Although civilians across the globe are fleeing conflict in record numbers, the reality is that far more remain behind. In addition to traditional wars, people stay in territories governed by criminal organizations. How might individuals threatened with displacement by a criminal gang manage to resist? Drawing on intensive participant observation and interviews in marginal neighborhoods of Medellín, Colombia, I argue that the urban residents most likely to remain despite being at risk of displacement are the “well connected.” Despite threats, they leverage ties to a community figure or member of the armed group to stay. I test a number of related hypotheses using an original survey and survey experiment. Unlike other work stressing that residents are trapped by scant resources or remain only by joining local associations or belligerents, my theory reveals residents’ agency and neutrality as they seek safety and security in conditions of state absence.
Abello-ColakA.Guarneros-MezaV. (2014). The role of criminal actors in local governance. Urban Studies, 51, 3268–3289.
2.
AdhikariP. (2013). Conflict-induced displacement, understanding the causes of flight. American Journal of Political Science, 57, 82–89.
3.
AlbujaS. (2014). Criminal violence and displacement in Mexico. Forced Migration Review, 45, 28–31.
4.
AndreasP. (2008). Blue helmets and black markets: The business of survival in the Siege of Sarajevo. Cornell University Press.
5.
AriasE. D. (2006). Drugs and democracy in Rio de Janeiro: Trafficking, social networks, and public security. University of North Carolina Press.
6.
AriasE. D. (2017). Criminal enterprises and governance in Latin America and the Caribbean. Cambridge University Press.
7.
AriasE. D.BarnesN. (2017). Crime and plural orders in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Current Sociology, 65, 448–465.
8.
ArjonaA. (2016). Rebelocracy: Social order in the Colombian civil war. Cambridge University Press.
9.
AuyeroJ.KilanskiK. (2015). Managing in the midst of social disaster: Poor people’s responses to urban violence. In AuyeroJ.BourgoisP.Scheper-HughesN. (eds) Violence at the urban margins (pp. 189–211). Oxford University Press.
10.
BadaX.FeldmannA. E. (2019). How insecurity is transforming migration patterns in the North American corridor: Lessons from Michoacán. In FeldmannA. E.BadaX.SchützeS. (Eds.), New migration patterns in the Americas: Challenges for the 21st century (pp. 57–83). Palgrave Macmillan.
11.
BarnesN. (2017). Criminal politics: An integrated approach to the study of organized crime, politics, and violence. Perspectives on Politics, 15, 967–987.
FennoR. F. (1978). Home style: House members in their districts. Little, Brown.
20.
GordonJ. (2019). The legitimation of extrajudicial violence in an urban community. Social Forces, 98, 1174–1195.
21.
GranovetterM. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360–1380.
22.
GranovetterM. (1995). Getting a job: A study of contacts and careers. University of Chicago Press.
23.
IbáñezA. M.MoyaA. (2016). Who stays and who leaves during mass atrocities. In AndertonC. H.BrauerJ. (Eds.), Economic aspects of genocides, other mass atrocities, and their prevention (pp. 251–273). Oxford University Press.
24.
IbáñezA. M.VélezC. E. (2008). Civil conflict and forced migration: The micro determinants and welfare losses of displacement in Colombia. World Development, 36, 659–676.
25.
International Committee of the Red Cross. (2018). The roots of restraint in war.
26.
Internal Displacement Monitoring Center. (2017). Global report on internal displacement 2017.
27.
KalyvasS. (2006). The logic of violence in civil war. Cambridge University Press.
28.
KalyvasS. N. (2015). How civil wars help explain organized crime—And how they do not. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 59, 1517–1540.
29.
KalyvasS. N.KocherM. A. (2007). How “free” is free riding in civil wars? Violence, insurgency, and the collective action problem. World Politics, 59, 177–216.
30.
KaplanO. (2017). Resisting war: How communities protect themselves. Cambridge University Press.
31.
KrakowskiK. (2017). Resisting displacement amid armed conflict: Community-level conditions that make people more likely to stay. Journal of Peacebuilding & Development, 12, 68–84.
32.
LindleyA. (2010). Leaving Mogadishu: Towards a sociology of conflict-related mobility. Journal of Refugee Studies, 23, 2–22.
MasseyD. (1987). The ethnosurvey in theory and practice. The International Migration Review, 21, 1498–1522.
35.
MesaG. S. (2015). La cuadra times [The block]. Cámara de Comercio de Medellín para Antioquia.
36.
MuanaP. (1997). The Kamajoi militia: Civil war, internal displacement and the politics of counter-insurgency. African Development, 22, 77–100.
37.
MuggahR. (2015). The invisible displaced: A unified conceptualization of population displacement in Brazil. Journal of Refugee Studies, 28, 222–237.
38.
O’DonnellG. (1993). On the state, democratization and some conceptual problems: A Latin American view with glances at some postcommunist countries. World Development, 21, 1355–1369.
39.
Patillo-McCoyM. (1999). Black picket fences: Privilege and peril among the black middle class. University of Chicago Press.
RamírezJ. G.RendónA. J. C.DuncanG. C. (2014). Nuevas Modalidades de Captación de Rentas Ilegales en Medellín [New modalities of illegal rent capture in Medellín]. Universidad EAFIT.
42.
SánchezB. M. (2016). A silenced exodus: Intra-urban displacement in Medellín. In CantorD. J.SernaN. R. (Eds.), The new refugees: Crime and forced displacement in Latin America. Institute for Latin American Studies.
43.
Sánchez-JankowskiM. (1991). Islands in the street: Gangs and American urban society. University of California Press.
44.
StanilandP. (2010). Cities on fire: Social mobilization, state policy, and urban insurgency. Comparative Political Studies, 12, 1623–1649.
45.
SteeleA. (2009). Seeking safety: Avoiding displacement and choosing destinations in civil wars. Journal of Peace Research, 46, 419–429.
46.
SteeleA. (2017). Democracy and displacement in Colombia’s civil war. Cornell University Press.
47.
ThachilT. (2018). Improving surveys through ethnography: Insights from India’s urban periphery. Studies in Comparative International Development, 53, 281–299.
48.
The World Bank. (2017). Forcibly displaced: Toward a development approach supporting refugees, the internally displaced, and their hosts.
49.
WoodE. J. (2003). Insurgent collective action and civil war in El Salvador. Cambridge University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
