Community policing, and citizen cooperation with law enforcement more broadly, can improve local security outcomes by providing decentralized mechanisms for police accountability to local citizens. We hypothesize that five factors—alignment of citizen/police interests, relative costs of cooperation, costs of crime, prevalence of others’ cooperation, and perceived police efficacy—comprise a decision framework that guides citizens’ choices regarding whether to share information with law enforcement. We find evidence for this framework using rich survey and survey experimental data from a large nation-wide survey of Guatemalans and municipal administrative data. Our results indicate that increasing police efficacy, witness protection, and neighborhood trust boost the odds of cooperation with police by up to 55%. At a time when conversations about the relationship between community and police are widespread, this research offers insights into conditions under which cooperation between community members and law enforcement is most likely to occur.
AbbinkK. (2004). Staff rotation as an anti-corruption policy: An experimental study. European Journal of Political Economy, 20(4), 887–906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2003.10.008
2.
AkerlofG.YellenJ. L. (1994). Gang behavior, law enforcement, and community values. In Values and public policy. Brookings Institution.
ArguetaO.KurtenbachS. (2017). Guatemala: National fragmentation, local cohesion. In CoxF. D.SiskT. D. (Eds.), Peacebuilding in deeply divided societies (pp. 33–64). Springer International Publishing.
BaB. A.DeanK.MummoloJ.RiveraR. (2021). The role of officer race and gender in police-civilian interactions in Chicago. Science, 371(6530), 696–702. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abd8694
7.
BarnesN. (2017). Criminal politics: An integrated approach to the study of organized crime, politics, and violence. Perspectives on Politics, 15(4), 967–987. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1537592717002110
BatesonR. (2013). Order and violence in postwar Guatemala. PhD Dissertation, Yale University.
10.
BauerM.BlattmanC.ChytilováJ.HenrichJ.MiguelE.MittsT. (2016). Can war foster cooperation?Journal of Economic Perspectives, 30(3), 249–274. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.30.3.249
11.
BhavnaniR. R.AlexanderL. (2018). Local embeddedness and bureaucratic performance: Evidence from India. The Journal of Politics, 80(1), 71–87. https://doi.org/10.1086/694101
12.
BicchieriC. (2005). The grammar of society: The nature and dynamics of social norms. Cambridge University Press.
13.
BlairG.WeinsteinJ.ChristiaF., et al. (2021). Does community policing build trust in police anD REDUCE CRime? Evidence from six coordinated field experiments in the global south. Science, 374(6571). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abd344
14.
BlairR. A.2018. Legitimacy after violence: Evidence from two lab-in-the-field experiments in Liberia. Working paper.
15.
BlairR. A.KarimS.GilliganM.BeardsleyK. (Forthcoming). Policing ethnicity: Lab-in-the-field evidence on discrimination, cooperation, and ethnic balancing in the Liberian national police. Quarterly Journal of Political Science.
16.
BlairR. A.KarimS. M.MorseB. S. (2019). Establishing the rule of law in weak and war-torn states: *Evidence from a field experiment with the Liberian national police. American Political Science Review, 113(3), 641–657. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055419000121
17.
BowlesR.Garcia ReyesM.GaroupaN. (2009). Crime reporting decisions and the costs of crime. European Journal on Criminal Policy & Research, 15(4), 365–377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-009-9109-8
18.
BrockmannH.GenschelP.SeelkopfL. (2016). Happy taxation: Increasing tax compliance through positive rewards?Journal of Public Policy, 36(3), 381–406. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0143814x15000331
19.
BuckleyN.FryeT.ScottG.McCarthyL. A. (2016). Cooperating with the State: Evidence from survey experiments on policing. Journal of Experimental Political Science, 3(2), 124–139. https://doi.org/10.1017/xps.2015.18
20.
CarrJ. (2015). Kill the snitch: How Henriquez-Rivas affects asylum eligibility for people who report serious gang crimes to law enforcement. Washington Law Review, 91(3), 1313–1354. https://digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/wlr/vol91/iss3/12/
CruzJ. M. (2015). Police misconduct and political legitimacy in central America. Journal of Latin American Studies, 47(2), 251–283. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022216x15000085
23.
CurticeT. (2019). Police and co-ethnic bias: Evidence from a conjoint experiment in Uganda. Working paper.
24.
DafoeA.ZhangB.CaugheyD. (2018). Information equivalence in survey experiments. Political Analysis, 26(4), 399–416. https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2018.9
25.
DavenportC.SouleS. A.ArmstrongD. A. (2011). Protesting while Black?: The differential policing of American activism, 1960 to 1990. American Sociological Review, 76(1), 152–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122410395370
26.
DennyE.DowD.PittsW.WibbelsE. (2022). Replication data for: Citizen cooperation with the police: Evidence from contemporary. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/9JHGVS
27.
DorffC. (2017). Violence, kinship networks, and political resilience: Evidence from Mexico. Journal of Peace Research, 54(4), 558–573. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343317691329
28.
DudleyS. (2016). Homicides in Guatemala: The challenge and lessons of disaggregating gang-related and drug trafficking-related murders. Technical report USAID.
29.
EgamiN.ImaiK. (2019). Causal interaction in factorial experiments: Application to conjoint analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 114(526), 529–540. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2018.1476246
30.
FelsonM. (2006). Crime and nature. SAGE.
31.
Flores-MaciasG.ZarkinJ. (2019). The militarization of law enforcement: Evidence from Latin America. Perspectives on Politics, 19(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592719003906
32.
Flores-MaciasG.ZarkinJ. (2021). Militarization and perceptions of law enforcement in the developing world: Evidence from a conjoint experiment in Mexico. British Journal of Political Science, 52(3), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123421000259
33.
FontesA. W. (2019). Portrait of a ‘real’ Marero: Fantasy and falsehood in stories of gang violence. Ethnography, 20(3), 320–341. https://doi.org/10.1177/1466138118805123
34.
GanglK.TorglerB.KirchlerE. (2016). Patriotism’s impact on cooperation with the state: An experimental study on tax compliance. Political Psychology, 37(6), 867–881. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12294
35.
GingerichD. W.OliverosV. (2018). Police violence and the underreporting of crime. Economics & Politics, 30(1), 78–105. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecpo.12102
36.
GlebbeekM-L. (2001). Police reform and the peace process in Guatemala: The fifth promotion of the National civilian police. Bulletin of Latin American Research, 20(4), 431–453. https://doi.org/10.1111/1470-9856.00024
37.
GonzalezY. (2016). Varieties of participatory security: Assessing community participation in policing in Latin America: Community participation in policing in Latin America. Public Administration and Development, 36(2), 132–143. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.1752
38.
GonzálezY. M. (2021). Authoritarian police in democracy: Contested security in Latin America. Cambridge University Press.
39.
GutiérrezE. (2016). Guatemala elites and organized crime. Technical report InSight Crime & International Development Research Centre.
40.
HaimD.NanesM.DavidsonM. (2021). Family matters: The double-edged sword of police-community connections. Journal of Politics, 83(4). https://doi.org/10.1086/715071
41.
HainmuellerJ.HopkinsD. J.YamamotoT. (2014). Causal inference in conjoint analysis: Understanding multidimensional choices via stated preference experiments. Political Analysis, 22(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpt024
42.
HochmüllerM.MüllerM-M. (2017). Countering criminal insurgencies: Fighting gangs and building resilient communities in post-war Guatemala. In MoeL.MüllerM. (Eds.), Reconfiguring intervention (pp. 163–186). Palgrave Macmillan.
43.
HowellK. B. (2009). Broken lives from broken windows: The hidden costs of aggressive order-maintenance policing (pp. 271–326). New York University Review of Law & Social Change.
44.
HuS.ConradC. R. (2020). Monitoring via the courts: Judicial oversight and police violence in India. International Studies Quarterly. Forthcoming.
45.
ICG, (2018). Saving Guatemala’s fight against crime and impunity. Technical report International Crisis Group.
46.
KalyvasS. (2006). The logic of violence in civil war. Cambridge University Press.
47.
KarimS. M. (2020). Relational state building in areas of limited statehood: Experimental evidence on the attitudes of the police. American Political Science Review, 114(1), 536–551. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055419000716
48.
LeeperT. (2019). Cregg: Simple conjoint analyses and visualization. R package.
49.
LeeperT. J.HoboltS. B.TilleyJ. (2019). Measuring subgroup preferences in conjoint experiments. Political Analysis, 28(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/ARHZU4
LeviM. (1988). Of rule and revenue. University of California Press.
52.
LeyS. (2018). To vote or not to vote: How criminal violence shapes electoral participation. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 62(9), 1963–1990. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002717708600
53.
LundmanR. J.KaufmanR. L. (2003). Driving while Black: Effects of race, ethnicity, and gender on citizen self-reports of traffic stops and police actions. Criminology, 41(1), 195–220. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2003.tb00986.x
54.
MagaloniB.Franco-VivancoE.MeloV. (2020). Killing in the slums: Social order, criminal governance, and police violence in rio de Janeiro. American Political Science Review, 114(2), 552–572. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055419000856
55.
MeldeC.RennisonC. M. (2010). Intimidation and street gangs: Understanding the response of victims and bystanders to perceived gang violence. Justice Quarterly, 27(5), 619–666. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418820903228858
56.
MelnikovN.Schmidt-PadillaC.Micaela SviatschiM. (2021). Gangs, labor mobility and development. NBER Working Paper 27832.
57.
MoncadaE. (2009). Toward democratic policing in Colombia? Institutional accountability through lateral reform. Comparative Politics, 41(4), 431–449. https://doi.org/10.5129/001041509X12911362972511
58.
MoranJ. (2011). Crime and corruption in new democracies: The politics of (In)Security. Palgrave Macmillan UK.
59.
NanesM. J. (2018). Policing in divided societies: Officer inclusion, citizen cooperation, and crime prevention (pp. 1–25). Conflict Management and Peace Science.
60.
NatapoffA. (2009). Snitching: Criminal informants and the erosion of American justice. NYU Press.
61.
O’DonnellG. (1993). On the state, democratization and some conceptual problems: A Latin American view with glances at some postcommunist countries. World Development, 21(8), 1355–1369.
62.
PappJ.SmithB.WarehamJ.WuY. (2019). Fear of retaliation and citizen willingness to cooperate with police. Policing and Society, 29(6), 623–639. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2017.1307368
ReisigM. (2000). Experience, quality of life, and neighborhood context: A hierarchical analysis of satisfaction with police. Justice Quarterly, 17(3), 607–630. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418820000094681
65.
SnyderR.Durán-MartínezA. (2009). Does illegality breed violence? Drug trafficking and state-sponsored protection rackets. Crime, Law and Social Change, 52, 253–273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-009-9195-z
66.
SønderskovK. M.Peter Thisted DinesenFinkelS. E.HansenK. M. (2022). Crime victimization increases turnout: Evidence from individual-level administrative panel data. British Journal of Political Science, 52(1), 399–407. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123420000162
67.
SossJ.WeaverV. (2017). Police are our government: Politics, political science, and the policing of race–class subjugated communities. Annual Review of Political Science, 20(1), 565–591. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-060415-093825
68.
SullivanC. M. (2016). Political repression and the destruction of dissident organizations: Evidence from the archives of the Guatemalan national police. World Politics, 68(4), 645–676. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0043887116000125
69.
SunI. Y.LiL.WuY.HuR. (2018). Police legitimacy and citizen cooperation in China: Testing an alternative model. Asian Journal of Criminology, 13(4), 275–291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11417-018-9270-4
TellezJ.WibbelsE.KrishnaA. (2020). Local order, policing, and bribes: Evidence from India. World Politics. Forthcoming.
73.
TillyC. (1992). Coercion, capital and European states. AD 990-1992. Wiley-Blackwell.
74.
TrellesA.CarrerasM. (2013). Bullets and votes: Violence and electoral participation in Mexico. Journal of Politics in Latin America, 4(2), 89–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/1866802X1200400204
75.
TroyerL.Wesley YountsC. (1997). Whose expectations matter? The relative power of first- and second-order expectations in determining social influence. American Journal of Sociology, 103(3), 692–732. https://doi.org/10.1086/231253
76.
TylerT. R. (2004). Enhancing police legitimacy. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 593(1), 84–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716203262627
77.
TylerT. R. (2005). Policing in Black and White: Ethnic group differences in trust and confidence in the police. Police Quarterly, 8(3), 322–342. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098611104271105
78.
UNHCR (2018). Eligibility guidelines for assessing the International protection needs of asylum-seekers from Guatemala. Technical report.
79.
ViscontiG. (2020). Policy preferences after crime victimization: Panel and survey evidence from Latin America. British Journal of Political Science, 50(4), 1481–1495. https://doi.org/10.1017/s000712341800029
80.
WhitakerG. P. (1980). Coproduction: Citizen participation in service delivery. Public Administration Review, 40(3), 240. https://doi.org/10.2307/975377
81.
WuY.SunI.TriplettR. (2009). Race, class or neighborhood context: Which matters more in measuring satisfaction with police?Justice Quarterly, 26(1), 125–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418820802119950
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
