What are the drivers of citizens’ support for electoral gender quotas in transitioning and authoritarian states? Despite extensive research examining public support for women in politics in democracies, we know little about how the public perceives them in less democratic settings. To address this shortcoming, we use original survey data from authoritarian Morocco and transitioning Tunisia – two Arab countries hailed for their progressive gender policies. We argue that in these countries where citizens lack political information, they instead rely on their assessment of the government’s performance to form attitudes toward gender quotas. Furthermore, electoral legitimacy plays an important role in shaping citizens’ support for quotas, which are closely linked to how elections and legislatures operate. The findings offer strong support for our theoretical expectations and uncover important gender differences.
AbdulkadirR.ButtorffG. (2016). Kin-based values and attitudes towards gender equality in Morocco and Egypt. In ShalabyM.MogahdamV. (Eds.), Empowering women post Arab spring. Palgrave Macmillan.
2.
Abou ZeidG. (2006). The Arab region: Women’s access to the decision-making process across the Arab nation. [Review of the Arab region: Women’s access to the decision-making Process across the Arab Nation]. In DahlerupD. (Ed.), Women, quotas and politics (pp. 168–193). Routledge.
BaldezL. (2006). The pros and cons of gender quota laws: What happens when you kick men out and let women in?Politics and Gender, 2(01), 102–109. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1743923x06221019
5.
BanaszakL. A.PlutzerE. (1993). Contextual determinants of feminist attitudes: National and subnational influences in Western Europe. American Political Science Review, 87(1), 147–157. https://doi.org/10.2307/2938962
6.
BarnesT. D.CórdovaA. (2016). Making space for women: Explaining citizen support for legislative gender quotas in Latin America. The Journal of Politics, 78(3), 670–686. https://doi.org/10.1086/685379
7.
Batista PereiraF.PortoN. F. F. (2020). Gender attitudes and public opinion towards electoral gender quotas in Brazil. Political Psychology, 41(5), 887–899. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12655
8.
BeauregardK. (2018). Partisanship and the gender gap: Support for gender quotas in Australia. Australian Journal of Political Science, 53(3), 290–319. https://doi.org/10.1080/10361146.2018.1449802
9.
BektasE.Issever-EkinciE. (2019). Who represents women in Turkey? An analysis of gender difference in private bill sponsorship in the 2011–15 Turkish parliament. Politics and Gender, 15(4), 851–881. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1743923x18000363
10.
Ben ShitritL. (2016). Authenticating representation: Women’s quotas and Islamist parties. Politics and Gender, 12(04), 781–806. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1743923x16000027
11.
BensteadL. J. (2014). Effects of interviewer–respondent gender interaction on attitudes toward women and politics: Findings from Morocco. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 26(3), 369–383. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edt024
12.
BensteadL. J. (2016). Why quotas are needed to improve women’s access to services in clientelistic regimes: Why quotas improve women’s access to services. Governance, 29(2), 185–205. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12162
BrandL. A. (1998). Women, the state, and political liberalization: Middle eastern and North african experiences. Columbia University Press.
16.
BushS. S. (2011). International politics and the spread of quotas for women in legislatures. International Organization, 65(1), 103–137. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0020818310000287
17.
BushS. S.GaoE. (2017). Small tribes, big gains: The strategic uses of gender quotas in the Middle East. Comparative Politics, 49(2), 149–167. https://doi.org/10.5129/001041517820201323
18.
BushS. S.JamalA. A. (2015). Anti-Americanism, authoritarian politics, and attitudes about women’s representation: Evidence from a survey experiment in Jordan. International Studies Quarterly, 59(1), 34–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/isqu.12139
19.
BushS. S.ZetterbergP. (2021). Gender quotas and international reputation. American Journal of Political Science, 65(2), 326–341. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12557
20.
CasseseE. C.BarnesT. D.BrantonR. P. (2015). Racializing gender: Public opinion at the intersection. Politics and Gender, 11(01), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1743923x14000567
21.
CharradM. M. (2001). States and women’s rights: The making of postcolonial Tunisia, Algeria, and Morocco. University of California Press.
CharradM. M.ZarrughA. (2014). Equal or complementary? Women in the new Tunisian constitution after the arab spring. Journal of North African Studies, 19(2), 230–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/13629387.2013.857276
DarhourH.DahlerupD. (2013). Sustainable representation of women through gender quotas: A decade’s experience in Morocco. Women’s Studies International Forum, 41(2), 132–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2013.04.008
26.
DavidA.NanesS. (2011). The women’s quota in Jordan’s municipal councils: International and domestic dimensions. Journal of Women, Politics and Policy, 32(4), 275–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554477x.2011.613709
27.
DavisN. J.RobinsonR. (1991). Men’s and women’s consciousness of gender inequality: Austria, west Germany, great britain, and the United States. American Sociological Review, 56(1), 72–84. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095674
28.
DeckmanM.McTagueJ. (2015). Did the war on women work? Women, men, and the birth control mandate in the 2012 presidential election. American Politics Research, 43(1), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673x14535240
29.
de MiguelC.JamalA. A.TesslerM. (2015). Elections in the Arab World: Why do citizens turn out?Comparative Political Studies, 48(11), 1355–1388. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414015574877
30.
DiamondL.LinzJ. J.LipsetM. S. (1995). Introduction: What makes for democracy. In DiamondL.LinzJ. J.LipsetM. S. (Eds.), Politics in developing countries (pp. 1–66). Lynne Rienner.
31.
DonnoD.FoxS.KaasikJ. (2022). International incentives for women’s rights in dictatorships. Comparative Political Studies, 55(3), 451–492. https://doi.org/10.1177/00104140211024306
32.
DonnoD.KreftA.-K. (2019). Authoritarian institutions and women’s rights. Comparative Political Studies, 52(5), 720–753. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414018797954
33.
DonnoD.RoussiasN. (2012). Does cheating pay? The effect of electoral misconduct on party systems. Comparative Political Studies, 45(5), 575–605. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414011427130
34.
DonnoD.RussettB. (2004). Islam, authoritarianism, and female empowerment: What are the linkages?World Politics, 56(4), 582–607. https://doi.org/10.1353/wp.2005.0003
35.
DownsA. (1957). An Economic Theory of Democracy (Nachdr.). Addison Wesley.
36.
DukalskisA.GerschewskiJ. (2017). What autocracies say (and what citizens hear): Proposing four mechanisms of autocratic legitimation. Contemporary Politics, 23(3), 251–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569775.2017.1304320
37.
FeldmanS. (1988). Structure and consistency in public opinion: The role of core beliefs and values. American Journal of Political Science, 32(2), 416–440. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111130
38.
FranceschetS.KrookM. L.PiscopoJ. M. (Eds.), (2012). The impact of gender quotas. Oxford University Press.
39.
FranklinM. N. (2004). Voter turnout and the dynamics of electoral competition in established democracies since 1945. Cambridge University Press.
40.
FunkC. L. (2000). The dual influence of self-interest and societal interest in public opinion. Political Research Quarterly, 53(1), 37–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591290005300102
41.
GandhiJ. (2008). Political institutions under dictatorship. Cambridge University Press.
42.
GidengilE. (1996). Gender and attitudes toward quotas for women candidates in Canada. Women and Politics, 16(4), 21–44. https://doi.org/10.1300/j014v16n04_02
43.
GouldingK. (2009). Unjustifiable means to unjustifiable ends: Delegitimizing parliamentary gender quotas in Tunisia. Al-Raida Journal, 126(Summer/Fall), 71–78. https://doi.org/10.32380/alrj.v0i0.83
HassanM.ShalabyM. (2019). Drivers of tolerance in post-Arab Spring Egypt: Religious, economic, or government endorsements?Political Research Quarterly, 72(2), 293–308. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912918785995
46.
HatemM. F. (1992). Economic and political liberation in Egypt and the demise of state feminism. International Journal of Middle East Studies, 24(2), 231–251. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0020743800021541
HtunM.WeldonS. L. (2012). The civic origins of progressive policy change: Combating violence against women in global perspective, 1975–2005. American Political Science Review, 106(3), 548–569. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055412000226
49.
InglehartR.NorrisP. (2003). Rising tide: Gender equality and cultural change around the World. Cambridge University Press.
JonesM. P. (2009). Gender quotas, electoral laws, and the election of women: Evidence from the Latin American vanguard. Comparative Political Studies, 42(1), 56–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414008324993
52.
JonesM. P.NaviaP. (1999). Assessing the effectiveness of gender quotas in open-list proportional representation electoral systems. Social Science Quarterly, 80(2), 341–355.
53.
KangA. J.TrippA. M. (2018). Coalitions matter: Citizenship, women, and quota adoption in Africa. Perspectives on Politics, 16(1), 73–91. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592717002225
KittilsonM. C. (2006). Challenging parties, changing parliaments: Women and elected office in contemporary western Europe. Ohio State University Press.
57.
KittilsonM. C. (2010). Comparing gender, institutions and political behavior: Toward an integrated theoretical framework. Perspectives on Politics, 8(1), 217–222. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1537592709992799
58.
KrookM. L. (2009). Quotas for women in politics: Gender and candidate selection reform worldwide. Oxford University Press.
59.
KrookM. L. (2015). Empowerment versus backlash: Gender quotas and critical mass theory. Politics, Groups, and Identities, 3(1), 184–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2014.999806
60.
KrookM. L.O’BrienD. Z. (2010). The politics of group representation: Quotas for women and minorities worldwide. Comparative Politics, 42(3), 253–272. https://doi.org/10.5129/001041510x12911363509639
61.
KunovichS.PaxtonP. (2005). Pathways to power: The role of political parties in women’s national political representation. American Journal of Sociology, 111(2), 505–552. https://doi.org/10.1086/444445
62.
LlorenA. (2014). Gender quotas in Morocco: Lessons for women’s descriptive and symbolic representation. Representation, 50(4), 527–538. https://doi.org/10.1080/00344893.2014.979224
MagaloniB. (2006). Voting for autocracy: Hegemonic party survival and its demise in Mexico. Cambridge University Press.
65.
MeierP. (2008). A gender gap not closed by quotas: The renegotiation of the public sphere. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 10(3), 329–347. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616740802185650
66.
MeltzerA. H.RichardS. F. (1981). A rational theory of the size of government. Journal of Political Economy, 89(5), 914–927. https://doi.org/10.1086/261013
67.
MiuraM.McElwainK. M.KanekoT. (2022). Explaining public support for gender Quotas: Sexism, representational quality, and state intervention in Japan. Politics and Gender, 19(3), 1–25.
68.
MoghadamV. M. (2013). Modernizing women: Gender and social change in the Middle East (3rd ed.). Lynne Rienner Publishers.
69.
MondakJ. J. (1992). Institutional legitimacy, policy legitimacy, and the Supreme Court. American Politics Quarterly, 20(4), 457–477. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673x9202000406
70.
MorganJ.BuiceM. (2013). Latin American attitudes toward women in politics: The influence of elite cues, female advancement, and individual characteristics. American Political Science Review, 107(4), 644–662. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055413000385
71.
NohY. (2023). Public opinion and women’s rights in autocracies. Politics and Gender. FirstView.
72.
NohY.GrewalS.KilavuzM. T. (2023). Regime support and gender quotas in autocracies. In American political science review. FirstView.
73.
NohY.ShalabyM. (2023). Replication Data for: Who supports gender quotas in transitioning and authoritarian states in the Middle East and North Africa?Harvard dataverse. (Version V1) [dataset]. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/ROZBVY
74.
NorrisP. (2002). Democratic phoenix: Reinventing political activism. Cambridge University Press.
75.
O’DonnellG.SchmitterP. (1986). Transitions from authoritarian rule. Johns Hopkins University Press.
76.
PatemanC. (1985). The problem of political obligation: A critique of liberal theory. University of California Press.
77.
PaxtonP.HughesM. M. (2015). The increasing effectiveness of national gender quotas, 1990–2010. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 40(3), 331–362. https://doi.org/10.1111/lsq.12079
78.
PlutzerE. (1988). Work life, family life, and women’s support of feminism. American Sociological Review, 53(4), 640–649. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095855
79.
QuotaProject. (2021). ‘Global Database of Quotas for Women,’ Quota Project, International IDEA and Stockholm University, www.quotaproject.org
80.
RizzoH.Abdel-LatifA.-H.MeyerK. (2007). The relationship between gender equality and democracy: A comparison of arab versus non-arab Muslim societies. Sociology, 41(6), 1151–1170. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038507082320
81.
SadiqiF.EnnajiM. (2006). The feminization of public space: Women’s activism, the family law, and social change in Morocco. Journal of Middle East Women's Studies, 2(2), 86–114. https://doi.org/10.2979/mew.2006.2.2.86
SaterJ. N. (2009). Parliamentary elections and authoritarian rule in Morocco. The Middle East Journal, 63(3), 381–400. https://doi.org/10.3751/63.3.12
84.
Schwindt-BayerL. A. (2006). Still supermadres? Gender and the policy priorities of Latin American legislators. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 570–585. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00202.x
85.
Schwindt-BayerL. A. (2009). Making quotas work: The effect of gender quota laws on the election of women. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 34(1), 5–28. https://doi.org/10.3162/036298009787500330
ShalabyM. (2016). Challenges facing women’s political participation post-arab spring: The cases of Egypt and Tunisia. In ShalabyM.MoghadamV. (Eds.), Empowering women after the Arab Spring. Comparative Feminist Studies.
88.
ShalabyM. (2019). Support for gender quotas and perceived corruption in developing democracies: Evidence from Lebanon. In Corruption and informal practices in the Middle East and North Africa. Routledge.
89.
SimpserA. (2013). Why governments and parties manipulate elections: Theory, practice, and implications. Cambridge University Press.
90.
SmithA. E.WarmingK.HenningsV. M. (2017). Refusing to know a woman’s place: The causes and consequences of rejecting stereotypes of women politicians in the Americas. Politics, Groups, and Identities, 5(1), 132–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2016.1198707
91.
Taylor-RobinsonM. M.HeathR. M. (2003). Do women legislators have different policy priorities than their male colleagues? A critical case test. Journal of Women, Politics and Policy, 24(4), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554477x.2003.9971004
TrippA. M. (2019). Seeking legitimacy: Why Arab autocracies adopt women’s rights. Cambridge University Press.
94.
TrippA. M.KangA. (2008). The global impact of quotas: On the fast track to increased female legislative representation. Comparative Political Studies, 41(3), 338–361. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414006297342
95.
WeeksA. C. (2022). Making gender salient: From gender quota laws to policy. Cambridge University Press.
96.
WelborneB. C.ButtorffG. J. (2022). Gender quotas in the Arab world - 20 years on. Digest of Middle East Studies, 31(4), 340–358. https://doi.org/10.1111/dome.12274
97.
ZallerJ. R. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge University Press.
98.
ZhaoD. (2009). The mandate of heaven and performance legitimation in historical and contemporary China. American Behavioral Scientist, 53(3), 416–433. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764209338800
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
