Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Collective recognition of indigenous claims to land and traditional authority has advanced rapidly in recent decades in many countries. How do these processes impact identity and decision-making among individuals within communities themselves? I examine this in Peru, where the government has recognized thousands of indigenous communities covering one-third of the national territory. I leverage spatial and temporal variation in community recognition paired with detailed household survey data and find, using age cohort analysis, that the effects vary by generation in ways shaped by land access and scarcity. Experiencing recognition increases community self-identification and community membership. But the effects are strongest among adults and near-adults at the time of recognition, who are best positioned to win greater access to scarce community land and invest in community life immediately post-recognition. Younger generations born into recognized communities are less tied to their communities but also fare better economically, suggesting shifting intergenerational effects.

Keywords

Latin America political economy indigenous politics identity formation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Albertus

(2021). Property without rights. Cambridge University Press.

Albertus

(2025). Replication data for: Indigenous community recognition and identity: Evidence from Peru. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/UWLKMI

Behr

(2018). The developmental consequences of the de jure state-traditional relationship. Working Paper.

Benton

A. L.

(2012). Bottom-up challenges to national democracy: Mexico's (legal) subnational authoritarian enclaves. Comparative Politics, 44(3), 253–271. https://doi.org/10.5129/001041512800078931

Bonfiglio

(2017). Las Municipalidades de Centro Poblado en el Perú. Mimeo.

Caballero

J. M.

Álvarez

(1980). Aspectos cuantativos de la reforma agraria, 1969–1979. Instituto de Estudios Peruanos.

Carter

(2021). The representational effects of communal property: Evidence from Peru’s indigenous groups. Comparative Political Studies, 54(12), 2191–2225. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414021997157

Castillo

(2004). “Comunidades Campesinas del Perú: más cantidad, menos comunidad y más diversidad, en el último medio siglo.” In Alejando Laos, ed., Las Comunidades Campesinas en el Siglo XXI. Lima: Grupo Allpa.

Cuskelly

(2011). Customs and constitutions: State recognition of customary law around the world. International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources.

10.

Dahl

(1998). On democracy. Yale University Press.

11.

De la Cadena

(2000). Indigenous Mestizos: The politics of race and culture in Cuzco, Peru, 1919-1991. Duke University Press.

12.

Del Pozo

(2004). De la hacienda a la modernización. IFEA.

13.

Diez Hurtado

(2012a). Gobierno comunal: Entre la propiedad y el control territorial. El caso de la comunidad de Catacaos. In Asensio

Eguren

Ruiz

(Eds.), Perú: El problema agrario en debate. SEPIA XIV (pp. 115–148).

14.

Diez Hurtado

(2012b). Tensiones y Transformaciones en Comunidades Campesinas. CISEPA-PUCP.

15.

Diez Hurtado

(2022). Pueblos indígenas, comunidades campesinas y fiestas. Fondo Editorial PUCP.

16.

Duflo

(2001). Schooling and labor market consequences of school construction in Indonesia. The American Economic Review, 91(4), 795–813. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.91.4.795

17.

Fierro

(2020). Indigenous people, recognition, and democracy in Latin America. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 43(15), 2746–2765. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2019.1691740

18.

Fontana

(2022). Recognition politics. Cambridge University Press.

19.

Fukuyama

(2018). Identity: The demand for dignity and the politics of resentment. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

20.

Holzinger

Roos

Bayer

Behr

Neupert-Wentz

(2018). The constitutionalization of indigenous group rights, traditional political institutions, and customary law. Comparative Political Studies, 52(12), 1775–1809. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414018774347

21.

Hooker

(2005). Indigenous inclusion/black exclusion: Race, ethnicity and multicultural citizenship in Latin America. Journal of Latin American Studies, 37(2), 285–310. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022216x05009016

22.

INEI . (2014). Características socioeconómicas del productor agropecuario en el Perú. IV Censo Nacional Agropecuario 2012. INEI.

23.

INEI . (2017). Perú: Condiciones de vida de la población según origen étnico. INEI.

24.

Jacobsen

(1993). Mirages of transition: The Peruvian Altiplano, 1780-1930. University of California Press.

25.

Kapsoli

Reateguí

(1987). El campesinado peruano, 1919-1930. Universidad de San Marcos.

26.

Loveman

(2014). National colors: Racial classification and the state in Latin America. Oxford University Press.

27.

Madrid

(2012). The rise of ethnic politics in Latin America. Cambridge University Press.

28.

Magaloni

Díaz-Cayeros

Euler

A. R.

(2019). Public good provision and traditional governance in indigenous communities in Oaxaca, Mexico. Comparative Political Studies, 52(12), 1841–1880. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414019857094

29.

Mallon

(1983). The defense of community in Peru’s central highlands. Princeton University Press.

30.

McClintock

(1981). Peasant cooperatives and political change in Peru. Princeton University Press.

31.

McMurry

(2022). From recognition to integration: Indigenous autonomy, state authority, and national identity in the Philippines. American Political Science Review, 116(2), 547–563. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055421001039

32.

Mendoza

R. R.

(2004). Tradición y modernidad en las comunidades campesinas. Investigaciones Sociales, 8(12), 25–54.

33.

Naganoma

(2012). Procesos de formación y transformación de comunidades campesinas. In Diez Hurtado

(Ed.), Tensiones y Transformaciones en Comunidades Campesinas (pp. 39–72). CISEPA-PUCP.

34.

Norris

(2008). Driving democracy: Do power-sharing institutions work? Cambridge University Press.

35.

Peña

Vélez

M. A.

Camilo Cárdenas

Perdomo

Matajira

(2017). Collective property leads to household investments: Lessons from land titling in Afro-Colombian communities. World Development, 97, 27–48.

36.

Postero

(2007). Now we are citizens: Indigenous politics in postmulticultural Bolivia. Stanford University Press.

37.

Remy

(2013). Historia de las comunidades indígenas y campesinas del Perú. Instituto de Estudios Peruanos.

38.

Seligmann

(1995). Between reform and revolution: Political struggles in the Peruvian Andes, 1969–1991. Stanford University Press.

39.

SICCAM . (2016). Directorio de comunidades campesinas del Perú. Instituto del Bien Común and Centro Peruano de Estudios Sociales.

40.

Sieder

(2002). Recognizing indigenous law and politics of state formation in Mesoamerica. In Sieder

(Ed.), Multiculturalism in Latin America (pp. 184–207). Palgrave/Macmillan.

41.

Telles

(2014). Pigmentocracies: Ethnicity, race, and color in Latin America. UNC Press.

42.

Thiesenhusen

(Ed.), (1989). Searching for Agrarian reform in Latin America. Unwin Hyman.

43.

Tilly

(1992). Coercion, capital and European states, A.D. 990–1992. Wiley-Blackwell.

44.

Trejo

Altamirano

(2016). The Mexican color Hierarchy. In Hooker

Tillery

(Eds.), Racial and class inequalities in the Americas. APSA.

45.

Van Cott

D. L.

(2005). Building inclusive democracies: Indigenous peoples and ethnic minorities in Latin America. Democratization, 12(5), 820–837. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510340500322215

46.

Van Cott

D. L.

(2008). Radical democracy in the Andes. Cambridge University Press.

47.

Yashar

(2005). Contesting citizenship in Latin America. Cambridge University Press.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

2.46 MB

Indigenous Community Recognition and Identity: Evidence from Peru

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material