptive and maladaptive responses. In VollhardtJ. R. (Ed.), The social psychology of collective victimhood (pp. 100–119). Oxford University Press.
33.
HopkinsN.DobaiA. (2020). Community members’ theorization of their collective victimization. In VollhardtJ. R. (Ed.), The social psychology of collective victimhood (pp. 186–207). Oxford University Press.
34.
IyengarS.GreenhouseJ. B. (1988). Selection models and the file drawer problem. Statistical Science, 3 (1), 109–117. https://doi.org/10.1214/ss/1177013012
35.
JasiniA.DelvauxE.MesquitaB. (2017). Collective victimhood and ingroup identity jointly shape intergroup relations, even in a non-violent conflict: The case of the Belgians. Psychologica Belgica, 57(3), 98–114. https://doi.org/10.5334/pb.334
36.
KlarY.Schori-EyalN.KlarY. (2013). The “never again” state of Israel: The emergence of the Holocaust as a core feature of Israeli identity and its four incongruent voices. Journal of Social Issues, 69(1), 125–143. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12007
37.
KljajićM.ShelefN.vanderWildenE. (2025). Replication data for: Collective victimhood beliefs and conflict-related attitudes: A meta-analysis. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/UTPGMN
38.
LeachC. W. (2020). The unifying potential of an appraisal approach to the experience of group victimization. In VollhardtJ. R. (Ed.), The social psychology of collective victimhood (pp. 141–160). Oxford University Press.
39.
LernerA. B. (2020). The uses and abuses of victimhood nationalism in international politics. European Journal of International Relations, 26(1), 62–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066119850249
40.
LernerA. M. (2021). Quantifying the archives: Leveraging the norms and tools of data science to conduct ethical research on the Holocaust. Holocaust Studies, 28(3), 358–376. https://doi.org/10.1080/17504902.2021.1979179
LiM.LeidnerB.HirschbergerG.ParkJ. (2023). From threat to challenge: Understanding the impact of historical collective trauma on contemporary intergroup conflict. Perspectives on Psychological Science: A Journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 18(1), 190–209. https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916221094540
43.
LiM.LeidnerB.PetrovićN.PrelicN. (2021). Close or distant past? The role of temporal distance in responses to intergroup violence from victim and perpetrator perspectives. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 47(4), 657–672. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167220945890
44.
LiuJ. H.SibleyC. G.HuangL.-L. (2014). History matters: Effects of culture-specific symbols on political attitudes and intergroup relations. Political Psychology, 35(1), 57–79. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12027
45.
LuftA.SubotićJ. (2024). Ethics of archives: Improving historical social science through the consideration of research on violence. Social Science History, 49(1), 229–253. https://doi.org/10.1017/ssh.2024.42
46.
MaozI.EidelsonR. J. (2007). Psychological bases of extreme policy preferences: How the personal beliefs of Israeli-Jews predict their support for population transfer in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. American Behavioral Scientist, 50(11), 1476–1497. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764207302465
47.
MashuriA.ZaduqistiE.UlaM. (2017). A majority group’s perspective-taking towards a minority group: Its antecedents and impact on support for minority helping. Psychology & Developing Societies, 29(1), 44–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/0971333616689191
48.
MastersonM. (2022). Humiliation and international conflict preferences. The Journal of Politics, 84(2), 874–888. https://doi.org/10.1086/715591
49.
MossS. (2020). The ethics of researching and writing about collective victimhood in postconflict societies. In The social psychology of collective victimhood (pp. 421–440). Oxford University Press.
50.
NadlerA.ShnabelN. (2015). Intergroup reconciliation: Instrumental and socioemotional processes and the needs-based model. European Review of Social Psychology, 26(1), 93–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2015.1106712
51.
NoorM.BrownR.GonzalezR.ManziJ.LewisC. A. (2008a). On positive psychological outcomes: What helps groups with a history of conflict to forgive and reconcile with each other? Personality andSocial Psychology Bulletin, 34(6), 819–832. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167208315555
52.
NoorM.BrownR. J.PrenticeG. (2008b). Precursors and mediators of intergroup reconciliation in northern Ireland: A new model. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47(3), 481–495. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466607X238751
53.
NoorM.ShnabelN.HalabiS.NadlerA. (2012). When suffering begets suffering: The psychology of competitive victimhood between adversarial groups in violent conflicts. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16(4), 351–374. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868312440048
54.
NoorM.VollhardtJ. R.MariS.NadlerA. (2017). The social psychology of collective victimhood. European Journal of Social Psychology, 47(2), 121–134. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2300
55.
ObaidiM.BerghR.SidaniusJ.ThomsenL. (2018). The mistreatment of my people: Victimization by proxy and behavioral intentions to commit violence among Muslims in Denmark. Political Psychology, 39(3), 577–593. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12435
PatersonJ. L.BrownR.WaltersM. A. (2019). Feeling for and as a group member: Understanding LGBT victimization via group-based empathy and intergroup emotions. British Journal of Social Psychology, 58(1), 211–224. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12269
58.
PenićS.VollhardtJ. R.ReicherS. (2021). Reconciliation versus justice? It depends on the context: The role of symmetric and asymmetric violence in predicting postconflict attitudes. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 12(2), 202–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550620915064
59.
PerezM. J.SalterP. S.VollhardtJ. R. (2020). A critical race reading of collective victimhood. In VollhardtJ. R. (Ed.), The social psychology of collective victimhood (pp. 319–336). Oxford University Press.
60.
RoslerN.BranscombeN. R. (2020). Inclusivity of past collective trauma and its implications for current intractable conflict: The mediating role of moral lessons. British Journal of Social Psychology, 59(1), 171–188. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12336
61.
RuparM.BobowikM.ArnosoM.ArnosoA.VollhardtJ. R. (2022). General inclusive victimhood predicts willingness to engage in intergroup contact: Findings from Bosnia-Herzegovina and the Basque Country. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 52(2), 71–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12835
62.
Schori-EyalN.KlarY.Ben-AmiY. (2017). Perpetual ingroup victimhood as a distorted lens: Effects on attribution and categorization. European Journal of Social Psychology, 47(2), 180–194. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2250
63.
ShelefN. G.vanderWildenE. (2024). Re-evaluating the impact of collective victimhood on conflict attitudes: Results from a natural experiment, a survey experiment, and panel study using israel’s holocaust memorial day. American Journal of Political Science, Online First, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12906
64.
ShnabelN.BelhassenY.MorS. (2018). From victimhood to peace activism: The potential role of personal loss and inclusive victim beliefs. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 21(8), 1144–1154. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430217699463
65.
ShnabelN.HalabiS.NoorM. (2013). Overcoming competitive victimhood and facilitating forgiveness through re-categorization into a common victim or perpetrator identity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(5), 867–877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.04.007
66.
SimanTov-NachlieliI.ShnabelN.HalabiS. (2015). Winning the victim status can open conflicting groups to reconciliation: Evidence from the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45(2), 139–145. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2091
67.
SloughT.TysonS. A. (2023). External validity and meta-analysis. American Journal of Political Science, 67(2), 440–455. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12742
68.
StaubE. (2013). Building a peaceful society: Origins, prevention, and reconciliation after genocide and other group violence. American Psychologist, 68(7), 576–589. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032045
69.
SullivanD.LandauM. J.BranscombeN. R.RothschildZ. K. (2012). Competitive victimhood as a response to accusations of ingroup harm doing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(4), 778–795. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026573
70.
SzabóZ. P. (2020). Studied and understudied collective victim beliefs: What have we learned so far and what’s ahead? In The social psychology of collective victimhood (pp. 163–185). Oxford University Press.
71.
SzabóZ. P.VollhardtJ. R.MészárosN. Z. (2020). Through the lens of history: The effects of beliefs about historical victimization on responses to refugees. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 74(1), 94–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2019.10.009
72.
TongerenD. R. V.BurnetteJ. L.O’BoyleE.WorthingtonE. L.ForsythD. R. (2014). A meta-analysis of intergroup forgiveness. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 9(1), 81–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2013.844268
73.
Van den NoortgateW.López-LópezJ. A.Marín-MartínezF.Sánchez-MecaJ. (2013). Three-level meta-analysis of dependent effect sizes. Behavior Research Methods, 45(2), 576–594. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-012-0261-6
74.
VolkanV. D. (2001). Transgenerational transmission and chosen traumas: An aspect of large-group identity. Group Analysis, 34(1), 79–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/05333160122077730
75.
VollhardtJ. R. (2009). The role of victim beliefs in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict: Risk or potential for peace?Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 15(2), 135–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/10781910802544373
76.
VollhardtJ. R. (2013). “crime against humanity” or “crime against jews”? Acknowledgment in construals of the holocaust and its importance for intergroup relations. Journal of Social Issues, 69(1), 144–161. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12008
77.
VollhardtJ. R. (2015). Inclusive victim consciousness in advocacy, social movements, and intergroup relations: Promises and pitfalls. Social Issues and Policy Review, 9(1), 89–120. https://doi.org/10.1111/sipr.12011
78.
VollhardtJ. R.BilaliR. (2015). The role of inclusive and exclusive victim consciousness in predicting intergroup attitudes: Findings from Rwanda, Burundi, and DRC. Political Psychology, 36(5), 489–506. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12174
79.
VollhardtJ. R.CohrsJ. C.SzabóZ. P.WiniewskiM.TwaliM. S.HadjiandreouE.McNeillA. (2021a). The role of comparative victim beliefs in predicting support for hostile versus prosocial intergroup outcomes. European Journal of Social Psychology, 51(3), 505–524. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2756
80.
VollhardtJ. R.JeongH. Y.BilailR. (2022). Reconciliation in the aftermath of collective violence. In The Cambridge handbook of political psychology (pp. 582–598). Cambridge University Press.
81.
VollhardtJ. R.NairR.TroppL. R. (2016). Inclusive victim consciousness predicts minority group members’ support for refugees and immigrants. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 46(6), 354–368. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12368
82.
VollhardtJ. R.SzabóZ. P.McNeillA.HadjiandreouE.WiniewskiM. (2021b). Beyond comparisons: The complexity and context-dependency of collective victim beliefs. European Journal of Social Psychology, 51(7), 1138–1157. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2802
83.
VollhardtJ. R.ÜnalH.NairR. (2023). ‘you don’t compare horrors, you just don’t do that’: Examining assumptions and extending the scope of comparative victim beliefs. British Journal of Social Psychology, 62(1), 393–413. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12554
84.
WayneC.DamannT. J.FachterS. (2023). The Holocaust, the socialization of victimhood and outgroup political attitudes in Israel. Comparative Political Studies, 0(0), 00104140231194068. https://doi.org/10.1177/00104140231194068
85.
WeissA. (2025). Beyond retraumatization: Trauma-informed political science research. British Journal of Political Science, 55(e82), 1–25. https://osf.io/preprints/osf/rvkspv1.
86.
WohlM. J. A.BranscombeN. R.ReysenS. (2010). Perceiving your group’s future to be in jeopardy: Extinction threat induces collective angst and the desire to strengthen the ingroup. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(7), 898–910. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167210372505
87.
YoungI. F.SullivanD. (2016). Competitive victimhood: A review of the theoretical and empirical literature. Current Opinion in Psychology, 11(Intergroup relations), 30–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.04.004
88.
ZagefkaH.PehrsonS.MoleR. C. M.ChanE. (2010). The effect of essentialism in settings of historic intergroup atrocities. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40(5), 718–732. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.639
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
