This paper examines the global cleavages that structure world politics from the mid-19th century to the present. It develops the concept of cleavage applied at the global level and measures empirically how territorial divisions give way to the politicization of various types of inequality along functional lines cutting across world regions. Covering over 300,000 articles from The Economist between 1843 and 2020, the analysis applies semi-supervised computational text analysis based on word embeddings to capture the territoriality−functionality continuum in global discourse. This method allows testing the theoretical expectation that the territoriality in the politicization of global divisions has diminished historically. Results reveal a trend toward the de-territorialization since World War II, primarily for cleavages about social and economic inequality. Although spikes of territoriality re-appear during interstate wars throughout the entire period, surges of territoriality are temporary and do not reverse the historical trend towards prevailing cross-territorial divisions.
AlkerH. R.Jr. (1964). Dimensions of conflict in the general assembly. American Political Science Review, 58(3), 642–657. https://doi.org/10.2307/1953139
2.
BabonesS. J. (2005). The country-level income structure of the world-economy. Journal of World-Systems Research, 11(1), 29–55. https://doi.org/10.5195/jwsr.2005.392
3.
BaileyM. A.VoetenE. (2018). A two-dimensional analysis of seventy years of united nations voting. Public Choice, 176(1-2), 33–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-018-0550-4
4.
BarberB. R. (2014). If mayors ruled the world: Dysfunctional nations, rising cities. Yale University Press.
5.
BartelsL. M. (2016). Unequal democracy: The political economy of the new gilded age. Princeton University Press.
6.
BartoliniS. (2005). Restructuring Europe: Centre formation, system building, and political structuring between the nation-state and the European Union. Oxford University Press.
7.
BartoliniS.MairP. (1990). Identity, competition and electoral availability: The stabilization of European electorates, 1885‒1985. Cambridge University Press.
8.
BauböckR. (2005). Expansive citizenship: Voting beyond territory and membership. PS: Political Science & Politics, 38(4), 683–687. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1049096505050341
9.
BendixR. (1964). Nation-building and citizenship: Studies of our changing social order. Wiley.
10.
BenoitK.WatanabeK.WangH.NultyP.ObengA.MüllerS.MatsuoA.LoweW. (2018). Quanteda: An R package for the quantitative analysis of textual data. Journal of Open Source Software, 3(30), 774. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.00774
11.
BeramendiP. (2012). The political geography of inequality: Regions and redistribution. Cambridge University Press.
12.
BourguignonF. (2015). The globalization of inequality. Princeton University Press.
13.
BraudelF. (1993). A history of civilizations. Penguin.
14.
BrubakerR. (1992). Citizenship and nationhood in France and Germany. Harvard University Press.
15.
CaramaniD. (2004). The nationalization of politics: The formation of national electorates and party systems in Western Europe. Cambridge University Press.
16.
CaramaniD. (2015). The europeanization of politics: The formation of a European electorate and party system in historical perspective. Cambridge University Press.
17.
CaramaniD. (2024). A cleavage-based conceptualizati on of politi cised global integrati on. Journal of European Public Policy. 30(10): 3372–3395. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2024.2309197
18.
CaramaniD.GurovaS.WidmannT. (2024). Replication data for: The evolution of global cleavages: A historical analysis of territorial and functional world alignments based on automated text analysis, 1843−2020. Harvard Dataverse, V1. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/GRCL4G
19.
Chase-DunnC.KawanoY.BrewerB. D. (2000). Trade globalization since 1795: Waves of integration in the world-system. American Sociological Review, 65(1), 77–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240006500105
20.
ChhibberP.KollmanK. (2004). The formation of national party systems: Federalism and party competition in Canada, Great Britain, India, and the United States. Princeton University Press.
DreherA.NunnenkampP.ThieleR. (2008). Does US aid buy UN general assembly votes? A disaggregated analysis. Public Choice, 136(1-2), 139–164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-008-9286-x
23.
EisenstadtS. N. (2006). Comparative civilizations and multiple modernities. Brill.
24.
FerreraM. (2005). The boundaries of welfare: European integration and the new spatial politics of social protection. Oxford University Press.
25.
FindlayR.O’RourkeK. H. (2007). Power and plenty: Trade, war, and the world economy in the second millennium. Princeton University Press.
26.
FinerS. E. (1974). State-building, state boundaries, and border control: An essay on certain aspects of the first phase of state-building in Western Europe considered in the light of the Rokkan-Hirschman model. Social Science Information, 13(4-5), 79–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/053901847401300407
27.
FloraP. (1999). Introduction and interpretation. In RokkanS.FloraP.KuhnleS.UrwinD. W. (Eds.), State Formation, nation-building, and mass politics in Europe (pp. 1–91). Oxford University Press.
GethinA.Martínez-ToledanoC.PikettyT. (2022). Brahmin left versus merchant right: Changing political cleavages in 21 western democracies, 1948–2020. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 137(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjab036
31.
GrimmerJ.RobertsM. E.StewartB. M. (2022). Text as data: A new framework for machine learning and the social sciences. Princeton University Press.
32.
HaggardS.KaufmanR. (Eds.) (1992). The politics of economic adjustment: International constraints, distributive conflicts, and the state. Princeton University Press.
33.
HirschmanA. O. (1970). Exit, voice, and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states. Harvard University Press.
34.
HofstedeG.BondM. H. (1988). The confucius connection: From cultural roots to economic growth. Organizational Dynamics, 16(4), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-2616(88)90009-5
35.
HollowayS. (1990). Forty years of United Nations general assembly voting. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 23(2), 279–296. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0008423900012257
36.
HoogheL.MarksG. (2018). Cleavage theory meets Europe’s crises: Lipset, Rokkan, and the transnational cleavage. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(1), 109–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2017.1310279
37.
HuijsmansT.RoddenJ. (2024). The great global divider? A comparison of urban-rural partisan polarization in western democracies. Comparative Political Studies, 25(1), 109–135. https://doi.org/10.1177/00104140241237458
38.
HuntingtonS. P. (1997). The clash of civilizations and the remaking of world order. Simon and Schuster.
39.
InglehartR.WelzelC. (2005). Modernization, cultural change and democracy: The human development sequence. Cambridge University Press.
40.
KentorJ. D. (2000). Capital and coercion: The economic and military processes that have shaped the world economy 1800–1990. Routledge.
41.
KriesiH.GrandeE.LachatR.DolezalM.BornschierS.FreyT. (2008). West European politics in the age of globalization. Cambridge University Press.
42.
LandesD. (1969). The unbound prometheus: Technological change and industrial development in Western Europe from 1750 to the present. Cambridge University Press.
43.
LijphartA. (1968). The politics of accommodation: Pluralism and democracy in The Netherlands. University of California Press.
44.
LipsetS. M. (1977). Why no socialism in the United States? In Bialer, Seweryn and Sophia Sluzar. In BialerSewerynSluzarS. (Eds.), Sources of contemporary radicalism (pp. 131–149). Westview Press.
45.
MarshallT. H. (1964). Class, citizenship, and social development. Doubleday.
46.
MilanovicB. (2016). Global inequality: A new approach for the age of globalization. Harvard University Press.
47.
MorgensternS. (2017). Are politics local? The two dimensions of party nationalization around the world. Cambridge University Press.
48.
NisbettR. E. (2004). The geography of thought: How Asian and Westerners think differently … and why. New York: Free Press.
49.
NoëlA.ThérienJ.-P. (2008). Left and right in global perspective. Cambridge University Press.
50.
PianaV. (2006). The “pattern approach” of world trade structures and their dynamics. Princeton Institute for International and Regional Studies. Working Paper.
51.
PitkinH. F. (1967). The concept of representation. University of California Press.
52.
PomeranzK. (2000). The great divergence: China, Europe, and the making of the modern world economy. Princeton University Press.
53.
RobertsM. E.StewartB. M.DustinT. (2019). Stm: R package for structural topic models. Journal of Statistical Software, 91(2), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v091.i02
54.
RokeachM. (1973). The nature of human values. The Free Press.
RokkanS. (1974a). Politics between economy and culture: An international seminar on Albert O. Hirschman’s exit, voice, and loyalty. Social Science Information, 13(1), 27–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/053901847401300102
57.
RokkanS. (1974b). Entries, voices, exits: Towards a possible generalization of the Hirschman model. Social Science Information, 13(1), 39–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/053901847401300103
58.
RussettB. M. (1966). Discovering voting groups in the united nations. American Political Science Review, 60(2), 327–339. https://doi.org/10.2307/1953359
59.
SchattschneiderE. E. (1960). The semisovereign people: A realist’s view of democracy in America. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
SmithA. D. (1986). The ethnic origins of nations. Blackwell.
62.
TallbergJ.SommererT.SquatritoT.JönssonC. (2014). Explaining the transnational design of international organizations. International Organization, 68(4), 741–774. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0020818314000149
63.
TaylorP. J. (2003). World city network: A global urban analysis. Routledge.
64.
TerlouwC. P. (1992). The regional geography of the world system. Faculteit Ruimtelijke Wetenschappen.
65.
ThérienJ.-P. (1999). Beyond the north‒south divide: The two tales of world poverty. Third World Quarterly, 20(4), 723–742. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436599913523
66.
TrubowitzP.WatanabeK. (2021). The geopolitical threat index: A text-based computational approach to identifying foreign threats. International Studies Quarterly, 65(3), 852–865. https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqab029
67.
Van RossemR. (1996). The world-system paradigm as general theory of development: A cross-national test. American Sociological Review, 61(3), 508–527. https://doi.org/10.2307/2096362
68.
ViolaL. A. (2020). The closure of the international system: How institutions create political equalities and hierarchies. Cambridge University Press.
VoetenE. (2021). Ideology and international institutions. Princeton University Press.
71.
WallersteinI. M. (1974). The modern world-system I: Capitalist agriculture and the origins of the European world-economy in the sixteenth century. Academic Press.
72.
WatanabeK. (2021). Latent semantic scaling: A semisupervised text analysis technique for new domains and languages. Communication Methods and Measures, 15(2), 81–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2020.1832976
73.
WatanabeK.ZhouY. (2022). Theory-driven analysis of large corpora: Semisupervised topic classification of the UN speeches. Social Science Computer Review, 40(2), 346–366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439320907027
74.
WeberM. (1978). Economy and society: An outline of interpretative sociology (two volumes): University of California Press.
75.
WeilerJ. H. H. (1999). The constitution of Europe: “Do the new clothes have an emperor?” and other essays on European integration. Cambridge University Press.
76.
WelzelC. (2013). Freedom rising: Human empowerment and the quest for emancipation. Cambridge University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
