Understanding political and social effects of violence in local populations through public opinion surveys has become increasingly common internationally. Yet while researchers are attuned to possible challenges induced during survey implementation, this work focuses almost uniformly on respondents. This paper considers survey enumerators as critical actors for data collection in violent research settings. We present survey results from 245 enumerators in Côte d’Ivoire to show that their personal feelings of insecurity and exposure to violence while conducting surveys may condition challenges faced and compromises made to gathering data. We shed light on how academic research in violent political settings poses unique security concerns for enumerators, with ramifications for data integrity.
AdidaC.FerreeK.PosnerD.RobinsonA. (2016). Who’s asking? Interviewer coethnicity effects in African survey data. Comparative Political Studies, 49(12), 1630–1660. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414016633487
2.
AsieduE.KarlanD.Lambon-QuayefioM.UdryC. (2021). A call for structured ethics appendices in social science papers. National Bureau of Economic Research. Working Paper 28393.
BaronH.YoungL. (2021). From principles to practice: Methods to increase the transparency of research ethics in violent contexts. Political Science Research and Methods, 10(4), 840–847. https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2021.48
5.
BensteadL. (2014). Does interviewer religious dress affect survey responses? Evidence from Morocco. Politics and Religion, 7(4), 734–760. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1755048314000455
6.
BischopingK.SchumanH. (1992). Pens and polls in Nicaragua: An analysis of the 1990 preelection surveys. American Journal of Political Science, 36(2), 331–350. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111480
7.
BlairG.CoppockA.MoorM. (2020). When to worry about sensitivity bias: A social reference theory and evidence from 30 years of list experiments. American Political Science Review, 114(4), 1297–1315. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055420000374
8.
BlaydesL.GillumR. (2013). Religiosity-of-Interviewer effects: Assessing the impact of veiled enumerators on survey response in Egypt. Politics and Religion, 6(3), 459–482. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1755048312000557
9.
BlomA. G.KorbmacherJ. (2013). Measuring interviewer characteristics pertinent to social surveys. Survey methods: Insights from the field. Retrived from: https://surveyinsights.org/?p=817
10.
BoasM. (2020). Unequal research relationships in highly inesecure places: Of fear, funds and friendship. In Doing fieldwork in areas of international intervention: A guide to research in violent and closed contexts. Policy Press.
11.
BurchardS. (2015). Electoral violence in sub-Saharan Africa: Causes and consequences. FirstForumPress.
12.
CarettaM. (2015). Situated knowledge in cross-cultural, cross-language research: A collaborative reflexive analysis of researcher, assistant and participant subjectivities. Qualitative Research, 15(4), 489–505. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794114543404
13.
CastorenaO.CohenM.LupuN.ZechmeisterE. (2021). How worried should we be? The implications of fabricated survey data for political science. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 35(2), Article edad007. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edad007
Cronin-FurmanK.LakeM. (2018). Ethics abroad: Fieldwork in fragile and violent contexts. PS: Political Science and Politics, 51(03), 607–614. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1049096518000379
16.
DavisJ. (2020). Manipulating Africa? Perspectives on the experimental method in the study of african politics. African Affairs, 119(476), 452–467. https://doi.org/10.1093/afraf/adaa009
17.
DavisJ.MichelitchK. (2022). Introduction to field experiments: Thinking through identity and positionality. PS: Political Science and Politics, 55(4), 735–740. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1049096522000671
18.
DavisJ.WilfahrtM. (2023). Replication data for: Enumerator experiences in violent research environments. Harvard Dataverse. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/0ZUQAS
19.
de GuevaraB. B.BøåsM. (2020). Doing fieldwork in areas of international intervention: A guide to research in violent and closed contexts. Policy Press.
20.
Di MaioM.FialaN. (2020). Be wary of those who ask: A randomized experiment on the size and determinants of the enumerator effect. The World Bank Economic Review, 34(3), 654–669. https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/lhy024
21.
DionneK. Y. (2014). The politics of local research production: Surveying in a context of ethnic competition. Politics, Groups, and Identities, 2(3), 459–480. https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2014.930691
22.
Eriksson BaazM.UtasM. (2019). Exploring the backstage: Methodological and ethical issues surrounding the role of research brokers in insecure zones. Civil Wars, 21(2), 157–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698249.2019.1656357
23.
FujiiL. A. (2012). Research ethics 101: Dilemmas and responsibilities. PS: Political Science and Politics, 45(4), 717–723. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1049096512000819
24.
GenglerJ.TesslerM.LucasR.ForneyJ. (2021). ‘Why do you ask?’ The nature and impacts of attitudes towards public opinion surveys in the Arab world. British Journal of Political Science, 51(1), 115–136. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007123419000206
25.
HaasN.HaenschenK.KumarT.PanagopoulosC.PeytonK.RavanillaN.Sierra- ArévaloM. (2022). Organizational identity and positionality in randomized control trials: Considerations and advice for collaborative research teams. PS: Political Science and Politics, 55(4), 749–753. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1049096522000026
26.
HarrisJ. A.van der WindtP. (2023). Empowering women or increasing response bias? Experimental evidence from Congo. Journal of Development Economics, 103097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2023.103097
27.
HermanB.PaninA.WellmanE. I.BlairG.PruettL. D.OpaloK. O.AlarianH. M.GrossmanA. N.TanY.DyzenhausA. P.OwsleyN. (2022). Field experiments in the global south: Assessing risks, localizing benefits, and addressing positionality. PS: Political Science and Politics, 55(4), 769–772. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1049096522000063
28.
HimeleinK. (2016). Interviewer effects in subjective survey questions: Evidence from timor- leste. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 28(4), 511–533. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edv031
29.
HuangR. (2016). The wartime origins of democratization: Civil war, rebel governance, and political regimes. Cambridge University Press.
30.
JaffeA.DiLilloD.HoffmanL.HaikalisM.DykstraR. (2015). Does it hurt to ask? A meta-analysis of participant reactions to trauma research. Clinical Psychology Review, 40, 40–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2015.05.004
31.
JenkinsS. (2018). Assistants, guides, collaborators, friends: The concealed figures of conflict research. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 47(2), 143–170. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241615619993
KaplanL.KuhntJ.SteinertJ. (2020). Do no harm? Field research in the Global South: Ethical challenges faced by research staff. World Development, 127(3), 104810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.104810
34.
LoyleC. E.SimoniA. (2017). Researching under fire: Political science and researcher trauma. PS: Political Science and Politics, 50(01), 141–145. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1049096516002328
MarfoukL.SarvašM.WippellJ.ZhuJ. (2021). Does sensitivity bias lead respondents to misreport their level of trust in political parties?Afrobarometer Working. Paper 187.
37.
MartinP.PiccolinoG.SpeightJ. (2021). Ex-rebel authority after civil war: Theory and evidence from Côte d’Ivoire. Comparative Politics, 53(2), 209–232. https://doi.org/10.5129/001041521x15923094954447
38.
McCauleyJ. (2014). Measuring and reducing religious bias in post-conflict zones: Evidence from Côte d’Ivoire. Political Psychology, 35(2), 267–289. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12059
39.
MossS.UluğÖ. M.AcarY. (2019). Doing research in conflict contexts: Practical and ethical challenges for researchers when conducting fieldwork. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 25(1), 86–99. https://doi.org/10.1037/pac0000334
40.
MwambariD. (2019). Local positionality in the production of knowledge in northern Uganda. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919864845
41.
OlsonK.PeytchevA. (2007). Effect of interviewer experience on interview pace and interviewer attitudes. Public Opinion Quarterly, 71(2), 273–286. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfm007
42.
PaluckE. (2009). Methods and ethics with research teams and NGOs: Comparing experiences across the border of Rwanda and democratic republic of Congo. In Surviving field research. Routledge.
43.
RudloffP.VinsonL. T. (2021). Surveys in communities divided by ethnicity and conflict: Challenges, possible solutions, and lessons learned from a survey in Jos, Nigeria. Sociological Methods and Research, 004912412098617. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124120986175
44.
SangaréB.BleckJ. (2020). Challenges of research in an active conflict environment. In Doing fieldwork in areas of international intervention: A guide to research in violent and closed contexts. Policy Press.
45.
SmidtH. (2020). Mitigating election violence locally: UN peacekeepers’ election-education campaigns in Côte d’Ivoire. Journal of Peace Research, 57(1), 199–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343319884993
46.
SteinertJ. I.Atika NyarigeD.JacobiM.KuhntJ.KaplanL. (2021). A systematic review on ethical challenges of ‘field’ research in low-income and middle-income countries: Respect, justice and beneficence for research staff?BMJ Global Health, 6(7), Article e005380. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005380
47.
SyaharB.SoedirgoJ. (2019). How the positionality of research assistants shapes knowledge production. Paper presented at the 2019. American Political Science Association Annual Meeting, August 31, Washington, DC
48.
TaylorC.PevehouseJ.StrausS. (2017). Perils of pluralism: Electoral violence and incumbency in sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of Peace Research, 54(3), 397–411. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343316687801
49.
UtasM. (2019). Research brokers we use and abuse while researching civil wars and their aftermaths – methodological concerns. Civil Wars, 21(2), 271–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698249.2019.1654325
50.
WestB.BlomA. (2017). Explaining interviewer effects: A research synthesis. Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology, 5(2), 175–211. https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smw024
51.
WilsonE. A. (2018). ‘Don’t say “research”’: Reducing bidirectional risk in Kibera slum. Contemporary Social Science, 13(3–4), 337–353. https://doi.org/10.1080/21582041.2017.1418525
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
