A burgeoning literature shows that international trade and migration shocks influence individuals’ political attitudes, but relatively little is known about how international financial shocks impact public opinion. This study examines how one prevalent type of international financial shock—currency crises—shapes mass political attitudes. I argue that currency crises reduce average citizens’ support for incumbent governments. I also expect voters’ concerns about their own pocketbooks to influence their response to currency crises. Original survey data from Turkey support these arguments. Exploiting exogenous variation in the currency’s value during the survey window, I show that currency depreciations strongly reduce support for the government. This effect is stronger among individuals that are more negatively affected by depreciation, and it is moderated by individuals’ perceptions of their personal economic situation. This evidence suggests that international financial shocks can strongly influence the opinions of average voters, and it provides further support for pocketbook theories.
AhlquistJ.CopelovitchM.WalterS. (2020). The political consequences of external economic shocks: Evidence from Poland. American Journal of Political Science, 64(4), 904–920. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12503
2.
AklinM.AriasE.GrayJ. (2021). Inflation concerns and mass preferences over currency policy. In Economics and politics. Forthcoming.
3.
AklinM.KernA. (2019). Moral hazard and financial crises: Evidence from American troop deployments. International Studies Quarterly, 63(1), 15–29. https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqy047
4.
AmitiM.ItskhokiO.KoningsJ. (2014). Importers, exporters, and exchange rate disconnect. American Economic Review, 104(7), 1942–1978. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.104.7.1942.
AutorD.DornD.HansonG.MajlesiK. (2020). Importing political polarization? The electoral consequences of rising trade exposure. American Economic Review, 110(10), 3139–3183. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20170011
7.
AytaçErdemS. E. (2018). Relative economic performance and the incumbent vote: A reference point theory. The Journal of Politics, 80(1), 16–29. https://doi.org/10.1086/716971
8.
AytaçS. E.ÖnişZ. (2014). Varieties of populism in a changing global context: The divergent paths of erdoğan and kirchnerismo. Comparative Politics, 47(1), 41–59. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2261178.
9.
BaergN. R.HotchkissJ. L.Quispe-AgnoliM. (2018). Documenting the unauthorized: Political responses to unauthorized immigration. Economics & Politics, 30(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecpo.12101
10.
Ballard-RosaCMalikMRickardSScheveK (2021). The economic origins of authoritarian values. Comparative political studies. 54(13), 2321–2353. https://doi.org/10.1177/00104140211024296, Forthcoming
11.
BearceD. H.TuxhornK.-L. (2017). When are monetary policy preferences egocentric? Evidence from American surveys and an experiment. American Journal of Political Science, 61(1), 178–193. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12203
12.
BermanN.BerthouA. (2009). Financial market imperfections and the impact of exchange rate movements on exports. Review of International Economics, 17(1), 103–120. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9396.2008.00781.x
13.
BlombergS. B.FriedenJ.SteinE. (2005). Sustaining fixed rates: The political economy of currency pegs in Latin America. Journal of Applied Economics, 8(2), 203–225. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.283432
14.
BrozJ. L.FriedenJ.WeymouthS. (2021). Populism in place: The economic geography of the globalization backlash. International Organization, 75(2), 464–494. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818320000314
15.
Brun-AguerreR.FuertesFuertesA.-M.PhylaktisK. (2012). Exchange rate pass-through into import prices revisited: What drives it?Journal of International Money and Finance, 31(4), 818–844. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2012.01.009
16.
BursteinA.EichenbaumM.RebeloS. (2005). Large devaluations and the real exchange rate. Journal of Political Economy, 113(4), 742–784.https://doi.org/10.1086/431254
17.
BursteinA.GopinathG. (2014). International prices and exchange rates. In Handbook of International Economics (4, pp. 391–451). Elsevier.
18.
CalvoGReinhartC (2000). When capital inflows suddenly stop. In PeterKenenSwobodaAlexandre (Eds), Key Issues in Reform of the International Monetary and Financial System. International Monetary Fund.
19.
CampaJ. M.González MínguezJ. M.MínguezGonzález (2006). Differences in exchange rate pass-through in the euro area. European Economic Review, 50(1), 121–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2004.12.002
20.
CampelloD.UrdinezF. (2021). Voter and legislator responses to localized trade shocks from China in Brazil. Comparative Political Studies, 54(7), 1131–1162. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414020970233
ÇarkoğluAli (2012). Economic evaluations vs. ideology: Diagnosing the sources of electoral change in Turkey, 2002–2011. Electoral Studies, 31(3), 513–521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2012.02.005
23.
CarlinRHartlynJHellwigTLoveGMartinez-GallardoCSingerM (2018). Public support for Latin American presidents. Research and Politics, 5(3), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168018787690
24.
CarlinRyanHellwigTLoveGMartinez-GallardoCSingerM (2021). When does the public get it right? Comparative political studies. Forthcoming.
25.
CarranzaL.Galdon-SanchezJ. E.Gomez-BiscarriJ.Gomez-BiscarriJ (2011). The relationship between investment and large exchange rate depreciations in dollarized economies. Journal of International Money and Finance, 30(7), 1265–1279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2011.07.006
26.
ChoudriEHakuraD (2015). The exchange rate pass-through to import and export prices. Journal of International Money and Finance, 51, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2014.09.006
27.
CitrinJackGreenDonald (1990). The self-interest motive in American public opinion. In Research in micropolitics: Public opinion (pp. 1–28). JAI Press.
ColantoneI.StanigP. (2018b). The trade origins of economic nationalism: Import competition and voting behavior in western Europe. American Journal of Political Science, 62(4), 936–953. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12358
CravinoJ.LevchenkoA. A. (2017). The distributional consequences of large devaluations. American Economic Review, 107(11), 3477–3509. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20151551
De Carvalho FilhoI.ChamonM.ChamonM (2008). A micro-empirical foundation for the political economy of exchange rate populism. IMF Staff Papers, 55(3), 481–510. https://doi.org/10.1057/imfsp.2008.15
35.
de SoyresFFrancoisEGunnellaVPavlovaE (2021). Bought, sold and bought again: The impact of complex value chains on export elasticities. FRB International Finance Discussion. Paper No. 1309.
36.
DonovanK.KellstedtP. M.KeyE. M.LeboM. J. (2020). Motivated reasoning, public opinion, and presidential approval. Political Behavior, 42, 1201–1221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-019-09539-8
37.
DruckmanJ. N.PetersonE.SlothuusR. (2013). How elite partisan polarization affects public opinion formation. American Political Science Review, 107(1), 57–79. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055412000500
38.
DustmannC.VasiljevaK.Piil DammA.DammAP (2019). Refugee migration and electoral outcomes. The Review of Economic Studies, 86(5), 2035–2091. https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdy047
FajgelbaumP. D.KhandelwalA. K. (2016). Measuring the unequal gains from trade *. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 131(3), 1113–1180. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjw013
43.
FallonP. R.LucasRobert EB (2002). The impact of financial crises on labor markets, household incomes, and poverty: A review of evidence. The World Bank Research Observer, 17(1), 21–45. https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/17.1.21
44.
FongCHazlettCImaiK (2018). Covariate balancing propensity score for a continuous treatment. Annals of Applied Statistics, 12(1), 156–177. https://doi.org/10.1214/17-AOAS1101
45.
FrankelJ (2005). Contractionary currency crashes in developing countries. IMF Staff Papers, 52(2), 149–192. https://doi.org/10.2307/30035893
46.
FrankelJ.ParsleyD.WeiS.-J. (2012). Slow pass-through around the world: A new import for developing countries?Open Economies Review, 23(2), 213–251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11079-011-9210-8
47.
FriedenJ. A. (1991). Invested interests: the politics of national economic policies in a world of global finance. International Organization, 45(4), 425–451. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300033178
48.
FriedenJ. A. (1994). Exchange rate politics: Contemporary lessons from American history. Review of International Political Economy, 1(1), 81–103.
49.
GalindoA.PanizzaU.SchiantarelliF. (2003). Debt composition and balance sheet effects of currency depreciation: A summary of the micro evidence. Emerging Markets Review, 4(4), 330–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1566-0141(03)00059-1
GrangerC. W. J.HuangbB.-N.YangC.-W. (2000). A bivariate causality between stock prices and exchange rates: Evidence from recent Asianflu☆. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 40(3), 337–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1062-9769(00)00042-9
HainmuellerJ. (2012). Entropy balancing for causal effects: A multivariate reweighting method to produce balanced samples in observational studies. Political Analysis, 20(1), 25–46. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpr025
55.
HainmuellerJ.MummoloJ.XuY. (2019). How much should we trust estimates from multiplicative interaction models? Simple tools to improve empirical practice. Political Analysis, 27(2), 163–192. https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2018.46
HangartnerD.DinasE.MarbachM.MatakosK.XefterisD. (2019). Does exposure to the refugee crisis make natives more hostile?American Political Science Review, 113(2), 442–455. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055418000813
HealyA. J.PerssonM.SnowbergE. (2017). Digging into the pocketbook: Evidence on economic voting from income registry data matched to a voter survey. American Political Science Review, 111(4), 771–785. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055417000314
60.
HicksR.TingleyD. (2011). Causal mediation analysis. The Stata Journal: Promoting Communications on Statistics and Stata, 11(4), 605–619. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X1201100407
ImaiK.KeeleL.TingleyD.YamamotoT. (2011). Unpacking the black box of causality: Learning about causal mechanisms from experimental and observational studies. American Political Science Review, 105(4), 765–789. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055411000414
64.
IMF (2018). Turkey: Staff report for the 2018 article IV consultation. International Monetary Fund.
65.
JamalA.MilnerH. V. (2019). Economic self-interest, information, and trade policy preferences: Evidence from an experiment in Tunisia. Review of International Political Economy, 26(4), 545–572. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2018.1563559
KesriyeliM.ÖzmenE.YiğitS. (2011). Corporate sector liability dollarization and exchange rate balance sheet effect in Turkey. Applied Economics, 43(30), 4741–4747. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2010.498353
69.
KinderD. R.KiewietD. R. (1979). Economic discontent and political behavior: The role of personal grievances and collective economic judgments in congressional voting. American Journal of Political Science, 23(3), 495–527. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111027
70.
LaebensMÖztürkA (2021). Partisanship and autocratization: Polarization, power asymmetry and partisan social identities in Turkey. Comparative Political Studies, 54(2), 245–279. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414020926199
71.
LaevenLValenciaF. 2018. Systemic banking crises revisited. IMF Working Paper WP/18/206.
72.
LaytonM. L.SmithA. E. (2015). Incorporating marginal citizens and voters. Comparative Political Studies, 48(7), 854–881. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414014565889
MansfieldE. D.MutzD. C. (2009). Support for free trade: Self-interest, sociotropic politics, and out-group anxiety. International Organization, 63(3), 425–457. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818309090158
76.
MargalitY. (2011). Costly jobs: Trade-related layoffs, government compensation, and voting in US. Elections. American Political Science Review, 105(1), 166–188. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000305541000050X
77.
McKenzieD. J. (2004). Aggregate shocks and urban labor market responses: evidence from Argentina’s financial crisis. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 52(4), 719–758. https://doi.org/10.1086/381110
78.
MuñozJ.Falcó-GimenoA.HernándezE. (2020). Unexpected event during survey design: Promise and pitfalls for causal inference. Political Analysis, 28(2), 186–206. https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2019.27
NadeauR.Lewis-BeckM. S.BélangerÉ. (2013). Economics and elections revisited. Comparative Political Studies, 46(5), 551–573. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414012463877
81.
NucciF.PozzoloA. F. (2001). Investment and the exchange rate: An analysis with firm-level panel data. European Economic Review, 45(2), 259–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-2921(00)00050-7
ÖnkalD.YatesJ. F.Simga-MuganC.ÖztinŞ. (2003). Professional vs. amateur judgment accuracy: The case of foreign exchange ratesProfessional vs. Amateur judgment Accuracy. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 91(2), 169–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-5978(03)00058-X
84.
PalmtagT.RommelT.WalterS. (2020). International trade and public protest: evidence from Russian regions. International Studies Quarterly, 64(4), 939–955. https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqaa073
85.
Pop-ElechesC.Pop-ElechesG (2012). Targeted government spending and political preferences. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 7(3), 285–320. http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/100.00011017
86.
QuinnDSattlerTStephenW (2019). The political origins of exchange rate valuations. Working Paper.
87.
RemmerK. L. (1991). The political impact of economic crisis in Latin America in the 1980s. American Political Science Review, 85(3), 777–800. https://doi.org/10.2307/1963850
RodrikD (2021). Why does globalization fuel populism? In Annual review of economics. Forthcoming.
90.
SchiumeriniL.SteinbergD. A. (2020). The black market blues: The political costs of illicit currency markets. The Journal of Politics, 82(4), 1217–1230. https://doi.org/10.1086/708242
91.
SingerM. M.CarlinR. E. (2013). Context counts: The election cycle, development, and the nature of economic voting. The Journal of Politics, 75(3), 730–742. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381613000467
92.
SteinbergD. A. (2017). Interest group pressures and currency crises: Argentina in comparative perspective. Comparative Politics, 50(1), 61–82. https://doi.org/10.5129/001041517821864381
TilleyJ.NeundorfA.HoboltS. B. (2018). When the pound in people’s pocket matters: How changes to personal financial circumstances affect party choice. The Journal of Politics, 80(2), 555–569. https://doi.org/10.1086/694549
97.
WalterS. (2009). The limits and rewards of political opportunism: How electoral timing affects the outcome of currency crises. European Journal of Political Research, 48(3), 367–396. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2008.00837.x
98.
WalterS (2013). Financial crises and the politics of macroeconomic adjustments. Cambridge University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
