Does the economic integration of refugees affect public attitudes toward migration? We assess this pertinent question by examining a policy change in Germany, where the government significantly eased labor market access for refugees in the majority of the country. Using administrative employment data, we show that the policy led to a substantial increase in refugee employment, while natives’ wages and employment rates remained unaffected. The policy also had a positive effect on natives’ attitudes toward migration. Voters exposed to more refugees in the labor market were two percentage points more likely to vote for pro-migration parties across both state and federal elections. Additional survey analyses suggest that our results are driven by positive native–refugee interactions in the workplace.
AnderssonH.DehdariS. H. (2021). Workplace contact and support for anti-immigration parties. American Political Science Review, 115(4), 1159–1174. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055421000599
2.
ArtD. (2005). The politics of the Nazi past in Germany and Austria. Cambridge University Press.
BlinderS.FordR.IvarsflatenE. (2013). The better angels of our nature: How the antiprejudice norm affects policy and party preferences in Great Britain and Germany. American Journal of Political Science, 57(4), 841–857. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12030
6.
BundersonJ. S.SutcliffeK. M. (2002). Comparing alternative conceptualizations of functional diversity in management teams: Process and performance effects. Academy of Management Journal, 45(5), 875–893. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069319
BursztynL.EgorovG.FiorinS. (2020). From extreme to mainstream: The erosion of social norms. American Economic Review, 110(11), 3522–3548. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20171175
9.
CameronL.RutlandA.BrownR.DouchR. (2006). Changing children’s intergroup attitudes toward refugees: Testing different models of extended contact. Child Development, 77(5), 1208–1219. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00929.x
DancygierR. M.DonnellyM. J. (2013). Sectoral economies, economic contexts, and attitudes toward immigration. The Journal of Politics, 75(1), 17–35. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381612000849
DruckmanJ. N.LevenduskyM. S.McLainA. (2018). No need to watch: How the effects of partisan media can spread via interpersonal discussions. American Journal of Political Science, 62(1), 99–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12325
15.
DustmannC.VasiljevaK.Piil DammA. (2019). Refugee migration and electoral outcomes. The Review of Economic Studies, 86(5), 2035–2091. https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdy047
16.
FinseraasH.HansonT.JohnsenÅ. A.KotsadamA.TorsvikG. (2019). Trust, ethnic diversity, and personal contact: A field experiment. Journal of Public Economics, 173, 72–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2019.02.002
17.
FinseraasH.KotsadamA. (2017). Does personal contact with ethnic minorities affect anti-immigrant sentiments? Evidence from a field experiment. European Journal of Political Research, 56(3), 703–722. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12199
18.
FinseraasH.RøedM.SchøneP. (2017). Labor market competition with immigrants and political polarization. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 12(3), 347–373. https://doi.org/10.1561/100.00016109
Forschungsgruppe WahlenM. (2017). Blitzumfrage zur Bundestagswahl 2017.
22.
Forschungsgruppe WahlenM. (2018). Politbarometer 2017 (cumulated data set). GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA6988 Data file Version 1.2.0https://doi.org/10.4232/1.13170
23.
GhosnF.BraithwaiteA.ChuT. S. (2019). Violence, displacement, contact, and attitudes toward hosting refugees. Journal of Peace Research, 56(1), 118–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343318804581
HagerA.VeitS. (2019). Attitudes toward asylum seekers: Evidence from Germany. Public Opinion Quarterly, 83(2), 412–422. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfz023
26.
HainmuellerJ.HiscoxM. J. (2010). Attitudes toward highly skilled and low-skilled immigration: Evidence from a survey experiment. American Political Science Review, 104(1), 61–84. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055409990372
HangartnerD.DinasE.MarbachM.MatakosK.XefterisD. (2019). Does exposure to the refugee crisis make natives more hostile?American Political Science Review, 113(2), 442–455. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055418000813
29.
HeathA.RichardsL. (2019). How do Europeans differ in their attitudes to immigration?Findings from the European Social Survey 2002./03–2016/17.
30.
HilbigH.RiazS. (2022). Freedom of movement restrictions inhibit the psychological integration of refugees. The Journal of Politics, 84(4), 2288–2293. https://doi.org/10.1086/720307
KorinekK.EntwisleB.JampaklayA. (2005). Through thick and thin: Layers of social ties and urban settlement among Thai migrants. American Sociological Review, 70(5), 779–800. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240507000503
34.
MarbachM.HainmuellerJ.HangartnerD. (2018). The long-term impact of employment bans on the economic integration of refugees. Science Advances, 4(9), Article eaap9519. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aap9519
35.
MarténL.HainmuellerJ.HangartnerD. (2019). Ethnic networks can foster the economic integration of refugees. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(33), 16280–16285. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1820345116
36.
MaydaA. M. (2006). Who is against immigration? A cross-country investigation of individual attitudes toward immigrants. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 88(3), 510–530. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest.88.3.510
PaluckE. L.GreenS. A.GreenD. P. (2019). The contact hypothesis re-evaluated. Behavioural Public Policy, 3(02), 129–158. https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2018.25
39.
Pardos-PradoS.XenaC. (2019). Skill specificity and attitudes toward immigration. American Journal of Political Science, 63(2), 286–304. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12406
40.
RazinA.WahbaJ. (2015). Welfare magnet hypothesis, fiscal burden, and immigration skill selectivity. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 117(2), 369–402. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjoe.12092
41.
SchemerC.MeltzerC. E. (2020). The impact of negative parasocial and vicarious contact with refugees in the media on attitudes toward refugees. Mass Communication and Society, 23(2), 230–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2019.1692037
42.
ScheveK. F.SlaughterM. J. (2001). Labor market competition and individual preferences over immigration policy. Review of Economics and Statistics, 83(1), 133–145. https://doi.org/10.1162/003465301750160108
SimonovitsG.KezdiG.KardosP. (2018). Seeing the world through the other’s eye: An online intervention reducing ethnic prejudice. American Political Science Review, 112(1), 186–193. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055417000478
SteinmayrA. (2021). Contact versus exposure: Refugee presence and voting for the far right. Review of Economics and Statistics, 103(2), 310–327. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_00922
48.
ValentimV. (2021). Parliamentary representation and the normalization of radical right support. Comparative Political Studies, 54(14), 2475–2511. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414021997159
49.
VolkensA.LehmannP.RegelS.WernerK.BurstT.MatthießT.MerzN.WeßelsB.ZehnterL. (2020). The manifesto data collection. Manifesto project (MRG/CMP/MARPOR). Version 2020a. Wissenschaftzentrum Berlinhttps://manifestoproject.wzb.eu/
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
