Can China catch-up with the United States technologically by mobilizing its bureaucracy and assigning ambitious targets to local governments? We analyzed an original dataset of 4.6 million patents filed in China from 1990 through 2014 and paired this with a new, rigorous measure of patent novelty that approximates the quality of innovation. In 2006, China’s central government launched a national campaign to promote indigenous innovation and introduced bureaucratic targets for patents. Our analysis finds evidence that these targets, combined with political competition, pushed local governments to “game the numbers” by channeling relatively more effort toward boosting non-novel—possibly junk—patents over novel patents. Nationally, this is reflected in a surge of aggregate patents paired with a falling ratio of novel patents. China’s innovation drive is susceptible to manipulation and waste—it is enormous in scale but low in productivity.
AngY. Y. (2016). How China escaped the poverty trap. Cornell University Press.
2.
AngY. Y. (2022). Testimony before the U.S.-China economic and security review commission 'CCP decision-making and the 20th party congress. https://ssrn.com/abstract=4390821
3.
AngY. Y.JiaN.YangB.HuangK. G. (2023). Replication data for: China’s low-productivity innovation drive: Evidence from patents. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/LX5YI2
4.
AppelbaumR.ParkerR.CaoC.GereffiG. (2011). “China’s (not so hidden) developmental state.” In State of innovation. Routledge.
5.
BasallaG. (1988). The evolution of technology. Cambridge University Press.
6.
BlockF.KellerM. R. (2011). State of innovation: US government technology policies, 1969–2008. Paradigm.
7.
BrandtL.LitwackJ.MilevaE.WangL.ZhangY.ZhaoL. (2020). China’s productivity slowdown and future growth potential. World Bank eLibrary.
8.
BreznitzD.MurphreeM. (2011). Run of the red queen: Government, innovation, globalization, and economic growth in China. Yale University Press.
9.
Caixin. (2019). Insiders reveal chaos: This is how a patent superpower is forged. Caixin.
10.
Caixin (2021). Self-styled ‘godfather of patents’ rises, falls on China’s innovation obsession. Caixin.
11.
ChenL.ZhangX.ChenL.TianQ.JiangW. (2014). Varieties of global capital and the paradox of local upgrading in China. Politics & Society, 42(2), 223–252. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329213519422
12.
ChenY.LiH.ZhouL.-A. (2005). Relative performance evaluation and the turnover of provincial leaders in China. Economics Letters, 88(3), 421–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2005.05.003
13.
China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA) (2018). Notification on the special inspection of patent application related policies. CNIPA.
14.
China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA) (2019). 18 decisions reprimanding patent agents. CNIPA.
de RassenfosseG. (2013). Do firms face a trade-off between the quantity and the quality of their inventions?Research Policy, 42(5), 1072–1079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.02.005
17.
DesmetK.NagyD. K.Rossi-HansbergE. (2018). The geography of development. Journal of Political Economy, 126(3), 903–983. https://doi.org/10.1086/697084
18.
DixitA. (2002). Incentives and organizations in the public sector: An interpretative review. Journal of Human Resources, 37(4), 696–727. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069614
EhrenbergR. G.BognannoM. L. (1990). Do tournaments have incentive effects?Journal of Political Economy, 98(6), 1307–1324. https://doi.org/10.1086/261736
21.
EvansP. (1995). Embedded autonomy: States and industrial transformation. Princeton University Press.
22.
FlemingL. (2007). Breakthroughs and the “long tail” of innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 49(1), 69.
FravelM. T.ManionM.WangY. (2021). A “China in the World” paradigm for scholarship. Studies in Comparative International Development, 56(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12116-021-09317-w
25.
GilfillanS. C. (1970). The sociology of invention: An essay in the social causes, ways and effects of technological invention. MIT press.
26.
HallB. H.JaffeA. B.TrajtenbergM. (2001). The NBER patent citation data file: Lessons, insights and methodological tools. National Bureau of Economic Research.
27.
HuA. G. Z.ZhangP.ZhaoL. (2017). China as number one? Evidence from China’s most recent patenting surge. Journal of Development Economics, 124, 107–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2016.09.004
28.
HuangK. G.MurrayF. E. (2009). Does patent strategy shape the long-run supply of public knowledge? Evidence from human genetics. Academy of Management Journal, 52(6), 1193–1221. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.47084665
29.
HuntingtonS. P. (1968). Political order in changing societies. Yale University Press.
30.
JaffeA. B.TrajtenbergM. (2002). Patents, citations, and innovations: A window on the knowledge economy. MIT press.
31.
JenseniusF.HtunM.SamuelsD.SingerD.LawrenceA.ChweM. (2018). The benefits and pitfalls of Google scholar. PS: Political Science & Politics, 51(4), 820–824. https://doi.org/10.1017/s104909651800094x
32.
JiaN.HuangK. G.Man ZhangC. (2019). Public governance, corporate governance, and firm innovation: An examination of state-owned enterprises. Academy of Management Journal, 62(1), 220–247. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.0543
33.
KerrS. (1975). On the folly of rewarding A, while hoping for B. Academy of Management Journal, 18(4), 769–783. https://doi.org/10.5465/255378
34.
KohliA. (1986). Democracy and development. In LewisJ. P.KallabV. (eds), Development strategies reconsidered (pp. 153–182). Transaction Books.
35.
KohliA. (2004). State-directed development: Political power and industrialization in the global periphery. Cambridge University Press.
36.
KostkaG.XiaofanY. (2015). Career backgrounds of municipal party secretaries in China: Why do so few municipal party secretaries rise from the county level?Modern China, 41(5), 467–505. https://doi.org/10.1177/0097700414539628
37.
LandesX.MarchmanM.NielsenM. (2012). The academic rat race: Dilemmas and problems in the structure of academic competition. Learning and Teaching, 5(2), 73–90, https://doi.org/10.3167/latiss.2012.050205
38.
LandryP. F.LüX.DuanH. (2018). Does performance matter? Evaluating political selection along the Chinese administrative ladder. Comparative Political Studies, 51(8), 1074–1105. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414017730078
39.
LeeK.-F. (2018). AI superpowers: China, Silicon Valley, and the new world order. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
40.
LiQ. Y. (2012, June 12). Scientific and technological innovation are included in the assessment of local governments for the first time. Sichuan Daily.
41.
LiH.ZhouL.-A. (2005). Political turnover and economic performance: The incentive role of personnel control in China. Journal of Public Economics, 89(9–10), 1743–1762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.06.009
42.
LiuQ. Y. (2015, October 28). Patent applications in Qingyuan. Nanfang Daily.
43.
LiuM. (2017). Total factor productivity in China: Current conditions, problems, and policy solutions. Lau Chor Tak Institute of Global Economics and Finance.
44.
LiuX.BuckT.ZhangJ. S.TangH. W.DengX. L.ZhangW. Z. (2007). Innovation performance and channels for international technology spillovers: Evidence from Chinese high-tech industries. Research Policy, 36(3), 355–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.12.003
45.
LüX.LandryP. F. (2014). Show me the money: Interjurisdiction political competition and fiscal extraction in China. American Political Science Review, 108(3), 706–722. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055414000252
MaskinE.QianY.XuC. (2000). Incentives, information, and organizational form. The Review of Economic Studies, 67(2), 359–378. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-937x.00135
MurrayF.SternS. (2007). Do formal intellectual property rights hinder the free flow of scientific knowledge? An empirical test of the anti-commons hypothesis. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 63(4), 648–687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2006.05.017
50.
NebehayS. (2020, April 4). In a first, China knocks U.S. from top spot in global patent race. Reuters.
OiJ. C. (1999). Rural China takes off: Institutional foundations of economic reform. University of California Press.
53.
PerryE. J. (2011). From mass campaigns to managed campaigns: “constructing a new socialist countryside”. In Mao’s invisible hand (pp. 30–61). Brill.
54.
PerssonP.ZhuravskayaE. (2016). The limits of career concerns in federalism: Evidence from China. Journal of the European Economic Association, 14(2), 338–374. https://doi.org/10.1111/jeea.12142
55.
PrzeworskiA.LimongiF. (1993). Political regimes and economic growth. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 7(3), 51–69. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.7.3.51
56.
SchumpeterJ. A. (1943). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. George Allen.
SegalA. (2020). The Coming Tech Cold War With China. Foreign Affairs.
59.
SeligmanL. (2018). “Pentagon criticized for spray and pray approach to innovation.” Foreign Policy.
60.
ShihV.AdolphC.LiuM. (2012). Getting ahead in the communist party: Explaining the advancement of central committee members in China. American Political Science Review, 106(1), 166–187. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055411000566
61.
SolowR. M. (1957). Technical change and the aggregate production function. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 39(3), 312–320. https://doi.org/10.2307/1926047
TaylorM. Z. (2016). The politics of innovation: Why some countries are better than others at science and technology. Oxford University Press.
64.
WallaceJ. (2016). Juking the stats? Authoritarian information problems in China. British Journal of Political Science, 46(1), 11–29. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007123414000106
65.
WallaceJ. (2023). Seeking truth and hiding facts: Information, ideology, and authoritarian rule in China. Oxford University Press.
66.
WeissChenJ. (2022). The China trap: U.S. Foreign policy and the perilous logic of zero-sum competition. Foreign Affairs, 101(5), 40–58.
67.
WestJ. (2019). “China, a low-productivity superpower.” The Interpretator.
68.
WhitingS. (2004). The cadre evaluation system at the grassroots: The paradox of party rule. In NaughtonB.YangD. (eds), Holding China together. Cambridge University Press.
69.
WongJ. (2011). Betting on biotech: Innovation and the limits of asia's developmental state. Cornell University Press.
70.
WuJ.DengY.HuangJ.MorckR.YeungB. (2013). Incentives and outcomes: China's environmental policy (No. w18754). National Bureau of Economic Research.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
