Many authoritarian regimes seek to blunt everyday acts of resistance and social mobilization through co-optation rather than adopting riskier tools like outright repression. What are the political imprints of authoritarian-era co-optation after a transition to democracy? We examine this question in Portugal, where rural corporatist institutions known as Casas do Povo sought to co-opt peasants and dismantle worker mobilization in the fascist era. We find conditional effects for the consequences of rural co-optation in Portugal’s restive southern region, where Casas do Povo took on particular importance given ongoing social mobilization over exploitative labor conditions in the countryside. Absent robust co-optation, social mobilization in the fascist era translated into greater support for the left-wing Portuguese Communist Party after democratization and less support for the right. But the electoral legacies of social mobilization are absent where the fascist regime created early Casas do Povo, facilitating co-optation.
AlbertusM. (2021). Property without Rights: Origins and Consequences of the Property Rights Gap. Cambridge University Press.
2.
AlbertusM. (2023). The political price of authoritarian control: Evidence from francoist land settlements in Spain. The Journal of Politics, 85(4), 1258–1274. https://doi.org/10.1086/723991
3.
AlbertusM.BramborT.CenevivaR. (2018). Land inequality and rural unrest: Theory and evidence from Brazil. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 62(3), 557–596. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002716654970
4.
AlbertusM.SchouelaN. (2023). “Replication data for: Fascist legacies of mobilization and Co-optation: Evidence from democratic Portugal”. Harvard Dataverse, V1. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/5Q0YWJ
5.
BalcellsL. (2012). The consequences of victimization on political identities: Evidence from Spain. Politics & Society, 40(3), 311–347. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329211424721
BarretoA. (1987). Anatomia de uma Revolução: A reforma agrária em Portugal 1974–1976. In BarretoA. (Ed.). A Reforma Agrária (Vol. 7), Mem Martins: Publicaçōes Europa-América.
8.
BatesonR. (2013). Order and violence in post-war Guatemala. PhD Dissertation. Yale University.
9.
BautistaM. A.GonzálezF.MartínezL. R.MuñozP.PremM. (2021). The geography of repression and opposition to autocracy. American Journal of Political Science, 67(1), 101–118. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12614
10.
BermeoN. (1986). The revolution within the revolution: Workers’ control in rural Portugal. Princeton University Press.
11.
ChilcoteR. (2010). The Portuguese revolution: Rowman & Littlefield.
12.
CostalliS.RuggeriA. (2019). The long-term electoral legacies of civil war in young democracies: Italy, 1946–1968. Comparative Political Studies, 52(6), 927–961. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414018784057
13.
CutileiroJosé (1971). A Portuguese Rural Society. Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press.
14.
DantasMauro Rafael Magalhães (2018). A Guarda Nacional Republicana no pós-25 de abril: O processo da reforma agrária. Lisbon, Portugal: Thesis, Academia Militar.
15.
DinasE.Northmore-BallK. (2020). The ideological shadow of authoritarianism. Comparative Political Studies, 53(12), 1957–1991. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414019852699
16.
FernandesT.BrancoR. (2017). Long-term effects: Social revolution and civil society in Portugal, 1974–2010. Comparative Politics, 49(3), 411–431. https://doi.org/10.5129/001041517820934302
FowerakerJ. (1987). Corporatist strategies and the transition to democracy in Spain. Comparative Politics, 20(1), 57–72. https://doi.org/10.2307/421920
19.
FreireD. (2012). Estado corporativo em Acção: Sociedade rural e construção da rede de Casas do Povo. In RosasF.GarridoÁ. (Eds.), Corporativismo Fascismos Estado Novo. Coimbra: Edições Almedina.
HuntingtonS. (1968). Political order in changing societies, Yale University Press.
22.
KuranT. (1991). Now out of never: The element of surprise in the East European revolution of 1989. World Politics, 44(1), 7–48. https://doi.org/10.2307/2010422
23.
LinzJ. (1981) A century of politics and interests in Spain. In BergerS. (Ed.). Organizing interests in western Europe. Cambridge University Press.
24.
LinzJ. (2000). Totalitarian and authoritarian regimes. Lynne Rienner Publishers.
25.
LucenaM. (1999). Casas do Povo. In BarretoA.MónicaM. (Eds.), Dicionário de História de Portugal. Figueirinhas.
26.
LupuN.PeisakhinL. (2017). The legacy of political violence across generations. American Journal of Political Science, 61(4), 836–851. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12327
27.
MailerP. (1977). Portugal: The impossible revolution. Solidarity Press.
28.
MarquesA. H. R. d. O. (1978). História da Primeira República Portuguesa: As estruturas de base. Iniciativas Editoriais.
29.
McClintockC. (1981). Peasant cooperatives and political change in Peru. Princeton University Press.
30.
MooreB. (1966). Social Origins of dictatorship and democracy. Beacon Press.
31.
NeundorfA.Pop-ElechesG. (2020). Dictators and their subjects: Authoritarian attitudinal effects and legacies. Comparative Political Studies, 53(12), 1839–1860. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414020926203
32.
PereiraJ. P. (1982). Conflitos sociais nos campos do sul de Portugal. In BarretoA. (Ed.). A Reforma Agrária (Vol. 2). Publicaçōes Europa-América.
33.
Pires de AlmeidaM. A. (2016). The agrarian reform under the Portuguese revolution, 1974–76: Its roots and reversal. Studies in People’s History, 3(2), 185–196. https://doi.org/10.1177/2321023016665735
34.
Pop-ElechesG.TuckerJ. A. (2020). Communist legacies and left-authoritarianism. Comparative Political Studies, 53(12), 1861–1889. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414019879954
RiegelhauptJ. F. (1979). Peasants and politics in salazar’s Portugal: The corporate state and village ‘nonpolitics. In GrahamL.MaklerH. (Eds.). Contemporary Portugal (pp. 167–190). University of Texas Press.
RozenasA.ZhukovY. M. (2019). Mass repression and political loyalty: Evidence from Stalin’s ‘Terror by Hunger. American Political Science Review, 113(2), 569–583. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055419000066
39.
RueschemeyerD.EvelyneH. S.JohnD. S. (1992). Capitalist Development and democracy. University of Chicago Press.
StepanA. (1978). The state and society: Peru in comparative perspective. Princeton University Press.
42.
TáboasD. L. (2022). El corporativismo agrario a ras de suelo: las Casas do Povo en el día a día del Estado Novo portugués (1933-1974). Historia Social, (102), 85–104. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48645728
43.
VillamilF. (2021). Mobilizing memories: The social conditions of the long-term impact of victimization. Journal of Peace Research, 58(3), 399–416. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343320912816
44.
WilliamsonP. (1985). Varieties of corporatism. Cambridge University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
